Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1364436453647364936503691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Where Vladimir Putin is concerned, there's only one thing you can be sure of and that's even iF there was a peace deal hammered out, it would only last as long as it suited Putin. And then, back to battle again. He's done this time and time again. There are no circumstances under which he or his mafia can ever be trusted. Except of course by defeating him so badly that he cannot ever go to war again. Then maybe a modicum of trust might be OK, but even then, I wouldn't trust him 100%



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,914 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    "Both sides".

    This isn't a mutual war, this isn't some squabble over territory. It's a war of choice for Russia. Ukraine has no choice. Russia is feeding lives out of choice, Ukraine is having to sacrifice out of necessity.

    Russia has a much more significant and larger domestic military and production base. Which is largely untouched. This has been explained to you pretty clearly. You're ignoring it to repeat the same "I don't get it" points which is getting tiring.

    "Someone should broker peace", "Putin did seem open to negotiations with Ukraine/the west in that Tucker Carlson interview."

    Putin can end the war at any time by simply turning around. He bombs Ukraine 24/7 out of choice and has never suggested genuine peace.

    Not following the thread so much anymore, but it's obvious your posts are a faux "confused" about the war act whilst gargling pro-Putin talking points.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I was curious what the official Russian propaganda response will be as they all gone have quiet like the time Wagner marched on Moscow and the whole apparatus shat itself

    And the response so far directly from Peskov is “nothing to worry about”

    Weak, very weak, might take them a while to formulate a response

    Silence and/or a noncommittal Nothing to worry about is like you note the usual Kremlin response when things don't go their way and they're rewriting the script. I suspect after they work on said script they'll push even more of the "peace talks" angle, with more of the "look at how much it's costing Ordinary Americans™. Not directly at first, but through their spin machine. See above; our newest user is ahead of the game.

    Note too the usual Russian amnesia about previous talking points. EG there's been barely any talk of late of the recent ISIS Moscow terrorist attack/let's pin it on the Ukrainian nazis. Currently gone the way of biolabs, weaponised birds, Germans in German tanks, NATO soldiers, dirty bombs, gas attacks and the coup that never was, so never mind.

    The smartest thing Russians could have done is about a year ago to stop pushing and freeze the conflict so US and Europe loses interest in Ukraine, but no the eejits just can’t help themselves commit war crime after atrocities and keep directly threatening other countries

    I would say it's more that Putin kicked this off with no real plan beyond going all in. When their initial it'll be over in weeks plan fell on its arse he doubled down on that. He doesn't appear to have any climb down plan in mind. To do so would admit defeat, even if they spin it as a victory. As they will whatever happens and a goodly chunk of their acolytes will be happy to believe it enough to spread it.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 156 ✭✭Roald Dahl


    Hopefully the routing on russia and its dissolution happens in the near future and these beasts are indeed made pay for their crimes against humanity.

    I would like very much, after they have been rousted out of Crimea and with Ukraine on the road to moscow, for a conference to be held in Yalta, where russia's mapped-out future is openly negotiated and agreed upon. This would naturally include the publication of an endlessly-long list of wanted war criminals being instructed to hand themselves over to the ICC or face being hunted down as you have mentioned.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,428 ✭✭✭macraignil


    "such an olive branch"

    The Ukrainian armed forces had to deal with 6 cruise missiles, hundreds of moskovyte soldiers and huge numbers of other lethal weapons being used to attack their country yesterday. You have a bizarre idea on what the symbolic olive branch should look like.

    Meanwhile reports of more bad news for putin's naval forces in occupied Crimea.

    https://kyivindependent.com/explosion-in-sevastopol-russian-ship-reportedly-on-fire-and-crimea-bridge-closed/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,339 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Jesus Christ.

    This word “annexed” as in illegally invading another country is bounced around by Putins lapdogs as if it somehow has some legal definition.


    Please tell me what peace deal Ukraine should look for and what Russia is looking for?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,855 ✭✭✭Rawr


    It’s sort of: “What’s the quickest way to say you’re fully subscribed supporter of the Kremlin, without saying it?”.

    The answer seems to be; call the Russian encroachment into Ukraine “annexed territory” and their offensive operations into Ukraine “defense”.

    This is likely one of the most recorded conflicts in human history so far. We know what the Russians are trying to do, and for better or worse we’ve seen how they’ve attempted to do it. Calling their invasion a “defense of Russian territories” is akin to a MAGA sycophant claiming that Jan.6 was just “peaceful tourists” when we all saw it happen live.

    Which means statements like that of our newest Putin-fan is either based on ignorance of the facts (and they are facts) or are so subscribed to an echo chamber of Russian sponsored misinformation that they can’t fathom an alternative viewpoint.

    For those who find themselves in that latter mindset, I will tell you this. History will find you to be an object of pity.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    Russia looking for international recognition of its land grabs and everyone to forget the genocide and atrocities and lift sanctions of course

    Also Russia, wants to upend the “world rules based order”

    Was it Budanov who pointed out that eventually the house of cards will collapse (again) under the weight of lies and contradictions which rests on thoroughly corrupt and rotten power vertical without a way to peacefully transition power in a democratic manner.

    Anyways back to current affairs, thought these pictures are interesting this morning of a what seems to be lightly damaged patriot launcher being brought back in Antanov plane for repair



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,702 ✭✭✭firemansam4


    All the points are completely unrealistic. It is a complete fantasy and par for course for the unrealistic expectations in this thread. As much as I would love to see it happening, I don't see any scenario where it actually will happen.

    For starters it is quite clear that the West is not going to back Ukraine enough to be able to re-take all the lost territories, this new US package hopefully will help stem Russia's advance, but that about the best Ukraine can hope for.

    There is not a hope in hell that Russia will agree to leaving the territories it has already annexed. IMO the best bet Ukraine have now is to keep making Russia sacrifice as much men and equipment as possible in defending the territory they hold at the moment.

    If their is to be any peace plan then the harsh reality is that Ukraine will probably lose the territory held by Russia at present.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,610 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Hold up a minute, your solution to stopping more russian deaths is Tucker Carlson? You must really hate the russians or be utterly delusional.

    The donations to Ukraine have been the absolute cheapest castration of a superpower the world has seen, putin has made mistake after mistake and it's only that the russians around him are too chicken to challenge him that this charade of a special operation still goes on.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭pcardin


    I disagree. There were comments like your own before 1989 too and hey hou, lots of formerly annexed/taken countries got their freedom back. Point 1 and 2 is certainly possible. Point 3 unfortunately not.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,702 ✭✭✭firemansam4


    Yea I take your point but we are not talking about the same regime or Russia now.

    Barring a complete collapse of the Putin regime (Which does not seem likely at all) then there is no hope that they will pull out of the annexed territories by choice. So then the only option is taking it back by force, and nothing suggests that Ukraine have anywhere near the capabilities to achieve this, and it would require US/west backing on a whole other level to what we see at present to be able to achieve this.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,491 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    i agree. The best Ukraine can do is dig in and make it extremely expensive financially and otherwise for Russia to keep pushing. This new deal will help supply artillery shells, air defence and maybe some long range missiles. It’s not going to allow Ukraine to go on a major offensive. The best hope for Ukraine is that Putin dies or is assassinated and that the successor decides Ukraine is not worth it. I can’t see Russia giving up crimea but maybe they aren’t so attached to Donbas, who knows?



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,090 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    This could well be the last big aid package to Ukraine from the USA (certainly if Trump wins in November). Europe really does need to step up now. That means ramping up production of munitions and planning for a long conflict. Yes we would all love it if Russia collapsed and melted away but it's foolish to base plans around that possibility.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,876 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    The number one requirement of any "peace" deal is Ukraine joining Nato.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,703 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Absolutely, yeah. Putin can in no way be trusted, so there must be a guarantee which would extend beyond his word.

    This would probably mean Ukraine agreeing to cede some of their internationally-recognised territory, though. Crimea, at least, because I don't think NATO would want to set up in a country that is partly occupied by an aggressive neighbour.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,404 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    All Eyes On Rafah



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,090 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    I see one of the biggest useful idiots took the result well anyway



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,270 ✭✭✭thomil


    Posts from HI Sutton on Twitter/X indicate that the ship that was hit may have been the salvage and diving base ship “Kommuna”. While she’s obviously a valid target, this one, if true, hurts the naval historian in me, given that ship’s age and history. She was originally laid down in May 1912 under the name Volkhov, less than a month after Titanic had sunk.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,090 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    The "I am scandalised by people waving Ukrainian flags in congress" angle is especially disingenuous and petty.

    I strongly suspect that the majority of people using it would have no problems with congressmen waving Israeli flags.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,703 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I'm so sick of this whole, "we can't fund two things" spield from the American right-wing. The US was able to fund TWO occupations right through a recession, while keeping its own country running, and the whole military industrial complex thing would posit that the US's economy somewhat depends upon conflict. It's as if the American right-wing are just sick that some of those weapons are going towards people who genuinely need them and not just for brutalising people somewhere who fail the colour-chart test.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,339 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    So peace on Russias terms.


    Nope, the world needs to see you can’t illegally invade a country and get to keep a portion of that country.

    So the war goes on until Russia goes back home.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,048 ✭✭✭BKtje


    The US are accumulating debt at a monumental rate. If I was a US citizen I would be seriously concerned for the long term future of the US dollar.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    Just noticing lots of accounts crawling out of the woodwork the last days showing so much concern for US spending and convinced of the idea that Ukraine must make a deal and they can't get their territory back. Must mean we've done something right anyway. Really nice to see. 🙂



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    nonsense, it’s still the most economically powerful country in the world. With a continent sized free trade area and an abundance of natural resources and without the burden of health and social service drawings and demographic decline that European countries have.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,428 ✭✭✭macraignil


    Its funny how much pro putin commentators come out with calls for peace and doom and gloom about Ukraine's chances of defending itself from putin's terrorists just when billions of dollars of new funding for the weapons they can use to help themselves becomes available. Hope the US arms industry uses this new money now to demonstrate how well their latest weapons can make bits of putin's mob of genocidal terrorists. Modern fighter jets, Apache attack helicopters, long range missiles, proper mine clearing equipment and decent numbers of tanks could make a big deference and I don't think Ukraine will be in any mood to make moskovytes welcome to stay in Ukraine when they get better supplies of the tools to deal with them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,740 ✭✭✭zv2


    Weapons and border control have been artificially tied together because of political intrigue and power struggles in the government.

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,022 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    You're ignoring the vast difference in population, wealth, resources and technology between the 'West' & Russia and that their financial resources have their limits too.

    As long as Ukraine has the will to fight, it will receive backing and if it looks like faltering, it's quite likely neighbouring states will step in with manpower. It's in none of their interests to allow the current Russian state to expand it's ambitions of restoring empire. Russian leadership and the ordinary Russian citizens will suffer more & more until they realise that a change of mind is needed and they have a place in the world but not as they currently envisage.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,387 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    They can all shut the hell up and eat my giant bag of dicks over here:



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Can you imagine how the average Russian feels? He / She cannot even protest..and their lives are getting harder and harder each day! Increasing taxation, high inflation, Ruble devalueing, increasing shortages of basic foodstuffs and the ever-present danger of being conscripted.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement