Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

General Premier League Thread 2023-24 Mod Note in op 27/6/23 And 21/05/24

1195196198200201250

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,023 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    so by this do you reckon the chief burden of goals was on Firmino for all the years prior then? Liverpool have played a system of the centre forward creating space and opportunity for the wide forwards coming inside for, like, 7 years now.

    Nunez finishing is a problem. Of course it is. But again, he’s far from the main reason Liverpool won’t win the league - and he’s certainly one of the reasons the team has been in the running for so long.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,160 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    But the whole point is Firmino didnt get himself into the final positions like Nunez repeatedly is. You even say it, with Firmino, it was a system designed to create space and opportunities for the wingers to take advantage of. With current Liverpool Nunez isn't playing anything like Firmino's role, and those chances are instead falling to Nunez who is missing them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,258 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    wolves really should have taken the lead there



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,258 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    red for tackle on havertz?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,110 ✭✭✭✭Quazzie




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,023 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Wouldn't agree with that impression… he's still doing the Firmino stuff of dropping off deep and wide and pulling defenders around for Mo and Diaz to move into - and he has the assists and chance creations to show for it (he's not quite as good at this as Bobby was, but it's definitely still a big part of his role). And all the chances are not falling to him - a huuuuuge problem in the past few months is the chances Mo and Diaz are missing. Nunez does also do the extra thing of getting on the end of things in a way Bobby used not do as much in his last years, and more-so creates a lot of chances for himself.

    To illustrate, here's Haaland's heatmap this season as an actual centre forward, followed by Darwin's heatmap this season as someone with a lot more deeper lying responsibilities.

    As already said, his finishing isn't good enough, and when he misses chances it looks bad, but he's added a tonne of value all round even still. Put simply, Liverpool for 75% of this season have been a much better side for him being on the pitch, and a much more dangerous side with him on the field - hence the title run. It's just wrong to say he's the cause of not winning the league. Given the way the team is playing all over the park, the amount of early goals being conceded, the exhaustion and injury of the midfield, and the huge chances that Mo and Diaz etc are also missing over the past few weeks, it's obviously a lot more than just one player.

    Post edited by ~Rebel~ on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,258 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    1-0 arsenal on the stroke of HT



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,114 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Lovely. Hopefully they hold out to keep city honest, or as honest as a corrupt organisation like them can be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,089 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    The same way that Benzema (or Higuain) was Real Madrid's main first choice forward while Cristiano Ronaldo was there yeah? They were 'playing the number 9' there for the majority of Ronaldo's career in Spain.

    Is Havertz Arsenal's main forward now? Or is Jesus? Because it if is either of them, then they have bigger problems to face than Liverpool as Nunez is out-performing both. I say that Saka is Arsenal's primary forward and he is not the central forward Arsenal try to get attacks either to him or through him. Was Weghorst Man Utd's main forward last season, because he played central? Or Martial? Is Hojlund the main forward this season? Absolutely not, it's Rashford.

    Nunez has 8 assists in the PL this season. 5 of them are to Salah, so there is a clear directive at times there that Liverpool play to Nunez centrally who can then play in Salah for the goal-scoring. It is not too dissimilar to when Firmino is around with using Nunez as the central player who then brings the wide players into the action closer to goal where they can attack the ball better. Firmino used to drop deep and link up there that way but Nunez is more Drogba-esque in terms of being a one man battering ram using his pace and power to take control of more direct balls, or into channels etc. BTW Drogba scored 10 & 12 goals in his first 2 PL seasons. Actually, Drogba's average over his (first) Chelsea stint of 8 seasons was 12 PL goals per season. Nunez is on 9 & 11 so far.

    That October to February ish run of games was brilliant and a clear indication of how the attack functioned with Nunez and Salah being a great combo. That game where Liverpool created the most xG ever in a game against Newcastle (Salah scored 2, one assisted by Nunez) and then Chelsea game too. Salah was not available that game, so Nunez then became the primary focus of attacks. Nunez single handedly destroyed the Chelsea defence that night, even while being double marked. He didn't get the goal but he actually was involved in nearly every good attack that night. Think he hit the post a few times in those games, and the keepers made some incredible saves but that all gets forgotten over the course of the season because Liverpool, the team, hit a slump in April



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,030 ✭✭✭pavb2


    Relentless for Arsenal they play Chelsea midweek followed by Spurs away next weekend



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,042 ✭✭✭✭L'prof


    @Fitz* Is Havertz Arsenal's main forward now? Or is Jesus? Because it if is either of them, then they have bigger problems to face than Liverpool as Nunez is out-performing both. I say that Saka is Arsenal's primary forward and he is not the central forward Arsenal try to get attacks either to him or through him.

    Arsenal’s biggest problem is that they don’t have one tbh. Yes, they share the goals around and that’s fantastic but in the really tight games they sometimes struggle to find that bit of magic to get it over the line. I thought it would have been a priority this season but I’m looking forward to seeing who comes in to solve that problem for them




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,023 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Yeah… I can see why they didn't go for an out and out striker, with someone like Havertz being a good foil for the wide players - the assumption must have been that Saka and Martinelli would continue to increase their already solid goalscoring from last year as they mature further. Instead Saka's scoring has stayed around the same, while Martinelli has dropped from 15 league goals down to just 6. They've a decision this summer now on how they choose to set up - do they stay with the wide-goalscorer plan, or start trying to go more central.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,287 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    Didn't see the game but Forest have released this statement

    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,386 ✭✭✭d22ontour


    Could have had at least one I think.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,089 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    That's a very weird statement by Forest l, and it's not their first time either. Nearly every time they are on TV there is a reference to their referee analyst. Lodge your complaint in private if you want to, but going on about what club a VAR supporters and trying initiate a public pile on, from the official club account, is somewhat weird behaviour



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,560 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Agree the statement is weird. But jesus, the officiating was bad in that game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 361 ✭✭Patrick Mahomes


    Fair play to Forest for calling out how bad the refereeing and the usage of VAR has been this season. They will get fined heavily for that tweet but they are not wrong.

    Regards,

    P.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,560 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Think they could have done it more sensibly without the conspiracy theories though, right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 361 ✭✭Patrick Mahomes


    I don’t know to be honest but PGMOL haven’t helped the matter at all letting referees go over to the Middle East having Howard Webb go on TV with Michael Owen and badly defend errors. Maybe Forest along with other clubs have gotten fed up doing the sensible thing and not seeing results from that and Forest decided to just call it out now. There needs to be a full review of PGMOL and the usage of VAR over the summer. One simple thing is don’t have referees who are local to a team referee that teams match that would cut out a lot of the conspiracy theory crap online.

    Regards,

    P.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,560 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    But Luton aren't actually in this game at all. They're competing for relegation with both Everton and Forest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,654 ✭✭✭The Rooster


    Atwell is incompetent, but not because he is a Luton fan!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 361 ✭✭Patrick Mahomes


    No but if one of the the VAR referees is in fact a Luton fan well then that is an issue that PGMOL have created for themselves.

    Regards,

    P.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,560 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    How? You would assume most people who've gotten involved in any capacity in football have supported a football team before doing so. It would be a bit tricky to get referees in who haven't been watching football upto that point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,679 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    The handball from Young just before half time was as stonewall as they come.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,924 ✭✭✭KH25


    The refs aren’t up to standard, but you can’t have a situation where clubs get to have appointments changed at their call.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,858 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Things continue to fall apart for Liverpool. Maybe Klopp should have held back his big announcement till the end of the season…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,160 ✭✭✭Irish Aris


    I agree with this.

    On the other hand though, there are no consequences for any of these referees that are regularly prone to mistakes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,679 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    It's pretty simple, appoint neutral refs in the first place. Bring them in from overseas and take the local angle out of it. There's too much money involved for poor calls to happen week in week out, so absolutely no need for subpar officiating with no penalty for underperformance

    Also, no officials should be permitted to take hospitality from any club (or body/state associated with that club), including officiating games overseas for significant money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,881 ✭✭✭✭klose


    I applaud Forest for making these kind of statements, the lack of consistency is a joke and PGMOL et al are beyond criticism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,160 ✭✭✭Irish Aris


    Yes, totally agree. The foreign referees thing - we did in Greece years ago (not sure if it's still a thing) when things got really bad (to the point referees being attacked by enraged fans).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,881 ✭✭✭✭klose


    Refs doing nixers in the Middle East I can’t believe is still allowed, has it ever been reported how much they make off them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,287 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    Game week 34 table

    74

    Arsenal (89/51)

    Liverpool (89/43)

    73

    Man City (91/44)

    72

    71

    70

    69

    68

    67

    66

    Villa (78/21)

    65

    64

    63

    62

    61

    60

    Spurs (78/16)

    59

    58

    57

    56

    55

    54

    53

    52

    51

    50

    Newcastle (68/17)

    Man Utd (68/-1)

    49

    48

    West Ham (60/-9)

    47

    Chelsea (68/9)

    46

    45

    44

    Brighton (62/2)

    43

    Wolves (58/-7)

    42

    Fulham (54/-4)

    Bournemouth (57/-12)

    41

    40

    39

    38

    37

    36

    Palace (51/-14)

    35

    Brentford (47/-7)

    34

    33

    32

    31

    30

    Everton (45/-14)

    29

    28

    27

    26

    Forest (38/-18)

    25

    Luton (37/-28)

    24

    23

    Burnley (35/-32)

    22

    21

    20

    19

    18

    17

    16

    Sheff Utd (31/-57)

    ******



  • Posts: 0 Van Tall Cemetery


    This table is unreadable btw. Might just be me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭finno


    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,661 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,881 ✭✭✭✭klose




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,495 ✭✭✭✭Mushy


    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,873 ✭✭✭djan


    Might be an idea to just post as an image as Vanilla boards can't be trusted...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,378 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm




  • Posts: 0 Van Tall Cemetery


    I forgot Clattenberg is an advisor at Forrest. Surely they asked his opinion before that statement.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,160 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Tbf I find it hard to buy any referee conspiracy for any team.

    They are generally all that fùckin incompetent that if they tried to help a team they would probably fúck up and end up hindering and costing them the game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,635 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    Ashley Young must have naked pictures of Taylor from Dubai or something. For NONE of the 3 penalties it be awarded is comical, given what has been deemed to be a penalty all season for most teams. Maybe the red shirts confused the referee team, maybe they thought it was LiVARpool they were refereeing 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,258 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    scream loudest, get heard. VAR has been a total disaster all season, and certainly sky have cooled their criticism of it.

    if the decisions were that bad, fire away. sky seem to be focusing on the statement rather than what lead them to making the statement in the 1st place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,287 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    Getting to big to get a good screen shot

    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,258 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    officially or non officially? either way, it should not be allowed.

    i also think there is no way the ref should be in contact with VAR, it should be 1 way only - ref, you made a mistake there. i'm gonna award a pen.

    this nonsense of no pen for me, no pen, there was no foul there (or whatever that fella said to VAR after the mcallister non pen). that should not be allowed. speak away but VAR wont hear your thoughts, so wont be influenced by the onfield ref is the best way forward.

    the VAR ref's should also come from a separate pool from the onfield refs.

    and clear and obvious needs to go asap. its branded as not wanting to re-referee the game, but its really just to protect crap referring decisions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,115 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    1st one, there was contact but the Forest player made too much of it

    2nd was handball but from point blank range

    3rd was clearly a foul on replay but impossible for the ref to judge in real time.

    On MOTD they felt the VAR refs have been told more recently to only intervene for blatant errors - earlier in the season the first 2 might have been given. This obviously introduces inconsistency across the season but I guess if they just say they're never going to change the guidance during a season, that could lead to other errors.

    Forest's statement is conspiracy theory nonsense designed to deflect from their own shortcomings. A draw would have suited Luton better I'd have thought.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 693 ✭✭✭The Moist Buddha




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,089 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Arsenal got a nice break at the weekend with Wolves missing so many players. Seems like they are getting that break again midweek with Chelsea missing a few key players too with Palmer, Gusto, Chilwell added to the doubt/injury list.



  • Registered Users Posts: 258 ✭✭Suvarnabhumi


    Didn't a ref get banned from liverpool games for the rest of this season?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,117 ✭✭✭jacool


    On Sky today they stated that for the third blatant penalty, the VAR assistant said that Young had touched the ball and that was why it wasn't a penalty. None of the replays showed that he had touched the ball, because, guess what, he hadn't. He had clipped Odoi, who had actually played the ball. Same as the one in the first half, where the player was fouled and the ball wasn't played. Forest got right royally shafted in what was the biggest game of the weekend. If they don't get the points back on Wednesday they might be back on X again.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement