Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Universal Free School meals

1356

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,643 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Ooh times have changed. When I was in Primary school there was nothing like this. We were lucky to have a play area never mind hot meals.

    I did not even get hot meals in Secondery school. We had a shop in the canteen that was it.

    Sure we had a shop across the road that did hot meals but we were not supposed to go there during school hours. That did not stop us do but we had to spend our own pocket money no free meals.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,587 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    I knew kids of well off families who would be looking to come back to ours after school because their packed lunch did not keep them fed until both their professional parents could get home and get the dinner on.

    These were good parents working under pressure paying mortgages and long hours / commutes .

    I was lucky in my job , I could change my hours to suit my growing families needs eg finish at 3 or 4 to get home and cook a dinner .

    Did mean I might have to work some nights or late evenings / weekends but we worked it out myself and himself .

    But not every working parent can do those odd hours/ shorten that commute .

    And often they give their kids money to supplement replace the packed lunch but we all know that can be spent on rubbish or other non nutritious things.

    Hungry kids, wealthy or poor , is not what any reasonable person wants in this day and age .

    I support it .

    Like free school books for all and universal child benefit it will float more boats and help reduce child poverty just a little bit .

    I would also be in favour of applied supports to those that need FIS and BTS payments .



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I saw a comment underneath a social media article on this topic from a lovely mother who wrote "about f#ck!n time".

    It wouldn't cross her mind that she is responsible for her child, not the "gubberment".

    What does she expect the state to provide next for her child I wonder.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,655 ✭✭✭victor8600


    My view is that all schools should be providing cooked meals to children. This is not about some mythical "government control" or a nanny-state absolving parents from their responsibilities. I can make the best cheese sandwiches and sliced veggies for my kids, don't you worry. But cold sandwiches are not proper food, and eaten 5 days a week for more than 10 years are bound to have a detrimental effect.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Who says you have to feed them sandwiches 5 days a week for 10 years?

    I'd also be curious on the nutritional value of these hot meals. I can't imagine the budget per meal is high.

    Anyone know what their kids are being served?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,133 ✭✭✭Gregor Samsa


    Anyone know what their kids are being served?

    The options for our school tomorrow are:

    • Roast Chicken with Mash, Seasonal Veg and Gravy
    • Leek & Potato Soup with Soft Brown Roll
    • Chicken Curry on Rice
    • Mexican Chilli Beef Wedges
    • Chicken goujons with wedges and peas
    • Vegan Atlantic goujons with wedges and peas

    One needs to be chosen in an app before 10pm tonight. The app has photos of some dishes, but not all. The full list of ingredients of each constituent part of the meal are available (e.g, what the wedges are made of, what's in the gravy), but they don't give a nutritional content breakdown of the meal as a whole.

    There's basically a 3 week menu that then gets repeated, so my kids have already put in their orders for the first 3 weeks, then they'll make some adjustments based on what they liked or didn't.

    Different schools are using different providers (each school chooses their own one), so the menus and process could be different.

    We're a week and two days into it now. Two kids in 4th class. One is kind of fussy, one is a bit of a foodie. Only complaints so far are that the portions aren't huge, one didn't like the tomato soup, and the other accidently ordered vegan spaghetti bolognaise instead of beef. But she still ate it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,168 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    How do they cope with children with food allergies? People mentioned vegan and halal but those are life choices (don't care what flak I get for that). As someone with both a milk allergy and coeliac disease it's next to impossible to get both catered for in the same meal. I can't even eat in the canteen in work as they don't label any dishes as GF and I can't just take the word of whoever dishing it out. Of course vegan and halal dishes are listed, despite not being a medical necessity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 88,569 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    It's a good idea for all kids in all schools, I see our Taoiseach Simon Harris taking credit and photo opportunities etc., what a man



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,978 ✭✭✭SteM




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,133 ✭✭✭Gregor Samsa


    The app our school is using asks you to check off allergens from a list when you're setting up the kid's accounts. You can update it then once the account is made.

    Every dish on the menu lists the allergens (wheat and gluten are mentioned separately. I haven't looked at all the dishes, but I've seen dairy and soya beans mentioned too) , and there's icons to show if it's vegetarian, vegan or halal.

    My kids don't have any dietary requirements, so I don't know what options are presented to you if you do have an allergy or intolerance.

    Oh, there's a note at the bottom of each day's menu that says

    Allergen blocking functionality only applies to schools where pre-ordering is available thourgh the app. For purchases from the canteen, please consult the allergen handbook on site or ask a member of the catering team.

    I assume the company who provide the free lunches also (or previously) provided paid-for catering in schools. I also assume that if you've entered an allergen in your profile, that you're not offered dishes containing that substance. But I don't know if you're then offered an alternative or not.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,222 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Cold sandwiches are perfectly proper food for lunch, and what many, many people eat.

    Parents should be providing a hot dinner for their own kids after school. Parents who cannot manage to do that should be getting support to enable them to.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That sounds great.

    By the way I am all for this scheme. I just didn't like seeing a comment of "about f#ck!n time" from some degenerate who expects the state to provide everything for her "little angle"



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ Elliot Orange Boar


    Would this not be worth the investment, if you think about it from a bigger perspective. These meals could be made as healthy as possible, and it could be a way to combat the looming obesity epidemic in our society. It would be a small price for the taxpayer, if we could make an impact on that particular problem.

    When I went to school, kids were always stuffing their faces with crap on lunch breaks. You could force a bit of proper grub down their throats instead and save billions in healthcare and other costs down the line with diabetes heart disease etc. That would be my big picture thinking on it.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,772 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    This is support that enables the kids to have a hot meal.

    Your objections are nothing more than moralising and shaming. There are untold numbers of reasons why parents will struggle to provide sufficient nutrition for their children that will run the gamut from financial difficulties, to time problems to indeed carelessness and laziness. Distilling down why each of these problems exist and implementing solutions is going to be a lot harder, more time consuming and more expensive then just giving hungry kids some food.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,168 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    That sounds good, presumably they have a few dishes without the most common allergens, hopefully it varies a bit.



  • Registered Users Posts: 30 TheCrank


    My children get free meals in their secondary school. The quality is awful, they have to stand outside to eat it and every single meal is served in a polystyrene tray that gets thrown in the bin. The majority bring sandwiches and will take the meal when it's nuggets and chips.

    It is a world away from what I got in Belfast 40 years ago where schools had dinner halls and served meat and 2 veg followed by dessert daily. Back then if you wanted the dinner you bought 5 dinner tickets at the start of the week. If you were on welfare you were given a ticket that very nicely said "FREE" so everyone could laugh at the poor kids. They eventually copped on and made all tickets identical.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,898 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    But what use is that if the neglect is not going to be identified as a result of no/poor lunches being provided (and then dealt with)? How likely is it that a kid where the only significant sign of neglect is that parents aren't sending in "good" lunches will be spotted as being at risk?

    IME it's far more likely that all the other children will know but that the school will be blithely unaware.

    Reem Alsalem UNSR Violence against Women & Girls:"Very concerned about statements by the IOC at Paris2024 (M)ultiple international treaties and national constitutions specifically refer to women & their fundamental rights, so the world (understands) what women -and men- are. (H)ow can one assess fairness and justice if we do not know who we are being fair and just to?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,720 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    If you are providing family support, and the families still aren't managing to feed their kids, then it sounds like you are not doing your job correctly.

    Oh FFS!

    What do you propose @Mrs OBumble ?

    Get the state to take the children from their parents because in your eyes they are failing their children? I wonder did we ever try that before in this state!

    At the end of the day, there are good parents and bad parents. We don't live in a tyrannical dictatorship where we can whip kids from their parents because they fail some parenting test.
    Instead what we can do is make sure kids get school books, an education, a hot meal and so on. Programs like these work as per international studies show.

    It sounds to me you would open up the Mother and Baby homes again and fill them with kids because parents are failing them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,720 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    You would have loved it when the nuns and priests ran the place I take it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,587 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Yes. Indeed .🤨

    This is what this is ..

    without the singling out of individual children /families as requiring support .

    Post edited by Goldengirl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,720 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Studies support this idea.

    Concerns about adverse outcomes on student BMI were not supported by the literature; in fact, several studies detected a potentially protective effect of universal free school meals on BMI. 

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000006/

    Makes perfect sense.

    Give them proper foods, like protein, veg and the kids will eat less sugar and crap.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,898 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    What I remember (another northerner here - I didn't know free school meals weren't a thing in the south) was that somebody - maybe Thatcher? - made school meals much more expensive for all but the families on free meals, with the result that the rest of us started bringing in sandwiches, and some of the kids on free meals just stopped going because they wanted to eat with their friends. I know that because my best friend was one of them - and I know she wasn't the only one. We used to share our sambos with our friends, but I'm sure their parents would have been really annoyed if they'd known.

    Reem Alsalem UNSR Violence against Women & Girls:"Very concerned about statements by the IOC at Paris2024 (M)ultiple international treaties and national constitutions specifically refer to women & their fundamental rights, so the world (understands) what women -and men- are. (H)ow can one assess fairness and justice if we do not know who we are being fair and just to?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,247 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    My kids both get lunches in their school and have done since last year. The school is in a small rural village in the midlands but there are 300 or so pupils. While there are some kids that are having difficult upbringings, the area is by no stretch of the imagination deprived.

    I'm a bit perplexed by it tbh. I can understand having it in lower socio-economic regions but tbh, I think its a bit of a waste of money and what's been spent on it would be much better spent on school facilities, educational supports for kids with learning difficulties etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,708 ✭✭✭drury..


    Same here in Manchester 50yrs ago

    A team of dinner ladies serving hot meals in primary school everyday

    They got so many things right over there . It's a shame the way they're gone



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ Elliot Orange Boar


    I guess it comes down to how well you do it really.

    Just dumping out any old crap from a school cafeteria, would probably be a waste of tax money. And in this country, I would be worried that without strong controls put in place that's exactly what would happen in many areas. And you will get kids who are practically allergic to the sight of a piece of lettuce, so there will be some push back. Variety of choice would be important. Doing all of that inside a budget isn't easy, but it's not an impossible goal either.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ Elliot Orange Boar


    Does it not perhaps have some other less obvious benefits though? Like school camaraderie? Kids all sitting down eating together, the social aspect of that? Maybe some other things too, like teachers could spot an issue going on with a kid that they might not notice during a busy class where they're distracted with lessons? I'm just throwing out some ideas, I don't really know tbh without being involved in it…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,247 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Nope, because they always eat their lunches in the class room anyway, regardless of whether the school provides it or when we did.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,821 ✭✭✭TokTik


    We had that too. The parents paid for the milk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,821 ✭✭✭TokTik


    Not everyone is on welfare. Correct.


    But everyone with kids gets child benefit. This should be garnished, by say €10 a week to pay for the scheme. Everyone wins. Taxpayer pays less. Child benefit goes where it should go, to the child.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,341 ✭✭✭Cordell


    Meat and veg, menu options being only yes or no? Maybe it worked 40 years ago, today they need to cater for halal, ramadan, vegetarian, vegan and all the rest of these notions and nonsenses, and that's before you consider real issues like allergies and intolerances.

    The hot meal my kid started to get after Easter is decent enough, he liked most options and he's a fussy eater. You order online for the next week and there are plenty of options.

    Is it free? Nothing really is, even if you don't pay for it directly. If you pay taxes, you pay for it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,821 ✭✭✭TokTik


    Yes, if kids are being neglected, remove them from the parents that are neglecting them. Seems fairly obvious, no? And every teacher in Ireland is a mandated person who has a duty, through Children First, to report on any knowledge, belief or reasonable grounds of a child being neglected to TUSLA.

    We aren’t in old Catholic Ireland any more, so mother and baby homes mean absolutely nothing these days. Ban surrogacy and have children adopted by families that actually want them, rather than see them as a cash cow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,164 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Yes in lieu of a meal scheme we should mass confiscate children from their families.

    Lunacy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,591 ✭✭✭Dick phelan


    How healthy is the stuff being offered? In principle I like the idea, however, i asked my niece what she had for lunch as her school recently started the scheme, She got a chicken fillet similar to what you'd get at a deli, cubed potato, and a bread roll. She didn't have any veg or fruit. I am all for providing healthy meals to kids as the benefits make the price worth it imo, but if it's just going to be deli style or airplane type food then I'd say it's a bit of a waste of money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,341 ✭✭✭Cordell


    It's more like airplane food than freshly cut fruits and vegetables. But it's hot food, not deli, see below a snip of a ~45 items list.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,720 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Yes, if kids are being neglected, remove them from the parents that are neglecting them. Seems fairly obvious, no? And every teacher in Ireland is a mandated person who has a duty, through Children First, to report on any knowledge, belief or reasonable grounds of a child being neglected to TUSLA.

    So let me get this straight, you and @Mrs OBumble would advocate removing kids from parents who don't provide their kids with a proper lunch, as that is neglect, in your eyes.

    So let's dig into this.

    A study from UCG showed that approximately 16% of children go to school hungry.

    https://www.universityofgalway.ie/media/healthpromotionresearchcentre/hbscdocs/factsheets/fs_13_2006_july09.pdf

    I guess their parents neglect them.

    There are approx 550,000 children going to primary school in Ireland.

    16% is 88,000 children we will need to whip away from their parents and put them… somewhere under the care of the state or some other NGO or institution like the Catholic Church.

    As I said, ye would love to get the nuns and priests back to sort out these issues.

    Of course, your argument is both ridiculous and preposterous and reeks of an overdone sense of snobbery and morality.



  • Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 11,179 Mod ✭✭✭✭MarkR


    Does anyone know is a school required to set this up? Can they just not bother?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,428 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    I'd be more inclined to take kids off parents who don't send them to school of which there are a lot



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Yes, that system was there about 150 years ago. Any child seen on the street could get picked up. A real pity it went out of favour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,222 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Placing the children elsewhere should be a last step, if the parents absolutely refuse to provide at least basically adequate care.

    But some parents clearly need some intensive support to get the basics in place: food, clean clothing, adequate shelter, enough sleep, supervision and emotional support.

    Free food at school only starts to address one of those, and ignores yhe rest. So children continue to be neglected / abused.

    And if intensive support shames the parents-tough. It's the kids I'm concerned about,not the parents egos.

    This is based pretty much on comments from social worker friends: hunger drives kids to ask for help. Feeding them outside the home makes it a lot harder to identify who needs help.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,164 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    This is based pretty much on comments from social worker friends: hunger drives kids to ask for help. Feeding them outside the home makes it a lot harder to identify who needs help.

    Jesus of all the nonsense arguments I have read against this very simple and effective scheme that is number 1.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ate you satisfied that parents are sending their children to school hungry? 16% , that is outrageous. That sounds like a huge volume of people who can't be trusted to be parents.

    You're ignoring a huge problem, because you don't like an extreme solution that posted has suggested. That shouldn't cover up the fact that there are parents sending their kids to school hungry, what kind of parent does that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,428 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    My son was in a deis school at one point. They had a breakfast club for the kids , many of which had nothing to eat going to school. My lad went for the chat. They also had free lunches.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,150 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    40+ years ago in England, they supplied school lunches, in schools with Christians, Muslims, Hindus etc. There were no issues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,222 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Effective at covering up shít parenting so it's not so obvious kids are being neglected.

    But they ARE being neglected, and ye seem to think that's OK.

    It's not.

    Post edited by Mrs OBumble on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,341 ✭✭✭Cordell


    I'm sure they did but that wasn't my point. When you serve just one kind of meal, meat and veg as in the post I was replying to, you can't cater for everyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,164 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    But they ARE being neglected, and ye seem to think that's OK.

    No I don't, what a horrendous thing to say to anyone, you should be ashamed of yourself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,327 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    This would make sense other than the fact that there are hungry kids today.

    If feeding them in schools is somehow hiding the fact that they are hungry, then surely its common knowledge today who the hungry kids are? So why do we still have hungry kids? Why is nothing being done?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Just for the record I have zero issue with free meals being provided at school.

    I have a major issue with parents who don't feed their children and make them go hungry.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,428 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's a great idea it would be nice if it's not torn to bits by the food nazis accompanied by endless articles in the media saying the meals should be sugar-free, fat-free, salt-free ect, it's a good news story.

    The free school books is another good new story that's not getting much attention.



Advertisement