Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General British politics discussion thread

Options
1399400402404405499

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 25,548 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    First results coming in, Labour hold Sunderland and the big news is Reform take second place ahead of the Tories.

    This could be absolute annihilation for the Tories if Reform overtake them across the country.

    Tories also predicted to lose Blackpool South to Labour in the by election.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,511 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Mm. Don't run away with any ideas. Reform overtaking the Tories in areas that the Tories are losing anyway is not necessarily a precursor to Reform overtaking the Tories in areas that the Tories might conceivably win.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,068 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Man, the Tories are screwed



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,548 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Oh I know that, I'm saying if they lose enough seats due to voters shifting to reform (for these local elections) then this could be the end of Sunak and (hopefully) a General election soon.

    Blackpool loss would be massive for the Tories.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,511 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    The general election will be soon anyway, and Sunak will go either before or after the general election; it doesn't greatly matter which.

    As for the Conservatives losing seats because of voters shifting to Reform, we'll have to see. These results from Sunderland refer to a council in which the Tories were already the opposition; it was a Labour Council, so it's not a Tory loss, never mind a loss due to voters shifting to Reform.

    At the level of individual wards, you might find Tory candidates losing out to Labour when the Tory+Reform vote was higher than the Labour vote. Or, you might not find a lot of that; you'd have to do a fairly deep dive into the figures.

    Tl;dr: a protest vote for Reform in an election which neither the Tories nor Reform are likely to win is not at all the same thing as Tory voters switching to Reform in a seat that is winnable for the Tories.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 680 ✭✭✭US3


    Is khan still the mayor of London ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,966 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    2 councils so far have gone straight from blue to red. Redditch in the West Midlands and Rushmoor in Surrey.

    The scale of swing in Redditch is huge but it was a Labour are for years. But Rushmoor has taken 10 councillors from the Tories and the council for the first time ever.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,511 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    The count has barely begun. But there is no chance whatsoever that Khan will not be mayor at the end of it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 680 ✭✭✭US3


    Really. I thought he was very unpopular going from what I see online



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,511 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Do not mistake what you see online for anything approaching reality. What you see online has been highly manipulated by people who are happy to lay out a large amount of money to give you a distorted impression.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,306 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    It's like the US election; Biden may not be a first choice for many but compared to Trump (or in this case the Tory candidate which was not the best if I'm being polite)…



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,966 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    You are clearly looking at some very blinkered places online.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,998 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger




  • Registered Users Posts: 15,604 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    After the absolute disaster the Tories had, wonder will there be a heave against Richy Rich now?

    He has proven to a complete and utter liability.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,715 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I'd say that you'd want to be mad to take over the party at the moment as the drubbing they're currently getting is quite likely to be repeated (fingers crossed!) in a general election.
    However, Johnson cleared the decks of all sanity in the party so, you could well see a heave before the election.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    A horde of dubious Twitter accounts are no indication of anything.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,511 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Probably. When in doubt, ditch the leader.

    Of course, the previous three leadership changes have not fixed any of the Tories' problems; they have made them worse each time. The honours students will have worked out by now that the problem is not actually the leader; it's the party, its policies and its performance. But facing up to that would be scary, so they'll probably have a putsch instead.

    They are bent on ruin at the next election. Nothing will divert them from that course at this point.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,779 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Still some softness in the Labour vote in heavily Muslim areas it seems, failed to keep control of Oldham council



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    They've basically infantilised themselves as a party. A crucial component of growing up is realising that you have to take responsibility to the things you say and do along with the choices you make. The Conservatives have government the UK for 14 years. The UK being such a centralised country means they'v wielded a great deal of power and have done nothing more than abuse the population with austerity while denuding the state on behalf of their donors. People, myself included, might think it's the same everywhere but it feels increasingly like we're being governed by a particularly toxic group of malevolent children. Whichever one of them sits on top won't change anything unless the party itself changes and adapts but that won't happen until they're defenestrated.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭Panthro


    Sometimes I get the sense from random discussions Ive had with people is that they voted Conservative because they see them as upper class posh people that are well educated and must surely know what their doing.

    One conversation I had the guy said Labour is for working class people, and that's why he voted Conservative.

    Guy was as working class as I am! They like to be seen as a class above those around them. It's all a little bonkers.

    Purely my observations of course.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 68,779 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Same people often claim that Labour have abandoned the working class and are full of private school educated poshos.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭Panthro


    I like to call Labour "Tory Lite". Usually gets a giggle.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,617 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    But is there any doubt that Rishi has been truly awful? And that a more competent person could at least save a few percentage points and maybe save a few seats.

    Or maybe anybody that could do anything has already left the party or thinks that a few seats here or there is of no consequence and thus the only fight left now is that with Reform UK



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I feel like that's a bit cynical to be honest. By all means, you do you but things like Rwanda and Brexit were never Labour policy.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,277 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    I don't know how old you are, but some people remember when Labour were an actual Labour party and adhered to the principles that were laid down by people like Keir Hardie. But since Tony Blair the party has moved toward the right of the spectrum and has led to the creation of Blairite factions within it too, who are actually quite destructive. Rwanda and Brexit may not be "Labour policy" - I don't think anyone's ever made that claim - but that doesn't mean that the likes of Blair et al aren't further to the right of the political aisle than a lot of traditional Labour voters.

    Blair and the Blairites are more wedded to the likes of privatisation, including within the NHS (a pillar of Labour achievement) and are willing to water down policy to curry favour with business. The latter may not sound that bad on first blush, but it often has a bad effect on employees. The former should be against the politics of anyone who considers themselves a Labour voter.

    And, as far as Blair and his cohort are concerned, I'd need not mention Iraq. An illegal war which saw a, supposed, Labour leader saddle themselves for an American Conservative party that were further to the right than the Tories were at the time.

    So, "Tory-lite" may sound cynical, but it isn't that for from the truth for a lot of folk.

    Post edited by Tony EH on


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,127 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart




  • Registered Users Posts: 10,994 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    Blair for all his many wrongs (and I can't stand the man) was far more of a pragmatist than Starmer is, he allowed dissenting voices and actual Socialists in his party. It was a far broader church than what it's become.

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,277 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Not necessarily true.

    Corbyn's position on Brexit wasn't bolted on, either for leave or remain. He promised to carry out what the public voted on and engaged in a remain campaign. He was also firmly against a "no deal" Conservative style Brexit.

    "Labour will do everything to stop a no-deal Brexit, that is our
    priority. After that, we want a General Election … and [voters] will get
    the chance for a public vote under a Labour government between remain
    and a credible option, which we will negotiate with the European Union."

    However, like a lot of Socialists, he has some very grave concerns about how the EU is run and by whom, while still acknowledging that, in general, it has had many positive effects.

    What Corbyn promised was a second referendum in 2019 to see if the British people were, in actual fact, so enthusiastic about Brexit as it seemed in 2016.

    "Whoever becomes the new Prime Minister should have the confidence to
    put their deal, or No Deal, back to the people in a public vote...in those circumstances, I want to make it clear that
    Labour would campaign for Remain against either No Deal or a Tory deal
    that does not protect the economy and jobs."

    The likes of Diane Abbot may claim that Corbyn was a "Brexiteer", but the reality isn't as clear at that may make it sound. There are plenty of politicians and people that are cautious about the EU and its institutions, but understand that it's better to be in, in the long run.

    Especially when you don't have a plan for when you leave, a la the Tories.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,886 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    He engaged completely half-heartedly in a remain campaign because it was clear that he personally was anti-EU but the party would never have stomached that.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,886 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    So, "Tory-lite" may sound cynical, but it isn't that for from the truth for a lot of folk.

    And those folk are distinctly incapable of making any kind of reasoned judgement and prefer to deal in meaningless soundbites.

    Blair obviously and justifiably has the massive black mark of Iraq, but that simply isn't a left/right thing. He was wrong and deserves opprobrium for it. However, the NHS was better funded and worked better under him, schools worked better, infrastructure was better invested in. It was also the only break in 45 years of Conservative-led government. If the people don't want the "old Labour" you pine for then you have to meet them at a point you can get elected to actually accomplish something. Something Corbyn singularly failed at.



Advertisement