Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The National Party

1676870727391

Comments



  • There is not one person from any of these parties that I would see as having a good handle on the problems you raise. The raise the issues - sure - but they don't offer ideas or policies as to how to solve the problems.

    I agree.

    But that isn't the reason why I would vote for them.

    I would vote for those candidates as a vehicle to send a message to established parties. And I would continue doing it, over and over again, until the established parties started listening to voter concerns.

    Because to not vote for those candidates means there is nobody left to vote for in this matter. That means nothing changes, and that's not a good outcome.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,771 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    This is a really bad reason for voting for Nazis. Just saying.

    Do not confused what you "want to say" with your vote with what you actually do with your vote. Your vote is about who you seek to give political authority to.





  • Nowhere did I say I would vote for a Nazi or a fascist or a Hitlerite or any related term.

    For what it's worth, I wouldn't vote for the National Party for that very reason. They raise concerns about migration on purely racial, ethnic grounds. But that's not my reason for wanting to control migration, so they simply do not get my vote.

    I was specific in that I said I would vote for a candidate willing to raise concerns about migration — on my grounds, not racial or ethnic grounds.

    Your argument speaks volumes in that you believe anyone willing to raise concerns about migration is a de facto "Nazi"; a self-evidently ridiculous statement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,113 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    So the f what? You are shilling for an extremist bigoted hatemonger and liar.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,113 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,743 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Ya, she definitely does not deserve to be harassed on the street by a guy with a known history of violence. Same guy harasses library and creche staff, do they deserve it too?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,842 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The pretence of sending a message to the two main parties isn't remotely convincing. They know what they're voting for.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,743 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    The thing is, there's not a single far right party that isn't incredibly racist and mired in scandal. The posters claiming the protest vote simply aren't willing to out themselves fully.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,842 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Yeah. This is also why they keep rebranding. They either fall out amongst themselves and split or they say the quite part out loud too often.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,682 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    The problems with that us that 1) it gives encouragement to the far-right; 2) it indicates that their policies are popular even if the parties aren't and you'll get other parties taking on watered-down versions of them next time round.

    If you want to use your vote in that way, your best bet would be to spoil it. (And before someone comes in here and says "your vote shouldn't be abused" or "people died so you could vote" - true, but you have the right to NOT vote as much as you have the right to vote and a protest vote is still an endorsement to whoever you vote for.)

    Failing that, vote for an independent.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,356 ✭✭✭Shoog


    Some people are promoting these parties because the pay is good.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,842 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The other holes in the justification for supporting them presenting here are competence and politics. If your party campaigns primarily on immigration, it has to be both competent and willing enough to actually get something done. For context, the UK's asylum backlog is just shy of 150,000. The Rwanda plan is a scam to send 300 people there at a cost of £150,000 per person. The government has also presided over the highest level of immigration ever seen by the UK.

    So yeah, if you think trash like Dwyer, Blighe and Barrett have the skill to pull something off, I don't really know what to say to you.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34





  • You've got it exactly the wrong way around.

    The far-right have been emboldened precisely because voter concerns have gone ignored.

    If voters feel that their legitimate concerns are being ignored, they will go to extreme lengths to have their voices heard.

    Not because they are literally fascistic, but because they feel they have no other avenue to get their concerns across.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭Hamachi


    No. But Kitty does deserve to have her views challenged. If she types like a lioness, she needs to put on her big girl panties and have the intellectual courage to stand over her egregious opinions.

    As for the rest of your post, you’ve parroted that several times. Frankly, I’m deeply disinterested in what Dwyer does or doesn’t do. He’s a non-entity and isn’t going to have any influence either way. On the other hand, extremists like Holland do have a legitimate platform and need to be challenged time and time again, albeit not whilst walking down the street obviously!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,682 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    None of this challenges my post.

    I mean, I agree with what you're saying IS happening - what I'm saying is that it's the wrong way to do it. Far-right policies getting votes is more likely to get mainstream parties adopting similar policies to attract said vote.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,743 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    You can view her as an extremist but she's really not. Not liking her views doesn't automatically make her an extremist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,356 ✭✭✭Shoog


    There are two components to the "immigration crisis"

    1. - refugees from Ukraine which no one could have anticipated or planned for and which would be deeply counterproductive to refuse to deal with.

    2- immigration of skilled workers to fill positions which otherwise would go unfilled. To refuse to take skilled workers would cripple the very basis of the Irish economy and leave us all poorer.

    The issue of illegal immigration and other assillum seekers is minor and relatively insignificant to those other two factors.

    The far right is opportunistically lumping all categories of assillum seekers into one big pot because it doesn't serve their agender to apply nuance to a complex set of issues.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭Hamachi


    I disagree. She is very extreme. Now that doesn’t excuse street harassment but she is way out there in her views, which need to be challenged robustly. Her and Dwyer encountering each other is two extreme ends of the spectrum colliding in person.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,098 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    The only concern at the moment seems to be immigration. There isn't one other policy or political issue being addressed and none of these parties are even trying to run on any other issue.

    The correlation between heavy Twitter users and the supporters of these thicko parties is massive. As is the correlation between lonely angry men and the supporters of these thicko parties.

    Immigration is a nice easy one to pitch to thickos. But once you start talking economics, environment, energy, health, transport, education etc you'll find 99% with blank faces.

    No depth of knowledge and no willingness to do so.

    Like someone who can play twinkle twinkle little star on the piano and calls themselves a musician.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,359 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Christ more absolute numpties. Who are you going to espouse the virtues of next? Mike Connell?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,923 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Or Graham "let's exterminate the Jews" Carey. Not a bad sort if you park the genoicidal anti-semitism….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,098 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    Amazing to me that you just let yourself be dragged to wherever Twitter brings you for political opinion.

    And you're being dragged to the bottom of the barrel there if you think any of those clowns are sensible about anything. Unemployed middle aged men whos life went to **** during covid and havent escaped the rabbit hole.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭Hamachi


    You make a lot of good points. Unfortunately, what invalidates your argument is the assumed correlation in your post.

    Now I don’t use Twitter, nor will I be voting for far right candidates in the GE. However, I’ll be very transparent in saying that I’m very concerned about the levels of inward migration to Ireland and wish to see it significantly curtailed.

    Am I a lonely, angry thicko? Well actually, I’m not. I’m happily married, have three beautiful children, plenty of friends, and a great career. I know quite a few colleagues and friends who share my concerns about immigration. They won’t vote for the national party, but they do feel unheard by the political class. This sentiment is growing in Ireland and politicians who ignore it, do so at their peril.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,876 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    This post says it better than I could. I don’t have ethnic/racial reasons for wanting sensible migration policies - I have societal/economic/cultural reasons.

    Also, I have to vote strategically, giving our PR system.

    Hence I am considering where my vote will go.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,446 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    And you believe in the National party's stance on immigration?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,743 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    But you've linked to numerous racist accounts. You've even labeled them as decent people, only the other day you perpetuated a hoax about a kidnapping. On top of that, you're actively considering voting for a party that is modeled on the leader's love of the Nazis.... So you're not simply concerned about immigration if this is how you're behaving in the thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,098 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    Yes I agree. I did say its a massive correlation, not total.

    Ive had concerns about immigration since the 90s. And when we have people sleeping in tents on city streets there clearly needs to be a change made.

    But the people Im referring to are the lads who hop on trains with a bag o'cans to any old "protest", have links in their twitter bios asking for donations, aim fireworks at Garda etc. Like the crowd who were singing Ole Ole at the protest last week. No real interest apart from a day out masked behind a policital rally.

    Then back to Twitter to "win" vs the woke leftie commies et al.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,651 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    so what policies do you want to see implemented?

    We currently have “sensible migration” policies. What would you like changed?

    they/them/theirs


    And so on, and so on …. - Slavoj Žižek




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭ToweringPerformance


    What people? Any chance of a link or at the very least something to back up that statement.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,356 ✭✭✭Shoog




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭ToweringPerformance


    So it's just a wild guess so and you've nothing to back that up. Fair enough, carry on.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,842 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    That's like saying you're going to vote Green but you don't believe in climate change. It makes no sense.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,356 ✭✭✭Shoog


    Gript don't survive on their paltry subscriptions since they give away access.

    But there are paid far right promote rs everywhere and I have little doubt that a few pop up here once in a while.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭ToweringPerformance




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭Hamachi


    Sensible migration policies do not result in tented encampments forming in the centre of the capital city.

    Sensible migration policies do not permit an influx of spurious asylum claims, more than 80% of which are known to attribute to secondary movements.

    Sensible migration policies do not mean migrant workers living in tenement-like conditions sharing bedrooms with multiple people.

    Sensible migration policies do not see immigration catapulted to one of the most pressing issues for the electorate in 2024.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,113 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,356 ✭✭✭Shoog


    most of those issues are issues of housing policy not immigration.
    Its a huge scandel that this government can not find accommodation for refugees which they accepted into this country and that we have such a dearth of accommodation that the skilled workers we invited to come and make us wealthy cannot find places to live.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭ToweringPerformance


    None of that is evidence. The poster made a claim Gript media have taken payments from the National Party and failed to back it up. It's actually a defamatory statement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭Hamachi


    Incorrect on so many levels. Firstly, the majority of asylum seekers are not ‘refugees’, nor were they ‘accepted’ into this country. As McEntee herself has recently stated, up to 90% are secondary movements from the UK or elsewhere. It’s a huge scandal that these spurious economic migrants are subverting the international protection system.

    Secondly, why are you conflating skills-based migration with asylum seeking? Are you unable to discriminate between the two streams? We didn’t invite skilled migrants to ‘make us wealthy’ lol. There are labour shortages in some sectors. They come to grow their careers, often for a time-bound period. I know as I hire internationally for my team. The very idea that people are coming here with the altruistic intent of making Ireland wealthy is laughable frankly.

    Thirdly, the overall volume and velocity of inward migration is simply way too high. Per capita, the rate is higher than the UK. This isn’t sustainable longer term. It’s not possible to keep pace with the housing demands currently placed on this country. Who do you think is going to build all of these units? Should we send Helen McEntee and Roderick O’Gorman out on block laying and sparks apprenticeships to get us started? The current volume of immigration is exacerbating an already acute housing crisis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,619 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Is there any sign of Pepper's video on the two incidents of female politicians being threatened by far right goons? He's all about protecting women, right?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,651 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    actually they result in all of those things. The problem isn’t policy, it’s geopolitical instability out of Ireland’s control.

    What new policy do you believe would help?

    they/them/theirs


    And so on, and so on …. - Slavoj Žižek




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭Hamachi


    You have some explaining to do here. How do sensible migration policies result in those outcomes?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,876 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    You seem to think I have some “inside track” with Gav Pepper or can get him to post on specific topics???

    I have no connection to him, I just looked at some of his Twitter posts.

    Ask him what he is doing or not doing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,356 ✭✭✭Shoog


    Misreading what I said - most of the migrants are refugees and the majority of the rest are on work visas and will either go home or seek citizenship. No one is under the illusion that those on work visas do it for their own benefit - but that doesn't means that the country doesn't benefit massively from the economic growth that the skilled work visa scheme brings in and the tax revenues that they generate.

    Thats we accept refugees with no plan as how to deal with them is a scandel - not the fact that we accepted refugees from Ukraine.

    The real scandel in this country is that the government has sat on its hands for over a decade without doing anything meaningful about a predictable growing housing crisis. For that they need to be justifiably punished - not for meeting their international obligations to accept refugees.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭Hamachi



    1. Most migrants are categorically not ‘refugees’. The majority are EU/EEA/UK nationals, skilled migrants, students, and asylum seekers, none of whom are ‘refugees’.


    2. As for those on work visas, of course they do it for their own benefit, despite the fact that the semantics of your statement above, convey otherwise. Can you quantify the net benefits to Ireland. You’ve asserted that Ireland benefits ‘massively’. Please quantify those benefits, segmented by the various regions of origins of the migrants.

    3. There is a plan for dealing with refugees from Ukraine. They’re all housed to the best of my knowledge. Do you have information to the contrary? I don’t believe the encampment along the grand canal is populated by Ukrainians. Perhaps you have more information?

    4. How do you expect a government to formulate a housing policy when there is very little predictability around inward migration, which admittedly is partially due to their own disastrous migration policy? Should they just target 70K units per years and hope that it’s enough? Again, I reiterate my question to you, who will build these units? Yes, housing policy is a ‘scandal’, but the severity of the issue is compounded by unfettered immigration across multiple streams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,619 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Do you think it's strange at all, that he's only motivated to produce a 'we're so concerned' video when the alleged attacker is brown or black, and not when the attackers are Irish far-right goons?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,446 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    And how do we ascertain that they are spurious asylum claims? I'm judging by this that you have no issue with those claims you feel are not spurious?



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,651 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    It’s pretty simple. I believe the current immigration policies in Ireland are sensible. We have a duty of care towards asylum seekers and refugees. There have been some unfortunate results of the way the policies are implemented.

    Now, what policy do you propose to change the situation? What would you do differently?

    My position is that it’s not a policy issue. You believe it is. The onus is on you to propose something different, otherwise you’re just criticising.

    they/them/theirs


    And so on, and so on …. - Slavoj Žižek




  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,651 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    you’re great about pointing it symptoms without offering anything constructive in response. It’s almost impressive.

    they/them/theirs


    And so on, and so on …. - Slavoj Žižek




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭Hamachi


    Correction. We have a duty of care to process asylum claims and to adjudicate if the claim is legitimate or otherwise.

    Where I differ from you is in the execution of those policies.

    1. Massively accelerated decision making and appeals process. Both are completed within 12 weeks maximum. None of this floundering in the system for years and claiming ‘ties’ to Ireland.
    2. Those whose claims are found not to have merit are removed. If that requires physical deportation, so be it. Otherwise, access to all state services and supports are immediately suspended, thereby strongly encouraging self-deportation.
    3. Onerous financial penalties on employers found to have non-approved or failed asylum seekers on their payroll.
    4. Coordinated EU response to process applications outside EU territory. The migration pact may help deliver on this goal.
    5. More stringent controls on other migration streams, particularly the language school mills, that are bringing unfortunates into this country to work in appalling conditions and to live in tenement-like hovels.

    There’s a few to get started with, aggregating both policy change and solid execution.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement