Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time for a zero refugee policy? - *Read OP for mod warnings and threadbans - updated 11/5/24*

Options
1694695697699700851

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 146 ✭✭Will0483


    Most of that coastline is not relevant to people smugglers as they only cross in very limited port to port crossings with the shortest possible journeytime. Really only 1-5% of the coastline is relevant to this discussion. In the unlikely event that a boat gets through, you just offer no support at all to illegal immigrants without a visa.

    Anyway, once you shut off the main routes, the number of drownings and the numbers crossing in general will collapse.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,106 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    if you shut off the main routes, i'm certain they'd just take the far more dangerous routes. there are billions of africans and the population is exploding, some will always be willing to risk their lives, i can't see any viable way of stopping boats entirely.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Govt aligns accomodation with demand = Good.

    You missed that one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,470 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    That was only part of it. We were unable to send them any military aid as a neutral country - that would definitely have been a factor in us agreeing to accepting so many Ukrainian people in 2022. If we had been a NATO member, it may have been a different story with the refugee numbers.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,022 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Who said anything about being quiet?

    On either side though .

    The post I was replying to had said another poster was in the minority opinion HERE and I was pointing out that thread does have a high concentration of anti immigration posters by virtue of its title so imo that is unfair comment .

    Think it was your post to @Thelonius Monk .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,485 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Not to mention we have land routes where people can arrive in Europe on our eastern borders.

    Poland has deployed 10k soldiers, 2.5k cameras and a wall/fence on the border with Belarus and people are still getting through.

    https://balkaninsight.com/2024/02/29/poland-fence-in-the-swamp/

    Even at those levels, which are ineffective, it would require something near the size of the entire US military to try control the land routes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,904 ✭✭✭.Donegal.


    Only for those in state provided accommodation.

    I did see something recently(can’t remember where) and I couldn’t substantiate it. Irish people who seek a grant for 3rd level are means tested and have to live within a certain distance and if approved get an average of over 3k, while Ukrainians aren’t means tested, no distance criteria to college, zero fees, get an average of over 10k.

    If true that is ridiculous.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,022 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    As I said above .

    All voices have validity here right left and centre.

    Posters can not tell other posters they don't have a right to express their opinion just because they go against the prevailing narrative ..that is my point .

    We might not like and can argue against any opinion but to say the opinion is invalid because it is in the minority is just wrong .



  • Registered Users Posts: 146 ✭✭Will0483


    When you see the pushback when even a few thousand AS arrive, there'll never be millions allowed in as the EU would meltdown. Also, it would cost hundreds of billions to support that many arrivals indefinitely.

    With an ageing population to fund, EU governments are not going to prioritise non-voting illegal migrants.

    There's no real need to stop illegal immigration completely but we need to reduce it by 90 plus per cent and rapidly process those that do manage to arrive.

    Public interest in this topic will fall once it gets under control.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Do you mean Asylum Seekers or Refugees there?

    Obviously some Refugees would be housed in housing estates.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭dmakc


    But the "Immigration" thread literally had same proportions of opinions, so that's the "zero refugee" title theory out the window.

    This thread is absolutely a fair reflection on Irish society.



  • Registered Users Posts: 146 ✭✭Will0483


    Fair enough. This thread is not a referendum so no way of telling yet where the majority opinion lies. The polls definitely indicate a move towards anti-immigration views but we may need some sort of referendum on migration policy.

    How this would be framed is the difficulty.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Do you see the French border patrol getting tougher on migrant boats entering the UK though?



  • Registered Users Posts: 92 ✭✭Scar001


    Its on the Irish Refugee Council website.

    Fees waived and €1150 monthly in your arse pocket.



  • Registered Users Posts: 514 ✭✭✭ECookie13


    That is scandalous. No wonder you hear stories of Ukrainians signing up for 3rd level and not attending. I'm sure they also get their dole, deposited directly into their account, along with their free medical and travel cards.

    And the cheek of some of them to be moaning about the cuts this morning and "challenging" it, on their Facebook groups.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,996 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    This is a convenient fig leaf being raised post event. There was no discussion that I recall, that Ireland would take in more war refugees and give them better benefits that other EU states, in lieu of military aid.

    Funnily exactly this point was being raised by some lad called McEneaney in an interview earlier.

    We misjudged the length of the conflict, we've rightly offered shelter to genuine war refugees for the duration of the conflict, whence they may return to rebuild their state.



  • Registered Users Posts: 713 ✭✭✭gral6


    It is not enough at all. They should be moved out of State accommodation with exception of single women with their children and disabled people. I'm sick of seeing fighting age, health men drinking daily outside their state provided hotel accommodation. No English after 2.5 years here, no job….hilarious.

    Honestly , these men should be deported straight away. They can do something good for their own country, help it against russian nazies. They are not wanted here at all.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,557 ✭✭✭baldbear


    if the IPO has not made a decision on your application within 5 months , you can apply for permission to work.

    So people can work without a decision been made. I don't know how long they can continue to work if their decision is denied or if they appeal how many appeals do they have or can they continue to work whilst the appeal process is been used.

    A long dragged out process by the looks of it



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,022 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    No. As I said in my original post I believe the two immigration threads are attracting some traffic that is not elsewhere .

    The titles do draw more anti than pro because of the way they are worded.

    Eg ."How can we change/ manage our refugee situation better ?'" doesn't have the same bite to it but would be a little more attractive to posters who don't necessarily want to stop all asylum seekers .

    As it is there are just a few of us who are posting here who are not against , although that situation is rapidly becoming more difficult to maintain given our government's response to this .

    I keep seeing posts accusing 5 or 6 posters of effectively ruining the thread , just because they don't go with the main narrative .

    Some are left , some centrist .but our opinions /input are not wanted . Or are deemed invalid because it is not what the majority say they think here .

    That's unfair and goes against what a discussion forum is about .

    I happen to think that some , not all, opinions here are ill founded , on spurious reports from SM and X and some right wing SM hacks and deserve to be picked apart , .Just like you and others think mine are, no doubt .

    And good luck to you .That's what it's about .

    Otherwise we may all stick to WhatsApp or social media groups that don't discuss a subject .Echo chambers .

    But "popular opinion " here ..does that mean that the "popular " opinion is the correct one or just that it's popular ? At this time?

    Are well thought through opinions , against the thread ..invalid , just because they are not on the popular side on a particular thread ?

    I am saying that that is an unfair comment and calling that particular trope out .

    That was what my original op was about and why I am bringing it back to that .

    I never said that this thread does not reflect public opinion but I would disagree that it or any boards thread reflects ACTUAL public opinion accurately.

    It can't .

    It is a select group posting . Called for, by the title .

    The fact that some opinion polls might agree with some of the opinions on the thread from time to time is nothing to do with the thread being reflective , just that posters like to think that .

    When opinion polls last few months were saying people were still supportive of asylum seekers posters here did not think those polls reflected their opinions .

    But they were real opinion polls as the recent ones posted here .

    There are provisos with all polls and confounding factors but hey they are more valid than what any of us can surmise on a thread on boards

    So which is it ?

    A microcosm of public opinion ,

    Or a concentration of posters who are of one opinion mainly drawn to a particular thread , because, let's face it , there is no other thread on boards now , where they can voice that particular opinion without too much push back ?

    Not quite the same as representing public opinion .



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,470 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Nobody realised that the war would go on for years. The assumption was that it would somehow end by August or September 2022 with a ceasefire and that life in Ukraine would slowly return to normal. All of this stuff about Ukrainian people being supposedly a major 'burden' on Ireland only began to kick off in the media and elsewhere in late 2023, early 2024 - a good 18 months or more after the war started.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 514 ✭✭✭ECookie13


    This is also sickening to read, about the additional FREE benefits they get for being in college.

    https://www.irishrefugeecouncil.ie/ukraine-students-in-ireland

    And FREE English lessons to boot, yet the majority of them have not a word of English still. Seriously, what do they have to pay for out of their own pockets, apart from booze?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,381 ✭✭✭Archduke Franz Ferdinand


    it’s about time that these crazy benefits were stopped



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,762 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Are the free English lessons really that much of an issue??

    And my girlfriend teaches a class in a working class area of Dublin with Ukrainian students and seems to think they are doing OK in learning English or improving it. Apparently a couple of them also showing more interest in Irish than the Irish kids. But I'm guessing that's also sickening too.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,411 ✭✭✭corkie


    The Council adopts the EU's pact on migration and asylum

    • Today the Council adopted a landmark reform of the European asylum and migration system. This establishes a set of rules that will help to manage arrivals in an orderly way, create efficient and uniform procedures and ensure fair burden sharing between member states.
    • Member states will now have two years to put the laws that were adopted today into practice. The European Commission will soon present a common implementation plan to provide assistance to member states in this process.

    Ireland abstaining is more political than OPT-IN/OPT-OUT at this stage of the vote, EU elections pending.

    Post edited by corkie on


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,343 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    I don't think there is much issue with free English lessons. To be honest, a working knowledge of English is essential for employment here so I'd actually make English lessons a condition of receiving a stipend, unless they have a demonstrated proficiency.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,663 ✭✭✭DebDynamite


    Switzerland, the most famous neutral country of all (and the most expensive) pays on average 500 Swiss francs / €510 per month to Ukrainians

    On average, the country pays about 500 Swiss francs for an adult and 250 francs for a child, but no more than 2000 francs for a family.

    For example, Maryna Gomeniuk, a refugee from Ukraine, said that she received 1650 francs for two adults and two children. She also noted that the canton can additionally reimburse the cost of tickets.

    If Maryna had to have been in Ireland she would got €2136 / 2093 Swiss francs monthly for the two adults & two children.

    Not only that, according to the article, Switzerland are likely to start giving Ukrainians incentives (money) to go back home, while in Ireland, we’re only starting to discuss the likelihood of us cutting the most generous welfare in Europe to the majority of Ukrainians we have living here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 438 ✭✭DaithiMa


    In that mostly anecdotal blog post it says border crossing attempts dropped from 40K to 17k the year it was built. Over 50% reduction. Then last year it was 25k, still a 38% reduction. I am not in favour of using that approach here but saying it hasn't been effective is a bit of a stretch.



  • Registered Users Posts: 794 ✭✭✭Juran


    Same with our dog, we bring her to France every year, so I'm very familar with the pet passport and pet travel in and out of Ireland process.

    No dog, cat, ferret can land in UK or Ireland without this passport ie. Microchip, rabies vaccine & health check by vet. Ukraine pets were not given a choice, if they wanted to bring their pet into Ireland, they had to get the vaccine, chip, register, etc. At the port of entry. The exception was they had to keep the pet away from other animals for 21 days (the period the vaccines requires to become effective). They had to keep their pets in their temporary accomidation / back garden for 21 days minimun, and could be subject to random checks by Dept of Agriculture officals during that 21 day period to ensure they complied.

    I have no issue with our government paying for cost of refugee's pets, they are part of their family.

    The point I was making is that our government can manage, register, trace pets coming into the country to ensure full compliance, but can't seem to do the same with people.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,663 ✭✭✭DebDynamite


    Unreal. College fees waived, monthly maintenance payment €1,150, plus the free accommodation to boot. Accommodation of course which has become even more expensive for non Ukrainian students due to scarcity because some refugees are being housed in former student accommodation.

    It’s all non-means tested too for Ukrainians. The most wealthy Ukrainians can send their kids to college for free here, but any working Irish parents barely over the low threshold get nothing. Absolute joke!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 146 ✭✭Will0483


    Hopefully, but at the point that they are at Calais it's just whack a mole as they'll continue to pop up wherever they are tolerated. We really,really just need a common sense policy at EU level and no more shopping around for the best deal.

    God only knows what all this is costing in terms of policing and endless immigration tribunals not to mention feeding, housing and clothing all these people.



Advertisement