Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time for a zero refugee policy? - *Read OP for mod warnings and threadbans - updated 11/5/24*

Options
1703704706708709851

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 10,985 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    You have your opportunity in the upcoming local & Euro elections. Vote for anyone other than the current political party reps and sitting MEPs. Anyone.

    I'll guarantee you that if the parties lose large numbers of seats in these elections, it will be seismic in effect.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Interesting point on this is that the IT poll today shows FG increasing their vote share and SF continuing their freefall.

    FG and SF are now on equal terms at 23% vote share each.

    I have said for months that we will most likley see a return of the FFG govt & this is looking even more likley now.

    Independents seem to have stalled at 17%.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,304 ✭✭✭prunudo


    i don't know who you are in the real world and if you every considered either public life or doing media work, but your posts speak volumes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    The polls today are showing a big increase for FG and an accelerated drop for SF.

    FG now top party again. Sharing first place with SF.

    Its only a poll i know, but has there been a bounce with Harris taking over? It appears so.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,817 ✭✭✭Northernlily


    I genuinely feel they are a just a pack of naive incompetents. The weakest and most damaging Govt in the history of the state by their ineffectiveness.

    This is what happens when a docile middle class sits on their holes in the face of extraordinary incompetence. Scandal after scandal no accountability. The French would have rioted over the children's hospital increasing costs.

    And yet here we are - a major poll bounce for FG this morning. People will blame the greens.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Is that in addition to the 90 on the Grand Canal?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭thinkabouit


    wow upto 90 again already.

    now you can’t fix any problem without addressing the root cause.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,304 ✭✭✭prunudo


    a paid for poll taken in leafy suburbs no doubt.

    Maybe I'm wrong and will be different in the secret of the polling booth, but anyone I talk will not be voting FG.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭thomas 123


    I’d echo Augme on this one, while our opinions don’t usually align putting down conversation is not what we should be about collectively, all “sides”.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I see your point, but either way the same poll previously had SF on well over 30%.

    I dont think there is much doubt SF are losing support.

    I think the question is are their votes going to independents or back to FFG.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,681 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    SF have lost major support over the last year, and from listening to some of their representatives on political TV programs it's hard to see what better solutions they offer over FFFG, it appears they are blending in with the aforementioned just so they have a broader appeal to non-FFFG voters. I recall one of the SF reps. being asked what's the difference between them and FF..he was stumped.

    I personally don't believe they will do anything new about the Migrant crisis.. Or any other Crises we have in Ireland, i.e. Health, housing, Justice, Defence… the list goes on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,374 ✭✭✭Indestructable




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,485 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    As usual it's a case of why let the truth get in the way of a good story...

    I said people were concerned about immigration, but far more so about the activities of the anti-immigration movement.

    There are numerous cases before the courts now which I can't mention, but I don't think the recent 'hang the traitors' and swastika messages directed towards politicians have helped the anti-immigration cause, if you could call it that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,839 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Thanks - actually really appreciate that.

    My background is in IT and management but I've always fundamentally had a belief in fairness and what's right. These may be trite concepts these days but things like the waste, incompetence, corruption and apathy that's displayed across so much of our services, governance and leadership genuinely annoys me.

    I hate the "be grand" attitude that dominates these things, or the admiration for the "cute hoor" that very much still exists. They enable all of these things. The politicians we get are because we don't engage properly as a society and too many people quietly know that they'd do many of the same things if they had the chance/the balls. There's no thought of the longer term consequences, the impact to people or society, or any real direction for the country. We're entirely reactive and we are completely subservient to the demands of others - lobbyists, the EU, "big business" etc..

    It really frustrates me that people who try to do things right and play by the rules is not only unrewarded but seen as stupid by the same segment of society as the above.

    We need to really take a step forward. Get involved in the process, think of the bigger picture, and what sort of country do we want to live in and leave to our families.

    As I said, no-one else will do it for us.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,485 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    How do we compete with foreign countries, especially the oil-rich ones, willing to pay Irish trained doctors and nurses more than we can afford?

    It's a complex issue but one I think easily solved with some hard borders controls to prevent young Irish people leaving.

    'Keep them here! Keep them here!'



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,883 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    I think Ireland hasn't had to deal with any real issues as a nation before. Normally we hope the problem goes away or someone else tackles it.

    We have been ridiculously lucky benefiting from science and technology advances and investments from MNCs in these areas. That + English speaking + EU membership = Goldilocks economy.

    This government will try and spend its way out of a difficult problem. This will blow up the national debt and destabilize the country. They are desperately trying to avoid another housing bust by increasing demand and reducing supply. It's like an unfunny cartoon.

    They don't have any other cards to play. That's all they understand. We got a slap in the face in 2008 and our permanent government did not learn from that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,485 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Maybe some of those coming to Ireland were part of the 3593 who disappeared from Danish detention centres between 2016 and 2019.

    Are they living undocumented in Denmark or scattered around Europe?

    Or maybe it was people deterred by Danish policies who came to Ireland instead?

    Doesn't bode well for the Danish approach as a viable EU solution.

    https://unbiasthenews.org/living-in-fear-in-copenhagen-how-denmark-is-deliberately-infringing-on-the-rights-of-people-seeking-asylum/



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,762 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Yes. You do all those things, and that's great. But you have been enabled to do many of those things by virtue of the fortunate circumstances you were born into. You were born into good healthcare, a stable society that allowed you to grow up peacefully and to access a high level of good education and training.

    You own land and keep it well — but your land is in a temperate climate, you are largely not at risk of it being ruined by natural disaster or destroyed by war or of it being taken from you without legal recourse. Your right to private quiet possession of your land is protected by a strong rule of law.

    You pay taxes — because you live in a country with a functioning administration of taxation which is again supplemented by strong rule of law. Should misfortune befall you, there are many safety nets to at least break that fall.

    You served your country's defence forces and this is to be respected, but you chose to do so — you were never put in a position of having to take up a gun to defend your home, or indeed simply having to flee your home because an invading army or group of maniacs came with guns.

    This is not to say you should feel bad about this, or guilty. My objection is to those who demean migrants without acknowledging that much of the distinction between "us and them" in terms of our wonderful educated trained Western refinement is based on pure luck. And despite the fact that many of them have navigated an obstacle course in life far harder than the one we had to, and grafted hard, there is still a narrative pushed that poorer migrants are just lazy spongers.

    It is easily possible to be pro-controlled migration without that mentality — but some would appear to believe they are mutually exclusive.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,485 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I don't work for the Government or an NGO...

    But George Soros pays me per post...

    Cha-ching keep it coming 💸🤑🪙🫰💰💲



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,688 ✭✭✭✭zell12


    Got the name wrong, it was the Grand Canal, heard 75 on newstalk bulletin, it has increased again



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,791 ✭✭✭Rezident


    Best thing I have read online in a long time. Can we vote for you since none of the top three parties can be trusted here anymore?

    Agree with everything you have said, I'm sure many do, but where are they politically?



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,839 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Let's not forget that our current state as a country was not always so.

    100 years ago we had an armed uprising and civil war to establish our freedom.

    Our population was poor, uneducated and with little opportunities. Less than 100 years before that many were starving and dying.

    Those who made the decision to leave weren't welcomed with welfare and housing and money. They weren't welcomed at all in cases. They had to work to survive and if they didn't they didn't.

    We fought through a lot of hard times ourselves and sacrificed and lost a lot of people in the process to get to where we are today. The benefits you speak of were earned not gifted. The opportunities we now have were the result of flawed men like Haughey laying the foundations of the IFSC and multinational investment. The peace we've earned came after decades of fighting and loss and thanks to the efforts of people on both sides to fight instead for a better future - but again, no one handed it to us.

    Many (no not all) of the people who you are advocating for want the benefit of our efforts but without any of the sacrifices and efforts we made to get them. It might be understandable but it's not their right or entitlement.

    What they probably should be doing is what we did: demand the changes and reforms and improvements at home. It won't happen overnight and it won't be without pain and sacrifice but it's the only long term solution. It's just not possible to relocate the population of those less fortunate to places like Ireland and Europe, especially when they expect to be supported, trained, and funded from day one and potentially indefinitely.

    It's not our job to take on the responsibility for solving the problems, desires or ambitions of anyone who happens to arrive on our shores. We have our own people and problems to deal with and they must always come first. That's the promise and commitment between the State and it's people - it's the basis of the social contract.

    Charity begins at home as I've said. We've done more than our part. We only have so much to give and so much we can do and we've gone beyond that to the point of compromising our ability to look after our own problems and needs.

    It can't continue. It also ultimately will do nothing to address the reasons why people are leaving their own country. Quite the opposite - it'll make it worse for both the source and the hosts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Geert von Instetten


    If practised EU-wide by Member States, or preferably, if policies of deterrence based on the Danish model were legislated for and implemented at an EU level, I expect the Danish approach would be completely functional. As it is, the Irish electorate is concerned with the abuse of the asylum system in Ireland and the adoption of the Danish model in Ireland will address that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 591 ✭✭✭mykrodot


    and it that means just voting for an Independent and nobody else then do it. Do NOT give 2nd, 3rd, 4th preference votes!! These votes will still get mainstream politicians in on transfers!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,163 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    The Dutch looking to limit asylum seekers…

    https://migrant-integration.ec.europa.eu/news/netherlands-coalition-parties-introduce-stricter-migration-and-integration-measures_en

    Lets see how Brussels reacts

    After months of negotiation, 4 political parties in the Netherlands have reached a coalition agreement.
    They presented 10 key points which include strict asylum reforms and
    integration requirements, and instigated a temporary 'Asylum Crisis Law'
    allowing for far-reaching actions on migration.

    The key points from the coalition agreement are as follows:

    • The indefinite asylum permit will be abolished, and requirements for the temporary residence permit will be tightened.
    • Asylum seekers previously permitted to stay will have this status
      reviewed, with focus on deportation as often as possible and including
      through forced measures.
    • Those with refugee status will no longer receive priority in allocation of social rental housing.
    • Automatic family reunification will no longer be possible.
    • The 'asylum seeker dispersal law' will be repealed. The law aimed
      to distribute asylum seekers and refugees more evenly across the
      country, preventing certain municipalities or regions from
      disproportionately accommodating asylum seekers.

    Additional obligations on integration include:

    • extension of the standard naturalisation period to 10 years, regardless of the type of residence permit;
    • foreigners seeking Dutch nationality must, if possible, renounce their original nationality;
    • the language requirement for naturalisation is raised to level B1;
    • 'integration' includes knowledge about the Holocaust and its victims.

    Read more about the measures outlined in the coalition agreement.

    Additionally, the coalition will request permission from the European
    Commission to opt out of the European Asylum and Migration policy. They
    also advocate for stricter border control and the implementation of a
    ‘two-tier status system’ which will entail granting migrants different
    legal statuses based on their purpose or right of residence, such as
    permanent residency versus temporary or conditional residency.



  • Registered Users Posts: 34,099 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    If I could thank hundred times I would.

    Nail on head.



  • Registered Users Posts: 500 ✭✭✭Marcos


    This is exactly it. A vote for SF may as well be a vote for FF/FG/Greens/Soc Dems/Labour/PBP Rise etc. There is no difference between them on this issue. No transfers to any of these parties if you want to see any change in the current policies!

    When most of us say "social justice" we mean equality under the law opposition to prejudice, discrimination and equal opportunities for all. When Social Justice Activists say "social justice" they mean an emphasis on group identity over the rights of the individual, a rejection of social liberalism, and the assumption that unequal outcomes are always evidence of structural inequalities.

    Andrew Doyle, The New Puritans.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Lets see how this one plays out because Harris has committed to not allowing the camps to repopulate. But of course, they will; in the absence of any accommodation.

    If it goes unchecked it obviously want take long to reach 1000 tents. The govt are really in a mess with this now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,557 ✭✭✭baldbear


    A few lads earlier today. Crouching tiger hidden tents.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,291 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    Other than business owners looking to increase the cheap labour pool or property moguls looking to jack up real estate prices, I don't see who would be in favour of……

    Oh, wait, I just got it



Advertisement