Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time for a zero refugee policy? - *Read OP for mod warnings and threadbans - updated 11/5/24*

Options
1714715717719720851

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,342 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    Where can we see this breakdown?



  • Registered Users Posts: 347 ✭✭slay55


    from the radio this morning , the number was minimum of 1,800 tents



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,985 ✭✭✭almostover


    Good to see peaceful protest and community spirit in action!



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,468 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    A counter point would be that probably 99% of men from those communities are not involved in serious criminality. There might have been perhaps 100 British Asian men or less convicted of child grooming offences.

    Should we judge the Irish population based on the activities of Dublin's criminal / drugs gangs?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,362 ✭✭✭dabbler2004


    A counter point to that is how would you know how many are or are not involved in serious criminality? There are a large number of migrants coming here without documentation. We don't know who they are or what they've done or in a lot of cases what country they are actually from.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,664 ✭✭✭✭klose




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,985 ✭✭✭almostover


    Nope, but nobody should be allowed the freedom to wander any country when claiming asylum until such time as their background is thoroughly vetted. Yes our asylum processing times are ludicrously slow, but that is no excuse to allow unvetted people roam the streets. There is a large security issue bubbling under the surface in our current crisis.

    The government needs to do many things on our IPA crisis. Two of which are:

    1. Build detention centres large enough to house IPAs while their applications are processed. Unprocessed IPAs should not be allowed mingle with the general public. Main reason being security, until a person's background is established, the public should not be exposed to any potential risk.
    2. Speed up the IPA processing system. Hopefully point 1 would deter economic migrants destroying their documentation en route. That would leave us with the more genuine cases, who once their background and veracity of IPA claim is verified, can be safely allowed into the public.

    Also, whoever legislated to allow IPAs to work after 6 months while waiting for their IPA claim to be processed should have their head examined.

    A lot of this issue really boils down to our addiction to cheap capitalism in the West. We've a long journey to go on fixing that one. Meanwhile some practical solutions and deterrents to our IPA crisis would be helpful.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭jackboy


    How will faster processing times help if we will not deport significant numbers? Realistically that will not change.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,538 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    I agree to a certain extent, I don't believe we should have hundreds of people in this country living in tents, where No one knows where they are.

    IPAs are not prisoners however and cannot be detained indefinitely without trial. Article 40.4.1 of the constitution, ° No citizen shall be deprived of his personal liberty save in accordance with law.'

    And the Supreme Court deemed it unconstitutional to prohibit asylum seekers from work, NVH V Min. for Justice.

    They really need to speed up the claims process



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,985 ✭✭✭almostover


    Also, we should definitely discriminate when it comes to processing IPA claims. That means rejecting IPA claims for people with a violent criminal background. It may also mean rejecting applications from nations where the prevailing culture is anathema to our own. We have a liberal and republican constitution in our country and we should take reasonable steps to safeguard it. Take for example same sex marriage and the right to terminate a pregnancy. Both of which are now rights enshrined in our constitution by the democratic will of the people. There are certainly cultures in the world who would find both of those rights to be complete anathema to them. Why risk our own progress and values for those of others, especially when such values are clearly dear to us. We need to get out of idealistic thinking and get into realistic thinking i.e. the cultures of some tribes / nations / religions are diametrically opposed to ours. And that limiting immigration from these diametrically opposed cultures may be a good idea.

    Idealism has taken hold in a big way in our government. Nothing wrong with ideals but they must be applied pragmatically with respect paid to the reality of the situation. We had two idealistic referenda only in the near past that was pushed by government, both of which were soundly rejected by a realist electorate. We're seeing the same happen again in communities all over Ireland. An idealistic government believing that its possible to double the population of rural communities with IPAs and that integration will take care of itself. Again and again this is being resisted by realistic communities who rightly ask questions like, has our personal security been considered here? Our access to public services? Our access to hosuing in our local community? We've a rocky road ahead unless the government has an epiphany .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,681 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    What I think is that there's a very high representation of foreign nationals in Irish prisons(15% of prisoners come from a foreign national background), will we get breakdown of offences from the figures on cases of sexual violence/abuse from the non-nationals population..?

    We all see the high level cases, Pushka, Yousef Palani, Riad Bouchaker… All we'll see when an IPA/Migrant is involved will be "A man was arrested today…"

    So you can see that mothers of young children near the proposed migrant encampment at Thornton Hall are very worried.

    Thankfully these locals had some good luck today when they blocked a convoy of modular homes from their village:

    https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/social-affairs/2024/05/17/protesters-preventing-delivery-of-modular-homes-to-a-site-in-co-westmeath/



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,985 ✭✭✭almostover


    There's that element to it too. For the IPA process to work, one potential outcome must be that an IPA claim can be considered invalid and the person deported. The system can't work without that.

    It's like housing. For a housing system to work, evictions must be possible. In cases such as non-payment of rent / mortgage, damaged caused to property, anti social behavior or crime in a property.

    Same with security. To have public security we must punish and deter crime.

    We need to wake up a bit that way. Systems only work when non conformance to the system is penalised. It can't work otherwise. What we're doing right now with the IPA process is like playing a game of soccer without any referee. We're trusting the players to abide by the rules without any enforcement. It won't end well unless we change.

    Post edited by almostover on


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,538 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    How is that a very high representation? 20% of people in Ireland are foreign born.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,985 ✭✭✭almostover


    I agree, IPAs are not prisoners. But re-read your quote from our constitution 'save in accordance with law'. What laws should we have in place to protect the general population from unvetted immigrants? What is the lesser of two evils here? Detaining IPAs until their background and veracity of IPA claim can be established? Or leaving IPAs who are unvetted out into the public. Also, I didn't specify anything about indefinite detention. It should be of definite duration by way of a speedy IPA processing system. That would go a long way to deterring anyone from destroying their documents in transit.

    As for the supreme court decision, that was ill advised. I can't think of a single country I can travel to right now where I could work legally without having my background checked first. I work with a large multinational and travel a bit for work and when outside of the EU I can't even enter a country without a Visa and background check being done first.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭jackboy


    You are correct but we are never going to deport large numbers, no chance. The processing system is actually not relevant. Also, the accommodation capacity is irrelevant because we are never building our way out of this. Everything is down to how many are entering the country so only policies lowering numbers entering the country will have an impact.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,538 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    What laws should we have in place to protect the general population from unvetted immigrants?

    That would be every law, the same protections for everybody from everybody else.

    And you can indeed work in every UK or EU country, we all can. I wouldn't have the audacity to call a Supreme Court decision ill advised, they are the experts in interpretation of the constitution.



  • Registered Users Posts: 436 ✭✭WealthyB


    IPAs are not citizens. I can't believe this has to be pointed out to you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,709 ✭✭✭ShamNNspace


    He was where the work WAS for a short while, after that he worked his lad, that bedded him and his family in for the long run for collect benefit💶💶💶 for make glorious mansion in Romania... Very nice I like Irish peeple



  • Registered Users Posts: 891 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    You've managed to contradict yourself in three sentences. In fact, the first two contain the contradiction.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,342 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    audacity? A healthy functioning and democratic society is allowed to question authority figures.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,538 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    I'm not sure what you're trying to say here? The provisions of the constitution apply to everyone in the country. Unless you think the Supreme Court don't understand the constitution



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,538 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    Do you think ordinary members of society have the experience and knowledge on the interpretation of the Constitution, that the Judges of the Supreme Court have?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,342 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    how do you know the poster is an “ordinary member of society” whatever that means

    Regardless I believe everyone has the right to question authority figures. Supreme Court judges are not gods



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,681 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    15% of prisoners come from a foreign national background. Further, the IPA could not provide ethnicity data for 22% of committals…. So potentially 37% of the prison population are non-nationals.

    The numbers of migrants arriving is ever increasing so I am sure the crime stats involving these male arrivals, of whom we have no idea of their criminal records, mental health history, religious views on LGBT people (many coming from countries where LGBT people would be imprisoned or stoned to death). In Nigeria where a large cohort are from and claiming asylum here: https://www.humandignitytrust.org/country-profile/nigeria/ In the second highest number of migrants country: https://eurasianet.org/anti-gay-violence-goes-unpunished-in-georgia-again

    And Somalia https://www.humandignitytrust.org/country-profile/somalia/

    How many families with kids would feel safe letting their young children travel to school on busses when a migrant camp for 1000 undocumented migrant males in put in place near where they live?



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,538 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    Its fairly self explanatory! Are we not all ordinary members of society



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,817 ✭✭✭Northernlily


    OK this is something that seems to be wrong with discourse.

    Both things can be true at once. Some shameful **** has gone on in this country. Never deny that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,538 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    15% of prisoners come from foreign national background, the other 22% you have no idea of their nationality. 20% of the country is foreign born, so no not a very high percentage really. Seems normal enough.

    A And you think that we should be afraid of people coming from countries where being gay is illegal, like it was here until 30 years ago, should other countries have been afraid of the Irish because of that?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,342 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    I’m not denying that. Every country has its shameful events. But I’m sorry, I’m not buying that Ireland has the atrocious reputation that this poster claims



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,725 ✭✭✭Augme


    I don't why you are incapable of accepting the facts of the situation. Again,there no need for people to make up false stories to push a certain agenda.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,681 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Go back to 1992 and ask someone who's stuck in that year in Ireland, we moved on, so then answer the real question where you have all these migrant males coming from countries where being Gay can get you imprisoned or killed..and while you're there ask them what their religion thinks of the LGBT community?



Advertisement