Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Experts calling for Operation Transformation to be taken off the air

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 936 ✭✭✭lumphammer2


    I'm glad Operation Transformation is scrapped …. I never liked that programme and agree with the reasoning why it should be scrapped …. people were brought to tears several times on the programme ….. it also was a vehicle dreamt up by Noel Kelly to promote initially the late Gerry Ryan …. and then Kathryn Thomas …. and the Henrys …. all clients ….

    The programme besides its harmful influence and association with the RTE of the Tubridy era …. it simply was too long on as well …. it had run its course …. it represented the lack of invention …. I know it was popular back around 2008 when it started but I don't think it was watched much in the last few years …. a lot of these programmes go on too long and this is one of the biggest examples of all ….

    All the WRONG programmes end up going on and on …. and the right programmes are ended too soon …. Love/Hate et al …. I hope Kin will be back for a 3rd series …. it is this sort of show we want to see more of …. not OT and the rest ….

    Post edited by lumphammer2 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭bilbot79


    This is scary because in nearly all of the shows about weight loss I've seen and from what I've seen from food addicts/other addicts I know, it doesn't take much for excuses to get the better of them. Food addicts will latch onto statements like that to say there's nothing I can do so may aswell order pizza



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    It's true though so the conversation should lead with the facts.

    He gave the same figures back in 2016

    "For some years now we have realised that weight gain is 90pc irreversible for 90pc of people. It's a very important reality that needs to be understood and accepted.

    "Then prevention - and in particular in childhood - becomes the primary goal. "The research we are doing with the National Children's Research Centre is focused on the immune system and regulation of weight - and that's where the explanation for this dynamic defence against weight loss is to be found.

    "Ultimately understanding that will lead to treatments for obesity, but it really should be prevention, prevention, prevention."

    https://www.independent.ie/life/health-wellbeing/weight-gain-is-often-irreversible/34691464.html

    That's the message that needs to be getting out there to those who are currently normal weight or overweight, prevention. Chances are if you become obese you will not be able to get to a healthy weight without medication, and even medication doesn't work for everyone. I'm not sure what the chances are of being able to lose it if a person is just overweight and not obese but it does seem to have a decent success rate because I think we would all know quite a few who went from overweight to normal/slim and stayed at a healthy weight.

    And for people who are already obese who think well I can't lose the weight I might as well order pizza I think to those people there needs to be a large emphasis that even if the weight isn't shifting that a healthy diet can still benefit them in numerous ways and that an unhealthy diet and overconsumption is going to make things a lot worse. As bad as you feel now you're going to feel a lot worse in 2 years or 5 years if you keep ordering pizza.

    I think the facts are kinder in some ways and harsher in others, but they are the facts regardless and the conversation about obesity and preventing it and reversing it has to lead with the facts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭kaymin


    Weight gain is not 90% irreversible for 90% of people though - maybe on a permanent basis it is because people fall back in to their old habits but weight can be lost without drugs and many people achieve it - far more than the 5 or 10% that are being quoted - the stats and research is being presented in a very misleading way.

    The emphasis needs to be on a permanent lifestyle change not on short term diets or drugs whose effects are also only temporary. That's something I felt OP emphasised which is why I find the letter from the Irish experts to cancel OP a bit bizarre.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,708 ✭✭✭jackboy


    It is the word 'irreversible' that is incorrect. It is more accurate to say that 90% of people will not reverse weight gain. That has a very different meaning. 'Irreversible' implies not possible to reverse rather that the truth which is 'will not reverse'.

    Almost everyone that goes on a diet will not sustain weight loss as the concept people have of a diet is not useful as a fix for weight gain. Instead of going on a diet people should be correcting their diet permanently. Unfortunately too many diets are started with the full intention of going back to eating mountains of junk after the diet.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭kaymin


    It's like they're trying to get the research results to fit their own agenda. I also think '90% of people will not reverse' is also incorrect as many people do reverse their weight gains, albeit not permanently. Ultimately it boils down to a need for a lifestyle change - change of eating habits and activity levels permanently, but the Irish medical experts seem to want to rule this out as a solution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,482 ✭✭✭✭lawred2




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They should replace it with You Are What You Eat. Sit the fatties in front of a table filled with all the crap they eat on a weekly basis, and then ask the experts to explain how over consuming of calories is not the reason for their disgusting waistlines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,708 ✭✭✭jackboy


    I think it goes way beyond that. Many people that are of normal weight or slightly over weight also have a diet based on junk food, which is going to make them sick. Its staggering that most people go into supermarkets and fill their trolleys with junk, thinking they are buying healthy food. Breakfast cereal, sliced pan, yoghurts full of sugar, most people think such things are healthy food.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 18,550 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


    In the course of this work did you address people's underlying reasons for overeating?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 18,550 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


    In other words, an organisation with no international standing. I'll take the WHO, World Obesity Federation and research over WebMD. On a more local level, the HSE has its Model of Care for obesity, which Prof O'Shea said on the HSE podcast that the WHO praised. https://www.hse.ie/eng/about/who/cspd/ncps/obesity/model-of-care/

    You used your OP to complain about the lack of emphasis on personal responsibility. That same HSE website, informed by NHS information, also gives tips, in its treatment section, for people to make changes to their own situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,661 ✭✭✭drury..


    I think he forgot that part

    I'm guilty of it myself, but it's so easy to say eat less exercise more



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,626 ✭✭✭JayRoc


    Interesting question.

    Yes, to a certain extent. It's generally obvious which people are having difficulty in making changes to their life, and you want them to succeed and get the results they're after.

    But at the same time, a personal trainer is not a psychologist. My brief was to give these people the information they needed to get what they wanted, and after that it was pretty much up to them.

    And I don't really believe most people who are overweight are mentally ill or need therapy. It is incredibly simple to lose weight but that doesn't necessarily make it easy. Food that makes you fat is generally nice to eat so you don't want to stop eating it.

    Just exercise a little self-control, make small long-term changes, establish a routine and be consistent. I don't think that requires therapy.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 18,550 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


    Thanks for that. I wasn't talking about therapy or that form of intervention. Since lifestyle is somewhat of the drumbeat we're hearing in this thread and it sounds like was in your wheelhouse, were you able to support people around good routines? Without a full sense of someone's life picture (job, sleep, family, stress, etc) we can talk about self-control (standard issue buzzword, no different to 'buy a pair of runners') all day long and it probably won't change anything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,626 ✭✭✭JayRoc


    I get you. Yeah it would have been standard practice to check in at every session regarding just those factors (these were typically high-paid professionals who worked silly hours, slept too little and often ate shite as a result) . More than once I recall taking people into an office for a chat rather than the gym session they had paid for because I knew it might do more good.

    Though if I'm being honest, it was the element of the job that interested me the least.

    At the time I just wanted to train people and became frustrated at what I saw as people paying me good money for my expertise and then ignoring it. Perhaps a little callow but I was but a pup in my twenties.

    I left the job after a couple of years and started working as strength and conditioning coach for which I am paid a lot less but have a lot more job satisfaction.

    Post edited by JayRoc on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭xhomelezz


    Who is watching that show anyway?

    Not gonna even comment on your opening paragraph...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,661 ✭✭✭drury..


    You're a coach and limited by your lack of knowledge regarding obesity



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    Well that's exactly what he said…. Weight gain is 90pc irreversible for 90pc of people, he added. You can lose it, but you will put it back on again.

    I don't think some people who gain it back fall back into their old habits either. They just stop being as restrictive. Healthy people should be able to occasionally increase calories or have a binge without their body storing it all as fat. But it seems that a lot of people who have lost weight need to permanently alter their habits to a dieting state if they want to keep it off, and that's not healthy or ok either. Their maintenance calories are often low, which tends to mean the person has other issues like little energy, low libido, they're always exhausted etc, it's hard to live like that permanently and it's not healthy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭kaymin


    Can you give some specifics about what you're referring to that's relevant to what we're discussing? I read the links and all I came across were buzzwords and meaningless management speak:

    'Takes a population health approach to managing
    obesity'

    Also the model of care you refer to is only in the process of being operationalised, meanwhile we have record levels of obesity.

    This one gave me a laugh:

    'To define specific services for the effective
    management of obesity and overweight in
    children, young people and adults across
    the life course incorporating prevention,
    early identification and treatment to
    prevent progression of disease and
    complications.
    '

    I wonder are they referring to people getting fatter. So what exactly are they doing if Johnny down the street is getting more overweight by the day?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭kaymin


    It's a contradiction to say something is irreversible when it's patently obvious many people reverse it - words matter when you're advising people that have limited self discipline in the first place.

    Are you suggesting adopting a diet such that calories in equals calories spent causes those issues?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    I find news articles never quote what was said in its entirety so it's hard to know exactly what was said or how well he explained it. I think there does need to be clarity and factual information, but then you can't help it if you're misquoted.

    He did say that people can lose it but they'll put it back on again.

    What issues are you talking about? The obesity or the issues that people often report when they are restricting calories like low energy, low libido etc?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭kaymin


    I don't see where he said people lose it but they will put it back on again - he just said it was irreversible:

    'Commenting on the study, Dublin obesity expert Dr Donal O' Shea, said: "For some years now we have realised that weight gain is 90pc irreversible for 90pc of people. It's a very important reality that needs to be understood and accepted.'

    You stated:

    'Their maintenance calories are often low, which tends to mean the person has other issues like little energy, low libido, they're always exhausted etc'

    And I'm asking whether this is anecdotal or based on research and is a direct consequence of people adopting a diet where calories in equals calories spent?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    That was a quote from 2016 from an article I posted where he was discussing prevention. He said it in the one you yourself posted earlier in the thread.

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/doctors-warned-to-stop-telling-obese-patients-eat-less-move-more-is-their-treatment/a1838111061.html

    Weight gain is 90pc irreversible for 90pc of people, he added. You can lose it, but you will put it back on again.

    Well I've never looked up any studies on it because I would believe the anecdotal evidence because it makes perfect sense. If someone is on a low calorie diet and they've stopped burning fat also then of course some things are not going to be running properly in favour of other more important things, but yes the research is there.

    https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/calorie-restriction-risks#TOC_TITLE_HDR_6

    Did you think it wouldn't be? How would you expect everything in the body to be working efficiently if the body isn't getting enough calories and it's also not burning stored fat? It's not going to just magic up energy to run everything. Obviously some things are shutting down or running very poorly.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭kaymin


    Okay but he's contradicting himself and the same issue arises when you come off the weight loss drugs. Also to counter the argument you made earlier, the hard miles are not losing the weight gains (they aren't irreversible) but keeping them off. So drugs are not the solution he is making them out to be unless he is condemning half the population to being on drugs for the rest of their lives.

    To your other point, the body is getting enough calories if calories in = calories out?

    Their strategy and communications seem confused and contradictory, on the one hand drugs and surgery are the solution yet then he goes onto say:

    'There is a model of care for obesity but the recruitment embargo has impacted the hiring of dieticians, he said'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    It gets enough to keep functioning at a very reduced rate……….but some things will be shut off like the reproductive system, libido, the person will be very fatigued, some people will suffer hair loss, their body doesn't have the energy to keep growing healthy hair, the immune system can be impaired, the person can have brain fog etc.

    It's not 'enough' if the body can't function in a healthy way on that many calories.

    It's 'enough' as in they'll stay alive, but it's not healthy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,708 ✭✭✭jackboy


    That is referring to an unhealthy diet where the calories taken in are too low. This is obviously unhealthy and unsustainable, just like a diet where too many calories are taken in. A healthy diet is what should be recommended. It might take a lot longer to lose the weight than a crash diet but it will be more sustainable

    Also, it's not all about calories, you could eat a big ice cream cone and get close to the target calories for the day, but not a good idea and you would be ravenous for most of the day. Speaking of ice cream cones, I noticed plenty today that were disgustingly big, like close to toppling over. You would be fair sick after eating one of those.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,485 ✭✭✭TheChizler


    I've heard stories from people working in the HSE health promotion department, from people who would normally be tasked with reading the most up to date research, recommending policy and coming up with campaigns. Basically upper management decided they were going to bring in consultants rather than listen to their own staff. Deloitte (fairly sure it was them) basically said people don't like being held personally accountable so recommended the HSE medicalise obesity. Not popular with the people now tasked with implementing these new policies.

    They've been told to stop saying obese people or people with obesity, they're now people living in bigger bodies...



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭kaymin


    I

    No surprise really, the whole campaign is a series of mixed and contradictory messages - when people really need to hear facts. Here's another from Mr O'Shea:

    “Eat less, move more is not the treatment for obesity. Get over it,” he said. “Stop thinking it."

    Lifestyle, including exercise and nutrition, is part of weight management and prevention of ill-health, he said, citing studies showing the negative impact of sedentary lifestyles.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-41368447.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,626 ✭✭✭JayRoc


    Would you mind elaborating on that? Do you mean the psychological issues, specifically? Metabolic factors, medical conditions etc?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    Yep but that's what people think they have to do because they are so used to hearing messages like what you say that "it's calories in < calories out….simple".

    Many start off cutting calories a sustainable amount and doing well for a bit but then stall and can't lose anymore so the message they're receiving is they have to keep cutting every time they stall. And then their calories are very low and they're still not losing weight but they're suffering from the effects of a restricted calorie diet.

    Agree that it's definitely not all about calories, and all calories are definitely not equal when it comes to weight gain or weight loss.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭65535


    Only watched it once or twice when it came out first - then found that they are back in the stone age by weighing in Stones ?

    We need to move on to Kilo's - we use them everywhere now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    Why did that give you a laugh? Do you feel the same about other things like heart disease or type 2 diabetes? They do try to advise people to live a healthy lifestyle to try to avoid progression of disease and complications, why should obesity be any different. They have now reached the conclusion that once people are obese that it is extremely unlikely that they will be able to reverse that so of course they should be trying to 'prevent progression of disease and complications'.

    Yeah they're referring to people getting fatter, but they're also referring to all of the other stuff that is going on in the body that goes along with it, they're not just gaining weight, many are on a road to damaging their bodies.

    Being 'fat' wouldn't be nearly as big of a deal as it is if it didn't often lead to all sorts of other health complications and reduced quality of life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,626 ✭✭✭JayRoc


    I think you may have taken me up wrong, to a certain extent. My point was that weight loss is a simple proposition. It's not complicated (generally speaking, obviously). People that make it complicated should be treated with a certain amount of skepticism.

    I'm not judging anyone who is overweight. It's difficult for a lot of people to lose weight. But it's not complicated



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    He's saying that exercise and nutrition is part of weight management and prevention of ill-health but that alone it's not going to treat obesity. Which does indeed seem to be a fact even if people don't want to believe it.

    I think you're seeing mixed messages and contradiction because you're choosing to read it that way. It's hard to know exactly what he said without reading an actual transcript but I would imagine any official campaign would state it in clear facts but again it will still probably be misquoted and deliberately misinterpreted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    Have the previous campaigns actually had any success in reducing the obesity crisis? or have any of the previous policies had any notable success? It doesn't seem that that is the case….what up to date research out there is genuinely going to make a difference?

    Obesity is now considered a disease by many countries and also by WHO and the European commission, surely it would be only a matter of time before Ireland were forced to classify it as a disease if the EU were saying it.

    And if it's a disease then how could they not medicalise it there is medication available and the previous 'treatments' have not had a good success rate?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭kaymin


    No, heart disease is 40% hereditary though granted obesity is hereditary to an extent. Depends on the circumstances for Type II diabetes - obesity and inactivity are contributing factors. I laughed because how they describe putting on weight as the progression of a disease - if I don't do exercise for a few weeks I'm now suffering from a disease - nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,697 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    It doesn't help that people like Lizzo are seen as some kind of role model when she is a walking heart attack.

    If she wants to eat herself into an early grave let her off but stop calling it body positivity.

    Eva Orsmond was the only one on that show who gave it to them straight and pushed them to do more and RTE got rid of her.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭kaymin


    I haven't taken it up wrong.

    Eat less, move more is not the treatment for obesity

    But, but

    It is part of the treatment for obesity.

    Maybe he should choose his words more carefully.

    I'd be curious what previous campaigns / policies were - I don't recall anything about them. A radical approach might be to ban the branding of sh!t food similar to how they banned branding of cigarettes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    Right, but some isn't hereditary so do you feel the same about it then?

    No you're not suffering from a disease after not exercising for a few weeks, you're the one who brought that nonsense into the debate so that nonsense comment must have been directed at yourself 🤔



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭kaymin


    tbh I don't feel anything about what you're asking about.

    What's the cut-off for when putting on weight becomes a disease?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 163 ✭✭_H80_GHT


    Seeing obese children eating junk food in restaurants with their parents is all too common these days.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    No but you don't have anything to say about any other point I refute either though.

    No idea, there would certainly be markers for illness/malfunctioning in the body where I think it could be officially classed as disease but I'm not sure if those are actually tested in individuals who are obese or if the doctors just make an assessment based purely on BMI, body fat and perhaps other health checks and failed attempts at losing weight.

    Presumably there is also a tipping point in people where it would be possible to pull it back and reverse things with the right intervention but go beyond that and you're kind of fucked, but then that's probably very individual also. Whether that can be tested I don't know but presumably if the future is going to be all about prevention then they will be.

    Post edited by marilynrr on


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭kaymin


    I've refuted any of your points that are worth refuting.

    Anyway interesting article in the Independent today:

    https://archive.ph/cb6Q9



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,882 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭kaymin


    So if you're obese (using some bullsh!t metric) it's a disease but if you're not obese but just overweight it's not a disease. Got it. Very scientific. I'm fairly sure there's some circular reasoning there.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    Nope you have a rigid view and you won't deviate from that. You ask questions but if they're answered then you ignore them and move on to bashing this new approach again.

    That was really not interesting, just another opinion piece saying that obese people want to blame everything but themselves. It's interesting to you because you also hold that view.

    There's loads of actual interesting stuff out there if you actually cared to look

    https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/12/health/obesity-changes-brain-wellness/index.html

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/obesity-research-confirms-long-term-weight-loss-almost-impossible-1.2663585

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK572076/#:~:text=Obesity%20is%20a%20chronic%20disease,defective%20hormonal%20and%20immune%20system.

    A lot of people want to believe it's a conspiracy theory by big pharma, all these scientists are just lying to push the drugs.

    As a side note I very much believe that big Pharma pushes drugs on people. I'm aware that there are big players in the industry who stand to benefit from this, but I also believe that it's true that people can't reverse this through diet and exercise alone.

    Now there's obviously a lot who believe that of course they could reverse it if they just stuck to the diet plan……..well great believe that if you want but the stats show that that approach hasn't been successful….so do you think that they should continue to focus on the same approach because it's the right one and hope that now it starts to work ? 🤔 As is often said "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results".

    Should they drop the healthy eating and exercising advice? Absolutely not. Because that's still important, but I don't think anyone is suggesting that either even if people want to interpret it that way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    No.

    https://www2.hse.ie/conditions/obesity/

    Your GP will check: 

    They may diagnose you with obesity if you have a high BMI and any health problems linked to obesity.

    Getting a diagnosis of obesity

    Your GP will assess your:

    Your GP may ask about:

    • how your weight impacts your health
    • your work and home environment
    • your sleep, diet, and physical activity
    • if you feel stressed
    • smoking and drinking alcohol
    • your family history
    • weight-related health problems
    • medicines you are taking that may be causing weight gain

    Body mass index (BMI)

    Your BMI is calculated by dividing your weight in kilograms by your height in metres.

    Work out your BMI using the safefood BMI healthy weight calculator.

    People with a BMI of 30 or more have a high risk of obesity.

    Waist circumference

    Your GP will measure your waist to see where you carry your weight.

    The amount of weight you carry around your tummy can affect your:

    • hormones
    • immune system
    • risk of heart disease and diabetes

    If you have more fat in your belly area than elsewhere, this may increase your risk of obesity.

    For men, you have a higher risk of health problems if your waist circumference is more than 102 centimetres (40 inches).

    For women, you have a higher risk of health problems if your waist circumference is more than 88 centimetres (35 inches).

    Waist size cut offs are lower for people of certain ethnicities because of a higher risk of type 2 diabetes and heart disease.

    Learn how to measure your waist circumference - safefood.net

    Health problems linked to weight

    Your GP will check if you have any health conditions linked to your weight.

    These conditions include:

    They may also carry out health checks to find out if your weight puts you at risk of developing health problems. These checks could include blood tests and measuring your blood pressure.

    This will help your GP to understand your risk of obesity. They will help you decide on the best treatment plan.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 18,550 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


    I think you're a bit stuck on this final point. Let's say some of the 'mechanics' of weight loss is straightforward, physically. Mentally, it sounds like another story. Can the average overweight or obese person transform their grocery list and and turn things around relatively quickly, probably not. You and others here are really undervaluing the need to focus on sustainable, long-term weight loss. No different to getting a personal best in a race, it takes months or years of effort, consistent training, sometimes things not going to plan, plus things in the background going relatively smoothly too.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭kaymin


    None of which says anything about whether your obesity constitutes a disease - or is it by definition if you are diagnosed as obese that you have the disease? I didn't claim BMI >30=obese, I was responding to another poster that claimed that. In any case it seems to be a rule of thumb using what your posted anyway 'People with a BMI of 30 or more have a high risk of obesity.'

    The WHO also states ' A body mass index (BMI) over 25 is considered overweight, and over 30 is obese.'

    My point is it seems very arbitrary and unscientific given the use of crude metrics such as the BMI. You mentioned markers which would be objective / scientific but I see no mention of that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    It says "They may diagnose you with obesity if you have a high BMI and any health problems linked to obesity" so they don't diagnose people as 'obese' and then say that means they have the disease of obesity. The doctor will diagnose someone with obesity (or not) based on all of the other information provided and the tests.

    Yeah you responded to another poster and seemed to take that as fact. I just posted the information from the HSE website to show that BMI was not the only criteria used.

    Yes WHO state that 30 is 'obese', but then obesity and obese are not the same thing. Also sometimes certain words can have two meanings.

    However having looked at the WHO website though they seem to be pushing it a bit and are also labelling 'overweight' as a condition..and saying people are living with 'overweight' which just sounds silly. I suppose for some they would technically fit the definition of chronic disease "a long-term health condition that needs ongoing treatment and management". But it just doesn't work with the word 'overweight' so I accept that some people would feel the same about the word obesity.

    It doesn't sound arbitrary or unscientific at all.

    There are markers described in the pathophysiology of obesity link I posted earlier. Presumably some of those are picked up in the blood tests. I'm not sure if they check for all hormones but they certainly would for insulin. They also mention on the HSE list that they check for high cholesterol, raised liver enzymes etc so they would all be blood tests.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement