Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time for a zero refugee policy? - *Read OP for mod warnings and threadbans - updated 11/5/24*

Options
1724725727729730899

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,882 ✭✭✭Augme


    Brexit was driven by anti immigration sentiment and was largely based on the fact that the UK didn't have control on their borders. So they voted to leave. Now, what happened after they left doesn't change the fact and reasons they voted to leave. Everyone except the people who voted to leave the EU knew that leaving the EU wouldnt make any difference on the number of asylum seekers they were going to receive.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,234 ✭✭✭Viscount Aggro


    Have they run out of fences, along the canal?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,882 ✭✭✭Augme


    Of course I accept that. I never claimed every Irish person thinks the same as I do. I accept there are a small of Irish people, like @john123470, who believe integration is impossible, who think "these people" (i.e. foreigners) will "will use their number to strongarm local elections."

    As I've said, the upcoming elections will tell where.Irish people stand on those.issues.

    When some says this, it blatantly clear what their position is on immigration. Stop pretending otherwise.

    Why is it so hard for the pro immigration lobby to accept that Irish people do not want their culture / values diluted and replaced?



  • Registered Users Posts: 422 ✭✭john123470


    ^ Nail on the head here. Communicating with this person is a waste of time.

    It does remind one though of the immediate urgency in getting a deportation infrastructure up and running before we are overrun



  • Registered Users Posts: 532 ✭✭✭ECookie13


    Funnily enough, this tactic did seem to work a year or two ago but not anymore. Anyone who mingles socially with groups will see how much more comfortable people are nowadays about speaking their minds regarding the asylum seekers/refugee situations, in public especially.

    It stinks of a last-resort tactic as they know they're in the minority now and the "BIGOT, RACIST" shouting tactic does not work anymore either. The only place that still seems to work like that is the little reddit Ireland forum, but that place is near satire at this stage and mods just ban anyone who does not fit in the echo chamber.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,184 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    A FG TD called Jennifer Carroll MacNeill has just finished an interview on RTE radio. As far as I could gather (see below) she stated that FG policy is that all the various refugees and asylum seekers arriving in their droves are welcome to stay and work here in the future. Who, why, how and when did this become some sort of official policy. Who did Jennifer Carroll MacNeill and FG consult before they decided to wreck this great change on Irish society? Why do they think they have to right to direct this? The f******** arrogance of them is astounding, far too long in office.

    Not related but why do many of these FG TDs, wannabee TDs, choirboys all speak like motormouths? They're like clones of each other as regards this rapid fire rhetoric. Instead of pacing their points and letting them sink in, they rattle on like a machine gun and you're left thinking, what did they just say? I can only conclude that this is a function of their lack of confidence in what they're saying and/or a desire to obfuscate and bamboozle, deceive the public. Whatever, out with them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,184 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Incomers will integrate as long as numbers are small, they are obliged to. When numbers are substantial though as they are now, different ethnic and cultural groups will form their own cliques and 'ghettoes'. The phrase 'birds of a feather flock together' is as true as it ever was.

    A cornerstone of our policy re refugee and asylum seekers has to be to restrict and control the inflow, so as to facilitate integration and not allow groupings to form. John is right.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,775 ✭✭✭thomas 123


    Can you not see how it came about, it’s to do with a lack of a spine. One dominant person at a table and a cackle of yes men/women/They/thems runs the country. You are punished and chastised for not toeing the party line as was witnessed in Galway with what went on with the two FF councellers.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,377 ✭✭✭tom23


    I’d not pay to much attention to that TD.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    So in other words, the perceived persecution you speak of never actually existed and people were always free to speak their minds about it as demonstrated by the fact that people openly speak their minds about it right now in public, as you say yourself, and they all haven't been dragged off to the gulag.

    Has it crossed your mind that it is possibly a rational conclusion to make that refugees were not a topic for discussion in Ireland up to a year or two ago because it quite simply was not a major topic in Ireland generally as we had not really experienced taking in such a large number of refugees before? And that — I dunno, just maybe — the fact that we did has therefore led to discussion and debate on it during the time since?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,747 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Just ignore JCMCN, she'd say anything to portray herself as the poster-child for EU wokeness, and is increasingly out of touch with the Irish people who support legal Immigration but not mass-illegal immigration. It's woke politicians like her who are pushing ordinary people into voting for "far" right candidates in elections..



  • Registered Users Posts: 238 ✭✭Sunjava


    But one of the reasons for Brexit was the fact that the British were sick of immigration....the same feeling of being fed up is beginning to show itself in Ireland. Our pro EU/freedom of movement ethos is starting to crack similar to the way it well and truly cracked in Britain, whether for right or for wrong. The EU and it's freedom of movement is great...for Europeans but now we are seeing it abused and manipulated by those it was never meant to serve.



  • Registered Users Posts: 422 ✭✭john123470


    From memory, I thought the Irish statesmen and women (in video above) were elected to office on a mandate to serve the Irish electorate who voted them into power ?

    Health, housing, crime were to be robustly tackled. Those were the promises. Granted, Covid and the war in Ukraine interrupted play. We stepped up, did our bit despite having our own woeful housing shortages, to help out 100 000+ Ukranian (genuine) refugees

    The speed with which our government acted in magicking up housing, funds for Ukranian refugees would make you dizzy.

    What nobody expected (or voted for) was Roderic O Gorman to follow up on our good nature re the Ukranian folk with his Ellis island type declaration via his tweets to the world at large to ..

    "Bring me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door! ..." (To which i'll gift you your very own key and a few bob to keep you going while i sort out a passport for you). I dont remember voting for that !!

    Had they worked as hard on behalf of their own Irish people who voted them into power, we could have solved our very own housing crisis in rapid fire time. One can only conclude that the werlfare and health of the Irish public is the last thing on their minds.

    Something very, very rotten in the state of Ireland



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭Real Donald Trump




  • Registered Users Posts: 18,615 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    There's not a chance Ireland can opt out of EU freedom of movement rules without leaving the EU and Single Market.

    Also, going down this route would mean Irish people would no longer have any automatic right to live, work or study in the EU27 or the EEA.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,118 ✭✭✭StrawbsM


    @john123470 if my memory serves me correctly, Rodder’s multiple language tweets went out in Feb 2021 so before the Ukraine war.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,118 ✭✭✭StrawbsM


    It’s definitely possible that in the next 10-20 years, countries currently in the EU will be looking to revert back to being a trading bloc only. International & European treaties will be rewritten and European countries will take back control of their destinies.

    Definitely need major changes to what we currently have has us taking responsibility for citizens of 2-3 other continents too.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,148 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Why is it so hard for you to not be so dishonest with the language you use?

    Honestly it’s been brought up a hundred times on this thread, so bloody sick of it - the thread is about asylum seekers/refugees will you give up your pathetic attempts at muddying the waters to imply people are arguing for restrictions on all forms of immigration?

    Seriously, you’re fooling nobody, just give it up, the thread gets derailed by people having to pull you and others up on this disingenuous BS constantly. It’s so regular I genuinely think you must be trolling at this stage.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,184 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    And the sooner the better we move in this direction the better. It's definitely on the cards as becoming a factor across the EU. 10-20 years is far too long a timeframe though. As I pointed out in a now deleted post, we can conservatively estimate a seismic change in our population make up within 10 years, if we allow this trend to continue and escalate as it will.

    I say that as someone who has voted generally voted yes in past EU referendums. Before I'm accused of being anti-EU or something.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,615 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    There has been a lot of misinformation about those tweets (spread by Gript mainly, who keep rehashing the story). The tweets were in eight languages (two of which were English and Irish) and were aimed at people already living in Direct Provision in Ireland and concerned the decision to end the DP system.

    Gript are still pumping out this nonsense to their followers in mid 2024 that those obscure tweets from February 2022 are the reason asylum seekers are coming here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,822 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    How would leaving the EU or specifically the freedom of movement aspect prevent asylum seekers arriving on Irish shores?

    The UK left the EU yet they still have asylum seekers arriving.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,882 ✭✭✭Augme


    The same feeling isnt being felt here. There is no support for Irexit parties and there will still be no support for them after the local and upcoming European elections as well. As I said, Ireland and the UKs outlook on other cultures is vastly different.

    I'm perfectly entitled to respond to posts made in this thread. If someone posts soemting like this

    Why is it so hard for the pro immigration lobby to accept that Irish people do not want their culture / values diluted and replaced ?

    Then I'll respond to this in this thread. If the term "pro immigration lobby" is deemed an accurate to term to usein this thread then the term "anti immigration lobby" is equally as valid.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,148 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    I don’t think they are equally valid actually, I think it’s a false equivalence - the majority of people in the supposed “pro immigration lobby” are pro all forms of inward migration asylum seeker or no.
    However the majority of the “anti immigration lobby” as you term them are actually pro immigration (through the proper channels) but in favour of tightening restrictions around asylum seeker applications (the topic of the thread) etc. so to label them the “anti immigration lobby” as you do is more of a misrepresentation than the former. Those that are against immigration in all forms are very much a minority.

    All that being said I would prefer if people on all sides used the specific language in regards to this, to prevent any of the sophistry we’ve seen in relation to terminology on this subject.



  • Registered Users Posts: 238 ✭✭Sunjava


    Its beginning to look like that. Nothing stays the same forever. Immigration from the 3rd world will be the biggest issue from now on (climate change noted, but questionable whether that can be stopped, perhaps immigration the same). Immigration has been a trickle for decades, encouraged generally and any feelings of hesitation towards its categorised as racist, xenophobic etc. now the trickle is becoming a flood and there is a feeling of helplessness like a sleeping driver waking to see the headlights approaching. The beauty of the EU migration was that generally movement was as likely to be permanent as it was temporary with people moving home depending on stage of life... The movement now is the permanent kind, and the people more varied, more reliant on help and a economy less capable/willing to assist yet unable to remove them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,389 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    Tweets don't just go to followers of the person tweeting. Algorithms apply on Twitter therefore it is absolutely possible that the tweets in multiple languages offering own door accomodation would have been seen by those outside of Ireland who don't follow ROG and who have never heard of him



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,234 ✭✭✭Viscount Aggro


    If that is the case, the Harris child has lost all credibility.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,615 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I imagine if you did a search for those tweets now, you'd find they only had a small number of views and retweets. This is a red herring by Gript and various right wing Twitter accounts - we'd perhaps have a relatively similar number of asylum claims for the last two years even had those tweets never been sent out by O'Gorman. Certainly, the idea that asylum claims would be low now but for the tweets hardly stands up or seems credible.



  • Registered Users Posts: 739 ✭✭✭aziz


    isn’t there a case or two coming before the high court of asylum seekers suing the government for not supplying them with accommodation.

    So can we expect the occupants of tent town to start bringing their own cases



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 54,282 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    It feels like we're playing whack a mole where you move one and 5 more take it's place. It feels like it's never going to end.

    This government has so much to answer for, they're policies have caused this.



Advertisement