P Diddy the next Epstein/R Kelly?

I can’t tell if you’re using my post as a springboard for your own thoughts on parenthood, or whether it’s something else entirely which I’m certain those people whom you consider fall below your standards will take no heed of 😳

It does remind me though of the period in the 80s when children emulated their role models in popular culture such as Rambo, Superman, etc and role models making something of a resurgence in modern popular culture - Barbie! The only caps I ever popped were the toy guns and rifles bought for us by our parents, relatives and neighbours as presents. How any of us didn’t regularly end up in hospital with injuries had a lot to do with our parents dismissing injuries as “only a scratch, g’wan!” 🤨

Maybe Joe and Diddy go sniffing children together

What's wrong with white rappers and lady rappers? You need to make sure you're connected bro.

A lawyer youtuber summary

The video which has emerged today is a hard watch.
He paid the Hotel 50k to delete the footage but someone kept a copy.
should be in jail.

He has now responded to the video leak.

https://news.sky.com/story/p-diddy-rapper-sean-combs-says-video-of-him-assaulting-singer-cassie-is-inexcusable-13139380

As much as it pains me to say it, with Chris Brown being welcomed back into the fold with open arms after the Rhianna incident, I think Diddy can still come back from this.

never liked the guy.. always just felt there was something monumentally off about him….. proven now, 100% IS….

Let’s be honest, if someone like Paul McCartney wrote songs containing some of the misogynistic, abusive, sexist shîte that passes for ok in Diddys world.. ohhh…Because #gangstarap…. He’d be cancelled in 5 minutes , same Metallica, Coldplay, U2 or anyone not of that genre… where it’s just accepted… 😵 constantly bigging up violence, sexism, criminality…. And not to be questioned, in fact protected, so is anyone surprised ?

An absolute fûcking ghoul, always was, just now, proof…

You seem more put out that he got caught and didn't successfully cover his tracks than the fact that he was battering his girlfriend.

You are posting in a thread about a vicious assault on a woman. If you "do not care" about people, if you "do not care" about victims and perpetrators of such an assault why are you even posting here? Something about the incident is drawing you to comment on it, why this incident and not others?

Expressing moral comments would not be 'emotive' language. Even if one does not feel emotional connection, one can reason an reasonable intellectual logical argument as to why laws against such actions are in place, and that such conduct is wrong, and can be called out as such.

Do you think it is ok to beat a woman like that? Do you think it is correct that such perpetrators are judged to have committed wrongdoing by society and accept the reasonable basis for such laws and judgments?

And if you are free to express 'amoral' perspective, then likewise others are free to point out the amoral basis of those questions \ perspectives. Or you could add your own such context.

If you don't care about the perpetrator and you don't care about the victim… as you declared above - why would the scandal cause you to care enough to post? Your claims are contradictory and are not convincing.

The amoral tone in your posts comes across as condoning such actions as this vicious assault, that the only thing he did wrong was getting caught.

Such a view is reinforced by refusing to give straight answers to a simple question like:

"Do you think it is ok to beat a woman like that?"

Criminal acts can also be subject to moral judgment. The moral reinforces the legal. Both are important. We see this for offences \ misdemeanours that are deemed illegal but perhaps not immoral. In the past such conduct towards women may have been nominally illegal, but not subject to social \ moral condemnation - and appear to have been more common \ tolerated. It is important to reinforce that this is an act both illegal and morally reprehensible.

Would you express a moral judgment if it was reprehensible conduct that was not illegal? Or would you fall back to another excuse or expression of disinterest?

There are no demands in my posts and the reason why you were quite reasonably asked to explain your interest in the thread is when you replied to my post with a statement like this where you declare such disinterest:

"I do not care about people, and that includes most victims of any sort, as well as perpetrators."

After such a statement, it is entirely reasonable to ask then why you are interested in the topic at all.

But we'll leave you at being "entertained" and "intrigued" by how a network of sex and drug traffickers operate - rather than, as might be expected, concerned and hopeful that law enforcement can shut down such operations.

The apology was pathetic.
Only sorry he was caught.
No defence for this saddo.

Don’t think this is the end either, only the beginning.

As for the victim blaming here…pathetic

How has he not be arrested with all the allegations yet? I know there only allegations but the FBI raided his houses surely the found something to arrest and hold him.. R kelly 2.0

https://www.forbes.com/sites/maryroeloffs/2024/05/22/netflix-buys-sean-diddy-combs-documentary-after-bidding-war/

A docuseries about the allegations of sexual abuse, rape and sex trafficking against rapper Sean “Diddy” Combs has landed at Netflix months after its producer, Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson, started teasing the project and posters for a fake documentary started making the rounds on social media