Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

Options
1118211831185118711881190

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭concerned_tenant


    I didn't dodge the question.

    When I asked about which Trump policies were fascist, I was told by most posters that Trump had no policies. It's an unusual form of argument to say that Trump is a fascist without policies — because if he doesn't have policies then he necessarily doesn't have fascist policies. When pressed, the response came that Trump's actual intention to become a fascist is for financial reasons. Not genocide or militarism, but to help out with money.

    You yourself have asked me about Trump's policies. Here's a reasonable overview of what he plans to achieve.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,442 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    You seems to think that unless people do exactly what Hitler did then they aren't fascists.

    Here's the dictionary definition of Fascism

    Lets look at Trump and what Trump would enable ,shall we ?

    • Exhalts Nation and race above the Individual ? - Check
    • Autocratic Government ? - Check
    • Headed by a dictatorial leader? - Check
    • Economic and Social Regimentation ? - Social regimentation , Absolutely .Economic - Kind of in that they will prioritise Profit over everything else
    • Forcible Suppression of Opposition ? - Check
    • A tendency toward Strong Autocratic/Dictatorial control ? - Check

    So , Trump and the modern GOP he facilitates solidly tick pretty much every box for Fascism in the dictionary definition of the term.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,262 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    You're given the wiki link to project 2025 which contained many facist policies. You're refusal to accept black and white evidence is just trolling (and juvenile) at this stage



  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭concerned_tenant


    No, you're exaggerating the terms of the definition to squeeze Trump into it. It's a populist attempt at playing to the gallery.

    I suggest we listen to what you claimed less than 1-hour ago:



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,953 ✭✭✭Christy42


    "Trump has increasingly used dehumanizing and violent rhetoric against his political enemies."

    "Trump has called to bring independent agencies such as the Federal Communications Commission and Federal Trade Commission under direct presidential control."

    "Trump promised to order the Justice Department to investigate political rivals and Joe Biden, and fire Attorney Generals who disobeyed him.[98] Trump has called for stripping employment protections for thousands of career civil service employees and replacing them with political loyalists if deemed an 'obstacle to his agenda' within federal agencies"

    Imprisoning political rivals, purging anyone who disagrees with him from power. Increasing personal power on the president like a dictator. Inviting violence against minorities.

    3 fascist policies taken directly from your own link (it also links project 2025 which was linked here as well which has more).

    Also I am not sure why his motivations are that relevant. Fascism for personal gain is still fascism.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,580 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Does it matter whether he is a defined fascist, or that he allows fascists to be open and have their policies enacted?

    You seem particularly focused on whether Trump meets the exact definition of a fascist.

    Let's take your view that he isn't. Does that change how we should see him? Should we ignore his calls to be a dictator? Should we ignore his refusal to accept the democratic will of the people? Should we ignore the multiple alleged crimes? SHould we ignore the sexual assault, and the contempt of court? What about the lying, the cheating, the attempt to steal classified documents? What about his attempt to bring in a Muslim ban? How do you classify someone who targets individuals based on their religion?



  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭concerned_tenant


    I think perspective and context are worth having, yes.

    By all means criticize Trump's individual policies and rhetoric. I don't agree with all of them, either.

    But there comes a point when reasonable critique of policies metastasizes into hyperbole and distortion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,378 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users Posts: 15,580 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    OK. So your point is that it is incorrect for anyone to claim he is a fascist and that doing so brings the debate down?

    A definition of fascist was provided and the reasoning behind claiming Trump to be one was given. An explanation that you simply ignored.

    That you don't see him as a fascist is perfectly fine, but then you seem to be overly concerned about how he is exactly defined rather than looking at his words and actions.

    He has long stated how much he admires leaders such as Putin, Xi and others. Doesn't that give you cause for concern over exactly what he wants to do? Doesn't his attempt to steal the election for the democratically elected Biden not give you cause for concern?

    He has also just taken a case to the supreme court on the basis that a POTUS should be immune from any and all criminal liability, essentially being above the law. Isn't that a concern?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,169 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Did you actually read the link you supplied ??

    Trump has campaigned on vastly expanding the authority of the executive branch over the federal government.[7] This would be accomplished through the reimposition of the Jacksonian spoils system,[8][9] invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807 to deploy the military onto American streets,[10][11] and directing the Department of Justice to go after domestic political enemies.[11] Other campaign issues include: implementing anti-immigrant policies and a massive deportation operation;[12] pursuing an isolationist "America First" foreign policy agenda;[13][14] repealing the Affordable Care Act;[15][16] pursuing a climate change denial and anti-clean energy platform;[17][18][19] terminating the Department of Education;[18] implementing anti-LGBT policies;[20][18] and pursuing what has been described as a neomercantilist trade agenda.[21][22]

    Trump has been leaning into violent and authoritarian rhetoric throughout the campaign.[23][24][25][26] Trump has increasingly used dehumanizing and violent rhetoric against his political enemies.[23][27][28] His 2024 campaign has been noted for leaning into nativist[29] and anti-LGBT rhetoric.[30] The Trump campaign has been noted for its close connections to Project 2025,[31][11][26] which has been heavily criticized and described as an attempt for Trump to become a dictator and a path leading the United States towards autocracy, with several experts in law criticizing it for violating current constitutional laws that would undermine the rule of law and the separation of powers.[32][33]



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,262 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    You don't understand the game, only @concerned_tenant gets to decide what's fascist or not, despite what 3rd party universal definitions are sent to them



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,442 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    I think it's probably reasonable to say that Trump doesn't hold to any particular ideology but he has identified a methodology that facilitates his goals - Which is to accumulate as much power and money as he possibly can.

    That methodology happens to align pretty well with standard issue Autocratic dictatorship which in itself is given to Fascist behaviours as has been previously explained.

    In order to achieve his goals he needs like minded people around him and he needs to enable their goals - They largely do adhere to the ideology of Christian Nationalism which is fascism by any other name but critically their ideology allows Trump to get what he wants , and what Trump wants is all that matters to him. The "how" is irrelevant as is the impact on anyone or anything else as long as he gets his.

    Trump isn't interested in "Making America Great Again" or establishing some long lasting legacy - He couldn't care less what happens after him. He just wants his cake NOW.

    But to get his cake he is willing to allow the rest of them to burn the place to the ground pursuing their Christian Nationalist Uptopia.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,521 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Here's some perspective, you think it's a good Idea to give power to the guy who tried to overthrow a democratic election. He's also tried to extort a foreign leader to get dirt on his enemies. In a normal democracy, he'd be facing prison time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭concerned_tenant


    Yes, though I would be very cautious in taking any strong interpretations based on how the article is written.

    Just to take one statement:

    invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807 to deploy the military onto American streets.

    This sounds very dramatic but when you look into the actual sources, it reads:

    Campaigning in Iowa this year, Donald Trump said he was prevented during his presidency from using the military to quell violence in primarily Democratic cities and states.

    Calling New York City and Chicago “crime dens,” the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination told his audience, “The next time, I’m not waiting. One of the things I did was let them run it and we’re going to show how bad a job they do,” he said. “Well, we did that. We don’t have to wait any longer.”

    This sounds very reasonable to me.

    The rioting in many Democrat cities has been outrageous. Anything that exists to ensure the military can quickly put an end to this violence is definitely worth having.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,682 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Honestly, I don't think you know what a fascist is, whatever about not engaging with the evidence you've already received.

    Here's Umberto Echo's 14 common features of fascism

    The cult of tradition. “One has only to look at the syllabus of every fascist movement to find the major traditionalist thinkers. The Nazi gnosis was nourished by traditionalist, syncretistic, occult elements.”

    Aiming for the Christian conservative vote. Removing a women's right to choose.

    The rejection of modernism. “The Enlightenment, the Age of Reason, is seen as the beginning of modern depravity. In this sense Ur-Fascism can be defined as irrationalism.”

    "Inject bleach to cure COVID". Dismantle the pandemic preparation unit.

    The cult of action for action’s sake. “Action being beautiful in itself, it must be taken before, or without, any previous reflection. Thinking is a form of emasculation.”

    It's how he speaks, isn't it? "I like him cos he speaks his mind" is what we hear a lot from his supporters (even when he reverses course mere hours later.

    Disagreement is treason. “The critical spirit makes distinctions, and to distinguish is a sign of modernism. In modern culture the scientific community praises disagreement as a way to improve knowledge.”

    Remember this?

    Trump Says Haley Donors Will Be ‘Barred From the MAGA Camp’

    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/25/us/politics/trump-haley-donors-maga-blacklist.html

    Fear of difference. “The first appeal of a fascist or prematurely fascist movement is an appeal against the intruders. Thus Ur-Fascism is racist by definition.”

    Uh huh. "They send us their rapists, drug dealers etc"

    Appeal to social frustration. “One of the most typical features of the historical fascism was the appeal to a frustrated middle class, a class suffering from an economic crisis or feelings of political humiliation, and frightened by the pressure of lower social groups.”

    Make America Great AGAIN. Was America ever great for those on the lower rungs? With darker skin? The use of the word AGAIN states that it is as good for some people. They want those people.

    The obsession with a plot. “Thus at the root of the Ur-Fascist psychology there is the obsession with a plot, possibly an international one. The followers must feel besieged.”

    Uh huh. The victim complex of all these court cases being a democrat plot. It's worth remembering that Trump has been named in over 4,000 court cases in his life. And that is not because that's how business works. There are many other property magnates that haven't been involved in that money.

    The enemy is both strong and weak. “By a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.”

    Biden is an old fool with dementia who can barely stand, but also behind everything that's affecting Trump, from court cases, to weaponising the FBI and the judicial system.

    Pacifism is trafficking with the enemy. “For Ur-Fascism there is no struggle for life but, rather, life is lived for struggle.”

    Uh huh. We have just seen one trump acolyte try to remove the speaker of the house for daring to cooperate with the Dems

    Contempt for the weak. “Elitism is a typical aspect of any reactionary ideology.”

    Trump disparaged U.S. military casualties as ‘losers,’ ‘suckers,’ report says

    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-disparaged-u-s-military-casualties-as-losers-suckers-report-says

    Everybody is educated to become a hero. “In Ur-Fascist ideology, heroism is the norm. This cult of heroism is strictly linked with the cult of death.”

    Lol. He couldn't have hit this more on the nose if he tried.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Garden_of_American_Heroes

    Machismo and weaponry. “Machismo implies both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality.”

    So, not just his stupid "military parade". I think we can throw in his "grab em by the pussy, 'locker room talk'" And now he's talking about controlling contraceptives.

    Selective populism. “There is in our future a TV or Internet populism, in which the emotional response of a selected group of citizens can be presented and accepted as the Voice of the People.”

    Remember how republicans used to be about, "facts don't care about your feelings"? But now when presented with evidence they don't like, they seem to veer towards, "I know what it says, I just don't/can't believe it".

    Ur-Fascism speaks Newspeak. “All the Nazi or Fascist schoolbooks made use of an impoverished vocabulary, and an elementary syntax, in order to limit the instruments for complex and critical reasoning

    I mean if you or any other Trump supporter does read this, I'm sure your first thought will be something along the lines of, "fake news".

    Post edited by Flaneur OBrien on


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,442 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Yet when he had the ability to do so , he refused to "call in the military" to quell the riots on January 6th because he agreed with their actions.

    What he wants is the ability to use the army to suppress things he doesn't like not for "the greater good" etc.

    Everything in "Project 2025" is about the consolidation of power under the Executive (aka Dictatorship).

    Framing it around specific incidents deliberately obscures the underlying goal.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,442 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    According to former Secretary of Defence Mark Esper, he wanted BLM activists to be shot in the legs.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭concerned_tenant


    Putin is more of a fascist than Trump will ever be, but Putin is at most always referred to as an autocrat.

    Trump, not a patch on Putin, gets called the fascist.

    It's an absurdity.

    And whilst I don't agree with everything Trump says or does, this inconsistency is worth calling out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭concerned_tenant


    It's the same problem as before.

    People take definitions of fascism and then cherry-pick comments from Trump that in some wishy-washy, pseudo-meaningful, distorted way, are supposed to meet the terms of the definition. It's dishonest, and knowingly so.

    Some other critics of Trump on this thread have already conceded that Trump isn't a fascist.

    And as I said above, when Putin and Xi get referred to as autocrats, but Trump is the fascist on the world stage, you know that all reasonable perspective is lost.

    You don't even have to like Trump to agree with this conclusion. It's obvious to everyone outside the Trump-hating bubble.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,432 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    You have dodged the question.

    I asked you to state some of Trumps policies, you won't do it.

    I'm not asking you to defend them, just to name them and you can't even do that.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,515 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    You claimed it "used to be" a country people wanted to emigrate to. People continue to flock, in droves, to the US. Both legally and illegally. Claiming it is not somewhere people are still attracted to is just bizarre wishcasting.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,378 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Cracking down on protests with military force eh. Thanks for completely discrediting yourself.

    Pigeon Chess. /ignore

    https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/posse-comitatus-act-explained



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,378 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Trump deleted the "Reich" promotional video



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,375 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    “He didn't say that.

    And if he did, he didn’t mean it.

    And if he did mean it, you didn’t understand.

    And if you did, it’s not a big deal.

    And if it is, others have said worse.”



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,270 ✭✭✭LambshankRedemption




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,442 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    So, the same tactics the Trumpsters have been wheeling out since 2015?

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,682 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Hang on, I've just given you 14 instances of Trump and his ilk exhibiting ACTUAL fascist behaviour, and all you can say is,

    "People take definitions of fascism and then cherry-pick comments from Trump that in some wishy-washy, pseudo-meaningful, distorted way, are supposed to meet the terms of the definition. It's dishonest, and knowingly so."

    I'm sorry, but that just does not fly. I'm not "Cherry picking comments from Trump" I am showing you (and any other lurker supporters) examples of his fascistic behaviour.

    Why don't you give everybody here your definition of what a fascist is? A link to an article is fine. But I do not believe that you actually know what a fascist is, given what I have read so far.



  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭concerned_tenant


    14 instances strewn together to come to a misleading conclusion.

    Here is an informed piece on the matter that explains why Trump isn't a fascist.

    The majority of genuine specialists, including the historians Roger Griffin, Matthew Feldman, Stanley Payne and Ruth Ben-Ghiat, agree that whatever else he is, Trump is not a fascist.

    It's a detailed analysis of the reasons why comparing Trump with fascist leaders of the past is, at best, misguided.

    The term is thrown around on social media and online fora to applause, but it's not taken that way in serious, academic circles who understand perfectly well what fascism is and what it means.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,375 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    I missed them and glad I did.

    I honestly would like some rational debate on the pros and cons of Trump/trumpism and time after time all I ever see is posters being delusional or disingenuous.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,375 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Absolutely smacks of his defenders arguing that technically, Trump is not a "rapist".....



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement