Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1773774776778779804

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 373 ✭✭Gary_dunne


    This is one of the major issues, the older generation very rarely downsize or adpat their living situation to suit their needs. We often see 3/4 bed homes with one elderly resident who would rather install a chair lift rather than sell the family home and downsize to a much more manageable property to suit their needs. There is an abundance of these properties throughout the country and will continue to occur with people leading longer lives.



  • Registered Users Posts: 189 ✭✭Hontou


    I have just prepared my large family home for sale as I'm downsizing. This involved skips, diy, weeding galore, one new door and never ending scrubbing and cleaning. And lots of expenses! I'm doing it now in my 50's as I know I won't be able for it at retirement age. I also think it is wasteful to be knocking about a big house with big bills when a large family should be living in it. The reason people don't downsize is they don't have it in them to do the work involved when they are older. I realise many also don't do it for nostalgia reasons. I think a motivation could be some kind of 'help to downsize' service as it is truly daunting.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,982 ✭✭✭hometruths


    @AdamD Eventually found the post I was referring to, and it was more made to illustrate point about being blinded by the narrative about what is for sale right now. You'll hear multiple times on here and in the media that the lack of current supply available for rent or buy is evidence of an overall deficit in the housing stock, but that's not necessarily true. And certainly the data would indicate otherwise.

    Though it will equally illustrate the point I was making that you need a higher turnover in the second hand market in order to keep everybody moving around when they want to, ensuring an efficient allocation of stock.

    Consider a hyper local micro property market consisting of just 4 properties, with no demand for people to leave the area, and no demand for new people to enter the area.

    Apartment A - rented by Jill, single young professional

    Apartment B - owned by Jack, single young professional

    Semi-D house - owned by Paddy and Mary, couple with two small kids

    Detached house - owned by Dinny and Denise, couple living with 20 year old daughter

    They're all happy, nobody wants to move, they're all housed according to their needs. As everybody views the market as to what is happening right now, as far as they're concerned - all is well. The narrative is that there are no problems.

    Fast forward three years.

    Jack and Jill are now a couple, looking to buy a house to move in together and start a family, but they cannot buy because there is nothing on the market. As far as they're concerned, the market is in chronic undersupply.

    Paddy and Mary's kids are bigger and they want to upsize but they can't because there is nothing on the market. As far as they're concerned, the market is in chronic undersupply.

    Dinny and Denise want to downsize to an apartment and their daughter wants to move out and start renting. But they cannot buy because there is nothing on the market, and their daughter cannot rent because there is nothing on the market. So they're stuck too, as far as they're concerned the market is in chronic undersupply.

    So now the narrative about the current market has moved in short order from no problem to chronic undersupply. Even though there are the same amount of people requiring to be housed and the same amount of properties in housing stock - I.e there has been no increase in demand or decrease in supply to the equation that has caused this chronic undersupply.

    The housing stock is perfectly adequate to house everybody according to their needs. Jack and Jill would be very happy to buy Paddy and Mary's house. Paddy and Mary would be very happy to buy Dinny and Denise's house. Dinny and Denise would be very happy to buy Jack's apartment. And their daughter would be very happy to rent Jill's apartment.

    The solution is obvious but nobody can see it because they're blinded by narrative that has been caused by what's available on the market right now - nothing.

    So everybody is screaming chronic undersupply, we need to build more houses, increase supply to accommodate demand, it's absurd to deny it, otherwise how do you explain why there is nothing on the market available to buy or rent.

    Politicians stimulate a developer to build two new houses and two new apartments to balance out the disparity in apparent supply demand.

    Fast forward a few years.

    Everybody put their house on the market so they could move into the new development. But as soon as they did so they discovered a problem.

    There is now an oversupply of two apartments and two houses.

    These are empty, languishing on the market but you cannot give them away because the market has moved into extreme oversupply, prices have crashed. There is now more than enough supply to house everybody according to their needs, but now they're not so happy, they're in negative equity, screaming that it's not fair, where's my bailout, how did nobody see this coming?

    If politicians and the developer had listened to the data rather than narrative they would have seen there was no demand for the new builds no matter how strong the narrative seemed to be.

    This is obviously a very simplistic example. But it illustrates the dangers of basing the entire narrative of the long term demand for housing stock on what is available to buy or rent on the property market right now today.

    But there is an element of this happening on a huge scale in the Irish market. The data is being ignored in favour of the narrative.



  • Registered Users Posts: 983 ✭✭✭Greyian


    The issue with this is that it has specifically been designed to work, which doesn't match the real world.

    What if instead, Paddy and Mary have one small child, while Dinny and Denise have a 22 year old son and a 20 year old daughter?

    Dinny and Denise sell their detached house. It is bought by Paddy and Mary. Paddy and Mary's house is bought by Jack and Jill. The 2 apartments are bought by Dinny and Denise (Apartment A) and the 22 year old son (Apartment B). Where does the 20 year old daughter live? It looks like we need a 5th property...

    You've also completely omitted that families are getting smaller (so more properties needed to house the same number of people) and that more people are staying single (so it's more likely Jack and Jill remain single and therefore stay living in their separate apartments)



  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,982 ✭✭✭hometruths


    It's been specifically designed as a simplistic example to illustrate a specific point - how the narrative can be misleading.

    And you've rather neatly illustrated my other point about projections based on assumptions, by disregarding a known number of people with a known number of properties and saying, "Hang on, what if we make some assumptions about a different scenario rather than the scenario at hand. Hey presto we need to build more."

    There's no doubt you can make assumptions to fit an argument for whatever figure you want to justify.

    Post edited by hometruths on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,219 ✭✭✭combat14


    serious trouble in retail property market continue as massive write off for shopping centre values persist

    the square for example has seen its value fall from 650m to 250m to 170m to 125m

    blanchardstown has also seen its value plummet

    who knows what way residential prices will go once migration controls are put in place and real building kicks off

    The Square shopping centre goes into receivership, in sign of property market strain

    https://m.independent.ie/business/commercial-property/the-square-shopping-centre-goes-into-receivership-in-sign-of-property-market-strain/a908000918.html



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,568 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    What's currently happening in the second hand market is more akin to a game of musical chairs in which the music has stopped, and everyone's stuck in their chair.

    Indeed, or they find they have no chair.

    Too many people chasing too few chairs, so if you have one, hold onto it!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,777 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    Once real building kicks off? And migration control?

    When are these going to kick in?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,777 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    Are you still spinning this stupid scenario

    After being shown to be incorrect about 50 times



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,184 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    I would counter that most people don't NEED to downsize.

    Why would you bother? The mortgage is paid, and let's be honest, if you could afford to live in the house for the past 40 odd years with kids and a mortgage, you can likely afford it when both are gone.

    It's your house, full of memories, and likely in decent shape thanks to your hard graft over the decades. Why would you bother moving away from your locality and your friends and familiarity? Why bother putting a house up for sale, and the months of dealing with estate agents, banks, valuers and worst of all, finding and buying a new place, when you could just not do it at all. If you've been in any place for any length of time, services have likely developed around you, so it's probably more convenient than a new build in the middle of an estate.

    And as for stairs, get a stairlift.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 373 ✭✭Gary_dunne


    What we mean when we are talking about people downsizing is to counteract the point that people are making that there is sufficient available housing to meet the population needs.

    In the example I gave there could be a 4 bed houses that only has one elderly person living in it when there's space for a family of 4. That family of 4 are living in a 2 bed apartment. There is no shortage there in this scenario as everyone has sufficient living space but when the kids are 16 and 17 and don't have their own rooms or the family have a third child it's an issue as the family have outgrown the apartment but have no where to move so now there is a shortage.

    In a utopia the elderly person could downsize in the same area to a property that suits their changing needs perfectly ie single floor living and the family of 4/5 can move into the available four bed house.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,184 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    My point is the idea of "downsizing" is irrelevant unless there is a real cultural desire among the elderly to do it.

    In the real world the elderly person likely wants to keep their house so they have spare rooms when the kids and grandkids visit.

    Anecdotally, my own grandparents live in a 4 bed house and 3 rooms are unoccupied 95% of the time. They've never once expressed any interest in downsizing. Thinking of my friends, all their grandparents either remain in the family home, or remained there until they passed away, or became unable to care for themselves.



  • Registered Users Posts: 373 ✭✭Gary_dunne


    That's why I said a Utopia, I know that it more than likely won't happen, it doesn't mean that is shouldn't be seen as part of the solution. It's a ingrained thing in our Irish culture, you never sell the family home which is not a view shared throughout many other European countries.

    To most it doesn't occur to them until unfortunately something happens that affects their health or mobility and a single storey dwelling suits their new circumstances far better. My own grandad lost his leg and instead of downsizing to a more suitable property the family built a massive extension to have a bathroom and bedroom downstairs leaving 3 double rooms upstairs vacant 99% of the year. Logically this is nonsensical. A 2 bed apartment would have suited him far better and the house that didn't need to be fully renovated could have been purchased by a family of 4 but again "you don't sell the family home".



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,080 ✭✭✭JohnnyChimpo


    Was chatting about this with my own mum who's in her late 70s. I asked her if she'd be happy to downsize to a hypothetical well-built 2br apartment in a block that was in the same estate (where she's lived for 40 years) - she said absolutely, no hesitation. I think a lot of the resistance to downsizing is just liking the comfort and routine of your own neighbourhood that you've invested decades into. It's a shocker that we don't have these kind of mixed uses in residential estates, such a no-brainer.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,747 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Writing was on the wall when there was that 26% write-down of property values on Grafton Street back in 2021. Insistance of an 18-month lockdown coming home to roost.



  • Registered Users Posts: 983 ✭✭✭Greyian


    The issue with simple scenarios is that they rarely work in complex realities. Nothing about the real world and balancing the needs of millions of people is simple.

    Property is Ireland is used inefficiently, that is without doubt, but even if it was utilised in the optimal manner, we would still have supply shortages.
    Any expectation of property use being perfectly optimal isn't realistic either. We can and should aim to improve it, but there will never be perfection.

    Less than 100 metres from my house, there is a 5-bed house with 6 young professional men living in it. They've converted one of the two living rooms into an extra bedroom.
    There's no efficient reallocation of existing supply that sees those 6 young men getting to have their own places, unless there's a family with 4 young kids with each of the six (2 parents, 4 children) living in their own 1-bed apartments (which hardly seems a likely scenario).

    With family sizes getting smaller, the natural outcome is that each property will house a lower number of people. Naturally it follows that this means that housing the same number of people requires extra properties (and housing more people requires an even greater increase in total supply of properties).

    In previous posts, you've said "So they're to calculate the housing deficit in April 2022, a point in time when they had an accurate figure of a) population, b) habitable housing stock and c) average household size."
    The issue with this is if you were to look at population, housing stock and average household size, supply would always appear to be perfectly delivered, because average household size is determined by the population and the housing stock.
    The problem is that to identify the number of properties required, you need to divide the population by the number of "family units" (where a family unit is a person or group of persons who want to live in their own household).
    Our average household size is higher than it would be if there was adequate supply, as there are a huge number of younger person continuing to live with their parents or in overcrowded rental accommodation specifically because there is not enough supply for them to be able to leave their existing household and start their own.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,184 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    I dunno, the supposed "utopia" where family sizes are matched to houses with the correct number of bedrooms is very non-sensical to me.

    It's based on there being swathes of empty, unused bedrooms across the country, and people eager to match the number of people in a house with the number of bedrooms it offers, which is just not true. I'm sure many spare bedrooms are home offices, hobby rooms, gyms, yoga studios, dens, second living rooms etc.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,982 ✭✭✭hometruths


    The issue with this is if you were to look at population, housing stock and average household size, supply would always appear to be perfectly delivered, because average household size is determined by the population and the housing stock

    Average household size is actually determined by the occupied housing stock not the total housing stock. That's a fairly critical difference when estimating any deficit or surplus, but unfortunately we're not allowed to discuss that distinction here, so we'll have to leave that particular argument there.

    Our average household size is higher than it would be if there was adequate supply

    This as another bit of the narrative that is widely believed but doesn't really stand up to scrutiny.

    We're the led to believe that the high average household size - 2.75 - compared to our European neighbours is evidence that we don't have enough houses.

    You can only start to make an argument that we have a shortage of stock if you assume that our preferred household size is about 2.4.

    So obviously you just need to blame supply for the fact that our household size is 2.75 and not 2.4, if only we had enough houses it would be 2.4. And hey presto, we have a deficit of 250,000 houses.

    The ESRI took a close look at why we are an outlier last year and found:

    Using cross country data from the EU-SILC survey, the research presents a range of stylised facts regarding how Ireland differs from other countries and attempts to explore what might explain the variation. We find that Ireland has a high average household size on a cross-country basis. However, this appears to be strongly influenced by demographics, with high fertility rate, younger population and thus high share of households with children important factors in explaining the cross country trends. Indeed, a majority of the differences between Ireland and other countries disappear in a regression setting when socio-demographic and basic economic factors are controlled for.

    So basically they found that our household size is higher because we have younger population who have more children.

    They also considered the potential impact of increased housing supply and found it would be fairly negligible relative to demographics:

    As housing supply rises (as proxied by a higher housing stock per capita) by one per cent, the growth in household size declines by 0.083 per cent.

    https://www.esri.ie/publications/household-size-in-ireland-stylised-facts-and-cross-country-trends



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,193 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I suspect most Irish people would not have too far to look outside their own circles to identify older relatives living in homes far beyond their needs - ‘in case the grandkids come to stay’…while the grandkids are rammed into a much smaller house with mum and dad day in, day out

    In fact I’d say it’s more unusual for an older person to NOT be living in a house beyond their needs.

    Ireland is a global outlier on this. There is definitely a cultural aspect and also housing stock composition issues which would be difficult to tackle, but there is also economic reasons

    1. Gains in the value of family home are exempt from CGT, giving it tax advantages over any other investment
    2. Investment literacy is poor in Ireland so older people releasing capital by downsizing would on average put it to poor use
    3. Property taxes are exceptionally low by global standards so there is no ‘stick’ to downsize
    4. There are weird inheritance tax rules which allow passing down of very valuable property tax free under certain conditions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 697 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Lyons has also made good points that much of the housing built in the Tiger was in the wrong places.

    I think that accounts for some of his aggressiveness in the targets.

    I’d note he hasn’t really brought that up (and that report might not be the best place for it), but I’d also say that WFH culture has given at least a short term reprieve from that (whilst simultaneously driving prices up outside of Dublin).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 697 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Well that was a point I raised earlier.

    We have supposedly more empty nesters than the rest of Europe but also a housing size that is too high.

    The logical conclusion to that is that you don’t need to just look at the number of units per 1,000. We have to consider the size of the houses we have and there is low hanging fruit in terms of releasing some of this under occupied housing.

    The answer here is the same, build more studios, 1 beds and 2 beds.

    But if our housing size is really going to go towards 2 by 2050, we need a sea change in culture. That includes a tolerance for Swedish and Finnish sized studios. I personally think that there needs to be a push from policy makers on this. Most people from the country have no issue with moving out at 18 for college and also getting a driving licence at 17. It’s a necessity. There’s a bit of a culture thing in Dublin against that. I think if you started seeing €400-€500 per month studios that you might see an attitude change.



  • Registered Users Posts: 697 ✭✭✭spillit67


    I went to view one of those a few weeks ago. They are beautiful and a lovely part of Greystones, the right side of town for me and close enough (a lot of the developments out there are too far from town for my tastes).

    That’s a massive house to be frank. Bit odd that they are using the 3 bed duplex photos there for that house though.

    That said, I struggle with Greystones given the connections. You are really out there once you get out there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,193 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Noise from the dart line is the only drawback and suspect you would soon get over that.

    I think it looks relatively good value vs some similarly priced houses in the area such as the Archers Wood equivalent or similar sized but older houses in Woodlands. A great builder also so you know quality will be there. Would definitely be considering it if we hadn’t bought already.



  • Registered Users Posts: 697 ✭✭✭spillit67


    I think it will ultimately hold its value. I agree on the location here vs. other ones in the locality.

    If you are someone from Dublin though, you aren’t moving here to be in touching distance. You are just really committed to Greystones (until the day that they really improve DART services), which is fine. Lovely part of the world and a great place to raise a family.

    Everyone has different preferences though so I don’t like to criticise. I see so much of that from older folks on social media running down new developments (and the prices!). The vast majority of new builds are a significant step up in quality on what was built even 15 years ago. The amount of older folk going on like they’re old squires of the land when they bought a cookie cutter semi D in 1992.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,904 ✭✭✭amacca


    Agreed...who the **** would want to rent with overholding being such a risk

    You cant shift problem tenants for way way too long or have a realistic mechanism to deter the wrong kind of tenant thrashing a property or pursue for damages

    And of course they did away with bedsits without any alternatives.…a big part of the problem is successive policy/ideology failures



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,193 ✭✭✭DataDude


    We took the plunge a few years ago and moved out (with a fair bit of trepidation) having spent most of our adult life in SCD. Couldn’t pay me to move back in to Dublin now. Probably too far out for a 5 day per week office commute to town though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,321 ✭✭✭arctictree


    Maybe it's just me but I'm still amazed by the price. I mean even half that is one heck of a wedge of money. During the last recession it was these highly priced properties that lost the largest percentage. Its a huge risk.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,613 ✭✭✭Villa05




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,512 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    A UK subsidiary/branch of an Irish company gets a large contract (happens regularly enough) so what impact does that have on Irish housing market? It’s got its workforce in the UK already and as the UK have similar housing shortages to Ireland and trades people in high demand.

    unless they have personal reasons to move to Ireland there is no incentive as they have plenty of work in UK.

    Do you think Ireland is the only country that has a housing shortage and a shortage of trades people? It’s the same story in nearly all western countries at present.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,613 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Revealing Interview with Michael O Flynn on the Housing Commission report



Advertisement