Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Russia-Ukraine War

11011131516125

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,875 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    RuZZian stooge Mick Wallace's campaign material arrived today. Slogan is "Good Trouble." He's not worth the sweat off the testicles of the man he's stealing the quote from. Shameless cnut.

    Hopefully his constituents are smart enough to not vote for that maggot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭rogber


    When will governments in the West ever f***in realise: telling Ukraine not to cross certain lines that would provoke Russia does not earn respect and goodwill from Russia, but only contempt. Every single day Russia pushes boundaries, not just in Ukraine but in all of Europe, with sabotage, spying, election meddling, physical violence, etc etc, and it will keep doing so as long as the only response from Europe is impotent expressions of "outrage" rather than hitting back in the same form.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    In all the hoopla today about what type of war this it, some major news that Belgium will send 30 F16s over next few years and billions in aid (unlike us in Ireland)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,785 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Perhaps there has been a longterm (secret) agreement between Western governments and Russia along those lines.

    Whether that was right or wrong it may be that those governments have to respect such an agreement.

    Don't forget there must be a hope that some of those around Putin may be amenable to forceful but honest language and may be able to twist Putin's arm(a euphemism I hope) when the time is right.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,901 ✭✭✭zv2


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,920 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Didn't the UK already announced that Ukraine can hit Russian targets with their supplied weapons? UK also being a NATO country, same for Estonia, Sweden, Norway etc...

    It's only big news if the UK couldn't give Ukraine the greenlight to use storm shadows within Russia as it's a joint venture with France.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,901 ✭✭✭zv2


    This has been gathering momentum for a while now. I don't know if Ukraine got the go-ahead yet. Can't wait to see what happens.

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,920 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Tide is definitely shifting for sure on using western supplied weapons on Russia soil.

    As with everything, artillery, tanks, cruise missiles, fighters.... Just takes one country to change their stance and the rest follow (eventually)



  • Registered Users Posts: 939 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    It was a province sundered from Romania by the Soviets in 1940 and then planted by Ruzzian/Soviet settlers. And the Ruzzians, in their usual manner, after Moldavia got its independence, decided to cut a chunk off it, occupy it and declare a spurious ''independence'' recognized by practically nobody.

    Post edited by ilkhanid on


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    Ah these are the republicans I remember, looks like they finally realised that Russia is not particularly highly regarded by most of the population



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭rogber


    It certainly needs to be happen but the next key thing is to make sure they have enough of the long range weapons needed. Otherwise it'll just be another of the false dawn "game changers" of which there have been many now. I certainly don't think it'll drive Russia from the stolen territories, but it will be a help. Protection for the skies would be an even bigger help



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,338 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    So Trumps plan to end the war in one day is to bomb Moscow... well that might end a lot of things in one day alright.

    Of course it is all lies / playing to the gallery in front of him whatever will get a reaction.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,785 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Perhaps Europe can put pressure on China to put manners on Russia.

    If they ,China act in an unfriendly way towards Europe then we could punish them in a recoprocal fashion.

    Russia has invaded a sovereign country on our border and what has the Chinese government done to either prevent the attack on the first place or support Ukraine ever since?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭flutered




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,063 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ten of Swords




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,679 ✭✭✭Field east


    up till now the conversation has been around we should be happy with Putin because his replacement - whenever- probably will be a lot worse. What has changed in your opinion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,679 ✭✭✭Field east


    I note that Putin has threatened UKr - with severe consequences- if the ‘West ‘ allows it to use its weapons to bomb/attack targets on Russian land.

    So to continue the ‘war of words’ strategy , why not the following words from the UKr side - for whatever reason !!!!!!!!!
    (1). Tell Ru that if it bombs civilian targets again that it can expect severe consequences at a TIME OF OUR CHOOSING

    (2) we note that you are buying/ getting arms from China, North Korea and Iran and using them on our sacred soil. You, Putin , and these supporters will suffer the consequences in due course



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,746 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,746 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    Denmark earlier (where the hq of Europeans largest company mysteriously went on fire)

    now Poland

    I guess Germany, Italy and US are waiting until Russians carry out terrorist and arson attacks in their countries



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,849 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    That's the standard modus operandi alright. Speaking of which, we must be due a "what can we do to help Ukraine with its shortage of conscripts" post soon.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,809 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Belgium giving 30 F-16s to Ukraine. Ireland's inability to give any military support is a huge embarrassment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,679 ✭✭✭Field east


    if that happens then should China North Korea and Iran , for starters, experience the same fate. Re Serbia, Hungry and Turkey helping Russia in any way - militarywise



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,849 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    The lying, tax dodging, elitist, failed property developer who liked to swan around his vineyards in Italy? I've seen those posters. And people will lap it up. It's a damning indictment of the intelligence of the average citizen that he was ever elected in the first place. A lot of people need to take a good look in the mirror before having a cut off de gubermint for the state of the country.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,849 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Belgium's history of military conquest and interference in sovereign nations is a huge embarrassment. Ireland can contribute to a push back against the rise of fascism and populism in plenty of other ways. The answer isn't always arm ourselves to the teeth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,404 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    Think they'd be better off with repurposed Russian equipment seeing as we can barely supply our own defence forces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 786 ✭✭✭scottser


    Seriously, that's just not our gig. Ever. We did supply medical and de-mining equipment though, which is fair enough.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    I think we can do more, much more, from specialist treatment of wounded here to recovery and psychological help to training to providing more medical supplies and maybe directly paying wages of a brigade or two

    These guys are putting the lives on the line to kill actual real to god Nazis and protect our cushy pampered Western European rears

    The anti europe crowd always goes one about European conscription and all that but what they think would happen if the Nazis win



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,920 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I wonder what he means by short range weapons?

    Just allow them to use long range patriot missiles within Russia. It would be far more effective. We've seen how effective patriot can be at preventing Russia launching glide bombs.

    Again the tools are there if the west allow it. I don't even think Ukraine received any long range IRIS-T missiles, then again zero chance Germany would allow Ukraine use them to down bombers over Russia.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,901 ✭✭✭zv2


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,580 ✭✭✭jmreire


    What happens? Hopefully Russia starts to see many more mysterious explosions in locations that they are attacking from. Things that go "BOOOOOOM" in the night (and daytime) !!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,222 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    He is putting the fear into Putin because Putin knows, as we all do, that Trump is unpredictable.

    Same with threatening NATO withdrawal, it was an attempt to force Western Europe to defend itself and pay for that, God couldn't make them do that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 159 ✭✭randomuser02125


    I'm going with Occam's razor and assume it's Trump saying something that popped into his barely functioning brain. Your post implies a level of intelligence Tiny simply doesn't have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,785 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Not sure what has changed specifically.

    To attempt to change the regime of any country is never an obviously beneficial road to go down and predictions of the consequences are surely incredibly unreliable.

    Personally I was initially reassured when Putin took charge from Yeltsin as I sensed he had intelligence and would be competent despite the difficult situation he faced in Russia.

    I think I was not alone in that but his actions (whilst I accept that it is Russia's right to fight their corner) have been morally depraved and disastrous for his own country and others'.

    I have little idea what will come after him but something surely will.

    We still need to treat Russia with respect even if they do not deserve it because one day good people will probably emerge from the straight jacket they are now living under,admittedly not necessarily in the aftermath of Putin's demise (look at Germany)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,240 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I'd say Kadyrov looks alright for someone who was rumoured to have died last year.

    But there's been something 'not right' in Russia for a long time. I'd say Putin almost thrives on this kind of political intrigue. How long have people been falling out of windows while gardening or playing golf etc. ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    More limits on the “no limits” partnership



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,850 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    @TheValeyard If you look at this map and particularly russia above kharkiv, thats russia. There are about 3 russia oblasts there along in a line toward russia occupied areas in east ukraine ( the red ) inc belgorad area where russia all along has used as an untouchable staging area for troops and for firing weapons into ukraine. Putin knowing they remain untouched by the blocks put on ukraine.

    So, I am hearing the US and others will allow use of there weapons ONLY for those oblasts in russia. This then pushes staging areas and russia weapons platforms firing into ukraine further north into russia.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,920 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Probably see Russians staging in Belarus soon, although there not any major cities within range of the border thankfully.

    The US hasn't allowed it yet, but the list of countries not allowing it is growing smaller each day. If the US allows it, I doubt they would allow the cluster shells be used, which would be really unfortunate. But as you say, it pushes the staging and supply lines much further back.

    Ridiculous situation where Ukraine has to sit there waiting until the Russians cross the border before they can fire on them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,850 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    @Wolf359f I would doubt Belarus would be used TBH. I would say if they were firing in from Belarus to Ukraine that might create a legit situ where Luka is then a legit target I would say?

    "Ridiculous situation where Ukraine has to sit there waiting until the Russians cross the border before they can fire on them."

    Yip, always thought that right from Feb 24th 22 ( my birthday :D .. for ever marked )



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    Those oblasts (Bryansk, Kursk, Belgorod, Voronezh, Rostov) neighbouring Ukraine each are bigger than most European countries

    Being permitted to use weapons like HIMARs here would be a major win and stretch Russian logistics to a breaking point

    Btw in all the hoopla here I was the only one to raise the most important event of last week, Ukrainians hit and destroyed Russian nuclear first warning radars 1800km away not once but twice, and nothing from Russia despite such an event technically be enough provocation for a nuclear escalation in the Russian doctrine



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,898 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    When there's been talk of a negotiated settlement including a demilitarised zone, the bothsiders always say that it should be on the occupied territory. Effectively making a demilitarised zone of these four oblasts on the Russian side of the border would be a far better long-term solution for Ukraine (and Europe) - and a clear signal to Putin that making a move on any other country's territory (e.g. Georgia) was more than likely to result in his USSR v2.0 getting progressively smaller.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Another domino falling



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    Every day they resemble the Islamic terrorists more and more

    and this gem from their tv heads



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,379 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    Part of me worries though that Ukraine are still getting their hands tied. Macrons words are extremely specific.

    Just the missile launch sites. But not other military targets? Why not concentrations of troops? What about airfields that bombers are taking off from? Ammo dumps? Radars? AA installations? Command posts.

    All of these are completely valid military targets. Why simply missile launch sites? That seems ridiculously narrow.

    My hope is theres more going on behind the scene and this is just a tester for western countries to see how Russia reacts. Its understandable but Ukrainians are dying, their cities being bombed while we tip toe the red line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 369 ✭✭vswr


    UK Storm Shadows…same missile.

    Or a few SCALPS with "Le Storm Shadow" and a few Union Jacks stickered on



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    Maybe they worried the 550km (probably more) range missile be used by Ukrainians who just go “**** it” and send it 460km distance from border to Kremlin to deliver Putin a 450kg present while he sits on the toilet.

    Edit; very nice!

    Kazakhstan blocking payments to China via their country, that’s ontop of Chinese companies not wanting to deal with Russia

    https://www-moscowtimes-ru.translate.goog/2024/05/28/banki-kazahstana-nachali-blokirovat-platezhi-izrossii-vkitai-a132091?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp

    Post edited by zerosquared on


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,379 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    Yeah I mean the worry is almost certainly either… Will Ukraine get desperate enough in future and bomb something truly escalatory. Or what will Russia do if Ukraine target a troop concentration and end up hitting civilians or something.

    But it still doesnt make sense anyway. No matter what Ukraine do the Kremlin will claim that a UK supplied Stormshadow hit 3 million Ukrainian POWs and Russian children. And that the UK are responsible. Then they'll do nothing. As per usual.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,898 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    Just the missile launch sites. But not other military targets? Why not concentrations of troops? What about airfields that bombers are taking off from? Ammo dumps? Radars? AA installations? Command posts.

    What he said wasn't quite as restrictive as that - he said (translated) "sites from which missiles are fired, military sites from which Ukraine is attacked" which I would take to include any bases where troops are massed with an apparently obvious intention to invade (i.e. close to the border) and airfields from which the bomb-launching aircraft take off. The "not other military targets" would seem to exclude, say, training grounds in the Moscow region or airfields in the far east of the country.

    Sounds to me like a politically sensible compromise - a very clear "get the fk out of Ukraine, Putin, and we'll leave you salvage what dignity you can; but we're the ones drawing lines on the map now."



  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement