Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - Threadbans in op - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

Options
1123712381240124212431267

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,451 ✭✭✭TokTik


    Defending yourself bad.

    Massacring women and children good.

    Got it.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,874 ✭✭✭Russman


    I try to just read and not comment on this thread, but this IMHO is the nub of it. No American president, no matter what the party, is going to deliberately tank his reelection chances for a few thousand Gazans, its just not going to happen. It might not be right, it might be callous, it might be whatever, but IMO its the reality. Personally I think on a human level Joe is likely appalled at what's going on, or certainly isn't "in favour" of it, but knows he has to suck it up to a degree.

    Were Biden to win, I'd say there might be a window of opportunity in his first 3/4 months for him to slightly bring Israel to heal, if he were of a mind to, and depending on the makeup of the new Congress, but once you get within 18 months or so of the mid-terms all bets are off again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 554 ✭✭✭scottser


    Why is he a disgrace? That's actually the most reasonable and decent thing I've ever heard him say..



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,969 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    The Biden administration made a huge misjudgement in trusting Israel at the start of their offensive of retribution. They should have made it crystal clear to Netanyahu and the IDF that they would tolerate a certain level of casualties in Gaza and a modest level of damage to civilian infrastructure. That after that, all bets were off and no further support would be given.

    Israel instead didn't just take the inch, they've taken the proverbial several hundred miles and utterly discredited & disgraced both themselves and their supporters like Biden and some EU leaders. They've discredited Biden and undermined his election campaign, holed it below the waterline.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,969 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Although I'd like to see Biden win over Trump, I don't think he will now - he's fracturing his vote. That is assuming Trump sidesteps/ exploits his current court case rows and gets his campaign in full swing. You can be quite sure that Trump will be selling MAGA big time and laying into Biden for being too involved in foreign policy etc. Ultimately Putin is not stupid and his divide & conquer tactics are working out for him.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 442 ✭✭Balagan1


    A lot of you on here won't want to miss the tribute by the UN General Assembly to the late President Raisi of Iran later today.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,425 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,874 ✭✭✭Russman


    I don't necessarily disagree with you, but I think most Americans don't really give a sh1t about Gaza ultimately. Maybe the US govt could have done that, but equally, they're then opening themselves up to the "not supporting Israel enough" accusations in an election year, or even worse, the "backing the terrorists" accusation. Personally I think that would lose them far more votes than their current position will. That's not to say I think they're right, but I just think the realpolitik of the situation has it this way.

    If Biden loses in November I doubt it will be because of Gaza, although we'll probably never know for sure.



  • Registered Users Posts: 612 ✭✭✭Fuascailteoir


    Heard an interesting discussion from human rights lawyers that said the ICJ has already ruled that Israel can not engage in self defence in the west bank i.e. outside of their borders. Although has not been specifically stated yet this also extends to the Gaza strip so the claims of defence are illegitimate.



  • Registered Users Posts: 554 ✭✭✭scottser


    By any reasonable metric, Israel's claims of 'self-defence' are illegitimate



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,425 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Eh?

    Hamas invades - Israel chases them back to Gaza and pursues the fight. Lots and lots of one-on-confrontations in Gaza with Hamas.

    Hamas continues to launch rockets into Israel, most recently to Tel Aviv. Hamas' allies attack from Lebanon and Iran, even Yemen though I don't think their drones reached Israel.

    Seems like self-defense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,801 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    It was pointed out last year the self defense argument doesn't extend to areas under occupation. It's the same as Russia arguing self defence in Ukraine.

    It may settle the legal argument that Gaza was occupied prior to Oct 7th. Lots of legal rulings will need to be made.



  • Registered Users Posts: 554 ✭✭✭scottser


    Nope. It's an illegal offensive and is being investigated for war crimes and potential genocide. The 'self-defence' argument is a fantasy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,801 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Hamas invades..... we'll ignore the fact that prior to Oct 7th Israel was bombing and killing civilians in Gaza. But we're back to the legal arguments, did Hamas invade or if Gaza was under occupation did Hamas attack the forces occupying it.

    Is Ukraine acting in self defense by attacking Russian soil? Is Russia entitled to claim self defense when Ukraine attacks Russian soil, despite the fact that Russia is an occupying force in Ukraine.

    It's not exactly a similar comparison, but if Israel is going to use the self defense clause in future court cases, you'll be sure those seeking justice for the thousands of children killed in Gaza will be making the case that Gaza was under occupation prior to Oct 7th.

    Remember the civilians in Gaza are the victims. Don't go trying to twist this as support for Hamas or trying to get Hamas off etc...



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,425 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    So, it's fantasy Hamas continue to launch rockets?



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,425 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Plenty of victims to go around. Yes, it's legal arguments of course. Another poster asserted it's an 'illegal offensive' but that's a legal ruling, his/hers was emotional.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    It is not a similar comparison by a country mile

    Ukraine before 2014 and then 2022 invasions by Russia was recognised as a state with borders set in 1992 by all the other countries in the world, including crucially Russia itself who even signed an agreement to defend said borders in return for nuclear weapons and destruction of things like bomber planes.

    Actually now that I think of it recognition of Palestine by all states will lead to boat load of issues for HAMAS and all Palestinians if let’s say on 7th October 2034 they decide to launch another attack on same scale



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,330 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    That’s actually a terrible understanding of how self defense works. It’s not self defense to commit genocide. If they want to claim self defense where is the offensive into Lebanon, Iran and Yemen? What are they stupid?



  • Registered Users Posts: 935 ✭✭✭boetstark


    I have been banned on this thread… <Mod Snip>

    Mod - Banned from the CA forum too now

    Post edited by Ten of Swords on


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,425 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    They're shooting at Lebanon; an offensive into Lebanon might've happened, but hasn't. Might still. Too bad Hamas turned tail and put themselves in with the citizens they might be sworn to protect, but unfortunately for them, they did. Sacrifice Gazans to gain popularity.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 554 ✭✭✭scottser


    To a million starving Gazans, the self-defence narrative is even more of a fantasy than the prospect of a meal. Look pal, you can try and defend the indefensible all you want but at some stage you're going to have look at this purely through a humanitarian lens. It's a genocide. Wave your tiny star of david all you want, justify it however you please, but it's still a genocide.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,801 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    So if Palestine is not considered a state, what's what make Gaza? I mean you're more proving that Israel has been an occupation force and as such Israel doesn't get to cite self defense.

    The issue isn't state V state, it's about an occupation force claiming self defense.

    If, in your example, Gaza is still occupied by Israel in 2034 and despite being recognized as a state, again, Israel cannot claim self defense.

    To dumb it down, it's like a trespasser claiming self defense after he enters a house and attacks the homeowner.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    I never claimed Israelis are not an occupying force nor actually ever defended them, quite the opposite I clearly stated on this thread that both sides are worse than each other in this smouldering dumpster fire

    Just pointing out that yet again the comparisons with Russian war in Ukraine are silly at best



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,614 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I don't get it either, I saw the Dail debate and it just seemed like political "virtue signalling" to give the Palestinian people a warm fuzzy feeling or themselves to say look at how great we are. It solves nothing other than create noise. Is it going to be proper recognition trade, a Palestinian embassy etc?

    The ICJ pronouncement was similarly pointless given that it has no authority to enforce any of their decisions on Israel.

    The whole thing had the feel of "The League of Nations" in the 1930's when Italy invaded Ethiopia/Abyssinia nothing was done. Only the promise of very limited sanctions.

    Post edited by gormdubhgorm on

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,489 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    any normal country that isn’t morally bankrupt wouldn’t fire into a populated area.

    If there was a terrorist hiding in a Tel Aviv shopping centre would the IDF bomb it.




  • Registered Users Posts: 23,489 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Hamas didn’t continue to, they attacked on the 7th October and 1 more several months later. After Isreal had killed over 35,000 people and levelled Gaza after destroying schools, hospitals , etc

    Bear in mind that Isreal has an iron dome which renders most of the missiles useless.

    In the time between Isreal has also launched an attack another foreign country by bombing their embassy



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,425 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose




  • Registered Users Posts: 23,489 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    well we established that Hamas is a terrorist group. And terrorist groups are generally morally bankrupt And we’ve all condemned the attack.

    I don’t see what your point is ? The Israeli response is totally disproportionate. It’s genocide with many more war crimes. The IDF knew the attack was coming and let it happen

    Collective punishment is not right. I don’t see how you try try to justify it.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,425 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Are Hamas morally bankrupt for firing into a populated area?

    What the IDF knew in advance remains to be determined, which is terrible. The Israeli people are protesting this and other failures of the Netanyahu government on a near-daily basis and holding huge protests.



Advertisement