Gript-A source of misinformation. **Read OP before posting**

Firstly, I very much so view the acts of Israel to be genocide. Equally there's a wealth of evidence for the Holocaust so if you're really trying to randomly shoehorn in Holocaust denial, you really are overestimating how wise you are....

I'm not surprised someone can go from reading Gript to holocaust denial tbh, seems like a logical step for its readership.

We seriously need to review the current standard of mental health services in this country

Congrats on buying into the rabbit hole of holocaust denial.

The winners of the war don't write the history books. WW2 is a prime example of that to anyone remotely familiar with the histography of WW2 would be familiar with that. Many surviving German generals accounts of WW2 were taken a face value and only found to wrong later for a whole variety of reasons. Albert Speer would probably have been hanged at Nuremberg had the information we now know about him been available to prosecutors at the time. The vast majority of reasons this has happened is because it takes decades for people to go through the vast amount of information available and new information can become available(ie post Cold War access to Russian archives). When it comes to the Holocaust time has shown even more definitely it happened and the 6 million number was correct.

The fact that the GRIPT even entertains such rubbish tells you a lot the people who run it. The Holocaust is one of the most well documented atrocities in history. Anyone or any organisation that attempts to downplay or deny it happens has zero credibility. An organisation like that has no remote interest in the truth. It's the definition of an organisation that just exists to spread misinformation.

Edit - What Israel does(as bad/indefensible as it current actions are in Palestine) or does not do in the present has no bearing on the factual events of what happened during WW2.

Would you care to engage with my actual point? WW2 is a perfect example of where the winners don't always write history. Many German generals wrote memoirs and naturally put themselves in the best possible light and it took time for these first hand accounts to be critically analysed. For some things such as on the Eastern front it was only post Cold War historians obtained information that shed a new and unflattering light on this memoirs. A perfect example of losers writing history.

Albert Speer escaped the death penalty largely due to lack of information. During his life he quiet literally wrote his own history. If he hadn't he wouldn't have lived as long as he did. If the winners write history as you are implying Speer would have been executed at Nuremberg. He is a perfect example of a loser writing history even if it was only during his lifetime.

You have at best tried to minimise the Holocaust if not deny it outright. The Holocaust is a historical fact and extremely well documented for a number of reasons one of them being it takes a huge bureaucracy to kill millions and that leaves a huge amount of evidence behind.

The fact that the GRIPT even entertains talk about Holocaust denial on any medium it controls makes it by definition a platform who's purpose it is to spread misinformation. I appreciate the odd fact will be thrown in to give an element of plausible deniability/credibility. However the minute you start talking about Holocaust denial or similar any pre tense to be interested in the truth vanishes.

New evidence can come to light but new evidence is very different from pretending evidence doesn't exist. That's what Holocaust denial is, it is the denial of evidence. In Speers case his claim during his lifetime was that he was completely unaware of the Holocaust and had no involvement with it. Since his death it's come to light that wasn't true.

New evidence and denying evidence are not the same thing and you are not comparing like with like. So I'm not being contradictory.

The Holocaust is an established fact, Holocaust denial is the denial of evidence. To say the Holocaust never happened you need to pretend a mountain of evidence from different sources and people was fabricated in a co ordinated way. You are talking about millions of people and documents, nevermind the physical remains of camps, grave sites etc etc. If you are denying the Holocaust you suggesting all that evidence has at best fabricated/a hoax/doesn't exist.

To bring it back to GRIPT if they happy for their platform or platforms they control to be used to discuss fantasy(a world where the Holocaust never happened) it says they are not interested in the truth and only misinformation. Anyone/platform who denies the Holocaust is not interested in the truth. That's not to say GRIPT don't report the truth the odd time when it suits them but it's just window dressings for misinformation. GRIPTs acceptance/tolerance of Holocaust denial is a perfect example of where they really stand when it comes to being truthful. Again if they were really interested in the truth they wouldn't be platforming Holocaust denial or similar.