Gemma O'Doherty major public meltdown

That you would think even for a second that politicians are the only people with opponents is - quite frankly - entirely disengenious. Transparently so. When I said not to feel bad about playing such a losing hand, I didn't mean to keep doing it.

You're done on this one Frumy. Sorry.

Sorry, Frumy. But no, just… no. You've driven your coach-and-four down a rhetorical cul-de-sac, and hit a brick wall. Time to stop cracking the whip and reverse gingerly.

Maybe you'll have better luck with another approach. But do try to put more effort in next time. I mean subtle effort, not… whatever that post was.

Whatever happened to Godwins Law? Oh yeah that's right people started disagreeing with the establishment so spurious claims of fascism had to be allowed in the absence of reasonable argument.

Your posts demonstrate otherwise, or else why are you jumping in trying to defend her and her reprehensible conduct?

It talks like a duck etc etc and if someone posts like a supporter of hers, then it is reasonable to state that.

You're trying to contradict actual video evidence of her going around accusing politicians of being paedos. If she had any actual evidence why hasn't she presented it? She has none and she knows it, so she is just casting aspersions, and here you are, defending her ability to tarnish the reputation of all politicians with such slurs. Clearly the actions we would expect from a Gemma O'Doherty supporter.

Desperate stuff. You've lost that argument entirely so now you've resorted to whataboutery and semantic games.

And as multiple posters have pointed out, your semantic games have completely failed also with nonsense about 'opponents' - she is a failed politician who stood for election. Again, clearly the actions we would expect from a Gemma O'Doherty supporter, trying to drag the thread down a semantic rathole.

If you are not a Gemma O'Doherty supporter \ defender, then maybe you should reflect on what you are doing here with your posts.

So she's clearly going around calling people paedos, rolling out semantics and whataboutery isn't going to convince anyone otherwise when the evidence is there for all to see.

I'm not a Gemma O Doherty supporter

Are you still trying to deny she was calling politicians paedos? Desperate stuff.

The hill you're going to stand and fight on defending Gemma O'Doherty is that she didn't name them?

Where's her evidence then?

It is plain in not naming them, aspersions are cast about all politicians.

It is still a scurrilous conduct, and you defend it.

So you agree it is ok to go around with such scurrilous accusations without evidence? Grand. I think we can all see the moral and intellectual bankruptcy of her tactics and your posts defending them.

And they are her opponents, she stood for election and lost. Another desperate semantic argument you tried and abjectly failed to make stick in her defence.

So exactly as I wrote in my earlier post, you are a supporter of at least some of her agenda.

And here you are defending her scurrilous tactics.

And you've expressed exactly zero concern for the victims of her conduct, either these scurrilous rumours OR her other vindictive campaign against grieving families.

And yes, it is very simple to see what your are doing here.

You said "I'm not saying what she did is right or wrong."

Well why not? That would be "incredibly simple" to do, but nope, all we get are semantics and whataboutery.

So by not doing so, and engaging in such tactics, the impression you create is that you think such conduct is ok, and it is entirely reasonable to criticise your posts along those lines.

You mean like this earlier post from you 'expressing concern' about the importance of 'context' in relation to the video posted in the OP?

Desperate desperate stuff. It didn't take long for you to utterly contradict and belittle your own posts did it? Hardly needs the rest of us to pick it about when you do so yourself.

How about you go back and re-read this post in light of your comments.

@Frumy have a look at this video

https://x.com/DUPleader/status/1652105877325742081

Hi @Frumy

Could you confirm that you watched the video and also confirm that she accuses people of being "Paedophiles" in said video? You seem to have ignored my straight-forward question.