Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Non-Irish-Eligible/Qualified quotas for the Irish provinces

  • 05-06-2024 9:07am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 3,847 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    Mods can close this if it’s covered somewhere already.

    Just read a few posts in a few of the provincial threads and thought a dedicated discussion thread might be better.

    The main point is the way the IRFU decide on NIE/NIQ players and their allocation to the provinces.

    I find it very interesting as it seems to me to be a multifaceted problem.

    How should the IRFU and the provinces best operate the signing of NIE/NIQ players?

    My own view is it should be done under a guiding set of principles and each case could be assessed with an overarching goal in mind.

    For example, Irish-qualified International-level props are highly valuable, even critical, to the national side, so decision-making around allowing players to be signed as props has to be managed extremely carefully with a lot of considerations at play.

    My own opinion is that the IRFU are getting the balance right most of the time, but the next chapter on this issue will perhaps be more challenging as the 5-year rule reduces the possibility of project players, so the focus has to switch more to Irish-Qualified players, and developing Irish players.

    Post edited by Jump_In_Jack on


«13

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,771 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I don't think the IRFU have hard and fast rules on the situation and I do think that is a good thing. There should be an element of flexibility to it and I think they do generally treat it on a case by case basis.

    I do think in general they err on the side of too much caution at times, being overly concerned with blocking IE players who frankly will never be good enough for Ireland anyway. But I would still say they broadly get it right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,533 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    we tried this to solve a very specific problem in 2011.

    https://www.irishrugby.ie/2011/12/21/irfu-player-contract-policy-agreed-to-aid-development-of-irish-qualified-players/amp/

    Seems like the only problem we’d be trying to solve now would be gripes among fanbases about (allegedly) uneven treatment



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,771 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I think making the "rules" so rigid and transparent was ultimately silly and they seem to agree as they've quietly dropped it.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Where's the middle ground here, FFF?

    There has to be room for discussion that doesn't constitute "alleged uneven treatment" but also doesn't call everything a gripe, abuse, resentment…



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    My own take is that they seem to be more stringent with key positions like TH and 10, which makes sense.

    In the main, they get things right, but it's a difficult one to square as for guys further down the national depth chart, an NIQ is no more blocking a player than an IQ who isn't anywhere near the international radar.

    With my Munster hat on, front-row has been the obvious weakness for us for awhile now. As much as I had high hopes for Josh Wycherley, an NIQ loosehead could be a real game charger for us (tho Loughman has improved a lot in the last 12-18 months or so; I still think he has the occasional upright carry, but his handling and scrummaging seems to have come on a fair bit).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,533 ✭✭✭Former Former Former




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    i think people are kind of blind to how much of a handicap only three NIQs or even four is to winning in europe for ulster, munster and connacht,,, and leinster in a few years (and partially now). Especially with position restrictions. Its really hard to produce elite talent evenly everywhere or find that on the IQ market.

    In Leinster's case, assuming the same rate of talent production isn't enough as three of their major elite players aren't homegrown in lowe, jgp and henshaw. Project players are done so that avenue is closed. Also, even if their talent production increases, again its really hard for that to be evenly spread.

    My view on NIQs is simple. Let everyone have five, any position, no two in one position.





  • So we're going to have 20 NIQs across the four provinces, but no 2 in any one position?

    Would you have no issue with all four provinces, for example, having THPs?

    Also - I must have missed the info that Robbie Henshaw was a project player. I didn't realise growing up in Athlone in Leinster he would need to be here for 3/5 years to be considered eligible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Ah I would have thought everyone would have figured that henshsw isn't leinster home grown. Aure we have plenty commenting about players from other provinces/areas of ireland playing forba different peovince to the one they gre up playing for/in

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Yea, i don't care if all the provinces have THPs. Its no two in one position in one province. Teams play 3/4 THPs a season and its a two man position when two players should play good minutes in each game. Its unlikely every province could simultaneously afford or want a starting THP at the same time anyway. They are really expensive at the elite end.

    Also, whenever anyone points out the extreme depth at some positions at leinster, the answer is always that those guys get enough minutes. Same deal. If provincial coaches don't rotate enough.. well the irfu has a big say in who gets hired.

    If you want to fully rule out positions that's fine, but i hate the system of this province gets that and then another can't.

    Henshaw came from connacht. Its extremely unlikely leinster get an elite player directly from another province again. That has only ever happened once. The point is that their talent production would need to increase to make up for that to maintain the same talent. I figured i didn't have to actually spell that out.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 360 ✭✭ShineyShiney


    I agree, I think that the easy option of going shopping is now fairly closed with the 5 year rule. That's now a lucky accident if a province signs a NIE player who remains and stays fit long enough to be of interest to the national side.

    Longer term thinking means under 19 and under 20:s now become a far more valuable commodity. Every province must be keeping very close tabs on upcoming key players and trying to attract them to their academy or offering early pro contracts.

    Connacht by nessecity are slightly ahead of the process, Illo, Lasissi. Munster in fairness tried their best but it hasn't worked out with Salanoa so far, (due to injury) and Knox. Salanoa may well work out yet.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Munster have

    Loughman, Kilcoyne, Wycherley

    Archer, Ryan, jager salanoa

    None are Ireland starters and haven't been in ireland 23s regularly so munster aren't as exposed to players having to be rested as much.

    Leinster have Healy, Porter and Furlong in Ireland 23s with Milne & Clarkson as back up. Alaalatoa and Ed Byrne are leaving. So and NIQ THP on one year deal is prudent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,644 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Project players still seem possible to me. If you say they have to be IQ by the time they're 30, say, it still allows you to look at 22, 23, 24 year olds. 25 would be cutting it a bit tight, because by the time you've sealed the deal and they've finished over there and come over maybe they're 26, but it's still doable. Early 30s wouldn't be a bad age for a high quality prop.

    Maybe South Africans are less likely, because if they looked good after 4 years the Springboks would be quite likely to just give them a cap. New Zealanders in the backs would probably be the best targets. We often hear how Ireland lack athleticism and pace on the wing.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I'm not talking numbers. I'm talking quality.

    Loughman, a 35 year old Kilcoyne and Josh Wycherley is an obvious area of weakness for Munster next season.

    Front row in general has been an obvious area of weakness for Munster for awhile, and an NIQ could've really helped.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,644 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Nucifora is probably wary of cute hoorism too. Maybe Munster don't try very hard to sign a Peter Dooley or an Ed Byrne when they become available because they don't want to weaken their argument for getting an NIQ.

    Maybe they look at Ryan at loosehead for next season, which is a good short-term fix at least.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    I'd agree it seems possible but no one has tried it yet it seems.

    I think allowing some big tight five project players would be interesting. One each?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    At the end of the day, how likely is that either of them will actually play for ireland? It would require a pretty insane injury run.

    It doesn't seem worth it to protect depth that deep.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    But there in lies the problem. Munster haven't really produced an ireland regular prop since Hayes/Horan. Kilcoyne has 50ish caps but mainly as a sub IIRC.

    Leinster have produced Furlong, Porter, Healy, McGrath, Moore. Three of them are still in Ireland 23s regularly so Leinster don't have as much access to them as Munster do to the guys I listed above.

    Leinster signed Michael Bent, Mike Ross.

    McGrath (injury) and moore (move/injury) would have had more caps but for circumstances.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    And Ireland selection shouldn't be the only criteria for sanctioning an NIQ signing. The competitiveness of the provinces should come into it too.

    Like I said, if Josh Wycherley isn't anywhere near Ireland selection, then having an NIQ in that position doesn't block him any more than if Munster had signed Ed Byrne.





  • Yeah, I'm on the same page on this argument. I think improvements in the front row would make Munster competitive in Europe (as in capable of winning the tournament), which I think has obvious knock on benefits for development of existing players and also driving kids to play the game across the province etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    We don't need 5, the provinces don't need 5, 3 is more than enough and the provinces need to concentrate on their academy programs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Everyone of these threads it's the same posters going on about the same time. we want more NIQ because that will magically make their provinces more competitive and in reality it probably won't

    It will cost the IRFU more money, it will reduce the number of available players to ireland, players will lose out to NIQ either on game time or they will be let go from provinces as they try to afford to buy in NIQ.

    None of the provinces are self sustainable, they are all held afloat by the IRFU. Even if the provinces all done a little better in Europe they would still be held up financially by the IRFU. Some of the provinces have huge loans that they are paying back over multiple years.

    Like who in their right minds thinks the best thing in the middle of all of this is to start signing more overseas players?

    We are losing irish qualified players last season and this season again because they are not getting enough game time at provincial level. How is more NIQ going to make that better?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,771 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Everyone of these threads it's the same posters going on about the same time. we want more NIQ because that will magically make their provinces more competitive and in reality it probably won't

    Of course it will. Munster, as an example, are a very good team with an absolutely sub-standard front row. An NIQ there will a) definitely improve them and b) not block anyone with the remotest chance of an Irish call-up anyway. It's the exact scenario a high-impact NIQ should be brought in for.

    If we are going to go down the road of economics, it would certainly be a more intelligent use of funds than bringing in Jordie Barrett.

    We are losing irish qualified players last season and this season again because they are not getting enough game time at provincial level.

    Who is this? Cause I can't think of anyone we're losing that I would care about losing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    No it doesn't, the French teams have signed plenty of overseas players and it doesn't make them any better. When you sign a NIQ they are not automatically a success. Plenty have come to Ireland and been a disaster across all of the provinces.

    Jordie Barrett is a short term signing for Leinster and could be a disaster or it could work out. If we are going to just concentrate on one NIQ because it's a bigger name than usual I don't think it's much of a discussion now is it?

    The provinces won't be out signing Barretts or names of that standard because they can't afford them, even in Barretts situation it is a family link is the only reason he is going to Leinster. If it came to money only he wouldn't be in Ireland would he?

    In terms of the front row in munster, of course it is blocking an Irish player. Once they get a player in that position the fans will move onto the next so called weakness and want someone signed in that position, on and on we go.

    It's not that difficult to figure out years in advance that you might have an issue in an area, Leinster also need to look at front row by the way, they should be going to the academy and saying right we need players in this position. Then working with the academy and with the IRFU on how to resolve the issue long term.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Everyone of these threads it's the same posters going on about the same time. we want more NIQ because that will magically make their provinces more competitive and in reality it probably won't

    There's absolutely nothing "magical" about suggesting that a better player could improve a province and make them more competitive.

    We are losing irish qualified players last season and this season again because they are not getting enough game time at provincial level.

    Who, exactly?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    This is all overly simplistic; you could apply the same logic to suggesting Leinster should pick Cosgrave ahead Jordie Barrett because "it could be a disaster or it could work out".

    The reality is you can expect better performances from better players. There are degrees here, it's not black and white. It's not guaranteed, but it's absolutely not "magical" to suggest as much.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,771 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    even in Barretts situation it is a family link is the only reason he is going to Leinster.

    It is in its hoop. He's going for a combination of the money and the squad and coaching. The rest is just plámás nonsense. You are the one who suggested the provinces and the IRFU can't afford more NIQs - if that was the case luxury players like Barrett should be the first ones to be refused. The provinces can, in fact, afford them, be it on their own or with outside help. It is getting the IRFU approval that is the issue.

    An NIQ front row at Munster blocks an Irish player yes, but it blocks an Irish player who is functionally irrelevant to the Irish team. That not every NIQ player works out is also a terrible argument against bringing them in.

    Finally, suggesting French teams haven't been any better because of their overseas signings is also utterly bizarre. It is just an incredibly wrong statement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    What makes him a "luxury player"? The whole premise of the NIQ was to sign top quality international players that can add to the squad. Now becuase one if a big name it is a "luxury player"? when is it not a "luxury player"?

    The provinces can't afford them, the provinces are all propped up by the IRFU. None of them are self sustaining.

    Munster who you keep going on about owe a loan to the IRFU which based on the last projections they won't have paid off for over 40 years. How is Munster able to afford NIQ and they can't pay off a loan?


    As I said at the start, it's the same few posters crying and whinging about NIQ in the vague hope it will make their province a little better. Nothing about what is good for the game of rugby in Ireland, if it is good for young Irish players in the academy or for players in the squads who would get dumped as the provinces try to afford these NIQ's.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Imagine, fans of a rugby team suggesting a signing in a weak position that might improve them…

    Still waiting on who these players are btw?

    We are losing irish qualified players last season and this season again because they are not getting enough game time at provincial level.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,771 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The only one coming across as "crying and whinging" in this thread is you.

    What makes him a luxury player? We quite clearly don't need him and we have significant cover in all the positions he normally plays. He's likely to see himself shoved out of position to the wing as his only chance of making the starting team. Meanwhile Munster are relying on a combination of very old, very young and completely substandard front rows - none of whom are remotely in the picture for Ireland.

    The provinces being "propped up" by the IRFU is also irrelevant. They need to pay some players either way and how they budget that is up to them. No one is claiming that the issue with NIQs is affordability except you. Everything you are saying is an argument for having zero NIQs, which no one would agree with.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,939 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    The IRFU does not "prop up the provinces." The provinces and the IRFU are one and the same. Take away the provinces from the IRFU and what is left? They both exist to support each other. The funds raised to support rugby on the Island are done so on the backs of the players. They actually prop up the whole edifice. The recruitment of NIQ and NIE players has always been part of the pro game. The presence of some have been extraordinarily beneficial at times while others have simply taken the place of local players. It is a conundrum that has to be explored from time to time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    The provinces are only afloat because of the IRFU, none of them are self sustainable. If the provinces could claim they make enough money on their own from TV/stadium etc then you maybe could push the NIQ model, but still wouldn't see why.

    Fairly simple stuff really, why would the IRFU want to spend money on players who can never add any value to the national side which is the reason rugby exists in Ireland. Plus as I mentioned getting in these players with no idea if they will or won't be successful and reducing the numbers of available players to the IRFU?

    Maybe you could argue it has to be explored from time to time, but the amount of air time on boards is incredible to the same conversation over and over again. Plus it's the same posters over and over and over again. The same points, absolutely nothing new, just the latest in a poor me moan.

    What exactly has changed sicne the last time this was discussed? in reality more Irish qualified players are due to leave Ireland because they couldn't get game time at their province(Joey, Moloney etc)

    The academies seem to be improving across Ireland, so why now is the requirement to bring in more NIQ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Yes Im "crying and whinging" because I am saying the system is ok as it is. Try again.

    "we quite clearly don't need him"? based on what?

    I have never said no NIQ's, very clear on that.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Fairly simple stuff really, why would the IRFU want to spend money on players who can never add any value to the national side

    Because it may improve the performance of the province, getting them further in competitions, giving the IQ players exposure to a higher level of competition, thereby improving them in the process.

    There's also plenty of NIQ players over the years who have been very highly spoken about towards improving standards / changing the culture at teams.

    in reality more Irish qualified players are due to leave Ireland because they couldn't get game time at their province(Joey, Moloney etc)

    Carbery isn't blocked by an NIQ so is completely irrelevant to this discussion.

    Molony regularly has had amongst the highest minutes of any Leinster player, as far as I'm aware. Whatever his reasons for leaving, it's not lack of provincial minutes. (For a player of his age profile it obviously seems to be a financial decision).

    There will always be scope for NIQ players. None of this is "crying and whingeing".



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,771 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Having Jeremy Loughman and Stephen Archer starting a knockout match for Munster provides literally zero benefit to the IRFU or the Irish rugby team over having a far more capable NIQ player. Blocking them signing a player there, and the end result being a capable IQ player in Ed Byrne moving to England anyway quite clearly shows the current system isn't working - Ireland have lost a capable IQ player anyway, and Munster's front row is still questionable which helps noone.

    The NIQ system as stands is mostly fine, but there is something of a stubborn "any IQ player is better than an NIQ" element that I think is counterproductive.

    Also neither Carbery or Moloney are leaving cause of not getting provincial game time or NIQ players coming in. They are leaving cause they're not gonna be first choice provincial players and won't play for Ireland and want to make more money elsewhere. It matters to Ireland not one tiny iota that Moloney is leaving.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,644 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Loughman is a good player with 5 Ireland caps. With Healy and Kilcoyne approaching the end the benefit to Ireland of him starting Munster's biggest games certainly isn't zero. He's not a Farrell favourite, but he's a reliable option they can call on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    The most magical thinking in irish rugby are the ones that think the numbers of NIQs affect what happens in academies when it comes to 3-8 players.

    Leinster will always be focusing on their front row in academy. Before, now and forever. Its not a question of will or want, its just that guys like furlong and porter and healy naturally don't come along that often. That's normal. Leinster will find it hard to replace Furlong in the academy and having or not having NIQ THPs will not change that at all.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Vague hope… come on lol… signing better players to make teams better is a literal fact in ALL sports.

    This is the weirdest hill to die on I have ever seen on here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    How are they better? at the moment the argument is not for any specific players, just more NIQ's.

    On another thread, I think it was you, maybe someone else, who even admitted the players might not be any better than the Irish qualified ones.

    So it has nothing to do about signing better players, it's just about signing players

    I couldn't care less what "hill to die on" you talk about, especially when you run from one thread to another going on about NIQ 😂 have you anything to discuss in Irish rugby apart from NIQ and the Leinster private schools which you shown many times you have no idea about but constantly discuss?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,644 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    I'd agree with zero NIQs. At least for Leinster. Or I would have based on how Lancaster could develop the squad players. But it remains to be seen how that situation will evolve over the medium term. Already the 2nd XV seem less capable than before.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    So it has nothing to do about signing better players, it's just about signing players

    This is a complete strawman; it's obviously about signing better players.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Because signing better players makes team better? The bigger the market of players, the more good ones available.

    Again, super weird hill to die on. This is just super basic market principles.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    I think leinster, ulster, munster should get same number (5 each for me). Connacht should be allowed a few more i think.

    Or maybe allow connacht to be speculative with early 20s potential project players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    What bigger market? Irish provinces are playing in the same market as everyone else. We don't have the same spending power as the French sides and even some of the English sides.

    So who are all these magical players that the Irish can sign?

    The NIQ quantity will go up, the quality fo the signings will not



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    The NIQ market is bigger than the IQ market.

    There aren't any magical players to sign. But there are rugby players available. I'm certain every provincial coach could identify weak spots in their squad that could be improved where an NIQ player would be more attainable than the equivalent IQ option.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    I’m sure the province could but trying to identify and sign players of quality is the issue

    When The coach’s had more NIQ the quality was questionable for players as they just signed to fill a slot and ended up Irish players not getting the game time, so this has all been tried before and the number of players across the World hasn’t massively increased and the money available in other regions has increased

    so you will end up with more quantity and less quality, blocking Irish players and making the Irish team weaker.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    The two players you pointed to leaving because of a lack of provincial minutes were 1) Carbery, who wasn't blocked by an NIQ and 2) Molony, who has 0 Irish caps.

    Molony leaving makes effectively zero difference to Ireland. I'm pretty sure you previously suggested he could return after his Bath contract and play for Ireland. With the best will in the world, that's just not going to happen.

    So it makes zero difference to Ireland. In fact, you could argue that him staying would block gametime for younger, higher ceiling IQ options in the academy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    When we tried it before the irish teams won more european cups even though the actual overall quality and depth of irish players was worse. Irish provinces were more successful in a higher NIQ era.

    Whether that is good for irish rugby? That's more complicated. But making the actual provinces better? Its pretty clear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,644 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    That's too many for me - at least for Leinster. Leinster historically have had issues developing hookers, second rowers and scrumhalves. If they had been allowed the quick fix of quality signings would they have been incentivised to address the shortcomings in development in certain areas? I would say 'no'. If you look at Sheehan's story, it sounds as if not a lot would have had to go differently for him to not be signed up by Leinster.

    I suppose as a supporter of a Leinster team who have been near the top for ages and an Ireland team who in general are better placed than ever before it's easy to see things that way. I can understand why Munster supporters would want a bit of leeway for another quality signing or two.





  • Yeah, I agree on this. I think 5 is too many.

    It's a very difficult balancing act to achieve - because coaches, particularly coaches who feel embattled or under pressure in their role, would be far more inclined to go the route of short-term fixes etc and sign shorter duration NIQs IMO than give the game time to younger players.

    You clearly have to have some level of central thinking around this - as for example you couldn't have a situation with all four provinces having NIQ THPs for example.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement