Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The accelerating fall in Sinn Féin support

Options
14749515253

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 801 ✭✭✭Relax brah


    Simon Harris is a decent hard working educated man not a bully or racist like them SF councillors. The sooner the better that party is disbanded



  • Registered Users Posts: 801 ✭✭✭Relax brah


    Scum Féin is what they should be rebranded



  • Registered Users Posts: 279 ✭✭carfinder


    You seem to conflate, repeatedly, the electorate as a whole, with the 30 odd percent of it that, up until recently, supported SF. The thread is about the drop in support for SF but you keep talking about the electorate as a whole. The drop in support for SF was driven, in part, by their stance on immigration - you seem very invested in discounting this reason as contributing to their fall in support. There will, unfortunately, be at least 1 anti-immigration Councillor elected



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,242 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    They are not defying the electorate, they very much represent the electorate and most likely will continue to do so for a very long time.

    You on the other hand need to stop relying on UK/US style political analysis because it does not work very well in Ireland or Switzerland (where I now live). Both countries are unique in that citizens make strategic decisions about the direction of their country through constitutional referendum. And that makes most voters more knowledgeable on issues and multi issue voters. Most voters will accept there are issues in relation to housing, refugees, immigrants, healthcare and so on, but they will not accept the simpleton approach of blame it on the refugees, the banks, yada yada… they fully understand that the issues of state are more complex than that. And they want to see that in the parties the vote for. So yes they will vote a little left of centre, a little right of centre and that is about it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 311 ✭✭Grassy Knoll


    I am not a Sinn Fein supporter or voter. However, I would give them credit for not tacking to the hard right on immigration as you would expect from a populist party. Turnout has not been mentioned much as a factor, but low turnout I would assume favour the more established parties…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭growleaves


    You've been in Switzerland a long time is my understanding.

    The refugee issue here is a real concern for people. It has nothing to do with blame and scapegoating - hence why people won't vote for the far right (including me).

    People want an existing party, whether that is FG or SF, to handle the immigration and refugees issue properly.

    It has nothing to do, from the general public's point of view, with the populist rabble-rousing of Trump, Brexit etc. You are the one who is confusing the situation.

    Harris and FG have already started to recognise this in fact and pivoted their rhetoric and policy somewhat (though perhaps they are only feigning for votes?) but probably need to go further.

    Only a complacent person would think that just the establishment parties not losing to the most outlier fringe-elements is a stamp of approval to just continue piling in masses of people with little care for the details.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭growleaves


    No one wanted them to "take the hard right" though but to act to restrict immigration and processes refugees in a safe and moderate way. If they can find some kind of a balance there they might be all right.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,511 ✭✭✭Finty Lemon


    O Broin is regarded as a classic useful idiot within the top echelons of SF. In truth, so is McDonald. These people are pushed forward to fulfil and electoral function in the South, i.e. soften the image of the party and make them more credible from a policy/ social perspective. That makes them 'the smartest people on the room' within SF circles, which in no way makes them the qualified for positions where being actually smart counts.

    There have been numerous of this type tried by SF Young, idealistic, comic book republicans that are either very opportunistic or very naive. Forums like this are full of them and they dont even realise it. Tragic in a way.

    The party would love to be in a position to run a 'real' republican like Padraig McLochlainn as nominal leader but are afraid ge won't wash in Dublin.

    The softy SF types like OBroin will never wield any real power in the party however, because they have never got their hands dirty. You need the stripes, the years, the bodies. OBroin could have conceivably been seen as an heir to McDonald, but the big fact is that a catastrophic failure to covince people on housing will weaken his case. Either way, leader could change but leadership will stay the same.

    Brian Gillen, Spike Murray, Martin Ferris, Eddie Copeland, Gerry Adams, Tom Murphy, Tom McMahon. It doesnt matter if its OBroin or MLMD on the poster, you are voting for these dudes anyway.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,329 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    It's hard to dispute that there is some degree of disjuncture between what the voters want on immigration and what they are getting from the government

     An overwhelming majority of voters (79 per cent) say that the Government should do more “to manage the issue of immigration

    But yeah if people are not going to shift their vote to parties proposing drastic changes to immigration policy then we have to accept that other issues are more important to them and that the established parties are by definition representing their voters in a broader sense…



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,897 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Why would low turnout favour established parties?

    Have you not seen Sinn Fein on immigration? like every topic they are flip flopping alll over the place. Not sure why anyone would give them credit for that

    It's like every topic, they flip flop around like a fish out of water



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,666 ✭✭✭Bobson Dugnutt


    I hear Matt Carthy is well regarded by those lads.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭growleaves


    As another poster said in a different thread, even in these local elections we've seen a significant increase in Independents - they are now at 19%, not far off FFG.

    Political re-alignments take time, but if some supporters of SF have now rejected SF over immigration it isn't clear where those votes will end up exactly but the uncertainty over that also doesn't mean that the immigration issue has gone away definitively.



  • Registered Users Posts: 311 ✭✭Grassy Knoll


    simple statement , no judgement here, but FF / FG supporters would be more likely to be older, therefore with perhaps a mortgage, better established in terms of their jobs, perhaps wealthier, in turn more likely to vote, thus parties such as Sinn Fein could conceivably see a lower turnout of its supporters. General elections have higher turnouts of voters over second order local / EU elections, thus it could be argued SF is likely to have a better turnout of some of,its support when that happens. Of course there are a bunch of other issues which are in play e.g. policy, candidates, strategy etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,897 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    So in other words you think the low turn out was based on age :-)

    Some real noise been posted across the internet since it was figured that SF wasn't having the predicted win's but that has to be one of the best

    In reality the people who are doing just fine have little inclination to bother going to vote than the vocal group who have been shouting for years how they want to vote XYZ out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,561 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    But again this is a national issue. Local government has very little say in it.

    Then if you look at those who are proposing drastic changes to immigration policy you see that many have very little else to add and may be somewhat unrealistic in how they play to make these changes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,561 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Of course it hasn't gone away, neither have the other issues that have been spoken about but these are local elections. Nobody called to my house telling me what they would do about immigration and I wouldn't have expected them to.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,666 ✭✭✭Bobson Dugnutt


    SF have a problem in that some of their activists and youth branch are big into socialism, Cuban Solidarity, eulogising the hunger strikers, a 32 county socialist republic.

    But a lot of their voter base couldn’t give a shïte about that stuff. They are grand with the nationalism, but fundamentally they want more big government and less migrants.

    I’ve said it before but SF’s unrelenting social media strategy over the past 15 years suggesting we live in a failed state has come back to bite them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,897 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    All the posters taken down in our area apart from a new independents and the Sinn Fein posters. All other main parties out quickly to remove the eye sores and get rid of them

    Sinn Fein it seems taking a lot longer to remove them.

    When do they need to be removed for?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,897 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    I have said it multiple times but the Sinn Fein online supporters are now helping every other party in Ireland, they are vile online and a total disgrace the way they attack and abuse people.

    Why Sinn fein think it is a good idea to have that sort of individuals running around representing their party across all social media is beyond me. No other party in Ireland would allow it to happen.

    Im sure FF/FG etc are loving it because it is costing them nothing and driving votes to them



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,571 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    Within 7 days of the election date if I remember right



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,739 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    I think, despite some problems that still exist, people in the main feel the country is in a better position than it was 12 -18 months ago. People have a tendency to drift away from mainstream parties when they are disgruntled. The idea of change seems appealing, but that appeal has waned.

    Sinn Fein didn't help their cause by trying to be all things to all men . People see through it as the gunk it is.

    I am not a Fine Gael supporter,but i think Simon Harris has played a blinder, he has stolen the thunder of both the left and far right since he got elected.He also has likely won back disaffected Fine Gael Voters. There was a poster a while back who claimed he rescinded his membership of Fine Gael after 30 plus years as he had become disillusioned with Fine Gael under Leo. I wonder has he changed his mind Now. Leo was smart to get out when he did. It has proven decisive for Fine Gael too.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,332 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Yes, SF have run long with the failed state narrative. They needed a disgruntled electorate to push for a change in whom people elected. Whilst we hear a lot of that narrative, both from SF the more extreme right incl Independent Ireland(Ballygobackwards party) the majority of people don't buy into it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,783 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    SF, like so much of the modern left have a position on migration more free market than Ronald Reagan . It makes a mockery of every policy they have, makes them unworkable.

    Carefully managed immigration is at its heart , left wing economics.

    It is the approach being taken now across much of the Nordics and in Europe.

    SF gave the working class 2 fingers and called it solidarity.

    Much of the left today is very middle class and insulated. That class divide is a growing problem for the left in many places.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,769 ✭✭✭hoodie6029


    You can see the effect of running too many candidates in constituencies has had on their vote. 

    In my county, Kilkenny, the Callan/Thomastown area there were no independents, Social Democrat or Irish whatever parties and they easily took one of the seats with 2 candidates running.

    Piltown area in South Kilkenny, you did have all those other parties along with well established mainstream candidates. 

    They ran 2 candidates and neither came anywhere close to where they needed to be on votes because of all the competition. They spilt their own vote on themselves too by running 2. 

    Based on the total votes they got in Piltown they may have taken a seat there with one candidate running. I’m no pollster but that seems like a 101 error in an election campaign. 

    Also one candidate in Callan would’ve likely topped the poll which would’ve been a better result that getting in last on the 3rd count. 

    Post edited by hoodie6029 on

    The road to Hell is paved with good intentions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,783 ✭✭✭✭Danzy




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Which is what Harris is doing & it is paying off.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Indeed. Leo leaving provided the opportunity for Harris to move a little more to the centre right, with enough time to gain momentum before the GE and win back votes for the party.

    He is certainly on track and a November GE looks likley.

    FFG govt to continue for the next term, as has always been the case. Now, more likley than ever.





  • if the Irish working man and woman is that simple then we are in bigger trouble than I thought



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭Notmything


    Repeating yourself doesn't make it anymore true.

    Carers get a respite payment every year. It's so they can get a break, respite you might call it, from having to be a carer 24/7. It doesn't just get paid at elections.



Advertisement