Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why don't the Labour Party and the Social Democrats merge?

2

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 359 ✭✭plibige


    Yes

    Not sure how that supports your point though, they don't need to merge to negotiate. And a government could be formed with one and a few indo's so not sure your point?

    In your scenario it could easily be FF/FG/SD plus independents. So what's the need to merge?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,408 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    To answer your question: size matters

    A merged entity has more bargaining power.

    A merged entity has more electoral power (one SDLP candidate has a better chance of election than 1 SD and 1 LP).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,518 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    They're political parties, not startup businesses. 'Scale' is not necessarily achievable, and if it was, it not necessarily the greater good. The assumption that a merger leads to a whole that is greater than the sum of the parts has no solid basis. The best model in vaguely recent history of this is the merger of Labour and Democratic Left, which really didn't produce 'scale'. Most observers agree that it produced a whole that is less than the sum of the parts prior to the merger.
    Some people like to vote for a smaller party, or like to feel that they're part of a smaller party, not a mainstream party. These aren't entirely logical or rational decisions. There's a whole lot of emotion and history tied up in these decisions.
    The most enthusiastic advocates for this merger seem to be those who would never vote for either party involved, leaving my slightly cynical about the basis for their advocacy



  • Registered Users Posts: 359 ✭✭plibige


    That's an opinion, and a weak one at that. Especially looking at history which is all we can do. Where parties that have gone into government with a minority of similarly sized to what you are describing, have consistently wiped out after.

    History would beg to differ, with your very weak opinion with no evidence of success



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,408 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Well, look at the current Green party experience of government.

    I would say they were pretty successful at getting good chunks of their agenda implemented. Well done.

    They are likely to get a thumping in the next GE.

    Should they have gone into government in the first place, or should they have maintained an aura of perfection from the sidelines?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,472 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Her name is out there now, likely will run in GE next.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,064 ✭✭✭Genghis


    I expect there is clear delineation along age groups between Labour and SD. Labour being moderate left voters mainly over 50s, SD being moderate left mainly under 40s.

    So maybe SD just need to keep appealing to younger voters and as Labour voters (not to mind representatives) diminish with age the SDs take over.

    I don't see a merger happening unless both are existentially challenged at the same time.

    I think they would coalesce with no issues, and from the point of view of the larger parties they could be considered a cohesive bloc in forming a government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,518 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Probably on the assumption that she would get her 1/4 quota and the associated refund of costs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,408 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    There's actually much more coherent arguments being made on here than in that Irish Times article, which is basically just a mishmash of talking head's comments. So well done boardsies. 😉



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 359 ✭✭plibige


    You mean the same green party that went into government with 7 seats. As in the exact number that I said would be suffice for either Labour or SD to go into government as a junior party. And you said need "a merged entity has more bargaining power".

    So is 7 enough or do you need more? And if so what's your point because you've got very muddled and unclear.

    The only thing that seems to be clear is you want them to merge so they are easier to deal with, other than that you are bending and twisting your logic to fit your very obvious agenda



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Renko, you're correct. The downward trajectory and continuing spiral of Labour started around the time of the merger with Democratic Left. Many old school Labour activists were appalled. They knew the history attached to many of the old SF stickies in their local areas. Remember, all constituencies in Cork and Kerry, urban and rural, at the time generally had a Labour TD. The old Labour grassroots stopped working. Labour sadly, is a stale brand. Labour first has to revitalise itself before any SD merger. A merger first will not revitalise the new entity.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,286 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    SD and LAB are slightly estranged family members. The greens are the neighbours who have similar interests.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,518 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Feckin vanilla, missing quote again



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,408 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    7 was the number needed in 2020. Who knows what the number needed in 2024 will be?

    I don't have an agenda by the way! It just seems like a very obvious political anomaly that merging would solve. Accusing people of 'having an agenda' is not a good way to have an argument (and you will note I don't do it).

    For the record, I voted LP as #3 in both elections and was delighted to see O'Riordain get in as well as Cllr Field.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,518 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    She was Director and later Chief Commissioner of IHREC, which is a GO, not an NGO.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,408 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    And the estrangment relates to two old aunts who had a disagreement over the seating arrangement at a family wedding ten years ago. They now refuse to go to family weddings. Apart from that, they're a happy family. 😀

    The neighbours like them but secretly think they're better than them because they don't use any fertiliser in their garden.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,472 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    The merger was in 1999.

    TD numbers:

    • 1997: 17 Labour, 4 Democratic Left
    • 2002: 21
    • 2007: 20
    • 2011: 37
    • 2016: 7
    • 2020: 6
    • Now: 7, but about to go to 6 with AOR taking his MEP seat.

    So it really died off in 2016 after they went into government - and not back in the early 00s.

    At grassroots level, I guess some expansion is needed. I can see that in Cork they went from 7 councillors in 2009 which dropped to 0 in 2014, 1 in 2019 and now back up to 3 in 2024. So maybe there are some green shoots?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,148 ✭✭✭Augme


    She knew she was gone before the results of the 1st count were even announced. She had plenty of time to talk through and prep for that until the moment her elimination was officially announced.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,148 ✭✭✭Augme


    They should enter into meaningful negotiation. That doesn't mean they should enter government though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,108 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Amateur?

    Shortfall and Murphy are around a long time.

    Abandoning someone like that is pure cruelty.

    Leinster House is a 10 minute taxi ride to the RDS.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,108 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Exactly it looks like she was given ZERO support to prepare by her party.

    I stand by my original comment. Her party abandoned her and left her with little to no support in the RDS. Really really cruel.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,148 ✭✭✭Augme


    They do. Feel free to point to someone who received 4.3 first preference votes in a European elections and won a seat. S

    Stand by it all you want. I don't sinead will feel she's some delicate little kitten who needs the help of a press rep to get her through an interview. That's actually quite demeaning of her abilities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,108 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Many people at the RDS witnessed this. It's not merely my theory.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,148 ✭✭✭Augme


    Could she not handle it when she got eliminated?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,408 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    It happened. But you appear to be ascribing a malevolent motivation to it. It's just as likely to be simple incompetence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,108 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    I can't speak for her but everyone in the RDS saw what happened. Why on earth would any party abandon a candidate like that. The TDs were all in Leinster House yesterday.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,108 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Perhaps. She took out a huge personal loan for their benefit and they abandon her in the RDS. What kind of a party abandons it's candidates (while the TDs are in Leinster House) like that?

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,408 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    I would say one that isn't very well organized and the leadership doesn't have a firm grip on (as in 'get your asses down to the RDS right now and stay there until Gibney leaves the building - here's your media talking points, don't deviate from them').



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,148 ✭✭✭Augme


    So instead the TDs should abandon the job they've been elected to do by their constituents? They, and all political parties, had 100s of candidates who weren't elected over the last few days. That's the nature of politics. Party leaders or TDs cant be there to hold their hand. And if they do need their hand held by the party leaders they probably shouldn't be in politics either. I wasn't there so I didn't see it, but from the comments I read by Sinead she seems to have been very pragmatic and level headed about it. As I said, I wasn't there but she doesn't sound like someone who desperately needed some PR rep to hold her hand through talking to the press.

    She told The Irish Times she is proud of her campaign, particularly her “positive” contribution to the debate on immigration. She said she is “coming out of this feeling bruised but good about what lies ahead”.

    Ms Gibney said she knows the Social Democrats “appreciate what I’ve put on the line for this election” adding: “They have given me their full backing for this run.”

    She said: “The financial aspect of this was really tough for me because I did put so much on the line ... but I know that I’m also in a very privileged position.”

    She said her career, which included “high-profile roles” in the private and public sector, “will allow me to get back on my feet”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,108 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    I'm not convinced by that at all. Abandoning a candidate in a high profile count like this isnt the same at all as local elections. Its not something any other party would do. It really isnt. Its expected in something such high profile that you get party support and backing, not abandonment. I wasnt in the RDS. I know many who were and were disgusted at the visibility of the soc dems abandoning her.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,752 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    i dont see the point of the SD party? they just seem like a cheap version of Labour or for people who cant hack it in the main parties they get a second chance or easier pond to rise in.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,663 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    The more political parties the better if you ask me.

    Choice is good



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    From your distance on the right, everything left of centre must look the same. I do hope that Labour and Soc Dems both grow and cooperation and even a merger would be possible, at some point. But a merger would want to generate a dynamic taking them to a new level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,752 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    I see a difference, there is PBP, then there is People With (a little ) Profit (but feel guilty) before they morph into full Labour supporters

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,408 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Sure - but different parties with identical policies? That doesn't make much sense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27 DamiensNeck


    The Social Democrats are not a serious party. The frequently make spelling and grammatical mistakes in their documents.

    They can't proof read their posts yet they think they are able to run the country?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,663 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    giving out about a spelling mistake in a tweet, probably sent off a phone



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,286 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    probably formulated it as 'prouder' first, then decided on 'more proud' but forgot to remove the '-er' before sending.

    they're clearly not fit for government.

    or well, their social media person, anyway.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 27 DamiensNeck


    If they can't check their spelling is right in a tweet, you expect them to be able run a country?

    As I said, it's not a once off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Anyone with some disability eg dyslexia, shouldn't be considered for public office???



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,286 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    it's a tweet.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    It's a tweet from a media team: this is a slightly inane angle to batter any party over the head with.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27 DamiensNeck


    Policy documents they release have had basic spelling errors in them.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Then supply those documents if they're so egregious. Shouldn't be hard, they're everywhere.

    And again, doesn't really explain why it has any real baring on the party's credability vs. ya know, the actual content of the policy documents, which would be more germaine to the discussion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 375 ✭✭StormForce13


    "To be able TO run a country" reads better! 😋



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,286 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    I hear they have terrible taste in interior decor too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,518 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I'd bet a fiver that every policy document from every party has a spelling error or two in them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,902 ✭✭✭standardg60


    You're clearly the SD's tweeter with that post😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 499 ✭✭subpar


    Labour did the right thing by the country when they went into Government after the FF failure to manage the Celtic Tiger led to the IMF having to run the country's finances for a few years. Labour lost out at the ballot box in the next decade and a half , unfairly in my opinion.

    They are now showing some green shoots and are gaining support again. Now that the Sinn Fein bubble has burst a recovery in Labours fortunes is likely to continue.

    Having said the above a merger between Labour and S. D. would be a postive move.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement