Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General British politics discussion thread

Options
1439440442444445498

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,739 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Can't remember the exact stats but Thames Water needed something like cancellation of fines and a 40% water bill increase just to avoid bankruptcy.

    Trouble is all the taxes (possible and existing) that have not been ruled out are ones with relatively narrow bases, where they have to be set at punitive levels to raise the amount of cash the government would actually need. VAT on school fees is "expected" to raise a billion or so but that is with an overnight 20% hike.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,010 ✭✭✭Shoog


    The problem with this is that since many of these companies are now foreign they would take the government to a dispute resolution tribunal for potential lost profits. Since these are quangos outside the UK judicial system they generally win their case and are awarded huge payouts in compensation.

    Government's run scared of large multinational companies these days.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,932 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It's been done already with train lines. Although I don't know if the system of awarding companies to services is the same as with water.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,189 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Well then the UK govt needs to grow a pair and equip the regulator to deal with them. It is clear they are just fleecing the English public (Water is still nationalised in Scotland and I read somewhere that water in Wales is owned by a not for profit company)



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,189 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Labour effectively nationalised the rail infrastructure in Britain in 2001 when it forced Railtrack into administration.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,010 ✭✭✭Shoog


    Didn't Most of those companies simply go bankrupy and throw in the towel ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,189 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Covid put paid to it all and the UK govt moved to take back all the operator franchises and move them onto management contracts where the state takes the risk on income and spend and pays the private company to manage the service



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,010 ✭✭✭Shoog




  • Registered Users Posts: 68,754 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    This is, if done right, one of the better systems in so far as you can still sack a particularly crap operator. Its basically what the Luas is here; and indeed all other public transport as contracts expire

    That the biggest contractor here is state owned is a major difference, but we have Transdev (Luas), GoAhead (various bus routes) and many smaller bus operators under the same type of deal.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,852 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It's also how buses work under TfL in London and no one would be any the wiser. It's a perfectly fine system when done well.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,286 ✭✭✭Kalyke




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,739 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Noticed Farage squeezed that into the ITVX debate that just started. Decided to stop watching..



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,932 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    As long as the regulator does their job and pricing, maps, tickets and livery stay aligned on the customer side it works perfectly fine and makes no difference to the user.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,189 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    This is a good example of the duplicity in Labour's health plans. They talk as if the private health sector has surgeons, consultants, doctors, nurses, support staff and facilities lying idle ready to be used to treat the backlog. They generally do not and the government giving money to these private health companies actually makes the NHS worse. They really wanted to shut down Andrew Fisher before he spoke



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,708 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I've lost some respect for Beth Rigby, I have to say.

    This is absolutely pathetic:

    Sunak ran from the ceremony. The document is supposed to present Labour as a credible party of government. Diplomatic relations with foreign leaders will be a big part of that. I don't know what point she's trying to make here.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,852 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    What a stupid question. Portraying the fact they have carefully considered all their proposals and not been secretive about them as a negative. Excellent response at least.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,708 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Yeah. I've my reservations and a list of changes I'd like to see in British politics but at least we're moving away from the cult of charisma and clown show politics towards something more sensible, albeit flawed and uninspiring.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,380 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    Just catching up on last nights Q&A

    Few things I note

    Either Rishi gives ZERO “”””” at this stage or he’s thick.

    Beth’s approach to Rishi seemed a lot softer than on Keir. And here is me thinking all along it was Laura K who was secretly or not so secretly a Tory fan

    Anyway. Only one of them came across as anyway credible and that was Keir.

    Other fella is a waste of space



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,189 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Rayner looks absolutely lost in this exchange during the ITV debate this evening - either she does not really care or she hates the fact that Starmer refuses to let any of his team speak about Brexit



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,932 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Farage has demanded a one on one debate with Starmer as he feels he is now "leader of the opposition"

    For once I am laughing with not at him. That's quality trolling of the Tories.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,380 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    LOL,

    He is a more than capable speaker, problem is, most of it is racist or lies, or both



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,932 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Registered Users Posts: 210 ✭✭Randycove


    maybe he can explain why it is that one in ten of his candidates are Facebook friends with the leader of the British Fascist party (in fairness, probably his only friends, but still..)



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,358 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    Maybe he can explain when we're going to get to see his interview with Julian Assange. That was why he went to visit him in the Ecuadorian embassy in 2017, wasn't it?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,133 ✭✭✭flatty


    "Privitised/privytised" it most certainly was.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 18,403 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


    Modern politics is so weird and disconcerting. We had Truss vs the lettuce. One of the world's leading democracies?! Sunak with his D-Day shambles, pretty poor apology and then 'ran over' comment. Was expecting a near double apology. In recent weeks, I've watched a few videos from Times Radio, which are admittedly a bit clickbait…I do wonder if the 'Tories are finished' narrative, which has been galloping along, might be a touch overstated, given there are still a few weeks to go.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,739 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    I don't seriously believe stuff like the Conservatives being relegated to 3rd party status as the YouGov poll suggests, but if the polls havn't tightened by this time next week then everything is on the table.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,695 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    I suspect the polls will tighten and Labour will probably win by around 10% over the Conservatives at the end of the day. The size of the majority will come down to tactical voting and reform taking votes from the Tories to cost them seats. In that case Labour may not need +45% to win a seat but 35% could be enough if the Conservatives are on 30% and Reform 25%. One of the podcasts I listen to in my bubble noted that one of the problems for the Conservative this election is that in almost all seats the Libdems and Labour are not fighting each other. That is why you aren't really seeing them attacking each other.

    Now the SNP are going hard against Labour as they are their opposition in this election. The Conservatives are done in Scotland so Flynn from the SNP has been attacking Labour as much, if not more, than Sunak at PMQ's because they are more dangerous to them. That and it is also easy to go after the easy targets of immigration when it is not a problem in Scotland as it is in England (when I say problem, Scotland does not have as many immigrants as England so seeing other people isn't something that has really become noticeable in Scotland, not that immigrants are a problem). And also the majority of Scotland were in favour of Remain so saying Brexit was a mistake will not cost votes. Also, they can take those viewpoints that favour Scotland as they will never be in charge of the UK, they do not have to court those that voted for Brexit as they will always sit on opposition benches. The same for the Libdems, the Greens and Reform.

    I also note the talk of a super majority being a problem. You only need a 20 seat majority and you can still do what you want. I don't see the difference between Johnson winning a 80 seat majority and Labour 240 seat majority. There is nothing the opposition can do to stop you no matter your majority and those newspapers now complaining about a huge victory conveniently did not mention this in 2019.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,822 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    I suspect the polls will tighten

    Why? What evidence is there that the Tories are doing anything to pander to disgruntled Tory voters or undecideds ?

    At this stage in the campaign, I'm expecting them to be relegated to third place, and won't be at all surprised if they end up in fifth. That's where their French counterparts found themselves last week, for very similar reasons.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,695 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Not so much about the Tories doing anything right, more about history and the 1997 election showing what could happen. It will still mean a massive majority for Labour but Reform will most likely be found out the more scrutiny is paid to Farage and what they actually stand for so they will lose some of their current poll number back to the Conservatives. Add in those that just will not be able to vote for Labour on the day will mean a lower outcome.

    That is just speculation and presuming no more gaffes from Sunak until voting day. If they continue to pee their pants then all bets are off.



Advertisement