Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Aer Lingus Flight Crew Industrial relations thread 2024

1356729

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    On your last paragraph:

    The claim is not solely based on annual profits from 2023, that's merely an indication of how healthy Aer Lingus is and how capable it is of improving it's staff remuneration if it didn't focus solely on shareholder value and executive bonuses.

    I'm also uncertain why you think this profit is unlikely to be sustained? Pandemic aside, Aer Lingus has posted significant profits annually for over a decade. This is despite being so badly managed that they rely on wet lease hire ins every summer. These aircraft cost around €100k per day. Imagine if the airline was staffed adequately and they didn't have to squander that potential profit? How many pilot/cabin crew/engineer etc salaries would that cover?

    Lastly, Aer Lingus forecasts growing profits over the next 5 years to levels beyond the 2023 results. Ialpa are aware of this and so the claim, while only restoring lost purchasing power to pilots, is taking account of future financial performance.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,099 ✭✭✭BringBackMick


    that’s surprising but thanks for info .


    is this because they list a flight with flight time of 2hrs as a 3hr flight I wonder ?


    is there any oversight of them sort of shenanigans ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    I'm pretty sure most airlines do this nowadays, though the extent may vary. It's block-to-block time rather than time in the air that counts and at times taxi and ATC restrictions (for example) account for a not-insignificant portion of the overall journey time, especially on the fairly short hops that account for a lot of Irish traffic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 203 ✭✭breadmond


    In person ballot results are in, pretty unanimous in favour of action as expected

    https://www.rte.ie/news/2024/0617/1455044-aer-lingus-pilots-ballot/



  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭notuslimited


    I just hope they get on with it and put us all out of our misery. I’m booked for MCO in July and have paid €3000 for hotel stays that are non-refundable. If I was earning €200k plus I wouldn’t dream of going on strike for more pay.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,594 ✭✭✭✭TheDriver


    I concur. If you knew the date, then only those people are miserable but at present, anyone travelling in the next 3 weeks are collectively miserable and hence in no way supportive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 62 ✭✭FR738


    any ideas when they might announce a date?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 203 ✭✭breadmond


    I'm curious, at what salary figure exactly do you think workers no longer have the right to negotiate for pay rises? And how much do you think it's acceptable to have your real pay eroded by inflation before you do something and demand an improvement? Would you be happier if only first officers went on strike, or even newly minted captains who haven't breached the 200k barrier yet?



  • Registered Users Posts: 65 ✭✭knobtasticus


    To word this slightly better - it’s important that every employee of every company as successful as EI has the same spending power as they had in 2019. Companies have gotten away with socialising losses and privatising profits for too long. The rot stops now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 203 ✭✭breadmond


    I think it's nuts that the pilots are being painted as the greedy ones when the management board have awarded themselves 100%+ increases in renumeration over the last couple of years while refusing to meaningfully negotiate with the worker group who are literally responsible for keeping the whole show running safely and efficiently



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭notuslimited


    I never said they don’t have the right to negotiate for pay rises, I said I wouldn’t dream on going on strike if I was earning €200k plus.

    The Labour Court has issued its recommendation, and the pilots have rejected it while IAG has accepted it. As a result, a strike by pilots is going to cause a lot of heartache and misery for thousands of Irish families with significant financial costs probably running into the millions in terms of non-refundable payments made.

    And to add a little perspective, according to the latest research, the average salary in Ireland is c.45k.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 203 ✭✭breadmond


    Labour court recommendations aren't binding, and this one didn't address half of the pilots concerns including the attempt to split the workforce by putting new pilots on an inferior contract.

    Nobody wants to cause disruption or see the average holidaymaker lose out but at the end of the day the workers have exhausted all other options

    And I fail to see how the average salary has anything to do with it. The average worker doesn't need to invest 100k to enter their industry, the average worker doesn't have responsibility for hundreds of lives on a daily basis, the average worker doesn't live with the risk of a minor medical issue ending their career at any moment. Pilots are well paid but that's for a good reason, it's an incredibly highly skilled job that has almost zero tolerance for mistakes. That's without going into the unsociable hours and how utterly exhausting it can be...



  • Registered Users Posts: 362 ✭✭Rock Steady Edy


    At least with a minimum of 7 days notice and assuming it's only 1 strike day at a time, anyone affected can hopefully be moved to the day before or after the original travel date.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26 dash8q400


    To the pilots of Aer Lingus, fair play to you for standing up for yourselves and not letting the company try and run roughshod all over you. The job of a pilot is not your average everyday job nor can it be compared to such, you'll never get the support of the public, especially the vested interests of such people who are only worried about losing their own holidays so never be concerned about that, it won't get you what you're looking for. Stand up for your fair share of the pie. Hopefully some of the rest of us might follow suit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,594 ✭✭✭✭TheDriver


    In Cork or Shannon, many routes are not daily. Eg Tenerife is Mon and Fri



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,448 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    common sense? We all come at this from our own perspectives. Outside public service and entities which derive therefrom (such as a privatised formerly-state owned airline), there is no concept of a pay rise simply for racking up a further year of service. Accordingly, from the perspective of those who do not work in those areas, an incremental increase in pay is a pay rise. Was the pay higher afterwards but the role and responsibilities had not changed? If yes the. That would commonly be regarded as a pay rise. Understandably, if your experience is of that being the norm the. You don’t see it as a pay rise but outside the bubble you are in, that is precisely what it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,448 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    I think that they can strike if they want; what bugs me is the mock “poor mouthing”. I saw a statement somewhere that 2/3rds of the airline’s staff earn less than the proposed pay rise for the top captain. I am paid very well and I will fight for pay in a bonus culture. None of us would have ever seen us as the sort of people who would “strike” to improve our terms and conditions. We would find better ways or else head for another employer. One significant issue is that the EI pilots, in the main, will not leave the country for another employer hence why they employ the strike tactic. It’s very shop-floor and not very “professional”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,700 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    Its a bit of a scummy thing to do though in all fairness. Many who voted will be earning higher than those who will be impacted. Families who have saved hard to be able to afford a holiday. To schedule strike action during the peak summer months has one aim only and its to hold aer lingus to ransom and also cause hardship to normal men and women amd children.

    Im a public servant and regardless of pension levies or paycuts absolutely never back strike action. Its always the poorest in society that will be affected. Poor form from Aer lingus flight crew.



  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭notuslimited


    Please play the ball and not the man.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 26 dash8q400


    Funny how that works both ways, all joking aside though whilst I don't work for AL despite a previous accusation, I do work for another operator in Dublin who has seen its own terms and conditions slowly degraded over the past ten years but particularly during COVID. I do feel sympathy for the passengers but just remember whilst you may miss this year's trip due to IR, rember that the decisions the guys and girls are making in AL will affect them for the rest of their careers. If you begrudge their salaries then fair enough, we are a nation of begrudgers after all so that's not surprising. Them fighting for better terms and conditions will hopefully benefit everyone in the industry down the line myself include and hopefully stop the race to the bottom.



  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭notuslimited


    I don’t recall anybody begrudging the pilots their salaries. Good luck to them. I want my pilot to be financially secure and not having to worry about putting food on the table or for that matter wanting to live in a nice house and driving a nice car. They have a very responsible job and I have complete respect for them.

    I too am also ex EI and in my experience the race to the bottom has been going on for over 20 years. I don’t think the outcome of this dispute will benefit any non pilot staff in the industry in terms of pay or conditions. In fact, I would argue that if the pilots get more, there will be less flexibility from IAG for other EI staff if terms of their own pay aspirations.

    Finally, there has been a lot of talk about the wealth of shareholders etc, but in my book they will be OK. The real losers when it comes to paying out what a lot would consider as a very high pay award, is the fare paying passenger who will see fares increase. So it’s not the shareholders who will be worse off, it’s people like you and me who travel on EI. We will end up paying for the pilots pay award. I’m not adverse to this, but a pay award of 23% over 3 years seems excessive in my humble opinion.

    Post edited by notuslimited on


  • Registered Users Posts: 237 ✭✭CoisFharraige


    A bit far fetched if you ask me. Why do you think the pilots should even have the public's welfare in mind - Aer Lingus management certainly don't! It's a private company in a free market and the pilots have a right to do what they're doing, whether or not it affects people's travel plans. Unfortunately that's collateral damage that comes with this as tragic as it is.

    The Aer Lingus pilots have always been relatively well paid. Aer Lingus/IAG seem to be trying to chip away at this and bring it to a "new normal" slowly over the years. Looking at it very black and white - if I was a pilot in Aer Lingus I certainly wouldn't stand for that given the company is recording healthy profits and shows no signs of any financial weakness - especially if they (publicly!) showed nothing but contempt for me. If you were in their position and somebody said you could get a significantly higher salary but you had to strike - would you do it? Unfortunately economic theory would say yes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,594 ✭✭✭✭TheDriver


    Where's the post gone from the poster who heard from their cabin crew friend that 26th is possibly a strike day? (Or am I imagining seeing it?)



  • Registered Users Posts: 30 Kiss my Axe


    was me that wrote it, I didn’t remove it anyways. That’s what a cabin crew member told me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 130 ✭✭fael


    Industrial action is a right enshrined in Irish law. However, we as a country should be a bit more French and stand up for ourselves.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,594 ✭✭✭✭TheDriver


    Thanks, thought I was imagining things. Sounds like they're going to hit hard and fast and I suppose who can blame them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 85 ✭✭LubaDriver


    Nope, one day strikes for the likes of a airline will leave aircraft out of position. It will take a day or two post strike for normality to resume, possibly longer?

    One day strikes at airlines typically cause maximum disruption for minimal outlay - it's a very effective tactic.



  • Registered Users Posts: 30 Kiss my Axe


    for what it’s worth as I said it’s a cabin crew member that told me as I’m flying to the states myself with them July 25th, they’re hoping the company will rethink their strategy after 1 day of disruptions, she can’t envisage it going on too long in the height of their busy season. That’s the hope anyway.



  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭notuslimited


    I have been to Paris and other French cities during periods of industrial unrest. I would hate to see the level of violence, assault and smashing up of cities which can be a feature of French industrial action arrive here in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,700 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    Hopefully if the flight crew decide to ruin peoples plans then Aer lingus management will let them picket away.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 26 dash8q400




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,700 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    Strikes are bitter. Its a bitter move this time of year to strike.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,700 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    They obviously wont get 24 percent. I assume they are looking to meet in the middle of that figure and whatever was offered? 16 or 17 percent. Some payrise if you can get it.

    Re the strikes dates. If they give 7 days notice from tomorrow it'll probably be from mid day Tuesday next week.

    Highest paid captain will get close to 260k per year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,448 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    so that is your perspective. The pilots will form a small part of the workforce of any airline. Unfortunately success for them will mean the opposite for you. Except for those in regulated roles (engineers, mechanics etc), airline staff don’t have high barriers to entry. As a result, success for the pilots will absorb additional costs which could otherwise have been spread over other airline staff who are more replaceable than pilots (harsh but true).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,448 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    French air traffic controllers went on strike in protest against a law which raised the pension age to 64. A change from which they were exempt. Anyone who thinks they were right is a moron. The only people affected were non-French resident was the French flights were protected and flights from other jurisdiction were cancelled. Net result - no additional pressure on French government but impact on other working people. A farce.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,448 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    Out of the hands of Dublin management. iAG will not give in as it would encourager les autres. The pilots won’t win or to the extent that they don’t will be as a result of disproportionate damage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    At the moment I'm struggling to see where this is all ultimately leading.

    The Labour Court recommendation included a recommendation for "…the continuation of engagement, with the assistance of the WRC, on all matters in dispute with a view to reaching overall agreement. That engagement to be concluded by the end of August 2024. In the event of a failure to find overall agreement with the assistance of the WRC, outstanding matters to be referred again to the Court for a final and definitive recommendation…."

    It remains to be seen whether this proves possible. Work stoppages or work-to-rule may exert pressure on management, but they are not going to just cave in, or make major concessions just to get discussions going again. The parties are still going to have to re-engage at some point, presumably using the State IR mechanisms, as they seem incapable of making progress bilaterally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    To be fair, that was a General Strike in France, ie ALL Civil Service Unions were on strike.



  • Registered Users Posts: 130 ✭✭fael


    It's been mentioned a few times that the BA pilots got 24%. So if IAG would allow a 24% pay rise for them then why not for the others in the group? That doesn't rhyme with your logic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 696 ✭✭✭Lockheed


    Lot of factors in it from an IAG angle. Aer Lingus mgmt have indeed already offered to match that figure but as part of the agreement they are looking for improvements in productivity and flexibility beyond what the pilot community/IALPA are willing to accept. IAG as major stakeholders probably need to see some improvement in this productivity to help justify the increase in the cost base.

    Summer rosters, as was pointed out here to myself before, are fairly grueling already and these productivity and flexibility "improvements" have never been definitively outlined.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭notuslimited


    Maybe it’s just me but I always struggle with this comparison. Would a better comparison be what Ryanair pilots are getting in the Dublin base.



  • Registered Users Posts: 36 VivaLasBegas


    No. Different type of airline, different strategy and they do not fly long haul. Fair comparison is to network airlines, BA, KLM, Air France etc and if you look and what they get paid it's not unreasonable what is being asked for. And that's before you even look at the US majors who EI compete with on the Atlantic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    The reality, I believe, is that many of the employees groups in Aer Lingus have clauses that they negotiated with management stipulating that if an other group gets a higher pay rise than them, they are entitled to reopen their own pay negotiations. I have heard that this is a major reason that management don't want to give the pilots a higher percentage than anyone else. If true, it's an awful hole they've dug for themselves.

    As for paying higher fares, someone worked it out in the other thread at €5 maximum average per fare if the pilots got 24%. Would hardly be noticeable for the passenger if the company wanted to cover it that way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    See my previous post. Plus, other groups have already accepted pay increases that they were happy with. That's their prerogative, as it is the pilots to seek what they are asking for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,935 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    €5 per passenger actually sounds like a lot. If the average EI short haul fare is say €80/€90 then this would be a decent chunk just to cover this raise, ignoring the base pay and pay of all other staff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    €5 average. Lower fares wouldn't have as much of an increase.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,935 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    still - if €5 represents 25% increase, it implies that on average, €20 for every fare is to cover pilot costs. Considering fuel and the aircraft cost, that is higher than I expected.

    not making a judgement, makes sense in a way but just higher than I expected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,930 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    Never thought I'd say this but 'thank **** I'm travelling with Ryanair this summer'

    The anxiety holiday goers must be going through over this. Not nice esp with the price of things



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,448 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    True, and an interesting way of looking at it. I think what the original poster did to work it out is divide 40m by total passengers carried in 2023 (10.7m) to get approx €3.75 extra per passenger.

    Changes the maths a bit, €15 of what every passenger paid goes to pilot salaries. So it's not €15 out of every fare because passenger fares aren't the only revenue at an airline. A lot of freight is carried which is very profitable. All the on board sales, WiFi etc all has a profit margin. Bottom line I suppose is that pilots are expensive!



Advertisement