Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Aer Lingus Flight Crew Industrial relations thread 2024

1246729

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    What do you not understand?

    I was saying that pilot pay increases being to the detriment of other staff groups is not true, and in fact beneficial for other staff groups as I've been informed...



  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭notuslimited


    I think what you are saying is that it all boils down to Aer Lingus flying Long Haul to destinations such as LAX, SFO and SEA. Because in my book, EI and FR pilots flying to LPA or KGS would have a longer day than most of the pilots flying to the places like ORD, NYC or even MCO for that matter. So essentially, I think the argument about different strategy etc. is an artificial comparison to confuse people.

    Also, this old saying springs to mind “be careful what you wish for”. Because if the pilots insist that the comparison is reasonable, well if I was running EI I would consider splitting the airline in two and have a separate company running transatlantic….like Aerlinte Eireann back in the day. I would pay the short and mid haul Pilots the same as Ryanair and I would pay the long haul pilots what the pilots in KLM and Air France are getting.

    I think a company such as IAG has plenty of capacity for mischief making and the pilots have to be very careful about winning this battle but ultimately losing the war.

    Post edited by notuslimited on


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭chases0102


    what date is likely for strike action?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,678 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Add 7 to today's date and perhaps one or two more for good luck. It can be anytime from next Tuesday onwards, if it happens.



  • Registered Users Posts: 36 VivaLasBegas


    Well clearly you're the expert then 🙄 Just ignore Aer Lingus own publicly stated strategy of being a trans Atlantic carrier and growing connections. They overnight aircraft, offer business class on TA and Aerospace in European routes, have a frequent flyer club, lounges etc etc. Sure, exactly the same as ryanair.

    You clearly have an agenda.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,611 ✭✭✭California Dreamer


    Hear hear!! They should go and strike on a quiet Tuesday morning in January…..that will really show management that they mean business!!!! 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,700 ✭✭✭Gusser09




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,700 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    Could be next tuesday. Be Aer lingus will have to cancel flights the neclxt day too.



  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭notuslimited




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,794 ✭✭✭Trampas


    But does it effect ei much as fr etc as most of their frames are overnight in Ireland and bar 2? that based in Lhr and 1 in Rome. Ignoring the ta ones

    Im flying with them start of July



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 26 dash8q400


    Having flown both short haul and long haul I can not even begin to tell you how wrong you are with this statement, definitely not an expert by any stretch of the imagination.



  • Registered Users Posts: 362 ✭✭Rock Steady Edy


    Apparently each strike day will cost AL €20-€25m. Assuming last years profit of €225m, 10 strike days wipe out all 2024 profits

    On the other hand EI have 800 pilots. Let's assume an average salary of €100k, so a 25% increase costs 800 x €25k = €20m.

    Based only on those numbers, this ought to finish very quickly.



  • Registered Users Posts: 130 ✭✭fael


    They don't have to up the prices, they can also keep the prices the same for the passengers and absorb the cost increase be accepting lower profits. I think that is what the pilots' spokesman probably meant when he said something along the line that they wanted a pay increase instead of the money going to the shareholders.

    Think of that what you want but I think that's fair enough. At least 50% of the pay increase will be paid to the Irish government in taxes. The shareholders would pay way less tax and probably not even in Ireland.



  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭notuslimited


    I’m no where near an expert on the subject matter, more of a curious bystander. I still don’t understand why an airline offering business class, frequent flyer clubs or lounges etc. as you put it are in any way relevant to what they pay their pilots. These extras could all disappear and it would not make one iota of difference to what a pilot would base his or her pay claim on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 36 VivaLasBegas


    It's a network airline offering connections (approx 50% of TA traffic feeds to/from Europe) versus a point to point low cost carrier. If you want to be successful long haul you need to offer business class and lounges, FF benefits etc. Just because they both fly many of the same routes like Málaga etc does not make FR and EI the same. Maybe educate yourself on the differences before coming on here spouting absolute drivel like it's the truth.



  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭notuslimited


    https://www.rte.ie/news/2024/0618/1455288-aer-lingus/

    Battle lines are being drawn…with all the rhetoric from both sides, I don’t see this ending soon.

    My EI travel plans for the next 2 months see 6 European return trips for business plus a family holiday to the States. Shaping up to be a stressful Summer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,594 ✭✭✭✭TheDriver


    On the contrary, it'll end very quickly when govt and other vested interests in Irish tourism economy need an agreement reached. We're at the towel swinging in the dressing room stage of IR conflicts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭notuslimited


    I never said that FR and EI have the same strategy. I am questioning the belief that somehow this should be a core factor in justifying excessive pay claims.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,099 ✭✭✭BringBackMick


    maybe they’ll work it like they do public sector pay deals and give them ~70% of what they are looking for and spread it over 2.5 years


    would IALPA accept ~18% over 2.5 years or are they actually looking for an instant 24% pay rise?



  • Registered Users Posts: 26 dash8q400


    That much is clear and I didn't "put anything" so don't have a clue what you're referring to there but "an airline offering business class, frequent flyer clubs or lounges" has nothing to do with your claim that "Because in my book, EI and FR pilots flying to LPA or KGS would have a longer day than most of the pilots flying to the places like ORD, NYC or even MCO for that matter". Until you've sat in the front seat of both short haul and long haul aircraft, that statement is a load of crap.

    I think it's very relevant to the Aer Lingus pilots pay claim what BA got offered by IAG, two much more similar airlines than your so called comparison between Ryanair and AL. If you're going to compare like for like then at least compare like for like.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 36 VivaLasBegas


    It's not excessive, it's merely keeping place with inflation and matching the average pay increase in Ireland since 2019 according to the CSO. Also similar to what BA have got since 2019, Virgin pilots recently turned down 29% and easyJet pilots rumoured to be turning down 22%. The ryanair comparison is not valid and had been explained to you many times why the companies are different. It's a different type of operation, pilots work life balance is different etc so yes it is justified. I also don't believe anyone else thinks Ryanair is a model for anything like good employee relations or remuneration.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,302 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Minister for Finance calling on management and unions to enter meaningful discussions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭IngazZagni


    A lot of people on here saying the pilots won't have sympathy if they go on strike. That shouldn't and doesn't matter at all. This is a dispute within a private Corporation between its (extremely poor) management team and its (slightly greedy) pilots. I remember when Ryanair pilots went on strike and even here on boards there were a lot of people criticising them for wanting something as simple as union recognition.

    Aer Lingus management already proved they aren't taking this seriously enough by not accepting the electronic ballot and customers should take note of that.

    Negotiations always have a high claim and a low offer. That's how negotiations start. The pilots won't get 24% but management will face continued strikes unless they offer something much better than 9%.

    I do think blanket percentage increases are not the correct way to do it. It should be a lower percentage increase for those on 150/200k plus and a higher percentage increase for those on below 100k. The net financial gain will be more balanced then.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭chases0102


    If there is no news of strike action today, would it be safe to assume that AL will fly next week? A 7 day notice minimum?


    we’ve a family holiday booked for next Tuesday…..on tenterhooks here…..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,882 ✭✭✭pureza


    The unions will have to give EI notice and will announce strike dates

    So I wouldn't get too wortied about your flight on EI at this stage



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,322 ✭✭✭✭leahyl


    The return flight might be an issue though 👀



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,331 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    If management had any skills in running this airline, they would have sorted this a long time ago. In reality, I think something like a 15% pay rise, back dated to 1 January 2023 with no contingencies on productivity for that. Then agree a further 2.5% in 2025 and 2.5% in 2026. Get the job done and move on. Show the people they can run the airline and also their parent company.

    This being allowed to happen and going on the airwaves discussing salaries for the same people who fly us across the Atlantic in all sorts of challenging conditions with huge responsibility on their shoulders, who are already being paid the same or in some cases a lot less then their fellow Euro operators.

    The whole operation being relied on by people coming in to keep the show on the road when they are not scheduled to and using hire ins throughout the year gives a very bad impression. In what other areas does management want to cut back on?

    EI pilots wore the green jersey in Covid, took huge cuts for an extended period of time. The company is raking in the profits and management are sharing the spoils at the expense of those who actually work on the front line of the operation. IALPA are merely using what they are legally entitled to do for their members. EI don't want to negotiate, which shows their poor management skills yet again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,213 ✭✭✭FionnK86




  • Registered Users Posts: 5 taxingtimes22


    What date is the earliest they could strike, flying at lunchtime Tuesday technically that is less than 7 days, would we be safe? Thanks



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,882 ✭✭✭pureza


    Insurance is their friend there

    Plus a contingency fund

    EI will hire planes and pilots to get people home,even if its a day or 2 late

    EC 261 compensation afaik covers strikes too,so EI have to pay just costs to you,including you yourself re booking on another airline,hotel costs and 300 to 600 euros in cash depending on distance



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,651 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    It's worth noting that BA made a profit of £1.6bn (net) in 2023 and EI made €225m in the same year. This is a significant factor in determining fairness and equity in salary reviews etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭Jizique


    What has that absolute number got to do with anything? Have you looked at the value of these asset base? What return on those assets should they earn, in your learned view?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    I don't see how that's in any way relevant. The scale of the company is not really significant. They both deliver the same profit margin (within 0.1% of each other in 2023). Yes, BA is a much larger organisation and thus the numbers are bigger, but again the margins are the same. It's a nonsense argument.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭1123heavy


    And how many pilots does BA have to pay as opposed to EI?

    BA is about 5 times larger than EI. It's all proportionate.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26 dash8q400


    BA have 36,000 employees and a much larger fleet size including 3600 pilots. That's 6 times the size of AL. Their profit margins are similar. Like for like people.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,759 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    As expected work to-rule from 26 June.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,594 ✭✭✭✭TheDriver


    What exactly will that mean in reality? (Genuine Q). Eg what's a Friday change?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    Friday change: Every Friday the pilots roster can be completely changed for the following week from what it was at roster publication. This allows the company to plug gaps but it's a nuisance to pilots who have organised child care etc based on the published roster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,759 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Some cancellations most likely. This happened a few years ago due to staffing issues.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,940 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Delays. Lots of delays.

    Cancellations too, as pilots will no longer volunteer to work on their days off to help the company.

    And when they are duty they will no longer into safety reserve hours. (Official term is "going into discretion")

    Post edited by Tenger on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,935 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    They probably didn’t need a ballot to work to rule really - or maybe they do?

    if the Pilots work to rule and the impact is significant (as predicted) then that is purely on EI management. You can’t run a business that size on the hope that your pilots will help you out, maybe in extreme scenarios they can assist and cover gaps but not every day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,967 ✭✭✭trellheim


    This is looking very like the UK rail disputes, some of which are still dragging on . Anyone reckon IAG are just casual bystanders ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 237 ✭✭CoisFharraige


    Agreed. They'll quickly realise how much they've been relying on pilots' goodwill and general cooperation. Some members of the public will be surprised pilots even do answer calls outside working hours, check rosters, take such late roster changes etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    No surprise really - they were unlikely to go for a "nuclear option" as first step. The dispute will drag on longer, though, or until the arline's management decide that they need to make a move aimed at settling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 313 ✭✭Kilteragh


    Surely this is much worse for customers as we still have no idea who will be affected and when.

    At least if they said all out strike on July 1 then those affected could make alternative plans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,794 ✭✭✭Trampas


    So if you’re flying on a Saturday you won’t know if you’re flying until the day before?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    Worst-case I guess you might not know until you are at the airport - and of course that's even worse if you are travelling home from somewhere else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,594 ✭✭✭✭TheDriver


    Pilots could choose to work to rule but a union dictated generally requires a ballot plus it's more public. It also gives them the strike option.

    I assume EI would hire in planes which would cost them a fortune?



  • Registered Users Posts: 409 ✭✭sherology


    I tend to agree. The multiple cancellations on Sunday, some yesterday, and ORD earlier today... Were these due to work-to-rule being already implemented unofficially/unannounced to the public- seems like a lot - and really unkind to the passengers - screw management all you want but don't screw the public so blatantly.

    I hope EI planners pre-cancel some flights and rebook people onto alternatives now... Reduce multiple daily routes a bit (like LHR - maybe see if a 330 hire-in can take over), to make room for fewer crew available, and don't just sit on their hands. And why aren't they in meetings now and until they resolve!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,935 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    so realistically, they don’t have enough pilots to crew their operation - is the gap bigger on short haul or long haul?



  • Advertisement
Advertisement