Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Aer Lingus Flight Crew Industrial relations thread 2024

Options
145791033

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,599 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    It's worth noting that BA made a profit of £1.6bn (net) in 2023 and EI made €225m in the same year. This is a significant factor in determining fairness and equity in salary reviews etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,887 ✭✭✭Jizique


    What has that absolute number got to do with anything? Have you looked at the value of these asset base? What return on those assets should they earn, in your learned view?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    I don't see how that's in any way relevant. The scale of the company is not really significant. They both deliver the same profit margin (within 0.1% of each other in 2023). Yes, BA is a much larger organisation and thus the numbers are bigger, but again the margins are the same. It's a nonsense argument.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,011 ✭✭✭1123heavy


    And how many pilots does BA have to pay as opposed to EI?

    BA is about 5 times larger than EI. It's all proportionate.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22 dash8q400


    BA have 36,000 employees and a much larger fleet size including 3600 pilots. That's 6 times the size of AL. Their profit margins are similar. Like for like people.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,696 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    As expected work to-rule from 26 June.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,482 ✭✭✭✭TheDriver


    What exactly will that mean in reality? (Genuine Q). Eg what's a Friday change?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    Friday change: Every Friday the pilots roster can be completely changed for the following week from what it was at roster publication. This allows the company to plug gaps but it's a nuisance to pilots who have organised child care etc based on the published roster.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,696 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Some cancellations most likely. This happened a few years ago due to staffing issues.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,817 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Delays. Lots of delays.

    Cancellations too, as pilots will no longer volunteer to work on their days off to help the company.

    And when they are duty they will no longer into safety reserve hours. (Official term is "going into discretion")

    Post edited by Tenger on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,887 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    They probably didn’t need a ballot to work to rule really - or maybe they do?

    if the Pilots work to rule and the impact is significant (as predicted) then that is purely on EI management. You can’t run a business that size on the hope that your pilots will help you out, maybe in extreme scenarios they can assist and cover gaps but not every day.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,908 ✭✭✭trellheim


    This is looking very like the UK rail disputes, some of which are still dragging on . Anyone reckon IAG are just casual bystanders ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 231 ✭✭CoisFharraige


    Agreed. They'll quickly realise how much they've been relying on pilots' goodwill and general cooperation. Some members of the public will be surprised pilots even do answer calls outside working hours, check rosters, take such late roster changes etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    No surprise really - they were unlikely to go for a "nuclear option" as first step. The dispute will drag on longer, though, or until the arline's management decide that they need to make a move aimed at settling.



  • Registered Users Posts: 285 ✭✭Kilteragh


    Surely this is much worse for customers as we still have no idea who will be affected and when.

    At least if they said all out strike on July 1 then those affected could make alternative plans.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,613 ✭✭✭Trampas


    So if you’re flying on a Saturday you won’t know if you’re flying until the day before?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    Worst-case I guess you might not know until you are at the airport - and of course that's even worse if you are travelling home from somewhere else.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,482 ✭✭✭✭TheDriver


    Pilots could choose to work to rule but a union dictated generally requires a ballot plus it's more public. It also gives them the strike option.

    I assume EI would hire in planes which would cost them a fortune?



  • Registered Users Posts: 393 ✭✭sherology


    I tend to agree. The multiple cancellations on Sunday, some yesterday, and ORD earlier today... Were these due to work-to-rule being already implemented unofficially/unannounced to the public- seems like a lot - and really unkind to the passengers - screw management all you want but don't screw the public so blatantly.

    I hope EI planners pre-cancel some flights and rebook people onto alternatives now... Reduce multiple daily routes a bit (like LHR - maybe see if a 330 hire-in can take over), to make room for fewer crew available, and don't just sit on their hands. And why aren't they in meetings now and until they resolve!!!



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,887 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    so realistically, they don’t have enough pilots to crew their operation - is the gap bigger on short haul or long haul?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,887 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    they can’t do that for the short term though as pilots wont accept the change in rosters. They can do it from the next roster issue though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    The media are full of suggestions of hire-ins but this is not necessarily straightforward.

    (i) It is high season and there aren't too many carriers with aircraft sitting around doing nothing. Also, nowadays there are fewer pure charter operators, whose business model included an element of picking up ad hoc work where the opportunity arose.

    (ii) Aer Lingus would need to have a good idea of what capacity they wished to hire in, and what flights were to be operated on this basis. A work-to-rule may not make this type of planning easy. They might have to hire in capacity as a contingency and then decide day-to-day how/if they were going to use it - messy for all concerned. Privilege Style, who have done a lot of flying for Aer Lingus in recent years, no longer have their 757 but do have two A321s. Their A330 is operating for Air Europa until early August 2024, so may not be available.

    (iii) It has been suggested that the other IAG carriers might chip in and provide aircraft, but as they operate as stand-alone airlines I am not sure that this is how things would work. I could see BA putting larger aircraft on LHR-DUB where they were able to manage that, if a lot of EI services were being cancelled, but whether things would go any further than that, I don't know. As IALPA, BALPA and the Spanish Airline Pilots’ Union (Sepla) signed a co-operation agreement in May, some degree of solidarity on that front might be expected too.

    https://sepla.es/en/groundbreaking-agreement-between-pilots-from-iberia-british-airways-vueling-and-aer-lingus-to-create-the-first-inter-union-alliance/



  • Registered Users Posts: 219 ✭✭sailing


    I was just reading the statement from Aer Lingus in relation to the work to rule. Surely work to rule means employees just work their contracts. Do Aer lingus not have enough pilots to crew their operation or am I missing something here?



  • Registered Users Posts: 393 ✭✭sherology




  • Registered Users Posts: 22 dash8q400




  • Registered Users Posts: 49 knobtasticus


    Correct. And this shortfall in flight crew has been historically managed through the flexibility and good-will of EI’s pilots agreeing to work overtime/days off/flex rosters. This work-to-rule will now serve to very publicly expose the extent of this under-resourcing of pilots - and indeed other employee groups. The irony is, a properly resourced airline should largely have no issue handling a work-to-rule - why should any company be allowed rely on the flexibility of its employees just to function normally?

    Any disruption due to work-to-rule is a symptom of mismanagement and passenger ire should be directed accordingly.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    No, work to rule had not been implemented. Pilots, in general, have not been working on their days off for some time now but an actual work to rule will be far more disruptive. Those cancellations were all the result of a combination of maintenance issues and a lack of flight crews to operate the aircraft.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,908 ✭✭✭trellheim


    why should any company be allowed rely on the flexibility of its employees just to function normally?

    How else are management expected to earn bonuses ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 219 ✭✭sailing


    Is it also true that if you work beyond your contract in a delay situation etc that you don’t earn a cent? You effectively work the overtime as goodwill? If so it seems crazy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 998 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    Delays and plenty of them with some canx. Also not as easy as getting some pilots in to cover. Already a shortage of pilots and also need to be qualified on type.

    A couple of planes go tech, that’s when it gets potentially really messy .

    If not sorted in the next couple of weeks it’ll take things to go tits up before I see a resolution



Advertisement