Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia-Ukraine War (Threadbanned in op)

Options
1565759616283

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,435 ✭✭✭macraignil


    Yes making a video of supermarkets is such a normal thing for tourists to do and yet another normal day for putin's forces in Ukraine yesterday:

    I'm sure you would say it looks like putin can cope with these losses without it being any sort of problem for his mighty empire and time is running out for Ukraine to make concessions….



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,200 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    There is always a middle way, the main problem for Europe is it looks like it has backed a loser, cant be a positive for the long term serviceability of either NATO or the EU, one should worry about the "sheer fkn hubris" of it all

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,200 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Im not sure what you think the point is? all that matters is where you think the lines will be in 6 mths? 50% i'd say no significant change but there is a downside risk for Ukraine on the other hand I dont see the lines retaking Crimea or any such.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    The lines didn't really change in WW1 for 4 years. Then one side collapsed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,536 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    The other option was giving Russia free reign to complete the invasion. This would have resulted in larger scale genocide. On top of that, their military would have been left in a far stronger position without international backing for Ukraine. So Russia could easily have considered expanding beyond Ukraine. So what pray tell is the "middle ground" you have in mind?

    Russia aren't coming out of this as a winner in any way btw. International position destroyed, huge amounts of oligarch's wealth taken, trade relationships destroyed and their army is decimated. Prior to the war they were viewed to have a pretty powerful military but that image has been decimated.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,583 ✭✭✭Field east


    there is ABSOLUTLY no mention in this thread app out the amount of CO2 being produced because of the war. Areas could be divided into :-

    (1) explosion of bombs, missiles, etc

    (2) fuel used in vehicles - airplanes, vehicles

    (3) manufacturing of machinery, vehicles, missiles for use in the war



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,583 ✭✭✭Field east


    Forgot no 4 ie all the Co2 being produced because of all the fires- buildings, forests, vehicles, etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,459 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Producing the vast quantities of concrete that will be required to rebuild Ukraine will generate enormous amounts of CO2 as well.



  • Registered Users Posts: 264 ✭✭vswr




  • Registered Users Posts: 18,200 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    You assuming Russia just collapses? i'd go with 95% ukraine doing that if they are the choices.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,112 ✭✭✭yagan


    Well for all those eco conscious types Russia is burning through their soviet era stock so fast that they'll probably be heading to the front on bicycles soon, #sustainableinvasion



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,200 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    the other option <insert blah blah blah> , your concern for Russia now is touching , lets see how it works out

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,088 ✭✭✭riddles


    lest we forget the Time person of the year in 2007

    Putin is not a boy scout. He is not a democrat in any way that the West would define it. He is not a paragon of free speech. He stands, above all, for stability—stability before freedom, stability before choice, stability in a country that has hardly seen it for a hundred years. Whether he becomes more like the man for whom his grandfather prepared blinis—who himself was twice TIME's Person of the Year—or like Peter the Great, the historical figure he most admires; whether he proves to be a reformer or an autocrat who takes Russia back to an era of repression—this we will know only over the next decade. At significant cost to the principles and ideas that free nations prize, he has performed an extraordinary feat of leadership in imposing stability on a nation that has rarely known it and brought Russia back to the table of world power. For that reason, Vladimir Putin is TIME's 2007 Person of the Year.

    champions league final 2008 Moscow

    Winter Olympics 2014 Sochi

    Now fast forward to 2024, millions emigrated - 100s of thousands dead or injured.

    Foreign investment gone.

    Inflation 17% interest rate 8-9%

    Mincing about North Korea trying to find a new friend. 

    Slow hand clap for Putins execution of a plan that was years in the making.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,281 ✭✭✭keeponhurling


    And the ever looming threat of the Russians doing something very very bad involving the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power station.

    Either intentionally or accidently.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,805 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    **** me, is that the latest talking points. Ukraine should surrender to stop climate change?



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,930 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    It's becoming very expensive for the Kremlin, they've already had to hike taxes significantly to pay for it all, there could be a partial collapse of the military, they have a labour shortage due to the war, they are experiencing manpower issues (and are now e.g. looking to Africa for mercenaries), they are being impacted by the first batches of strikes on their energy infrastructure, there could be political issues

    Russia is still potent, have a large war machine and can likely drag this out for a good bit longer, but keep in mind they have a GDP smaller than the state of Texas. Shell production is only just starting to get going in Europe and the US, Ukraine will start to receive F16's this summer, they have only just been allowed to use weapons to strike inside Russia, they have only just started to receive US aid after a lull.. none of these are magic game-changers, Ukraine is still in a difficult situation, but all of this is applying heavy pressure to Russia and it's military



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,583 ✭✭✭Field east


    at least that’s a start but away, away, away,away, —————————-, off the mark!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,569 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    How do you think the Ukrainian population are going to cope with the onset of winter? The country's electricity generation has been seriously degraded with no chance of significant repair in advance of Winter.

    https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/05/18/world/with-its-energy-network-nearly-destroyed-ukraine-already-fears-winter/

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,573 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Yes. Greta must have a word with the Ukrainians.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,536 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    So instead of engaging with the points, you just respond like this? It's not exactly demonstrating that you can actually argue this alternative solution. Letting Russia invade Ukraine would have resulted in more genocide and further expansion. It would have been far more destabilising effect globally.

    Post edited by eightieschewbaccy on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,644 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Yeah, it seems crass to mention it given the human toll/ suffering, but the ecological devastation caused, even just for Ukraine's own habitats, is depressing. Its the same with every war, but this is all in the midst of having reached global environmental crisis point. Another thank you card to write to Putin.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,644 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Fantastic contributions to the thread. Summed up as basically Russia is bigger than Ukraine so the world should have bent over for Putin. You're entitled to your views but given the lack of any real substance to them don't be shocked by posters being dismissive.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,257 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    I think they won't have to cope nearly as hard as all the (Kremlin apologist\Both sides\Ukraine should negotiate) posters have been coping recently. They've been flooding the thread this past while since the Swiss peace summit for some reason.

    Don't forget also it was Russia that suffered the most last winter since their infrastructure is crumbling and every penny that could fix all the bursting pipes and breaking dams is being used to send all the maintenance lads to die in Ukraine.

    What do you think? Do you think Ukraine could be on to a winning formula soon since they have pretty much all of the worlds most influential countries supporting their peace formula? Meanwhile little bunker boy Vlad has had to prostrate himself in front of North Koreas Pop and Fresh. Is that why all the Kremlin sh*te spewers such as yourself are suddenly so riled up and scuttering up the thread?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,644 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    No, jesus, that was your take from his post?! Do share your list of permitted talking points why don't you. It was a f**king observation. Don't be so paranoid, or are we back to looking for Reds under the Bed again after a few months where this thread was actually interesting and informative?



  • Registered Users Posts: 416 ✭✭jonnreeks


    Read an article recently and it mentioned all the major rich oligarchs who support Putin and have a big influence on politics behind the scenes are not happy with the effect of the sanctions, travel restrictions and business opportunities now in place. They feel that the future does not look bright. They would not be happy having to holiday in North Korea or Iran while their children would have to avail of Universities in Pyongyang or Tehran or other unattractive totalitarian countries. Gone are the days that they could avail of the tax havens of the World while sending their sons and daughters to the attractive cities of Europe!



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,281 ✭✭✭keeponhurling


    This reminds me maybe the ultimate success so far.

    Russia are in no position to invade and occupy any other countries, they simply don't have the manpower.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,425 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    Ukrferry restarted its operations in July 2023 with its ferry Vilnius (9,341 dwt) operating between Romania and Georgia. 

    Additionally, at the end of May, the Ukrainian Sea Ports Authority reported that negotiations were underway to also resume a ferry service connection to Baku, Azerbaijan on the Caspian Sea



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭ToweringPerformance


    Putin is just a dictator with nukes and has consolidated power in the last year. Russia is further away from removing him from any other point in his reign imo.

    https://www.rte.ie/news/world/2024/0621/1455901-russia-wagner/



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,886 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    It is bad, but I think they will survive.

    This extensive damage to grid/thermal + power plants Russia managed this year is (partly) a fruit of the stupid NATO/US "non escalation" reactive policy in dealing with Russia wouldn't you say? Also the silly Republican block/strike on providing military aid that lasted for half a year or so.

    NATO/US have hemmed themselves in long past sense with all sorts of red lines and tripwires all over the place, where Putin/Russia are free to escalate and adapt/adjust their strategy as they like in Ukraine (and elsewhere), bar perhaps use of nuclear weapons (China/India have said they would not be happy).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭nigeldaniel


    How is Russia going to cope… Russia up the creek and heading back to the stone age. Putin has destroyed everything Russia built up from 1990 to 2020 thanks to his ill-balanced notion of his own importance. The man is a crazed mafia goon. Russia now depends on North African countries for manpower in the Russian army—North Korea for weapons and by the looks of it, Micky Mouse for a friend.

    Dan.



Advertisement