Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Would you agree that "Golden age" of Irish rugby is over?

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,765 ✭✭✭Shehal


    No , we are still in the Golden Age

    Wonder would he have written this if Leinster/Munster won the URC yesterday?



  • Registered Users Posts: 336 ✭✭Rugbymad2020


    Ireland has no depth and even Farrell knows this by he’s team selection at the WC



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,835 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    No , we are still in the Golden Age

    No question that we need to strengthen in a few areas.

    We need better back up to Porter at LHP , back row is interesting, on the face of it we have a lot of talent, but there is a rebuild on the horizon at 6 and possibly even 7 and below the surface not as much proven test experience as you'd think.

    Scrum Half is a problem, but only because JGP is so good that there is always going to be a drop off to the next guy. This will be a huge two tests for Casey.

    Crowley is comfortably out on his own at 10, hopefully Prendergast (or whoever) can emerge to give him competition.

    We're generally fine at centre, although Osborne becoming a test quality centre would be timely given the age profile of Aki, McCloskey and to a lesser extent Henshaw.

    Our first choice back three is well established, but beneath that there are real issues IMO and this is an area we need to develop one or two players.

    I'd love a real game breaking back though.

    Those are the issues, we can debate the candidates to step up, but it's a big 12 months for Ireland between SA, the Emerging Ireland Tour, the Autumn Internationals and next summers tour when the Lions are in Australia. The squad and team may look quite different come November 2025. Given all that I wonder if Andy's appointment (hugely deserved as it is) as Lions coach next year may be badly timed in some respects for Ireland.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    No , we are still in the Golden Age

    Given all that I wonder if Andy's appointment (hugely deserved as it is) as Lions coach next year may be badly timed in some respects for Ireland.

    That's certainly possible, but you could make the argument that having a new eye for selection and development for a year might bring through players that otherwise would not have made it. Or just freshen things up for everyone for a bit.

    I'm on the fence about the whole thing really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,765 ✭✭✭Shehal


    No , we are still in the Golden Age

    I havent read this due to the paywall but I listened to the 9 minutes YouTube clip on the 42 where he talks about these issues and it all just seems very reactionary, I really wont if Leinster/Munster hadn't got knocked out last week would he be saying any of this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Right, if Leinster had won a few CCs over the last few years it would be a different conversation. They didn't so the conversation revolves around things that need to happen for Irish teams to win competitions. Not directed particularly at you @Shehal, there are often comments like this suggesting that commentators or posters would say different things in response to different facts. I guess I hope they would!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,566 ✭✭✭Downlinz


    Reasons in favour of the golden age being over:

    • Project players have played a huge role in the success of Irish rugby over the past 10 years and it's a recruitment device we can no longer rely on.
    • The gulf in squad depth between ourselves and South Africa, New Zealand and France is growing. It appears to be IRFU to concentrate caps on fewer players with fewer central contracts rather than build depth and as such we've seen the likes of Frisch, Kleyn and Ben Healy ignored by the system and leave. A lot of eggs in very few baskets
    • Budgets for Munster, Ulster and Connacht have been cut this year. Squad sizes are reducing and quality of players being signed are worse than those leaving.
    • The financial gap between the provinces and Top 14 is growing rapidly to a point where a player exodus feels inevitably on the horizon.
    • We used to have 3 teams consistently in the quarter finals in Europe, now it's usually only 1.
    • We're still hugely reliant on a handful of private schools for most of our elite players. Rugby has failed to spread across demographics in the country.

    Reasons to think the next years can be as good or better:

    • Our under 20's performances have been consistently excellent and better than at any point in history.
    • The IRFU manage the sports financials prudently in a time when so many other unions appear to be heading towards collapse.
    • We now have a better league than ever both for competitiveness and revenue.
    • Leinster at least are still able to attract some of the best coaches and players.

    Overall it's a mixture of signs though I feel Ireland and Leinster have a group of ageing players there that'll need transitioning away from in the next 3 years which may affect results from both but they'll both be serious teams and win silverware for long term, just probably not quite as good as recent levels.

    The picture for Munster, Ulster and Connacht is much more bleak.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    At work and on phone so can't address this in full but think you're wrong on a few of those reasons and saying thwyŕe why golden age is over

    I think the gap between some provinces and France is closing. It certainly isn't with leisnter. By their signings, taking into account central contracts etc etc

    RuRugby has not in any way failed to spread across demographics across the country. More coming through at pro level across clubs. New areas and people who didn't go to fee schools.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,765 ✭✭✭Shehal


    No , we are still in the Golden Age

    I was referring more about this season than the last few seasons tbh. I just found it interesting how this was only brought up by Jackman this week but not the week before when it was looking like we'd have an all Irish URC final.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 Dax Damp Bongo


    No , we are still in the Golden Age

    I really disagree the difference in depth is growing between Ireland and SA, NZ and France.

    To a certain extent we've always had a depth disadvantage just by virtue of having materially fewer pro players (especially v France and SA), but I can't see the logic behind the gap growing. SA & NZ also named relatively settled squads for the summer series with relatively little rotation.

    Even since the RWC, Jack Crowley, Joe McCarthy and Calvin Nash have proven themselves as really capable players at this level, and hopefully Jamie Osborne might get the chance to do similar this summer.

    Our underage production has been excellent in recent years, and we're really competitive at that level now. I think that's a major change versus the c. 2011-2015 period, and should mitigate the impact of no longer relying on project players.

    I don't get the argument around the players being signed for the provinces (presumably the NIQs?) being worse than the players they're replacing?

    I don't see this doomsday player exodus scenario to the Top14 - players are still very well paid and well looked after here. There will always be a certain amount of it for players at a certain point in their career, but I don't see any real evidence for fears of it happening en masse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,765 ✭✭✭Shehal


    No , we are still in the Golden Age

    I suspect if Ireland win the series in SA we'll move from a doomsday thread like this to "Have Ireland peaked too soon" like the clip of our fingers.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,915 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Depth in NZ is as thin as it ever was. Players in their mid 20s are leaving for better money, whereas that was generally the preserve of the twilight all black.

    france put all the eggs into winning the RWC basket, and failed. They are rebuilding, though not on the scale that Lievremont did. Their depth is not increasing pro rata to ours, its pretty much the same as its always been.

    personally i have no problem with letting the likes of Healy, Kleyn and Frisch fall through the cracks if it means unearthing (potentially) better players like Crowley, Joe Mac and Osbourne.

    There is no sign at all that there will be an exodus abroad by players. the vast majority of players to move to england or france over the last few years were never near being test level players, and theyre the ones we should be letting go to make room for, again potentially, better players.



Advertisement