Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Aer Lingus Flight Crew Industrial relations thread 2024

Options
1272829303133»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,343 ✭✭✭dublin49


    When you represent only 7% of revenue nothing is off the table.I am not saying anything will,but depending on how it progresses seismic change is not off the table.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,232 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Iag must get tired of going from one union to another (he got more so I want more etc)I presume if they give aer lingus what they want it causes issues elsewhere,at some stage might they look to tidy up the operation, amalgamation of two into one?



  • Registered Users Posts: 156 ✭✭jellies


    I think that's a bit more complicated after Brexit because the UK pilots are not licensed to fly (based) in the EU and vice versa. So it's hard to see how they can merge Aer Lingus and BA for example.



  • Registered Users Posts: 371 ✭✭gossamerfabric


    They won't be merging with high cost BA. They will use another AOC or create one as needed.

    This is all reminiscent of when folks round here were salvating at the thought of Ryanair management backed in to a corner and would give the Irish crew everything they wanted.

    Years roll by and I fly Ryanair often but rarely find myself on an Irish operated plane.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    That article having no direct quotes but made up entirely of quotation attributed to "a source" should be ringing alarm bells with anyone who reads it. I'd hazard it's almost entirely fabricated and the unnamed source is a senior member of the Aer Lingus management. It's a hit piece designed to steer the public narrative. Not to mention the author was an Aer Lingus employee in the 90's and according to another poster here joined the company with an individual who is now a member of the management suite. Not a stretch to imagine there's a connection there.

    As for an excuse for dramatic overhaul of Aer Lingus: I don't believe that for a second. If IAG had wanted to take that kind of action, they don't need an excuse. And if you insist that they do, wouldn't Covid and the subsequent recovery have presented a much better excuse for restructuring? Regardless of how small a percentage of IAG Aer Lingus makes up, there's no denying that their business model is successful and very profitable. It doesn't need to be restructured, it works.

    Engage your critical thinking heads people. Two sides are at loggerheads and they are spinning the stories they want the public to believe. IALPA, to their credit, have been pretty damn consistent in what they have been stating to the media. Aer Lingus have been ramping up the rhetoric and sensationalism week by week. To me that screams desperation. I think Aer Lingus have actually conducted themselves disgracefully in the media. They haven't shown an ounce of respect for their pilots. They have disclosed their salaries and pensions and used those as sticks to beat them with in public. I don't care what you believe, or which side of the fence you sit on: that is no way for executives who are earning in excess of €1m annually to behave or treat their staff. It's bitter and completely unprofessional.

    On that point, perhaps there will be major restructuring of Aer Lingus when this is all said in done - but it will be confined to the management suite. The damage is done, the pilots will never trust these individuals again. IAG will likely put them out to pasture before the year is over.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,915 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    I have no skin in this game and am no fan of the Indo, but it's quite a leap to suggest that one of their journalists is just making stuff up. You don't set out any evidence for this assertion. Also - and I am not a fan of the "unnamed source" school of journalism either - there is more than one source quoted, and at least one is a union one. Given the references to internal Fórsa processes, that organisation or someone with links to it may be one of the sources.

    Post edited by EchoIndia at


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,381 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Hmmm…..you seem to be going down the auld semi conspiracy theory against Ei management.

    Most sensible folk realise that managements job is to manage for the better strength of the the company, not hand out ‘sweeties’ and be popular .



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    I did set out my evidence for it, there are no sources attributed to most of the quotes and the journalist has apparent connections to Aer Lingus management. There are so many sections attributed to unknown sources that I'm not sure which one you're saying was attributed to the union, but if it's the same one I'm thinking of it quotes "an experienced trade unionist". That is so vague, there are any number of people who could fit that description and they may not even be connected to Fórsa.

    I didn't see anything at all that would suggest a trade union insider provided any information on the internal processes. All that was repeated was exactly what Ialpa had already publicly confirmed: they have some sort of disputes committee that was meeting to consider escalation when the invite to the WRC came through.

    The article supposes that this was a huge relief to Fórsa, who are apparently against the idea of further escalation, but I think it's particularly noteworthy that this whole section of the article is not accompanied by a quote from anybody, not even an unnamed source. So again, it appears to me that the journalist has just come up with this thesis and ran with it.

    Like, if he had even attributed the quotes to "a Fórsa official who wishes to remain anonymous", I would have more faith in their veracity. But he doesn't. It has absolutely zero credibility. The only quotes that are attributed to named individuals are to Adrian Dunne (The COO) and to Mark Tighe (Ialpa president). Both appear to be from internal communications to Aer Lingus staff so the journalist does have a source inside the company. I'm guessing that the previous poster is correct and that the connection is a former colleague of the journalist who is now in EI management. I can't prove this unfortunately but both articles I have seen from this journalist have been extremely biased against the pilots so I'm confident his source isn't an Ialpa member.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,915 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    There is a whole division of journalism (primarily the political correspondents) who speak to people and then quote them without naming them. Those are the agreed "terms of business" between the journalist and the source and presumably the journalists would have little to write if they could only cite sources who agreed to be quoted by name. We may not like this, but I don't jump to the conclusion that the journo in these cases is inventing stuff to fit a narrative.

    Post edited by EchoIndia at


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    Perhaps it is a bit on the conspiracy theory end of the spectrum, but it's not that far fetched to expect the company to try and control the narrative to their liking. To be fair, the vast majority of articles I've read are balanced and fair.

    But this one, I mean have you read it? It's a stretch to call it journalism, it would be more at home in the fiction department.

    Management's job is to run the company effectively. Part of that is maintaining a content workforce that is proud to work for you. It appears that they've totally an utterly failed on that front with their pilots. There is clearly a huge problem here and it goes beyond wages. The relationship between management and pilots looks like it has broken down completely. EI management are delivering excellent profits, but are understaffed to the point that they had to spend tens of millions of euro on hire in aircraft last year. Their frugality has allowed them to benefit from massive bonuses, but at what cost? Clearly the pilots are unhappy with how they are treated and if other accounts are to be believed, the maintenance department was in disarray and is still struggling to attract qualified engineers.

    I think it's unfair to characterise what the pilots want as a hand out of sweeties, they want their pay to reflect the purchasing power it had 5 years ago. For a company delivering huge profits, that shouldn't be considered a big ask.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    I should clarify: I'm not suggesting the journalist is making the quotes up, I'm suggesting that the "source" is not as credible as it is made out to be. My feeling is that the source is someone who sides with EI management, hence why the articles appear so biased. I understand why unnamed sources are sometimes a necessary evil, but like I said: why aren't they attributed to "a Union official - who wishes to remain anonymous" or similar. Many of the quotes are attributed just to "a source". That's meaningless.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,381 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    I was referring to management in general not particularly EI, Mr L.

    The pilots have every right to pursue pay and conditions.

    From what I know the companies operating profit was €278m.

    I don’t that would be considered “huge profits” in the airline international business,which is extremely volatile



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,210 ✭✭✭plodder


    I thought the article made a lot of sense. It was all quite plausible and true in some respects, but probably highly speculative in other respects, as the sources were more than likely not Aer Lingus management but other industry insiders. Could be wrong about that of course, and maybe it was Aer Lingus (or IAG) management, and they are deadly serious. Who knows?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    Margin is what matters really. I read somewhere recently that profit margin above 10% is exceptionally good in the airline business. EI had 9.9% last year which would therefore seem quite good.

    Prior to Covid, Aer Lingus had huge cash reserves. In 2019 it was around 600m if I recall, closer to a billion the year before. Even now after the turmoil of Covid it has over 350m in cash. It's not a poor company any way you square it.

    Yes, the industry is volatile. The staff are the ones who take the pain in the downturns, be that through pay cuts, eroded T's & C's and lay offs. Now in the good times the management are gladly taking huge increases in their remuneration but the staff are left lagging behind. It's about time someone stood up and called it out for what it is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    Could be anyone, that's the problem with it, full of vaguery and whataboutery.



Advertisement