Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Are-ireland-and-leinster-the-biggest-chokers-in-world-rugby ?

  • 30-06-2024 4:37pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭


    https://amp.rugbypass.com/news/are-ireland-and-leinster-the-biggest-chokers-in-world-rugby/

    I'd agree with this assessment , I think in is in Irish psyche . Losing is celebrated here. It's hard to overcome that and turn in it to a winning mentality

    There is a different mentality in South Africa and New Zealand

    Ireland is a country that celebrates losing. 1 million Irish people came out to celebrate ireland losing in the quarter finals of the soccer world cup

    The Irish women's soccer team were celebrated in the same way , coming last in their group



«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,209 ✭✭✭Nigzcurran


    Dont be a silly billy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Boks love this kind of stuff lol



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 446 ✭✭mrm


    Oh great…this chokers/ bottlers bullsh1t all over again. If we say 'yes', will you go away with your myopic mis-assessment of high level sport. You have already identified there are two nations that are difficult to beat in this sport. NZs best performance in 4 years put us out of last WC….and then I guess they 'choked' afterwards cos they didn't win the tournament.

    Mcilroy, Leinster and Ireland have won major tournaments. Have they some win rights we do not know?

    "Yes, but it's the same type of style though, with the way they play," he (Burger) suggests. Its called playing rugby…something SA have turned their back on, admittedly with success. Hope it doesn't last, seriously ugly wins the last two WCs. Did the article address that?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    MOD: I will leave this open for now, but this thread is going to have a pretty short leash.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,008 ✭✭✭Shehal


    No the back to back 6n champions are not chokers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭sxt


    Really? .World cups and European cups for club teams are the lithmus test. leinster and Ireland losing every big game when it mattered in these tournaments in the last two years tells a very different story



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,488 ✭✭✭Buddy Bubs


    Its part of the mind games for SA match, nothing more. Id take it as a compliment they feel the need to do this. Rassie is at his usual messing too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭PMC83


    So European Cups and World cup count but 6 nations don't?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 446 ✭✭mrm


    Oh right, so the sport is competed by a collection of chokers, except one non choker every 4 years (WC) and yearly (EC). That's a convenient assessment that wraps up the entirety of the events in those competitions. I am glad we are done with this assessment - I feared it had more depth and we would be here for at least another 6 or 7 minutes. Probably more convenient you restricted it to only the last 2 years for both!



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The 6N doesn't matter because Ireland are on a phenomenal stretch of victories in it and because by association the RC doesn't matter because SA are crap at winning it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭sxt


    Yes .How you do in a world cup is the lithmus test and matters alot more in how you do in a six nations ..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,042 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    No. Just overrated on the world stage in a game that about 8 teams play to a decent level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,720 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    . Losing is celebrated here

    Well, Andy Farrell and the Ireland team are deeply unpopular among a certain cohort of Irish people so I don’t know about that.

    I don’t know about the rest of you but I’m shocked that Schalk Burger is a bit a of a dick. Shocked, I tell you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭sxt


    If you don't think Ireland and leinster aren't chokers, then you have a wild imagination

    There are only 8 proffessional and competitive teams in world rugby. The ireland national team are no better than Part time players in Tonga and Western Samoa and Nambia result's wise in the ultimate Rugby competition . In fact Tonga and Samoa and Namnia have performed Lot better as they are amateurs

    Ireland's best result is a last 8 game and they have lost every single one!

    If thst isn't choking, I don't know what is?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,710 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Its incredible how fragile so many South African ex-pro's are. They need to hammer home how unbothered they are by Ireland at every turn.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 446 ✭✭mrm


    So you're going to be selective with your 2 year duration assessment period, I'll be selective with this following scenario to you. You state this is simple choking in all instances that leave us with Tonga et al., nothing else - you set out the criteria of assessing the loss in every single last 8 game. That's your stance, no ambiguity in your assessment.

    2015 WC (litmus test), final group game France and Ireland play one of the most bruising competitions I have ever seen in any sport event (MMA - Robbie Lawlor/ Rory McDonald may be the only other event that equalled it). Ireland go into the knock out round battered as do France; Ireland with 7 major players out injured. Both get hockeyed by NZ and Argentina respectively (who played each other 1st game in their group and cruised their final group games).

    This loss was down to choking - your assessment. What and where are the choking points here? Was it the group games draw? Was it Paul O Connells hamstring that tore completely off the bone? It choked? Or Paul choked by taking to retirement? Or the other 6 players choked and feigned injury? I am struggling to see it. Please outline the choking in this instance - one of the last 8 choking losses according to you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 446 ✭✭mrm


    Sorry actually, please don't bother.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,732 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    In WC terms it's between Ireland and France. Previously it was New Zealand for 24 years.

    In club terms, Leinster must be coming close to dethroning Clermont if they haven't already.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,261 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Yawwwnnnnnnnn.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Ah Clermont still have us. We can't be the biggest chokers in Europe and also the second most successful team to my mind. Though clearly those pushing the "biggest chokers" narrative are happy to play around with timescales to suit themselves.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,488 ✭✭✭Buddy Bubs


    Is the only way for an underdog to win that the favourite must be a choker?

    I played rugby for 22 years, won some big matches we had no right to and lost some matches where we expected to.

    Were we chokers when teams turned up well and got one over us on the day? No.

    Were our fancied opposition chokers when we beat them against the odds? No.

    Sometimes it just your time, other times it's not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 267 ✭✭VayNiice




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,288 ✭✭✭crisco10


    yeah Leinster winning their first 4 finals gives a lot of breathing room compared to Clermont



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 753 ✭✭✭Timfy


    No trees were harmed in the posting of this message, however a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    While I wouldn’t go as far as to say they are chokers, I can see why there is at least a discussion about it. Over the last few years both Leinster and Ireland, with a large crossover in players, have failed to make the most of their opportunities. But the teams they lost to were if not better teams, certainly on a par with their Irish rivals. The fact that neither team has been able to get over the line, both figuratively and factually, when the win was there, does point to some weakness, which other teams have capitalised on.

    I’ve never put much stock in world rankings, we were top of that list in 2019 shortly before the WC, but I don’t think anyone thought we were actually the best team in world rugby at the time, which was brutally exposed in front of my eyes in Shizuoka.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,566 ✭✭✭✭fullstop


    While OP is clearly on a bit of a windup, I think there is certainly merit to the discussion. Prior to 09, we hadn’t won a Grand Slam in 60ish years IIRC. Once they got over that hump, 6N titles and Grand Slams became fairly frequent, with the monkey off the back. However, the inability to get beyond a WC quarter final is ridiculous in a sport where there are 8 serious teams and we’re supposedly in the top 3. It’s clearly a mental issue, which Leinster seem to have now developed when it comes to finals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,008 ✭✭✭Shehal


    It's also down to the fact we've been probably the most screwed of any nation with the RWC draw with the exception of possibly Scotland.

    Two RWC's in a row where we had to beat another top 4 side regardless of where we finished in the pool in order to get to a RWC SF,



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I agree with you on that, the draws, particularly in the most recent World Cup are an embarrassment to the organisers,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,008 ✭✭✭Shehal


    It's part of the reason why I think anyone who uses the recent RWC as evidence that Ireland are "chokers" are either trolling or are just desperately try to find any evidence to fit their narrative, this is even more apparent when they dont label France bottlers despite the fact they also went out in the QF's.

    Like do people Seriously think England arent bottler's just because they got to play Fiji in a QF rather than NZL/France? And even then they nearly screwed that up.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,320 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    This is simply untrue, I’d say it’s more like 15 than 8

    Regardless I always think this is such a dumb point to use to beat rugby with - apart from football can you please name for me a single field sport in the world that has a more competitive international scene than rugby? Genuinely?

    Hockey, cricket, baseball, lacrosse etc etc all would have comparative or fewer competitive international teams involved.

    Does this mean they’re all pointless?

    Just because football has a monolithic global popularity means nothing else is relevant to enjoy?

    Really ignorant take if you ask me. And always ironic that you see it put forward in a country where the national sport is played only here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,008 ✭✭✭Shehal


    Who said they were the litmus test? And also if Leinster coming 2nd 3 times in a row makes them a choker then does that mean everyone in the world other than SA and everyone in Europe other than La Rochelle in 2022/2023 and Toulouse in 2024 are chokers as well?

    It seems a very particular criteria to be considered a choker and seems to conveniently suit you which makes me very skeptical of everything you've written.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I don’t agree with the op that they are chokers, but there are questions to be asked about their mentality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 482 ✭✭StormForce13


    Moving from the general to the specific, I'd argue that losing a final against a French team in Lansdowne Road after being 17-0 and 23-7 up certainly suggests to this keen Leinster supporter that some food may have got stuck in the team's collective throat last season.

    However, the narrow loss in Marseilles in 2022 can't really be described as a choke and neither can the one in London last month.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,008 ✭✭✭Shehal


    No there doesn't, it was highlighted for years that the 2023 had a ridiculously lopsided draw that was going to mean 2 big sides were going home early and unfortunately Ireland & France were the two who suffered that fate. You might have a case of choking if both sides got battered and were outclassed in the QF but the reality is there was only the bounce of a ball between the sides.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,962 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Leinster are like the Patriots from 2007 to 2014. Comfortably the best team of that era overall, but have conspired to find new and improbable ways to lose knock out games. They'll come good again, just a pain in the balls watching great teams trip up repeatedly



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭Rugbymad2020


    well that’s a lame excuse.basically saying u can’t win a World Cup cos u have to beat a top 4 side.heard it all now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭Rugbymad2020


    15 competitive teams lol id say it isn’t even 8 prob more 6.cricket has more competitive nations too by the way.england,sa,West Indies,India,Pakistan,Sri Lanka,Australia,Nz, and every one of those teams could win a World Cup.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,732 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    England weren't rated at all and finished 3rd, losing their semi by a point. I don't know anyone could understand that as bottling anything. They destroyed NZ in 2019 in the semi...

    France completely bottled their QF. Their high ball defence went to absolute pieces and they lost to a team they were expected to beat with home advantage.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Don’t forget some atrocious refereeing decisions though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,720 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    England beat NZ in 2019 despite being underdogs, went into the final as favourites and got beaten out the gate.

    In 2023, they stumbled past Samoa and Fiji, and somehow led the Boks going into the closing stages but couldn’t close it out.

    In what way are we chokers and they are not?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 868 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    It seems very simple to me.

    If (insert team name here) win, they are WINNERS !!

    If (insert team name here) lose, they are CHOKERS !!

    This system, easily available to all, allows fans, who commit a relatively tiny fraction of their lives compared to the commitment that players & coachs provide, to label teams & somehow feel better about themselves.

    Simples.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Isn’t it those fans, who commit their money despite committing only a tiny fraction of their lives compared to players and coaches, that contributes to the existence of professional players? I wouldn’t feel to sorry for the players who take a bit of stick when they lose, what has now become with familiarity, in finals.
    And I post that as a huge fan who has travelled extensively to support our provincial/national teams.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 363 ✭✭El Vino


    I don't think Ireland are chokers, I think they have advantages during 6 Nations and Nov Internationals on player welfare and cohesiveness. When it comes to World Cups this advantage is negated by the long preparation other countries get over a full summer. In the main we have done a good job organising our resources. I will reserve judgement on Leinster until after the end of next season, if the current squad are lucky with injuries they should do the double with the addition of Barrett and RG. They do seem to tighten up in close games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 868 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    Fair point. Where does that argument leave the fan who follows amateur sport, spending as much cash & effort as the follower of professional sport ?.

    Is there a greater onus on professional athletes to provide value to to their subscribers / fans ?. It seems to me that both amateur and professional teams attract the adulation as winners, and the scorn if losers /"chokers" pretty equally.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    As Roy Keane says in his own inimitable way “It’s their job”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Just out of curiosity, how many Super Rugby and/or Champions Cup titles do SA sides have? 3 isn’t it? Since the game went professional, SA clubs have won just 3 trophies “that matter”. Plenty of choking going on there too it would seem, so I suppose you’d probably have a good deal of experience assessing that all right.

    Just to compare, at club level Irish sides have 7 HEC/Champions Cup titles in that time. So are over twice as successful as SA clubs when “it matters”. In fact, if I’m not mistaken, senior SA clubs have just 4 trophies in all of the pro era. The 3 Super rugby titles and 1 URC title. Leinster have won more trophies in the last 6 years than all senior SA clubs have won in the history of professionalism. Bulls losing the final at home recently just further confirms it I suppose….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Just looked at the RC too. SA have 11 wooden spoons. 11! The highest number in the competition. They’ve only won the thing 4 times. NZ have won it 20 times! Ireland have won the same number of 6Ns titles in the last 10 years as SA have won RC titles ever.

    So SA have a great record at RWCs but an incredibly poor record at senior level (club and international) in every other competition. So 4 times they’ve gotten themselves up for the big one and outside of those handful of months have failed to deliver any form of consistency or success of at all. And their clubs have been a downright failure. But somehow Irish teams are the chokers! Hahahaha!



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,732 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Does anyone give a toss about the RC, really? It's a non-event compared to the 6N, NZ win it every year at a canter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,906 ✭✭✭✭28064212


    Well, they do only have to beat teams who choked to win it, so it's pretty easy for them. Except 2019 and 2015 of course, NZ choked those years.

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,008 ✭✭✭Shehal


    They win it because everyone else is a choker though based on the narrative being created here right?



  • Advertisement
Advertisement