Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Aer Lingus Flight Crew Industrial relations thread 2024

1181921232429

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 117 ✭✭shamrocka330


    25% parked and 25% getting heavy maintenance….which is half! 😂 look, don’t want to ruin your point but your numbers are a bit exaggerated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,829 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    I wouldn’t say half are parked, but utilisation is nearly halved! Off the top of my head it’s over 40 flights a week less on the 330! That’s a lot of idle hours.

    AGP & FAO go back to the 320

    YYZ goes to 321

    LAX, SFO, SEA & MCO all go 3 weekly

    ORD goes to daily (6 weekly for a short period)

    BOS goes daily

    The 107 drops to a 321

    MIA and LAS come online!

    That’ll really skew averages! And as someone said above, I wouldn’t be using FR as a yardstick for FTL limits.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,454 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    perhaps that’s some of the productivity/flexibility EI wants to discuss, the ability of non-EI pilots to fly EI aircraft or making EI pilots available for these unproductive aircraft to be deployed in other IAG operations during the down time. It’s all speculation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,306 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Is there around twelve pilots a plane ?If they are grounded as much as you say surely there's time off?



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,302 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    8hrs of talks done.

    Labour court has informed EI & IALPA that it will be formally intervening with a hearing to be held on Wednesday

    Work to rule continues but labour court requesting no further escalation before the hearing takes place



  • Registered Users Posts: 118 ✭✭Phen2206


    Yes if opportunities to fly more during winter came up the pilots certainly wouldn’t refuse (and contractually couldn’t anyway). Operating for other IAG airlines could be an option but I’d be surprised if BA and IB don’t have their own issues with seasonality (albeit less so than EI) so this probably would have happened already if it was a runner. EI did do winter wet leases for Novair back around 10 years ago so something similar could certainly work again. But you won’t see non-EI pilots flying EI aircraft.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,763 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    That’s a good idea, fly them three quarters empty for the winter and burn plenty of fuel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,764 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9



    Whatever about the hours from FR, pilot issues were in the news a few years ago again. It's probally all changed with the LRs. Would be good to know 2019 averages and 2023 even accounting for loses due to hire in's to see if it's true or not.

    "Aer Lingus' A330 captain hours will be circa 695 this year versus an industry averages of 850.

    "This makes Aer Lingus one of the less-tasked pilot bodies in Europe," 

    https://www.independent.ie/business/irish/aer-lingus-in-pilot-standoff-as-captains-refuse-5000-extra-to-fly-on-their-day-off/37489498.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,982 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    So flights are still in danger after 8 hours of talks ?

    Christ electing a pope wouldn't take so long



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭IngazZagni


    Looks like they've gone further apart with Aer Lingus not budging and on top of that requesting new demands that the court has not seen yet hence the decision to intervene on Wednesday.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    Yes, saw an interview with the IALPA president. He said exactly that - not only were Aer Lingus not willing to budge, they brought new demands. Hard to know how this will pan out now. Will the court take a dim view of the seeming unwillingness of EI management to negotiate in good faith? I think the more likely outcome is a recommendation that will see both parties get something, but if IALPA stick to their principle of not buying an inflationary pay rise, then we could be heading for an escalation of strike action. How long will we have to wait for the labour court recommendation?



  • Registered Users Posts: 65 ✭✭knobtasticus


    Without speaking to any of my mates in EI - and this is purely conjecture - it wouldn’t surprise me if the company had now demanded an expansion of flex rostering as part of any pay deal. A touchy subject that had been intentionally avoided by IALPA in these negotiations. Knowing what I do about the internal attitude to flex, I can say with certainty, if flex has been thrown into the mix, any deal - with any amount of money - that involves an expansion of flex will be rejected immediately.



  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭notuslimited


    What is flex rostering and why is it contentious.

    Secondly, The Labour Court issued a recommendation a couple of weeks ago which was accepted by IAG and not accepted by IALPA. What is different this time round in terms of their role? I am not quite clear how their role is now changed based on the following which is taken from the Labour Court website.

    The role of the Court in the resolution of industrial relations disputes is to act as a Court of last resort.  In other words, local dispute resolution arrangements in the organisation / company and other dispute resolution machinery of the State should have been fully utilised before a case comes to the Court. The Labour Court provides an industrial relations service to consider disputes that parties have been unable to resolve themselves or with the assistance of the Workplace Relations Commission. Such disputes can be referred to the Court for an ‘opinion’ in the form of a Recommendation of the Court which is not binding on the parties.

    Post edited by notuslimited on


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,302 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    I wouldn't say further apart.

    Only the other day the labour court declined to intervene as there wasn't a basis for talks to be successful. The fact that they went for 8 hours yesterday and the court will now have a formal hearing shows to me anyway that they are closer than before potentially. If the court didn't see grounds for a deal they'd have left it as it was last night and said we'll check back in next week for example.

    They'll go through the hearing tomorrow and issue a recommendation. while non binding it'll likely be the best possible as it sees it, after which you'd expect IALPA members to vote on it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,829 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    Decent amount of free time in the winter for A330 pilots. Short haul pilots are on a 5-3 split so the winter is almost as busy as summer for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,808 ✭✭✭Trampas


    Let’s say the pilots accept 12.5% and continue some sort of work to rule as seems ei want more if they go above that figure. How can we not still see cancellations



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,302 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    They won't accept 12.5% , if whatever the labour court recommend is around that 12.5% then it'll be straight out rejected by IALPA most likely. You also can't accept a deal and then continue industrial action.

    Work to rule is going to continue until there's a deal that gives both sides some of what they were looking for. Neither are going to want to look like they've lost.

    If the labour court recommendation is rejected then I'd expect more all out strike days to be called.

    Post edited by Tenger on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    Not sure the WTR is having the impact EI Pilots probably thought it would. Maybe they'll switch to a more aggresive type all out strikes going forward until this is resolved. 24 hour type stoppage, 3 times over a week maybe. That would impact either day of each strike day also.

    Honestly, i'm not sure where either side is at, at the moment.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,302 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Oh absolutely the next step is more all out strikes longer than 8 hours.

    EI do seem to be handling the WTR relatively well, albeit it's 100% hitting their pocket. I've seen passengers being re-routed with Air France and business passengers getting an upgrade by being re-routed onto AF new A350 business class for example.

    I'd been thinking along the lines of what you said there as well, more frequent ones on alternate days, that would have a huge impact with crews out of place. It'd absolutely cripple the EI network if they wanted to go down that route.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,808 ✭✭✭Trampas


    I was more if they did which I don’t expect they would. Is the 12.5% no strings attached?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    The current WTR is being managed well as they can cut some of the multiple flights per day to the likes of LHR. I don't know what generally the load factor is for the likes of LHR, but flying it occasionally i would say it is in the region of 90, 95%, so EI MGMT can manage these by cutting 10/15% of the daily flights they run more than one flight per day.

    Anyway, conjecture, let's see how it plays out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 31 Kiss my Axe


    Can someone explain this decision the labour court came to last night like I’m a 6 year old. Is it good bad or an indifferent sign for the customers who are flying in July or is there multiple conclusion's to take from it based on a person point of view. Thanks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    You'll have a better idea tomorrow, but my feeling is that neither side ar any closer to settling this. I expect more dramtic actions over the coming 2 weeks and then who knows after that.

    But don't take anything i said above as any kind of first hand knowledge,. Just my opinion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,763 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Any idea what the 'threats' to the pilots were annotated in these letters Mr T.?

    Was there an increase in the number of pilots not working their days off in the lead up to this dispute?

    If the electronic vote was valid why did the pilots agree to a "paper" vote?

    Seems to me that leaving out the bellicose language that those exchanges would be part and parcel of

    industrial dispute back and forward.

    Hopefully this can be sorted soon for everybody's sake.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,763 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    I would suggest that if the pilots adopted that tactic, that we would be into lockout situation.

    Shut the company down till a deal was done or the company fold up tent.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    Who knows B. I suggested the Pilots haven't had the impact they thought they would with WTR. There didn't seem to be a huge hullabaloo even with the 8 hour strike.

    What are their tactics going to be next? who knows



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,763 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Well I'll put it to you this way Dubya, I cannot see numerous one day strikes being tolerated by EI.

    The one 8hour strike was well 'posted'n advance.. running one day strikes ,I feel, would be a different animal.

    Anyway, maybe both sides will come to their senses soon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    Let's hope, for all parties concerned and the travelling public, moreso the families taking their one and only jaunt a year



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 630 ✭✭✭Idioteque


    From what I've seen to date, it looks like IALPA is the side that has not been negotiating in good faith. There's no negotiation from them, it's a demand of 'pay us the 24% or nothing'. That's why they haven't wanted to use any industrial relations tools again until recently as they have no intention of budging on that. They can't be seen publically to not engage again given this is dragging on, so they are back in labour court. Tighe has said many times they won't budge on their demand.

    EI mgmt. have said all along that they would negotiate but there has to be a compromise. I think the best negotiations happen when both sides are willing to give something to get something. It seems to me that the quickest path to a resolution (given no budge on pay demand from IALPA) would be a negotiation around the productivity improvements EI mgmt are looking for, as I'm sure there's room for changes there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 31 Kiss my Axe


    pardon my ignorance on this now but am I right to assume if the labour court recommend the pilots to get a 21% increase tomorrow like they want, EI could still reject it and we’ll be back to square one or do management have to go with the ruling?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,103 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,829 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    WTR is having the impact that was expected. It was never intended to cripple the airline, it was intended to show the airline how much goodwill is being relied on! People are getting from a to b and the airline is coping ok but it’s costing them a fortune and is not sustainable long term!

    I think the airline are at a stage that they’ll happily allow this dispute to cost more in strikes and hire ins to ensure they don’t come out the “losers”! If it’s true that there is only 5m a year separating them, and a strike would cost 15m a day (so I’m told) then two days strikes would cost the airline more than just paying up over a 3 to 5 year deal! It might have cost them more already. It’s become a matter of bravado dare I say



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    Indeed it does, a case of oneupmanship.

    There will be a compromise, there always is. But there will be a serious lack of trust and goodwill between both sides for a long time to come



  • Registered Users Posts: 31 Kiss my Axe


    so if it’s recommended somewhere in the middle between the 12.5% & 21% that was offered and that what is now being asked for and one side rejects it the public opinion will sway heavily against the party that rejects it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    Public opinion counts for SFA in the grand scheme of things



  • Registered Users Posts: 91 ✭✭Mobius2021


    I hope both sides cool down and work things out. If it keeps going on and escalating there is always a slight, outside chance that both the Aer Lingus management and the pilots lose - IAG lose patience with both and threaten to wind down Aer Lingus. After all Aer Lingus is only one of their subsidiaries. I obviously hope that doesn't happen but it might focus all their minds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    Sorry, you've got that completely wrong.

    Ialpa, in direct discussions last week, indicated to Aer lingus that they would be willing to settle for a lower percentage. They restated this yesterday in the labour court.

    Aer lingus, on both occasions, stated they were not willing to move from their position unless work practice changes were on the table. In fact, yesterday, Aer Lingus introduced new demands that neither the union nor the labour court had heard before.

    So the union has shown willingness to move from it's position, Aer lingus has not and has in fact dug deeper into it's position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,829 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    Yep pretty much, goodwill and trust is gone and no matter what happens from here, it’s not coming back, not with the current management anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,763 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Wouldn't say you are 100% right in that pronouncement, Dubya.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 630 ✭✭✭Idioteque


    Well as I said, it's from what I've seen to date. Maybe you have some insider info on what's happening in direct discussions and what was discussed yesterday in the Labour court.

    Everything I've seen stated by both sides has for the most part reflected my take on it. As of yesterday, Tighe was quoted as saying "Ultimately if the company doesn’t cede to what is a reasonable cumulative claim from pilots, we will continue fighting".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    Maybe/Maybe not. Will all this stop me from flying EI again? or even giving it a second thought? Not a hope. In fact, i'm hoping after all this settles down there is a massive sale and i'll get stuck in.

    I won't be the only one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,763 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    So the corollary is it would come back with a compliant management who just agree to all requests?

    Management of whatever make up have a job to do just like the pilots, I feel its a bit disingenuous to be pumping out general statements like that.

    When this is all over it will be back to normal pretty quickly I would suggest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    When this is all over it will be back to normal pretty quickly I would suggest.

    Not a hope B. This is more deeply engrained and been going on the last few years, not last few months.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,763 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,598 ✭✭✭✭TheDriver


    Lets not forget (and assuming it's the same as mine and other union represented professions) that strike days are unpaid. Start counting up strike days in quick succession and pay packets get hit hard, esp staff who may have large outgoings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,829 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    Nah, whatever goodwill was there before is gone now…. This isn’t something new either unfortunately, it’s been going on a while!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,425 ✭✭✭plodder


    Have to disagree. It's the pilot's stance of no negotiation on work practices that comes as across as intransigence. Work practices could mean anything. As little change as possible for the pilots, and total (but unachievable) flexibility for management. I cringed every time I heard them say - it's making the pilots fund their own pay rise. How are they going to be able to back down from that hardline stance? Hopefully the LC make it easy for them and they get down to do what they should be doing - ie. negotiating all the details.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,968 ✭✭✭trellheim


    Much as I normally take the employers side here, the pilots have a point in my view - they had to take massive hits during COVID which the airline swallowed afterwards and never gave back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 630 ✭✭✭Idioteque


    It funny as I'm the opposite. I'd normally side with the workers but in this instance, I find it hard to side with private-sector workers who are demanding a pay increase pegged to inflation and also because the company made more profits - all the while having the ability to cause massive disruption to everyone else.

    I do think the pilots deserve a pay increase and should have gotten one every year but, given the high salaries most are on, demanding it's pegged to inflation is a bit too far for me - what about as inflation falls, will they give some of the percentage back?

    Also, if I want to benefit from a company making more profits - I'll buy shares in that company. Do EI staff get any opportunity to buy shares at a discount as part of a sharesave scheme? If not, that could be one way to offer employees an opportunity to share in the times when the company is performing well. Also, I know some private companies will provide larger bonuses or pay increases in a year that the company performed well and that it's usually tied to performance reviews.

    Overall I think everyone wants the people flying their plane to be content and well paid, I just think IALPA's approach to this and how they articulated things have not helped from a public sympathy perspective.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,333 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    While I'm sure many of the pilots have large outgoings, these strike days will count for very little. So far it has been 8 hours. Even then, EI just shifted the TA departures out to that afternoon, so the duty time and flight time still happened for all those crews that day, just later in the day. When this is all resolved, there will be a large back pay catch up for the deal. These folks pay tax at the top end of 52%. So the net effect is just 48% into the pocket. Based on the pay claim, this is a very worthwhile exercise for them.

    These are also the pilots that worked on 50% pay all through Covid and then still reduced pay long after restrictions eased. This is one workforce that can take a hit to pay. They will have worked it back in overtime by year end if they want.



Advertisement