Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Enoch Burke turns up to school again despite sacking - read OP before posting

Options
1394395396398400

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Apologies, bumping because the thread is sticking without showing the last page again.

    So annoying when it does that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,981 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Again, I have no idea what "simple tresspass" is or what it has to do here.

    He has already been arrested for criminal trespass the DPP in their cowardice refused to prosecute.

    I also linked to a story of an 83 year old man last week being arrested for criminal trespass whilst having a cuppa on public land.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,981 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    The kids and staff at the school were destressed.

     It shall be an offence for a person, without reasonable excuse, to trespass on any building or the curtilage thereof in such a manner as causes or is likely to cause fear in another person.

    It's criminal trespass 101.

    Arrest him and prosecute him when he arrives back in September.

    It immediately takes it away from the school who are spending an absolute fortune in civil court dealing with the bollíx, not to mention the stress.

    It is exactly what Burke wants, because he knows there is unease in our justice system over our archaic contempt laws.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,058 ✭✭✭afatbollix


    He is right beside the school building when he is doing his protests and if they didn't lock him out I'm sure he would walk in like he did before.

    https://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/back-school-time-enoch-burke-30805695

    For his first protest, he went inside and they had to close a classroom and a corridor, The head at the time sat with him the whole time so he wouldn't move around the school.

    The law is an ass that someone can just enter a school and is legally allowed to stay, even the guards can't move him on.

    Schools are quite open here, In other countries they have gates and blocked off fences to stop people viewing the kids where as we are happy for anyone to just walk up to a school and spend all day standing outside. I'm surprised no one is talking about how much of a safeguarding issue this is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,432 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Did you read the story you linked? There was an aggravating circumstance: “However, Mr McElwee received a summons accusing him of trespassing “in such a manner as caused or was likely to cause fear in another person”.

    Have the staff or pupils made a complaint to Gardai that they are in fear? If they have the DPP quite rightly have to assess whether to prosecute.

    Trespass is not usually criminal unless there is some element of force or other aggravating circumstance. It is a civil matter, that is why WHS got an injunction against him, it it is for breaking that injunction that he has received the severest of penalties, imprisonment. He hasn’t received lenient treatment, he has spent the best part of two years locked up, lest we forget, people who do commit more serious, criminal offences have been known to spend no time in prison.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,684 ✭✭✭chooseusername




  • Registered Users Posts: 10,727 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    If Burke had been working in a state school and not a private school how would this have differed i wonder? Would a state school be able to afford the various legal challenges? Or would the state cover them?



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,432 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Wilson’s Hospital has been a public school in the free educational system since 2011 when it stopped charging private fees.



  • Registered Users Posts: 149 ✭✭AnnieinDundrum


    it is a state school.


    has been for years.

    Boarders pay boarding fees, not tuition


    non boarders don’t pay fees



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,981 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Have the staff or pupils made a complaint to Gardai that they are in fear?

    Again, he has already been arrested for criminal trespass.

    I have no idea what you are trying to argue here?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,727 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    But surely the money from the boarders helps?

    They're doing the right thing, seems like all the onus is put on them to move the law forward too which seems unfair on the school..



  • Registered Users Posts: 149 ✭✭AnnieinDundrum


    I haven’t a clue how the finances work. I haven’t seen the accounts.

    But what does it cost to call the gardai to say someone is trespassing? His contempt of court is between him and the court surely, not the school?

    are the school taking actions against him at this stage?


    a quick google… court awarded costs against EB, he has to pay the school costs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,364 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    In Ireland, State school = ETB school.

    All other schools are private.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,432 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    I'm arguing that he hasn't been treated leniently, as you state, he has been jailed for a lot of the last two years for contempt of Court.

    The DPP didn't believe the necessary ingredients were there to sustain a prosecution for criminal trespass, one of which was him behaving in such a manner as to cause, or likely to cause fear in another person, and yet you think they should have gone ahead with the prosecution, and probably handed him a win in Court, after which he would have claimed vindication.

    Put simply for you, the contempt of court ruling was easier to obtain and had a more serious penalty (imprisonment) than risk losing a criminal case, and even if convicted, he probably would have gotten no more than a slap on the wrist.



  • Registered Users Posts: 149 ✭✭AnnieinDundrum


    People say private meaning fee paying. But you are correct.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    There was a report that first year students felt uncomfortable at his presence, though if any formal complaint was made I don't know.

    https://archive.ph/2aZpm



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,337 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    You would think if he was allowed stand at the gates indefinitely that eventually someone would crack and have a pop off him. Nobody wants the school their child attends having this publicity or have a strange man hanging around outside.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,432 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    No, you wouldn’t think someone would assault him.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,503 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Just blare a Right Said Fred/Village People playlist from a pair of speakers near the gate. Enoch flight response would trigger and he would have to flee the gay or burst into flame and be sucked into hell.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,441 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 34,648 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    What are the chances of the school collecting the costs they were awarded? Not at all good, would be my impression.

    Fingal County Council are certainly not competent to be making decisions about the most important piece of infrastructure on the island. They need to stick to badly designed cycle lanes and deciding on whether Mrs Murphy can have her kitchen extension.



  • Registered Users Posts: 34,648 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Fingal County Council are certainly not competent to be making decisions about the most important piece of infrastructure on the island. They need to stick to badly designed cycle lanes and deciding on whether Mrs Murphy can have her kitchen extension.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,981 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    the contempt of court ruling was easier to obtain

    That is complete nonsense, the school has been put through the absolute ringer in terms of cost and time dealing with this cretin and will still be dealing with him for some time to come.

    How do you think this ends? Or do you think the civil route is working?

    The only route that will work is if his criminality is treated as criminal, the same as everyone else in this country.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,239 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Contempt of court is a very serious matter because it represents a direct threat to our democracy, so of course it carries a serious tarif right up there with treason which is 40 years. Nobody, but nobody gets to pick and choose which laws they want to abide by and which they don't…… Now you may be happy to go to court, win your rights and then sit back and accept the defendant deciding not to abide by that court's decision, but you would be very much in the minority.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,404 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    If Burke had been prosecuted for trespass in a manner likely to cause fear, and if he had been conficted (which is by no means certain), the maximum sentence he could have been given would be 12 months plus a fine of €1,270. And, as a first offender, he would not have received the maximum sentence, or anything close to it.

    As it is, he has been subject to much longer imprisonment and much heavier fines. Contempt of court is a much more serious matter than criminal trespass.

    I'm puzzled as to why you think that giving him a shorter term of imprisonment, and a lower fine, than in fact he received would have been a more effective way of dealing with the problem he presented.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,981 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Because a criminal conviction is an extremely serious thing, especially for someone who works with children. Also I think it is a given he would be a repeat offender so prison time would be inevitable.

    But this is not about what incarceration he receives, this is about rightly punishing criminality and removing the onus from the school in dealing with the creep.

    The civil route which was never designed to be punitive is simply not working, it's what Burke wants.

    How do you think this ends?



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,432 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    You seem to be struggling with this.

    On the one hand, the DPP have said the circumstances do not exist for them to succeed in a prosecution, using your logic, a criminal case should proceed where there is a poor chance of success. End result? Probable acquittal, Enoch feels vindicated and emboldened, and he goes back to WHS confident in the knowledge the Courts have said he is doing nothing criminally wrong.

    Is that what you are saying should happen?

    On the other, yes WHS went through the wringer, but a positive civil result in getting Burke away from their property is better than a failed criminal prosecution which means he can stand where he likes without fear of prosecution.

    You can make something that isn’t criminal, criminal just because it annoys you. The DPP decides what cases go forward, they have deemed this not sufficiently provable to succeed.

    How do I think this ends?, God knows, I suspect Burke’s resolve will be stronger than WHS given that they fought the University in Galway for 7 years, and I doubt even the Judges don’t know what to do if this persists . But as long as he stays on the right side of criminal law, you, or your ilk spitting the dummy isn’t going to change anything.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,404 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    A conviction for a trespass offence isn't a bar to working with children. Even it were, that clearly wouldn't bother Burke. The actions he has already taken will ensure that he never works in education again.

    As for how this ends, how do you think it ends if Burke is convicted of a trespass offence and bound over to keep the peace (which is the likely consequence for a first offender, possible with a three-figure fine)? How does it play out from there? If Burke ignores a High Court injuction how likely is he to be awed by the majesty of a District Court binding-over order?

    The truth is that the enforcement mechanism for binding-overs and fines is the the same as for violating an injunction; ultimately, imprisonment. You're just providing a slower and more cumbersome route, with more incidents and more court appearances, for Burke to get to the point he's at now, plus the risk of "vindication" for Burke if he had been acquitted on a trespass charge (which would have been a distinct possibility).



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,767 ✭✭✭hoodie6029


    If that was an all boys schools someone would have climbed the wall and pissed down on his head after about the third day. That’d move him on!

    The road to Hell is paved with good intentions.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,584 ✭✭✭Mal-Adjusted


    Silly question but why does he have that sour puss in every photo? Is he super serious all the time or does he just put it on when the media are about?



Advertisement