Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why wont die hard GAA fans admit football these days is muck?

1181921232427

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭Rosita


    The most basic problem with Gaelic Football is the ability of teams to put so many defenders in the "scoring zone" which means the opposition has to approach in a slow possession-focussed way which is probably very intellectual and interesting for the stats people but makes the game unwatchable.

    Offering two points for a score from an unlikely angle or distance will simply encourage defenders to focus on stopping that.

    How you prevent 12 players in defensive mode congregating in front of the goal is a mystery. But while this happens all other strategies will struggle to have an impact.

    The way things are going they might as well hand Croke Park over to Leinster rugby as they'll be the only ones who'll fill it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,436 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭shockframe




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭Rosita


    I think people will always rise to the bait when "standards" are mentioned. The word will mean different things to different people. For example in an old game a player kicking a ball blindly will be considered by many a "poor standard" while these days hand passing a ball two feet to an unmarked colleague and retaining possession is excellent. The player of yesteryear would think to himself that a chimpanzee could do that. That argument is unresolvable.

    It certainly seems a far worse game to watch these days than my memory of 20 years ago. But that's to leave out a provocative word like "standards".



  • Registered Users Posts: 463 ✭✭Dont Be at It


    Well I guess the idea is that encouraging defenders to focus on stopping 2 pointers will free up more space inside.

    I think the skill of kicking has regressed. It has to have when you consider that most defenders don't kick a meaningful pass all season-just handpassing.

    I'm not saying the skill potential for them to do it has disappeared in a purely physiological sense but it's just not being encouraged from a young age so the skill never gets a chance to properly develop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,733 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    Fair point - and that also comes back to the earlier point on player fitness - the reason for the 12 defenders is because basically 28 lads are running up and down and up and down the pitch for 75 minutes. What do you think of a shot clock type set up? Or alternatively, having less players on the pitch. 13 a side.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,503 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    I was at the games yesterday, the Kerry v Derry reminded me of this.

    It made the Donegal v Louth game look like a game out of the Kerry Golden Years video.

    The only redeeming feature is that no team as ever won anything playing the way Derry played yesterday.

    At least Kerry played the football yesterday when the game got late and it opened up a biy, Derry persisted with their muck regardless.

    The new rules they are experimenting can't arrive soon enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Just ban the hand pass and have only kick passes and you'd have football again. By all means solo with the ball and kick from the hand, either to pass or for a score.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 231 ✭✭Charlo30


    Ban the hand pass entirely and you risk going back to the days of catch and kick. And I'm not sure anyone really wants that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,507 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Weekend of puke football

    Good luck to Galway though



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,436 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    Don't mind handpass as can quicken plays, but Handpass over the bar should not be allowed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,598 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    What does fitness have to do with players not being able to mark and tackle players, or shoot from distance? it isn't athletics it is football.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭Rosita


    Not so sure it'd be a bad thing. At least disruption of possession might be possible. The difficulty is that while defences can be packed the same series of movements would probably persist just with players kicking the ball to someone two feet away. But in principle the handpass is a problem in the sport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,978 ✭✭✭WesternZulu


    All is says is that since kickouts have become such an important part of the game that goalkeepers have become the best players in the team at kicking long range off the ground.

    Hardly surprising that so many then take 45s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,866 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    You are correct, the handpass as the game is being played now is a major problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭Rosita


    Its a little bit ironic that this has emerged since since goalkeepers stopped taking predominantly long kick-outs. They probably always took more long kicks off the ground than any other player but just for some reason were not tried with place kicks elsewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,978 ✭✭✭WesternZulu


    Back in the day they didn’t need to be nearly as accurate with their kickouts.

    Now goalkeepers are excepted to land a kick on a sixpence both from longe and short range.

    So it’s no surprise they are often the best placed players in many teams to take 45s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,296 ✭✭✭threeball


    There was a instance yesterday in the Derry game where the wing back carried the ball through the Kerry defence, got to the 21 right in line with the right hand post and instead of shooting, popped a pass off to McGuigan. The Kerry defender who was coming across to tackle the wing back, just switched his attention to McGuigan and with the extra second it took to pass and shape for the shot he ended up making it and blocking him down. Ball turned over, Kerry went down and scored. Absolutely criminal 2pt swing. If you can't kick the ball over the bar from the 21 with your bad foot, never mind your good one, you have no business even playing football, much less winding up in an AIQF.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,866 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,579 ✭✭✭Downlinz


    A two pointer rule would pulls defences out further giving the attacking team the option of attempting the shot, taking on an isolated defender or playing over the top in the space created between the perimeter and the goal defenders. You'd also have competent distance shooters camped on the two point line occupying defenders leaving more space at the goal.

    It's basically becoming field basketball at that stage but at least it improves the spectacle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 511 ✭✭✭Davys Fits


    Handpasses are the reason we have a possession game thats so easy to maintain. I don't see how it adds anything in terms of speed. In fact its probably why the game is so laboured at times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,436 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    I don't see handpassing ever been opted out from the game. Maybe limit number of passes in a row.

    Although wasn't that tried before? Like about 50 other rules ha.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,598 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    I have seen Ciaran kilkenny do the same this year, a man very capable to kicking it over, sure I was kicking them kind of shots over at under 16 level and I wasn't a multi all Ireland winner like he is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,837 ✭✭✭intellectual dosser


    Some of these rule changes themselves will make it unwatchable. I’d rather see how teams evolve over time than see the rulebook chopped up into a game none of us recognise.


    However, is there anything to be said for reducing the number of players on a team? 13 a side would create more space that could encourage kick passing and longer range shooting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,422 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    So is your contention that Ciaran Kilkenny is not as good as the players of yesteryear?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,978 ✭✭✭WesternZulu


    I used to think that the game would evolve and didn’t need intervention but it’s clear to see that rule changes badly need to be made.

    The game is already unrecognisable to the sport it was even as recently as the 90’s and 00’s.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,837 ✭✭✭intellectual dosser


    Defining the problem that needs to be fixed is going to be an issue.

    It’s not scoring. 6 of the 8 Quarter Finalists this past weekend put up 15 points or more. I haven’t done any analysis but I’d imagine that compares reasonably with past Championships.

    Slow build up play and moving backwards? It’s not pleasant viewing but it’s what teams choose to do. I don’t know how you counter it with rule changes without creating one or two new viewing miseries. Is it really worth making significant changes to the game?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,978 ✭✭✭WesternZulu


    I don’t think any of the proposed changes could conceivably make the game any worse.

    Doesn’t that say it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,598 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    No because he is a player of both now and the past when football was entertaining to watch. also he didnt kick it short into the goalkeepers hands, he was too afraid to shoot because presumably he was told not to shoot unless it was a guaranteed score.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,422 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    So it’s context then, rather than player skill?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,745 ✭✭✭Feisar


    Non GAA man here so take this with a pinch of whatever.

    Like a lot of field sports I assume they grew from kids games, rules were formalized and we get the games we have today be it gaelic, soccer, rugby, aussie rules? etc. Did the original creators who formalized the rules ever think they'd become the sports we have today, analysed to the nth degrees, I doubt it. So how does a game remain "pure" and keep up with modern stat analysis and also the fitness levels of todays top players? As an aside I always found it funny that football and hurley while drastically different sports follow the same format, fifteen aside, and a goal is worth three points. IMVHO to beat the stats they'd need to split the pitch up into coloured zones. Lets say a player is only allowed shoot when they have a 90% success rate. Well to shoot from a 45% success rate distance they need 2 points and from a 30% 3 points. I can't think of any other way to break the stats style play. Basically, if you can't beat them, join them.

    First they came for the socialists...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,422 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    hurling will never have the same issues because at any time a top player will ping it over the bar from 60 metres out, if given time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 463 ✭✭Dont Be at It


    Funny that you say it... He's the first player comes to mind regarding this phenomenon. He had a pretty decent chance to get a point away, to level the game, in injury time. Instead of going for it he turned back around and recycled back out the pitch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,598 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    it was a different game I saw him do it this year. not the Galway game. pity as he is well able to kick them over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,582 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    As has been noted on the thread, players are far more likely to get a wide from further out, or worse still play it to the keeper. This is not a modern phenomenon, it was always the same. Many of the points in the good old days were from 13 Yard frees. I long ago learned never to cheer for a ball from far out that seemed destined to go over the bar, only to tail away left or right at the end, or turn out to be short. Only cheer when it goes over the bar.

    The report from the "sandbox" game in Mullingar, confirms that giving 2 points for a shot over the bar from far out, did not increase the success rate. It will fail as an idea. Because the percentage thing as the saying goes is to engineer points from closer in. It's working well in general, with many games having over 30 scores. There were 42 scores in the Donegal Louth game. Shortage of scores is not a problem in the modern game. And to repeat, offering 2 points for a successful shot from further out will fail as an idea.



  • Registered Users Posts: 463 ✭✭Dont Be at It


    I agree that some games have lots of scores but it's the nature of the scores in a lot of the games involving the top teams. They're all the same.. Handpassing the ball over and back, runners off shoulders, trying to get the ball into the 'scoring zone' to the one or two forwards that can actually score. And the scoring zone seems be getting smaller every year.

    I think a big problem with any rule change is the fact that top level intercounty football is almost a different sport to the club game now. Anything involving x numbers of players in the half of the pitch, or two refs, etc is a non runner at club level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,598 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    As someone else said goalkeepers never took frees, now its very common. so if you get 2 points for a shot from far out, do you not think teams would practice this skill and became very good at it? I think they will.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 925 ✭✭✭homewardbound11


    In my opinion .
    gaelic evolved on soccer professionalism .
    Soccer is no where as fun as it was 30 years ago as every team are technically hard to penetrate. For that I’d do the following .

    -) once possession is brought past the half way it can not be recycled back again into your own half . This is monitored by the ref .
    Promotes turn overs .
    -) keepers not allowed outside the 21.
    -) 3 forwards and 3 backs must remain in their own half at all times . This allows for more space in attack . A difficult one but should be monitored by both lines men .
    -) a second referee for each half of the pitch .
    -) persistent off the ball fouling or persistent fouling in order to break down a counter attack results in a 21 yard free .
    -) players faking head injuries in order to stop the game . It’s getting so much like soccer . If a player goes down holding his head then he must leave the pitch for assessment . Referees desecration on when to let him back on .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,866 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    After the Gaa itself , the commentators, the pundits , and most of all the general public all agreeing that

    the weekends game were, apart from one half of play, tedious and boring, you come up with this !

    King Canute is alive and well.

    Our game is on a terminal slide if this continues, its glaringly obvious, yet the clipboard merchants won't

    relinquish their death hold on our game. The number of 'scores' in a game is no indication of how 'good' a game is

    You can have two teams shunting up and down the field via hand passes for the 70 mins at walking pace and then

    scoring points via the hand from 5 metres

    Time is running out and action needed…….and fast.



  • Registered Users Posts: 463 ✭✭Dont Be at It


    I'd be thinking the same. Teams and players will focus on where the reward is. The size of players these days... Shouldn't be a bother having the length from 40m



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,582 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    At least the game on the field continues at present uninterrupted excepted by fouls or when the ball goes out of play. In the logical copy of soccer, which players and coaches adopted to ensure more possession and scores. Everyone can be a defender or an attacker as required, including the goalkeeper.

    All these new ideas are designed to make players do things which will not come naturally. Like staying in certain places on the pitch, or not being able to pass the ball in certain ways. The players already rejected the unnatural restriction on the number of handpasses. Anything which needs an extra referee is a non starter. Even the best qualified referees are condemned regularly for being useless. Often on the GAA forum here. Where are twice as many better qualified referees supposed to come from?

    Two ideas I do agree with. The disappearing foam from soccer, and the tap and go free from rugby. And any stronger support for referees and other officials to make players behave more like in rugby rather than soccer. The GAA referees already have more power than in soccer by being able to move the ball forward for frees. This should be used more often to cut out the abuse on the field.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,059 ✭✭✭randd1


    Getting rid of the preliminary QF would rank up the pressure in the groups from the off. As it is, you could lose two games and draw the other, and still go through. That would suck the life out of any championship in any sport.

    Forcing teams to actually having to go and win at least one game to progress surely couldn't be a worse endeavour. And who knows, it might even be a way to change the mentality in the game as well given managers would have come up with plans to win rather than plans to contain.

    Now, it may mean a couple of dead rubbers after two rounds, but dead rubbers are better than the dead-feeling round robin we have now.

    And as someone else pointed out, part of the problem with the QF's was the atmosphere in Croke Park, it's too big. How about as a reward for, and an encouragement to go out and win games, the team that tops the group gets a home QF? Massive incentive, and likely a more vocal atmosphere for a QF in a home ground.

    Football is a great sport and engagingly entertaining when the two teams are focused on going for the win, whenever we've had that on display we've usually had a great game. However, pure negativity seems to be the order of the day. So football probably does need some rule changes to encourage attacking football. But just a handful of tweaks would breathe life into the championship itself outside of the way the game is played, a poor structure is never going light a fire in people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,059 ✭✭✭randd1


    Where has the art of kicking the ball when running directly at goal gone?

    Remember when a lad was running towards goal and about 40 yards out and he'd just leather it on the side of his foot towards the far post and let the curl take it over.

    Are players coached to not take shots outside of 30 yards anymore? Even at that, they'd still recycle it.

    PS - Where have the mavericks gone? Wouldn't you just love to see a lad being forced out away from goal around the 21 do a bicycle kick and let it fly up in the air and over the bar from 25 yards. Or drop the ball in around the 14 yard line for an attacker to jump and swing a fist at it and let it fly over his head and over the bar. Fanciful and highly unlikely yes, but the game seem devoid of off the cuff moments of madness like that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,866 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    The reason that there was no 'atmosphere' in Croke Park and in other venues too is not that they are too big but that the action on the field of play is abysmal.

    When you have long periods of nothing happening but players shunting up and down the field slowly, hand passing the ball backwards and sideways and the other team just gathering in their own half out come the phones and there is more interest in their content than the game.

    The attraction of games is uncertainty and chaos coupled with skill and effort, not trying anything till its a near certainty to succeed makes for boring football as was well proved on Sunday.

    Gaa need to wake up fast before the game sinks into a sludge of monotony which will drive paying spectators away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 52,778 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    I know of substitutes being handed a piece of paper before entering the field with '' don't shoot '' written on them. Only certain players allowed to shoot and only from certain areas. The flair and natural ability of players is being taken out of the game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,582 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Apparently Peter Canavan was complaining that teams have designated shooters, who need to stay close to the goals. He was the designated shooter for Tyrone, making him top scorer in Ulster three years in a row. Conor McManus was the same for Monaghan, he did it four years in a row.

    It is nothing new in football, and top scoring forwards used to be heroes of the game instead of now being accused of ruining it. I don't remember Canavan wandering out the field too much to take pot shots from 40 metres.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 153 ✭✭Dogsdodogsstuff


    I miss 14 outfield players marking each other , long kickouts and strong midfielders gloriously competing for every kickout. I really dislike this 29 players within the 40 yard line crap and roaming keepers.

    Not saying all the rules should be changed , I just really dislike how the game has evolved. One of the enjoyments of the game was individual battles and quite often you did feel like you could win a game on any given day.

    Games seem to be pure tactic driven, no individual quality or spontaneity as much cause you know exactly what’s gonna happen. That team will score a point and everybody will drop back to defend or maybe push up for a kick out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,866 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Exactly, and very little will change unless the GAA clear the clipboard merchants off the backroom teams.

    Lets hope Jarlath has the drive and will to drag Gaelic football out of the malaise it now wallows in.



  • Registered Users Posts: 598 ✭✭✭Treble double


    The question is what kind of a spectacle do people want Gaelic Football to be, I think the answer will change depending on the generation of the person. The one thing that has changed the game massively is the increasing amount of time going into preparing teams it is now proffesional in all but name. So therefore if the desire is for the game to go back to a more random, free for all type of a contest a limit will have to be imposed on the amount of time teams are allowed to train and prepare and this will have to be strictly enforced. If you want football akin to the nineties teams will have to be only allowed train for an hour and a half twice a week and only once on weekends if there isn't a match. This will ensure there isn't time for video analysis and long meetings where elaborate tactical plans are hatched and learned. Whatever changes are brought in by Gavin etc al will be circumvented by coaches over time given enough access to players. If we want a truly amateur harem scarem random game the only way to do it is by strictly enforcing a limit on time inter county teams are allowed to prepare. Good luck with that, as Eddie O Sullivan say you can't put the toothpaste back in the tube. One rule that might change the face of the inter county game is to limit players to one hop and one solo, but that is never going to happen. I think we just have to accept modern sport is one of control and not randomness



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,978 ✭✭✭WesternZulu


    There has been a couple of mentions of how advantageous a one hop one solo rule would be.

    I don’t get how that would help in any way. You wouldn’t make lateral passages of play significantly more difficult.

    What would become more difficult is any sort of flair from individual players. The Mulligan goal against Dublin would be impossible, the Flynn wonder point for Kildare a few years ago against Dublin too couldn’t happen, as well as countless other memorable moments in gaelic football.

    It would make it more difficult to attack and easier to defend. Exactly the opposite of what’s needed to make the sport more spectator friendly.



Advertisement