Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Aer Lingus Flight Crew Industrial relations thread 2024

1192022242529

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,480 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    that’s one way of looking at it. The earlier Labour Court recommendation was for a 9%+ interim settlement and the independent pilot pay tribunal recommended 12.25%. EI said it would pay the 12.25% and was willing to consider more with changes in Ts&Cs. The pilots said 25% or nothing. From a negotiation perspective, IALPA has undermined its position by unilaterally offering a reduction as it is not principles-based such that it undermines the position it has taken before now. Forsa had accepted the 12.25% or thereabouts for the cabin crew, they’ll look stupid if they support the pilots getting 25%. All in all, it’s hard to see this going anywhere without some level of work practice changes - it’s the only way to get to “yes” for all parties. The pilots can get closer to their demand, IAG can say they got something want and Forsa can say that the additional money is for the work practice changes.

    A simple split it down the middle and nothing else deal won’t be suitable for anyone.



  • Registered Users Posts: 37 fandozzle


    Yep. 15-18% and work practice changes is probably where a settlement ends up



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,824 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    As someone who is due to fly in a couple of weeks I'd disagree totally with you around the impact the pilots actions have had. While there's only been an 8 hour strike, the work to rule has seen numerous flights cancelled daily - See here for info: https://www.aerlingus.com/support/disrupted-flights/ialpa-industrial-action/#/tab-0-options-for-customers-with-cancelled-flights

    That disruption, which is very real for those that were due to take those flights, as well as the ongoing uncertainty about the continuance of the action have led to reduced bookings and general reputational damage (which will ease with time)

    As for what "side" I am on, probably the pilots, despite their actions causing plenty concern in my sphere. The very fact that the WTR has caused the cancellation of as many flights as it has, would say to me that the airline have been reliant on "goodwill" to achieve its' significant profits over the past couple of years and the complete double standards of senior management inhancing their income over the past two years to the level it has gotten to is yet again another statistic as to why the gap between the low paid and the highest paid continues to increase (I appreciate the pilots aren't low paid).



  • Registered Users Posts: 65 ✭✭knobtasticus


    I think most everyone would be hoping for something along these lines but there’s certainly zero appetite among EI’s pilot body for more WC changes. Management achieved significant and long-lasting structural changes to pay and conditions during Covid. The pay demand is seeking the reversal of those changes - any pay deal that includes more WC changes won’t even be put to the pilots for a vote.

    I’d like to think the LC will take a very dim view of management refusing to move from their position and now, at the 11th hour, demanding more structural changes over and above their last presentation to the LC.

    Stories coming out now of pilot families away on holidays having their return tickets cancelled by management, threatening legal letters being sent to people, rosters being marked with ‘Failed to show’ (or something to that effect!) when the WTR prohibits a pilot from operating a particular duty (‘Failed to show’ (?) is a formal disciplinary term and can lead to dismissal), pilots being abandoned in the US and told to either operate a flight home (and therefore breach their WTR) or ‘stay there indefinitely’…

    Management have gone rogue. It’s a union bust. Plain and simple. A union bust won’t be tolerated by the other unions in the group. Things could get interesting if BALPA and SEPLA fire up their industrial processes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,088 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    Realistically, what do you envisage BALPA and SEPLA doing, beyond expressing support at a general level?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,771 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    No major issue with family tickets being cancelled. Pretty standard during industrial action and passengers should have priority for limited capacity available.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,799 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Very pugnacious post if I may say so.

    You get these comments regularly and one would have to say did the pilots on holidays not know

    a. that there was a serious dispute in the offing

    b. who the regs regarding tickets were in these situations.

    Those of the pilot workforce going on holidays on 'concession' tickets should have been aware of problems arising.

    A little bit of restraint in these posts would be great, common sense and a lowering of the rhetoric dial is the answer.

    A little movement from both sides is needed, a little give from the pilots on minor 'productivity' a little give from management on the 12.5% ..cuts out the relativity issues and counter claims from other unions.

    Settle down a bit lads….



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,956 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    I would contend that IALPA knew that withdrawal of concession travel was going to happen once the WTR commences. Standard practise.

    The "failed to show" is probably intended to scare the individual pilots. But that "FTS" will be removed post investigation/IR situation.

    The US situation is probably based on an old issue around returning home as planned in a disrupted operational situation. It's an old setup. EI prob telling them to make their own way home if they want to, when previously the company booked them on an EI flight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    For clarity I was referring to the previous poster and the hit on the pockets of the pilots.

    No doubt plenty of flights have been cancelled and disruption caused to the flying public.

    A full 24 hour strike or longer would really mess things up and take a very long time to sort out and cost millions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,824 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    I'd say its costing them millions as things stand.


    As a matter of interest, for those people here that have had a cancelled flight, were AL able to get you another flight in and around the same time or was a refund the only option? (I see they have three refundish options on their site however a refund wont suit me unfortuantely)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,161 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    So, a key meeting with regards this current situation will take place today

    I'll take the positive view that this will be the beginning of the end. Although that's not to say that there will not be further disruption in the coming weeks, i'd hope that there will be a general consensus of agreement between both sides after recommendations are made.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,731 ✭✭✭MoodeRator


    My DUB-JFK flight was cancelled for this Saturday. It was cancelled last Friday, but after here nothing other than that I called them Saturday. I was then informed I should have receieved another email (which I hadnt) to explaing that we had been moved onto a Deltas flight which leaves an hour earlier. So all good in the end. Just not sure what happens about seat reservations at this point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,326 ✭✭✭jj880




  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,956 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    A bad time for this info to be reported. It's part of a wider Exec reward package, just bad PR for the CEO.

    According to the article, the reward relates to 2021, during which all Aer Lingus staff were on reduced salary (50%)

    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/2024/07/03/aer-lingus-ceo-awarded-close-to-300000-in-shares-as-pilots-and-carrier-prepare-for-fresh-talks/

    Post edited by Tenger on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,123 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    is the Labour Court decision binding on both sides? Or if not what happens next



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,088 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    A bit like RTE last summer, anything EI-related will be given media prominence at the moment. In normal times it would be deemed fairly unremarkable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,161 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    I dis-agree, i recall BA on strike and it was very prominent in the UK Media, also the time of the year it is, it's more relevant to a lot more people, than say early January strike



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,634 ✭✭✭Damien360


    The CEO is judged on share performance. I work for a US based listed company. The payments to executives on the board and the value of shares they sell would make your eyes water but we are all told to tighten the belt and brace for more cuts.

    I would see that story as nothing more than a hit back at the very generous pension payments for DB scheme to pilots that was reported which I am still unsure if that's part of the quoted yearly pay.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,304 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Nope nothing in the labour court is binding.

    They'll issue their recommendation and then it's up to both sides to decide if they accept it or not. IALPA will likely vote on it with the executive issuing a recommendation to members on how to vote.

    If either or both sides reject its pretty much as you are now but with IALPA likely going for more strikers and longer than last Saturday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 612 ✭✭✭AnRothar


    Only if both sides agree to a binding arbitration before hand.

    However its very likely whatever comes out will still need to be balloted on by the pilots.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 32 Kiss my Axe


    When is the LC’s recommendation due to be delivered. Will it be today or at least by end of business Friday?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,088 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    That's not how the Court generally works. Usually, it can be a couple of weeks or more before recommendations are issued, but no doubt they will be striving to issue their recommendation/s in this case a good deal faster. That being said (based on my experience of these processes), today is about hearing formal submssions from the parties, possibly asking some questions about factual issues and then considering the issues in the round. The Court will presumably be trying to craft conclusions that they believe represent a fair outcome for both parties in what it is a complex and at times bitter dispute. There won't be an outright "winner" and anyone who believes that the outcome should represent victory for one side or the other is likely to be disappointed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,968 ✭✭✭trellheim


    All that matters is

    1. do they strike a deal
    2. do they recommend it to the members (especially if the WRC impose something)
    3. do the members accept it in a ballot

    otherwise its groundhog day



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 396 ✭✭StormForce13


    [Childish insult deleted]

    "Before entering the Labour Court on Wednesday Captain Mark Tighe, president of Ialpa, said if the Labour Court was unable to provide a recommendation, “which protects employees, us, in this particular, situation from the degradations of inflation, then we will simply have to stand our ground against our employer and hope that people understand that this is not just about us.”

    Hopefully for his colleagues' sake, common sense will eventually break through, although it may take a few more trips to the local food bank before it does.

    Post edited by Tenger on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,824 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Am just wondering, similiar happened me today. Flight for next week cancelled and we've been moved to a flight about 12 hours later in the day. In this instance is it still possible to claim compensation I wonder?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,326 ✭✭✭jj880


    Genuine question. What compensation and the basis for it? It never occurred to me in that scenario there would be compo available...



  • Registered Users Posts: 117 ✭✭shamrocka330


    Don’t fully agree with some of the ways he’s conducting himself but calling him names is childish and reflects poorly on the point you are trying to make.

    The man is in an important position that represents the voices of all the pilots, therefore what he says and does needs to reflect this which needs to be respected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,824 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    The basis for it, I suppose, is that I may have made plans around an early morning flight (bus tickets, perhaps accomodation etc) and hadn't allowed for leavning a full 12 hours later, which also means a number of hours less at the destination, later arrival time (certain public transport options not being available) and generally more hassle than there had been with the earlier flight.

    The last part of the extraordinary circumstances, I believe is outside of the airlines control (third parties) but it's not clear.

    Any people who have been in a similiar position can provide any advice?

    This is from here: https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/travel-and-recreation/air-travel/compensation-for-overbooked-and-delayed-flights/

    Cancelled flights

    Where your flight is cancelled, you are entitled to a choice of:

    • Refund the cost of your ticket within 7 days or
    • Re-routing to your final destination at the earliest opportunity or
    • Re-routing at a later date at your convenience, subject to the availability of seats

    You may also be entitled to compensation.

    When compensation is not payable

    You are not entitled to compensation if:

    • You have received at least 2 weeks’ notice of the cancellation; or
    • You have received between 2 weeks and 7 days’ notice but you have been offered an alternative flight departing no more than 2 hours before your original departure time and arriving at your final destination less than 4 hours after your original scheduled time of arrival; or
    • You have received less than 7 days’ notice but you have been offered an alternative flight departing no more than 1 hour before your original departure time and arriving at your final destination less than 2 hours after your original scheduled time of arrival.

    If the airline can prove that the cancellation was caused by an extraordinary circumstance which could not have been avoided, even if all reasonable measures had been taken, no compensation is payable.

    Examples of extraordinary circumstances may include:

    • Weather conditions
    • Air traffic control restrictions
    • Security risks and
    • Industrial disputes that affect the operation of the flight



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,569 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    I agree with your point about calling him names – but suggesting that his actions necessitate respect because of his position is a slippery slope. Do you respect Donald Trump, given that he was democratically elected to be US President?

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,633 ✭✭✭✭TheDriver


    EU ruled that internal industrial action is not an extraordinary circumstances.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60 ✭✭General Disarray


    Mark Tighe has experience in this. He was also IALPA President during the strike and subsequent lockout of 2022.



  • Registered Users Posts: 166 ✭✭jellies


    The man has 98% pilot votes behind him. He is a genuine leader. Like it or not.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,198 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    sorry the what?
    Is there a link to this even as I have zero recollection



  • Registered Users Posts: 166 ✭✭jellies




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,088 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    He is almost 34 years with Aer Lingus, according to his Linkedin page.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 396 ✭✭StormForce13


    There's a huge difference between length of tenure and "experience". Tighe may have the former, but he certainly doesn't appear to have the latter. Intelligent people learn from experience and it's clear that notwithstanding his long tenure, Tighe hasn't learned anything. (That's why Fórsa Head Office had to tell him to cool his jets last weekend.)

    Thus far he's played the PR game very badly and his trenchant, "not an inch" attitude is reminiscent more of the DUP at its worst than of a professional 21st century Trade Union negotiator. (Of course, being posh and wearing ties, the pilots don't have a Trade Union, they have an Association! Can anyone spot the difference?)



  • Registered Users Posts: 166 ✭✭jellies




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,771 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    IALPA…

    IALPA retweet:

    [Massive image of PBP tax bands removed]

    You know something is wrong when you rely PBP for PR.

    Post edited by Tenger on


  • Registered Users Posts: 166 ✭✭jellies


    Just a reminder that Aer Lingus cancelled 76 more flights this week even though the pilots are working their contracts to the letter and are on full pay.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,198 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    Ah so when EI was fully state owned.

    Big big difference today, IAG will eventually get fed up of nuisance disruption when it really starts to cost the bottom line.
    They’ll get the cost basis they want for future investment one way or another.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭notuslimited


    Does anyone know how long the Labour Court is likely to sit on this before issuing its recommendation? Assuming no escalation and work to rule stays while the Labour Court decides, I’d say that most holiday makers would benefit from this dragging out a bit.



  • Registered Users Posts: 117 ✭✭shamrocka330


    Why should the pilots fill the gaps in the operation because EI management continue to cut corners over the years so that they can get their large pay rises and bonuses? Last year, pilots weren’t on a work to rule and EI still spent €25 million in hire ins, so this mess and subsequent cancellations is nothing new and EI pilots are fed up with it.

    I understand you’re trying to be a smart arse with your comment but how would you feel if you were constantly expected to come into work for extra shifts, expected to answer the phone at any time and constantly hassled to immediately change your plans because your boss is taking the piss and won’t hire additional support? And to top it off, your base pay was cut during Covid with no increase in 5 years. Yes, the overtime is great but that novelty wears off, particularly after 5 years of no work/life balance and cuts to your base pay. But I’m sure you would be happy with that.

    It’s obvious the deliberate messages that EI management have been circulating in public about pilot pay, number of hours worked etc. has had the desired effect on the likes of you but maybe take a moment to look at the bigger picture.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,088 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    Leaving aside your "sitting on this" language, the latest "Irish Times report states:

    "…Both sides said the court would issue a recommendation aimed at brokering industrial peace at the airline “within a few days” following a hearing that lasted more than 3½ hours on Wednesday afternoon.

    Capt Mark Tighe, Ialpa president, confirmed afterwards that the union would ballot its members in Aer Lingus on any Labour Court recommendation."



  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭notuslimited


    Thanks EchoIndia. On a separate matter, can anybody explain what is meant by flex rostering in the context of what IAG is seeking and what it would mean in practice for the pilots.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,799 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    And that proves what exactly…?
    A work to rule is designed to cause disruption,otherwise what’s the point.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18 Poland2020


    pilots work usually 1 roster period in the year on a variable roster (they can bid for it or inverse seniority). It plugs gaps in the roster and can spit out any pattern like a 3 on 3 off - 4 on 2 off - no less than 2 days off. The pilots fought hard for the 5/3 in 2011. Very few airlines work variable rosters now (Jet 2, BA, TUI still have variable).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,307 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    I thought aer lingus pilots flying hours per annum were lower than other airlines?



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,956 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    They are, but that's more down to the seasonality of the Aer Lingus network and their low number of 'proper longhaul' routes. (10+ hour flights)

    Aer Lingus pilots can be rostered over 800 flight hours a year (flight hours < working hours) Their shorthaul crew work a 5/3 pattern, mixing European and Transatlantic flying.

    Aer Lingus reduce their schedule over the winter, and slash it in early Jan-March.

    Many airline operate more evenly over the 12 months.

    EG. In summer 2023 Aer Lingus had a lack of pilots and had to hire-in other airlines top operate flights on their behalf. Apparently these hired aircraft cost €25m over the summer. 30-40 extra pilots on the books could have saved them that massive cost.



  • Registered Users Posts: 65 ✭✭knobtasticus


    There’s an egregious amount of clueless opinion being passed off as knowledgeable statements in this thread. It boggles the mind that people apparently can’t be bothered having the basic due diligence to read the pages of useful info contained in previous posts before engaging their fingers. Hopefully some of the below helps…

    Correct. But this WTR was designed to highlight in the public domain how under-resourced the airline is. As has been said before, the pilots are available to work their rosters as published and are also fully available on standby to cover roster changes. What they are now not available to do is work on their rostered days off or work duties that incur a significant delay beyond what was originally rostered - that’s what standby pilots are for but alas, EI doesn’t have enough of those.

    At no stage has IALPA ever played the ‘poor’ card. Just because a worker is perceived to be earning a high salary doesn’t bar that worker from exercising their industrial right to ask for more - in line with inflation and the company’s profitability. Any argument otherwise is in bad faith. Also, ‘overtime pay’ in EI isn’t what you might think it is. In fact, conversely with other airlines, the payment for ‘overtime’ isn’t considered worth the hassle for pilots in EI and their free time is valued a hell of a lot more. With the right incentives in any job, staff are perfectly happy to provide ample flexibility. Those incentives don’t exist in EI.

    Good effort but the reality is significantly worse. There’ll be many pilots who will work 3 to 4 flex rosters in a 12-month period. That’s up to a third of their year where they won’t be able to depend on a 5 On/3 Off pattern in order to plan future commitments/appointments/childcare/holidays etc. if FR can crew their operation with a permanent 5/4 pattern then EI should be able to easily manage the same with a permanent 5/3 pattern without disrupting it with flex. They need flex because they use it as a 5/2 crutch to extract increased productivity out of their insufficient pilot numbers. Flex was never intended to be abused this way.

    As has also been previously explained, EI’s op as a mixed-fleet carrier can only be compared with other operators who roster a mix of short and long haul. Regardless, there’s no work condition or agreement limiting the number of hours EI can roster their pilots - they can roster them right up to legal FTLs if they like. Pilots can only work the rosters they’re given! If their productivity is apparently down then you should only be asking why their rostering is so inefficient. Perhaps it has something to do with the inordinate amount of time EI’s pilots spend on the road between DUB/ORK/SNN - none of which attracts any sort of duty pay. Or maybe it’s got more to do with the colossal amount of hire-ins used last year which took thousands of payable flight hours away from EI’s pilots.

    How much an employee gets paid doesn’t undermine their ‘right to disconnect’ and no employer has any business contacting an employee outside of a period where they are required to be contactable. Pilots are rostered standby duties and are supposedly contactable only within these periods. Unfortunately, the reality in EI is somewhat different with the company regularly disturbing rest periods with calls, texts and emails - often in breach of WCs. The more senior pilots will push-back against this and stand their ground but junior pilots often don’t have the same confidence to do so.

    ___

    The airline industry and its work practices have very few parallels to the rest of the working world which goes a long way towards explaining why the general public has, understandably, such a hard time wrapping their head around it. This is why EI management’s disinformation campaign has been so apparently effective when you hear and read people making assertions on various topics that bear no resemblance to the reality of being an aviation employee. It’s a notably unhealthy and unsociable career with a relatively limited longevity (these descriptors not being unique to aviation, of course). I have now thankfully left scheduled passenger ops behind and no amount of money could pay me to go back to it.


    edit - spelling and detail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭.Donegal.


    I know it’s only guess work but can you see this strike still ongoing in to august?



  • Advertisement
Advertisement