Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Biden v Trump (and one or two others) The US Presidential election 2024. Read OP before posting

Options
1212224262731

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 53 ✭✭Soc_Alt


    it won't. matter if Biden is replaced or not. Trump will win the next election imo.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭JVince


    If you had a sub for the Washington Post you'd know she's fairly active and people have grown to like her.

    She doesn't get UK tabloid attention as she has no gossip value.

    I'll call that she will be nominee and Pete Buttigieg will be vice president nominee.

    And trump will HATE that and will blow up.

    Imagine being beaten by a woman - worse, a coloured woman.



  • Registered Users Posts: 268 ✭✭Sn@kebite


    If the Democrats actually acted in a liberal way, as in were not sending weapons to Ukraine generating revenue for the weapons industry and provoking Putin, a nuclear leader.

    Or, maybe if they were not trying to prosecute their political opponents like with Trump and just did it in, well, a democratic way by putting someone better than Trump up for election.

    Then we might be able to decide Republicans=bad. As I see it the Democrats are acting in a right wing way.

    They also do nothing for male voters with suicide soaring, homelessness, unemployment, boys' underachievement in education, eroding due process in sexual assault/harassment claims (like we saw in UK in 2016-2018 and we'll see more of it under leftist Starmer), while having hundreds of millions of dollars spent on women's health, business development networks but not men's, not even minority men etc. This is generating a large alliance of young male voters in their teens to 30s who are (protest) voting conservative.

    So if they (Dems) acted in a left-wing way they would be winning easily. Look what happening in Europe…



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,026 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    Thanks fot putting the provoking Putin but in the first sentence so I knew to stop early.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,307 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    has there ever been as low a profile, verging on invisible VP as Harris ?

    I’m seeing if that is not just my imagination or a certain misconception from thousands of miles away but loads of seemingly bipartisan stateside journalists and publications say the same.

    Wonder if that might go against her ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 907 ✭✭✭Mike Murdock


    If not Kamala then who. That slimeball Newsom?

    Would it look good to push aside the first Black Female VP, for an alcoholic, philandering, Getty scion, who broke his own mask and gathering mandates during Covid, and who has just had to sign off on an emergency budget because he's run the state into the ground?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,325 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Pretty much this, with regards to Newsom. His presidential ambitions were known back when he was a mayor, let alone his time in the governor's mansion. He's now at his most unpopular in California (more against than for) not least because he is perceived at spending more time on national issues than on doing the state level job he was elected to do.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/nov/30/gavin-newsom-approval-rating-california

    He also has a couple of character flaws which don't help him in the "I'm better than Trump" stakes such as adultery and rule following.

    https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/18/politics/gavin-newsom-french-laundry-california-governor/index.html

    Finally he's the flagship for arguably the most polarizing state in the Union. If you like democrats, that's a good thing. If you're middle or Republican, not necessarily so.

    I can see Democrats selecting him. I can also see him losing, even to Trump. Personally, I'm planning to vote for Biden, even if he's a hollow shell. I voted for Newsom once (keep him onto the SF Board of Supervisors. He actually showed up at my door.). Never again. I'd rather abstein.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,697 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    I mean Newsom is an angel compared to the felony he'd be running against...



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,233 ✭✭✭crusd


    Its not the republican voters they need to convince, its the independents who believe Biden is not physically / mentally capable



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,339 ✭✭✭ronjo


    would Whitmer not be a better option than Newsom?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,233 ✭✭✭crusd


    You got to think anything could swing it at this stage. Its not about the 40% who would still vote for Trump if he gave Putin a blowjob on 5th avenue. And its not about the 40% who will turn up for the Dems either way. Its the independnet and potential non voters.

    Given Harris has not been very visible on the Israel issue and actually has been a voice pushing back slightly, would muslims in Michigan who ordinarily vote Democrat now turn up and vote?

    Would African Americans in Georgia, North Carolina and Virginia who are ambivalent about Biden turn out for an African American candidate?

    What would economically conservative women in Wisconsin, Arizona, Florida, Ohio etc do if presented with a female candidate in the wake of full or partial abortion bans in their states? These are women that already have reservations about Trump, to put it mildly, but hold their noses and vote Trump when the alternative is Biden. What if its Harris instead?

    People mistakenly think its about convincing some of the 40% hardcore republicans to switch and therefore automatically rule out the likes of Harris. But its not about them, its about the 20% in the middle. You also got to think the likelyhood of Trump saying something very offensive in a debate against the likes of Harris is quite high. The MAGA bros would whoop and holler and love it. Meanwhile the middle ground would go, "f*ck!, yes, he is truly a reprehensible idiot!"



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,171 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    She's not really black though as in African American heritage, her dad's from Jamaica and mother from India. Don't think it would make any odds to who I'd consider Black Americans if she was replaced.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,233 ✭✭✭crusd


    Black people form the Caribbean and from southern united states have the same heritage.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    1. Better communicator (she's a genuinely good speaker and connects well)
    2. The right geography (American heartland)
    3. Likeable (Harris polls very badly on likeability)
    4. A proven winner
    5. Brilliant on Roe and womens rights generally

    so, 'yes' 😀



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,635 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    You would be be surprised by the divisions some have. Foundational Black Americans is one of the less inclusive groupings.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,635 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    That is how it would work. One day it would be complete & total support. The next after deep reflection…

    The next week will give us some indicator. Think he might be going to stick it out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    He is trying to deny reality. Which is a very human reaction but the political reality will eventually bite.

    The fact is, as a political force, he is fatally wounded and his lifeblood is ebbing away. He would lose to Trump - bigly.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia




  • Registered Users Posts: 36,310 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    I think this mindset is how the Dems lose. I am aghast that Trump has gotten this far and is leading the race for the general election. But as much as it may baffle and offend my sensibilities, it IS reality. The electorate are very clearly telling the Democratic party that they feel Biden is too old to be President. There is a very consistent signal across polls on this topic. Now, as voters start to tune in, Biden is consistently polling behind in crucial swing states.

    You can look at all this data, be offended by it, and say that in the privacy of the voting boot Americans will hold their nose and choose Biden, rather than Trump. But this is flying directly in the face of what the electorate is trying to tell the Democratic party for a year now. Americans will not vote for an 82 year old man showing his age in significant numbers. They won't turn up, or they will hold their nose and click the other option.

    A change of candidate is essential, otherwise Project 2025 will be a reality.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,059 ✭✭✭McFly85


    I still find it crazy how both candidates are held to wildly different standards.

    Trump has recently been found guilty of a felony, has been found guilty of sexual assault, has repeatedly outright lied about what the current administration is doing or what he’s done(9 month abortions and importing criminals from overseas, didn’t have sex with a porn star), has refused to confirm if he will accept the election results, backtracked when asked if he would declassify the Epstein files because apparently there’s a lot of “phony stuff” in those, and would push the limits of what the president would do with his new protection from the DoJ.

    Biden is old, and sounds old. And that one thing is dominating the debate to the point where all we hear is he definitely won’t win because of that. Trump is old too and there’s plenty of gaffes from him too.

    Imagine Biden did one of those things listed against Trump, people would be losing their minds.

    In a practical sense too, what happens if Biden gets elected and cannot finish his term? Harris takes over, hardly the end of the world.

    I definitely don’t think Biden is the ideal candidate and the Democrats in general are dreadful at calling out republican bullshít, but if he stays on he’s still the better candidate by far.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 36,310 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    Well, there is some rationality at play here. Trump is old, but Biden is older and that matters from an actuarial table perspective.

    It's not fair, but swap Biden out for a young energetic candidate and attack Trump. Flip the script. Complaining about how the electorate feel about this is a waste of time. They've made their stance abundantly clear. Get a Whitmer or Newsome or even Kamala and start relentlessly attacking Trump in a context where he can't build an entire campaign around clips of Biden looking frail and uncertain.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,412 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    The problem is a lot of people in America have very different 'standards'. The Republicans are very clearly happy to abandon all norms and morals in the names of advancing their agenda, which they've successfully done (and continue to successfully do through a Supreme Court occupied by partisan hacks). It makes no sense that evangelical Christians would support someone as amoral - if not actively immoral - as Donald Trump, but they see him as a way of ushering in a Christofascist state so are more than happy to support him despite nobody in their right mind believing he's actually a Christian. The MAGA base clearly don't give a **** what repugnant or illegal **** Trump has done and will back their man no matter what.

    The puzzling bit is indeed the 'undecided' or swayable voters who ultimately decide US presidential elections. It seems baffling to most that they could possibly see these two candidates as equivalents. But then you have to remember the system is so rigged to force people into these binary decisions, and the amount of money flooding the system in a bid to persuade voters one way or the other is disgusting.

    Though at a certain point you also have to acknowledge that 'hold your nose and vote for the least worst candidate' is not a viable long-term election strategy. A lot of what the Dems do is awful - just look at Gaza, or the unambitiousness and timidness of their domestic agenda - and no surprise they lose voters because of it, no matter how bad the other guy is.

    As polls have consistently shown, a whole bunch of people do not want this election rematch to be taking place. That they're stuck with it is a failure of the political system on a grand scale.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,635 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    Camilla Long's article in the Sunday times mentioned the double haters. She described them as patriotic and maybe they should be running the country. Was an amusing read given the dour atmosphere post debate.

    https://www.thetimes.com/article/2a2dbee0-d8da-4269-b471-ee244fc13ab4?shareToken=12206f6aa4c4b4247e526d9b3268257d



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,940 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    The more double haters the better. A non-voter is a de facto 0.5 vote for trump as the unconvinced middle would be more likely to vote biden than trump if they do vote.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,000 ✭✭✭rogber


    I also find it crazy but it's the reality. Biden is measured against traditional expectations of a politician, the Trump phenomenon comes from a completely different universe. Being seen as too old is a huge problem for Biden, whereas being a convicted criminal and pathological liar is not a huge problem for Trump, in some ways he even uses it to his benefit.

    Bizarre, but that's the situation. The Dems have to react. I fear that either way, stick with Joe or switch, they're in a very difficult position



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,940 ✭✭✭✭ELM327




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,271 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    great hair, looks good in a suit, talks confidently.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    I'm starting to discount the importance of great hair after Ron De Santis.😀



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,271 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    The fact that he was wearing high heels canceled out the great hair factor.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 376 ✭✭csirl


    The Democrats only have themselves to blame. They've called it wrong consistently over the past 4 years. Trump was done after the last election. They kept him in the public eye and did so in a way that annoyed a lot of neutral voters. If they'd ignored him, he'd now be a cranky old man playing golf in Florida rather than the favourite to win the election.

    On Biden - its been clear for a while that he's in decline. Democrats are in "weekend at bernies" (or whatever that film is called) mode trying to get him to November. The voters arent focused on November. They"re thinking of the next 4 years. I hate to say it, but it looks like Biden will struggle to live another 4 plus years.

    This is an election that any middle of the road, energetic, presentable Democratic candidte would easily win. Yet they go for a guy who might not even be alive next November (what are they going to do if he does pass away or be medically unfit?)

    A substitute candidate at least has a good fighting chance of winning.

    My guess is that the Democrats will continue to pick the wrong strategy i.e. leave Biden in situ, as they've consistently called everything wrong to date.



Advertisement