Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ireland Under-20 2024 Team

1323335373843

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 222 ✭✭johnh6767


    has someone done the team of the last 3 years U20? Good insights to the future



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    DoDon't Really need to and not necessarily an insight into future for senior national team. Many guys who've looked class at 20s just don't go on at all to make an impression in the pro game.



  • Registered Users Posts: 222 ✭✭johnh6767


    agree but the stand out guys do and I have stand out for at least half of the 15 , just interesting to see if someone else has done the hard yards . Easier of course to pick the backs as skills v bulk is easier to identify at the u20 age group



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Not all stand outs at 20s go on and it's just very hard to say. Just stick to moment. Wouldn't worry too much about saying which 20s will be internationals, provincial players, provincial squad players or just club players in 3/4/5 years time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,546 ✭✭✭typhoony


    Hard to know what to make of the result today, I'm veering towards the glass half empty view, maybe there are too many options available in certain positions, but we need Faloon to make the correct calls which I think from today's game might be a bit clearer in the games ahead. The backrow didn't work and the centers defensively didnt seem to work well together either. There's more to come from Gleeson and he can be a real game changer if match fit so wouldn't blame him for backrow issues and it improved when he came on even though the balance wasn't right. Our scrums will always struggle but games are not won or lost there, and that goes for Irish teams in general



  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭ShineyShiney


    Naughton had a good game for me, kicked well, carried hard when needed and his passing was ok bar a couple. While he's been around this squad it was his first start and he didn't lead and direct as well as Murphy does but I wouldn't have it as a slight against him. Murphy looks really polished, smart and a real leader.

    Ward, Gleeson, Tracey and Sheehan would all come back in for me. Think I'd prefer Tracy on the wing.

    The belief in this group looks very strong, they had no right to sneak that win except for pure belief in that last passage. Fair play to them. Hard luck to the Georgians who were the better side for 55 minutes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 222 ✭✭johnh6767


    give it a try man! I’ll start with the easy bit


    7 Culhane

    8 Gleeson

    9 Gunne

    10 Prendergast


    Tell me more !!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    What's the rush. What's the panic why do you have to look to which guys could be 100 caps or long term pros. Why not simply just talk about how good they've been this year and keep winning or win when they've no right to…

    Look at the 2016 team that made the final. For every James Ryan in that squad whose playing top level pro rugby theres guys playing at best ail rugby or not playing at all.



  • Registered Users Posts: 228 ✭✭conquestscarer


    Dupont was on the bench for France u20s, some players just explode at senior rugby and others don't translate as well. If you look at the list of u20 player of the year the careers of the players vary from world class to names you haven't heard. The provinces job is to give talent with the potential the platform to fulfill il that potential.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,546 ✭✭✭typhoony


    Was he not the star of the 2016 u20 WC for france



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    He was in and out of the team but he was a 2 year U20 player which normally suggests he's a serious operator. Also played outhalf for them a bit.

    He played Leinster in the Champion's Cup when he was still with Castres as a 19 year old and he was well flagged in advance as a future star….and he was brilliant against Leinster if a little raw.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,724 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    While I agree with your point about hypotheical future teams, that 2016 team produced more than Ryan - Porter, Stockdale , Deegan and I think Keenan - a very good team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    I know. You've clearly missed my point. There's plenty of that squad nowhere near the pro game now and are at best playing ail and some not even playing now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,724 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    Didnt miss your point , you name checked James Ryan only, when ther was a bunch more that became good pros from that team - you missed my point, but doesnt matter you just want to argue everything, stop being petty, its only **** opinion



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,638 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Every year some very good players come through and there's some that don't make it. Even in weaker years, there's been many pro's developed.

    Sometimes, I feel that there's players passed over that really could have developed. Bobby Sheehan is one that comes to mind. I also think the locks from Ulster a couple of years back looked good prospects. MacNamee I think and I can't recall the other lads name. I would give Chris Cosgrave a gander if I was looking for a lad that could develop late. It's certainly tough to gauge promise in underage level and some players are slow burners.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,770 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1


    Interesting activity. In trying to keep it solely to how they performed at U20s and not since then (or factoring in their potential too)

    1 - Jack Boyle

    2 - Gus McCarthy

    3 - Paddy McCarthy

    4 - Evan O'Connell

    5 - Conor O'Tighearnaigh

    6 - Rueben Crothers

    7 - Ruadhan Quinn

    8 - Brian Gleeson

    9 - Fintan Gunne

    10 - Sam Prendergast

    11 - James Nicholson

    12 - Hugh Gavin

    13 - Hugh Cooney

    14 - Finn Treacy

    15 - Henry McErlean

    Tough exercise.

    Despite the majority of these players winning the U20s grand slam or getting very close, there are still some gaps in class here.

    There are also excellent players missing out.

    Scott Wilson, Ronan Foxe, Joe Hopes, Diarmuid Mangan, James Culhane, Sean Edogbo, James McNabney, Ben Brownlee, Fionn Gibbons, Pa Campbell were all stunning players at U20s level but were pipped by (to me) players who performed better at that age grade.

    There are players in there who I don't feel will go on to have long senior careers (and I really hope I'm wrong… make me eat my words lads!) in COT, Crothers, Nicholson, Cooney and Treacy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,639 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    I think there is too much recency bias in that team, especially in the backs. The 2022 team had the most exciting backline for me and not a single player makes the team?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,546 ✭✭✭typhoony


    Dont recall any standouts in the 2022 backline



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3


    Brownlee was the standout back in that side.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3


    1. Jack Boyle

    2 - Gus McCarthy

    3 - Paddy McCarthy

    4 - Evan O'Connell

    5 - Conor O'Tighearnaigh

    6 - James Culhane

    7 - Ruadhan Quinn

    8 - Brian Gleeson

    9 - Fintan Gunne

    10 - Sam Prendergast

    11 - Hugh Gavin

    12 - Ben Brownlee

    13 - Hugh Cooney

    14 - Finn Treacy

    15 - Henry McErlean



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,638 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    There's some who'll flame out for sure. In saying that, there's some who weren't stand outs at 20's level that will be good players. Mallon strikes me as one who could go a long way. I really can't begin to fathom if there's any international players in the recent editions of the 20's. I'm hoping Devine makes the grade as a 9. From this current crop, I like Ward and Hugo McLaughlin.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,336 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    Gunne had a high profile coming out of school but I felt he had a very average 6N - Devine definitely looked better in his U20 performances (even discounting his recent promise at senior level).

    Mullins probably worth a mention too on the wing - has kind of flown under the radar since due to his Sevens focus. But it's very competitive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    And why do you lose your s*** whenever anyone on here questions any ofyour opinions. I only name checked Ryan but thought it was obvious from my post I was referring to lot more than him.bdidnt think that needed to be explained.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,770 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1


    Recency bias will always be a factor of course.

    But the 2022 backline was decent but with better options in the most recent 2 years I feel.

    The players that started the 6 nations 2022 and the Summer series that year mostly were the likes of:

    Pa Campbell, Chay Mullins, Jude Postlethwaite, Fionn Gibbons, Charlie Tector, Matthew Devine, Tony Butler, Aitzol King, Dan Hawkshaw among others.

    I mentioned Campbell vs McErlean, to be fair that was a closish call. Both are stunning full backs and in the same team one could conceivably switch one to the wing. But I wanted to keep it as much positional as possible (hence Culhane not getting in over Gleeson)

    Mullins and King especially were decent options there on the wings given the relative lack of top class I included. I wouldn't be fighting too hard including either of them over Nicholson but Finn Treacy I feel has shown a lot more pace and rugby nous.

    Tbf to Devine he was excellent at U20s level and as someone else argued he could be considered over Gunne. I would argue that Gunne did deliver on his hype though and also added a very accomplished kicking game during his time there. Regularly getting excellent change on his box kick clearances.

    Just covering both posts with the same reply.

    Definitely arguments for other players in some positions. Less so in others



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Its hard to separate upside from performance in the actual u20s.

    In saying that, i'd say the two best performances have also the two highest upsides lately.. gleeson and mccarthy in last year's world cup. They were amazing. Assuming mccarthy learns how to scrummage to an acceptable level they are both just unbelievable prospects.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78 ✭✭lonester99


    I reckon over time now that systems are improving and player development is becoming more of a science with training routines/S&C etc we'll see a higher conversion of talent from u20s teams into the pro ranks than we probaby have 15 years ago, some of the teams ive seen in the past have maybe had one pro player potential, now youre regularly seeing teams with 5 plus players who could make the step up in the short term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,638 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    By the scrumaging seen so far from Ireland, what is the story?



  • Registered Users Posts: 222 ✭✭johnh6767


    Gunne ’a very average 6N’ are you kidding me he was a standout performer on a standout team, key 8/9/10 partnership role alongside Sam Prendergast & Gleeson in delivering 6N Slam. Interesting to read the views , always going to be a favouritism to recent teams but fun to exchange all the same. We all have our ’spotted him at schools level’ selection so we will too be biased , I’d have Culhane in for sure. Back to this year crew I hope improve for next game that was too squeaky for my liking



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    What's the issue you have with the scrummaging so far?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 204 ✭✭ljsulster


    Boyle

    McCormick

    McCarthy

    O’Connell

    Hopes

    Culhane

    Quinn

    Gleeson

    Devine

    Prendergast

    Mullins

    Gavin

    Postlethwaite

    Treacy

    Campbell



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,724 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    Cause its only you who knit picks every single post - move on, thers more to life



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,529 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    *nit picks



  • Registered Users Posts: 222 ✭✭johnh6767


    I knew this would be enjoyable

    Boyle

    McCarthy

    McCarthy

    O’Connell

    O’Tierneigh

    Culhane

    Quinn

    Gleeson

    Gunne

    Prendergast

    Mullins

    Gavin

    Cooney

    Tracey

    Osborne



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,638 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    It's iffy! Hit or miss. Georgia got the better of the scrum. Italy also until the subs came on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    i know we are maybe shoehorning guys into back rows but i prefer mcnabney to culhane at 6 specifically.



  • Registered Users Posts: 222 ✭✭johnh6767




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Georgia were huge. They'd props with top14 experience as well. And it's far from an issue for ireland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3


    Georgia have the strongest scrum in the comp. It was always going to be a struggle. Was madness not to start Spicer at 5.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,566 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,638 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I'm delighted that our boys won. That was an intriguing contest. Georgia probably deserved to win, imo.

    Our scrum struggled. The lads hung in at times but overall Georgia looked to be winning the scrum battle.

    Is Corrigan dropped? I reckon he's a better option than McKillop. Maybe it's just from this match but Georgia, seemed to win the collisions. We missed a lot of tackled too and yet we crawled over the line. What a great match!



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,546 ✭✭✭typhoony


    If Georgia beat Italy convincingly I certainly think that in the next few years their inclusion in the 6 nations will be undeniable at senior and u20 level.



  • Registered Users Posts: 204 ✭✭ljsulster




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    They need to be added to u20s anyway and can be/should be even without senior team being added. Very little chance this happening though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3


    Id start mckillop at 6.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,529 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Iit is a bit of an issue that our youngsters rarely get any game time while other countries' players rack up pro minutes. It's hard to compete at underage level and slows progress drastically.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3


    The vast majority of 19 year olds from Ireland aren't physically ready for pro rugby.

    Now do you want players doing more gym work from a younger age?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    They get game time in many cases but it's just not at pro level. Its in the AIL, occasional provincial games at a/development level and the best may play urc. Unless you change the whole system and change the whole approach around the schools cups etc then nothing will change



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,724 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    Sparrow looks big eneogh to me, not picking Spicer didnt help, Mullan is good too. Georgia always strong in scrum, I think the props coming through are good eneogh over the past few years, I remeber the really bad days in Irish rugby when we had no backup props, and up to fairly recently if Mike Ross or John Hayes were out, we were goosed



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Isla Shallow Sulfur


    Ya a lot of guys who atart young tend to age out early also

    I think part of sexton playing so late was his late start he was developed before he got heavy mins



  • Advertisement
Advertisement