Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Aer Lingus Flight Crew Industrial relations thread 2024

1202123252629

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 203 ✭✭breadmond


    Source on your basic facts? Aer Lingus are pretty average in the wage department, I fly for a LCC and make far more per hour than an EI pilots and will for pretty much every stage of my career if I stay here



  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭notuslimited


    My opinion is (and you can take it or leave it) is that all this talk about hire in’s, overtime, etc. is just a smokescreen by the pilots to cover their excessive pay demand. I bet once this dispute is settled, we will never hear about any of this again until und next pay dispute when all this moaning will start again. I think that many of the pilots are happy to work the overtime for the extra pay. If they did not, we would have heard about it a long time ago. And I am right in assuming that no matter what OT is worked, pilots cannot break their maximum flying hours ceiling in any given year. So, you can be busy in certain periods of the year, and relatively quiet in others.

    And let me get this straight, IALPA want BA wages, but don’t want BA terms and conditions when it comes to variable rostering?





  • Registered Users Posts: 117 ✭✭shamrocka330


    Not sure I’ve ever heard IALPA request BA wages? Regarding viable rostering, what does this mean?

    Hire ins and overtime is a smokescreen?! You haven’t heard about this before but the topic has been part of failed discussions between EI and pilots for years now. The overtime is not worth their while and the constant contact outside of working hours needs to be addressed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 117 ✭✭shamrocka330


    This industrial action is not as simple as ‘the executives got a bonus so we want a pay rise’. However, the optics of senior management receiving salary increases of over 200% in the past 5 years in addition to large bonuses certainly hasn’t helped the situation.

    To be fair, work hours and the right to disconnect are important in any job and are valid things to challenge if the employer is constantly in breach of this. I’m not sure how this is childish?



  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭notuslimited


    John, I sincerely wish you the very best. I hope you get a deal that you will be happy with. I have heard something of what you say and this was that there are pilots who were open to coming to a compromise/deal and others who are from the “no surrender” camp….and it is this group who hold sway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 203 ✭✭breadmond


    If there's a great number of pilots opposed to the union then why did only six vote against action in a secret ballot?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,088 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    In unions it would not be unusual for there to be a leadership of people with strong views, and a membership who are of a range of views, from strong to moderate. Support for industrial action doesn't necessarily translate to everyone being up for what that might mean if a dispute drags on with no end in sight. Anyway, let us hope that the Labour Court process manages to bring this one towards a conclusion.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,956 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    One aspect that might be pertinent is that many of the flight crew (and cabin/ground staff) are relatively new hires.

    Having joined within the last 5-7 years they would have no direct experience of large scale industrial relations conflict.

    More experienced union members would perhaps be more aware of the risks involved. (This doesn't mean they don't support industrial action)

    I believe the last strike/stoppage in Aer Lingus was 2011? The pilot lockout was 22003 I think?



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,522 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    Slighty off topic in one respect, but relevant, a long time ago now, working at the airport, I got well and truly shafted by SIPTU, as they didn't like that I had a different work ethic to them, the entire place was a closed shop, so I had to be a union member, it made no difference, I was effectively out of a job despite being massively overqualified to do the job, and the union had no witnesses, it was all hearsay, but because the management were spineless, the union were able to get me thrown out of a job that I was damn good at, simply because they didn't like that I wouldn't toe the union line on some very questionable work practices, and as for health and safety, if you were one of their chosen ones, it didn't matter what rules were broken, there was never any action taken against them, so the fact that there are questions being raised about the strength of the feelings within IALPA is no great surprise to me. From occasional comments I see here, some aspects of that situation haven't changed, the unions still call the shots if the management are spineless.

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,832 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    To be fair to John, what he says wouldn’t be the first time I’ve heard something along those lines…. I prob wouldn’t go so far as to say they’ll regret it, but I’ve heard of one or two concerns being raised behind closed doors! They are still 100% (or 99%😉) united with regards to the ongoing IA!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,088 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    That's one of the longest sentences I've ever read. I almost had to pause for breath!



  • Registered Users Posts: 22 StakeholderValue


    Some facts:

    97% in favour of IA based on a 98% e vote turnout.


    99% in favour of IA based on a 89% paper ballot turnout.

    Post edited by StakeholderValue on


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,198 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    It will be interesting to see how this holds in the next ballot



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,161 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    Those,not in favour of IA, are very much in an isolated position. I wonder have those not in favour, openly discussed this with their colleagues who voted in favour

    As in, could this small minority help with getting other members to change their mind.

    Unions are belligerent, and it seem IALPA are no different. I'll caveat that by saying IAG SM, seem to be as equally belligerent



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,477 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    industrial action might not necessarily have meant a strike as opposed to WTR.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 612 ✭✭✭AnRothar


    Ballots normally include upto and including strike action.

    First step is often only doing contractual hours/role.

    Limited strike next.

    All out is last step.

    Early days so far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,633 ✭✭✭✭TheDriver


    Same in every union, everyone wants pay rise or whatever is being fought for but some don't like industrial action when it comes around. This (if true) is no different.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭eddiejn


    they ll get it sorted eventually



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,799 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    [personal reference removed-Tenger]

    A 'strict work to rule' in an industrial dispute scenario is designed to cause problems for whatever company is involved.

    Bulldust about advising the public about how "under resourced" the airline is proves how clueless you are .

    Every concern and company operating today would eventually buckle if the workforce went on a "strict work to rule"

    Promulgating the view that there should be stand byes for everything and not having these stand byes is proof of under resourcing is ridicoulus.

    In an operational environment things will go wrong, some will be minor, some will be more serious.

    In a cyclical and highly competitive industry, airlines cannot afford to have a large tranche of employees sitting around

    in case something happens, co-operation is needed and a 'strict work to rule ' obviates that.

    Yes, when bigger disruptions occur and there is no standby cover available the airline will hire in, that's how

    it can afford to keep the cost base down and not have too much resources when the downturn season comes in.

    [Mod edit]

    Post edited by Tenger on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,799 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    where are you getting this "vast WC changes" information from.

    Could you outline them here?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,968 ✭✭✭trellheim


    "In a cyclical and highly competitive industry, airlines cannot afford to have a large tranche of employees sitting around"

    This is very true.

    But what is also true is the requirement for necessary goodwill from the workforce to operate in the flexible fashion to have that competitive edge.

    The creation and maintenance of this goodwill is one of the primary tasks of the senior management team. It is obviously absent otherwise we would not be in the current position. So it was either never there or too much rope was taken.

    Either is a management failure.

    With the news of the CEO receiving more shares, I can only wonder if that PR re the shares was deliberately caused to raise the roof or just badly timed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,799 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Much more measured and sensible post that the other stuff.

    You have made many good points .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,836 ✭✭✭Trampas


    A case of you’ve only ever seen the one side of a union. When a staff member goes through a hard time with a company and needs support. That’s the stuff people don’t see or hear about the vast majority of time. When a company wants to cut staff. Good luck in getting a half decent package while the union will fight to keep as many jobs as possible and the unlucky ones get as much as possible from the company. Good luck on your own



  • Registered Users Posts: 7 taxingtimes22


    I know no one knows for sure but anyone any idea when they Labour Court might make the recommendations? Due to fly home from Turkey Tuesday night and the same flight was cancelled last Tuesday and Saturday, looking to make plans for work, pets etc. Even if they do make a recommendation do people feel it is likely it could be implemented quickly and work to rule called off?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,220 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    It requires both sides to accept the recommendations

    As it stands the current work to rule remains and there won't be an escalation until after the union members vote on the recommendation

    If the union and EI accept we go back to normal, it won't be instant but a few days to position crews in the case of JFK and ORD



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,968 ✭✭✭trellheim


    As I said above

    1. Recommendations are not binding on either side
    2. Management will either accept or reject
    3. IALPA may recommend for or against the "deal"
    4. Pilots may/will be balloted on the deal . If management accept it they will almost definitely require IALPA to ballot the members whether or not the union recommend it
    5. Since management have poor form in accepting IALPA electronic ballots it will be a paper ballot



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,304 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Is this is Izmir flight ? If so last Tuesday I believe was due to the crew being out of hours. While Saturday was likely due to the strike.

    The latest cancelations for next week are already published for the work to rule.

    Whatever the LC recommend will have to go to a vote with IALPA but it's unlikely to have any impact on flights already cancelled



  • Registered Users Posts: 7 taxingtimes22


    My friend is due back the same day on the Izmir flight that was cancelled last night too, I am on the Dalaman to Dublin flight that was cancelled Saturday the 29th of June and Tuesday 2nd of July.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    If the court issued the recommendation today, IALPA would have to decide whether or not they are recommending that their members accept it. They would probably decide that pretty quickly. They would then have to ballot their members to decide whether or not the deal is accepted. This would most likely be an electronic vote, as the previous ballot on the interim LC recommendation was electronic. Aer Lingus only challenged the electronic ballot on industrial action because any company facing industrial action will understandably take any and all measures to attempt to subvert that action. I don't expect that they would challenge a ballot on the recommendation. Aer Lingus would also have to decide whether or not to accept this recommendation. They could decide quite quickly but may not announce their decision until they know the outcome of the IALPA ballot. They have done this before, waiting until IALPA have balloted against a motion and then announcing that they would have accepted it.

    All of this is to say that even if the recommendation comes today, the process involved in accepting or rejecting it would likely take at least a week, during which time the work to rule would continue. I wouldn't expect further strike announcements until after the ballot and obviously only if the recommendation is rejected by IALPA. A minimum 7 days notice is still required for a strike so it would be at least 2 weeks before we would see another work stoppage.

    Hopefully it doesn't come to that though and the LC can produce a recommendation that is palatable to both parties. The biggest problem for you at the moment is that Turkish destinations are some of the longest duties for flight crews on short haul and so are susceptible to crew going out of hours.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,832 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    Was told today that a labour court recommendation was planned to be given by EOB today but that’s unlikely now.

    Re: Turkey flights, crew on those flights regularly go out of hours and have to go into “discretion” in order to get home. As part of the WRT, pilots are not going into discretion hence more flights than normal getting stuck.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,657 ✭✭✭thebiglad


    If that flight was being cancelled for the strike Aer Lingus would have told you already so, it will go ahead unless impacted by work to rule etc which cannot be predicted.

    Off topic but by the way, I came back on that flight 3 weeks ago - check in was mental -get there 3 hours early - also, the check in staff adopted a ryanair approach to luggage size and weight - keep within your limits, there was no flexibility - may have changed but, it was only 3 weeks back and 2 flights per week so, not many cycles.

    Dalaman is an expensive airport too!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    What are the max hours for EI pilots before going into discretion on short haul? It must be very tight on the Turkey and longer routes. Any delay along the way and that’s it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 209 ✭✭Gary walsh 32


    More flights cancelled up till the 14th of July same time as the 3 aircraft that are leased in contract is till 14th of july probably be extended



  • Registered Users Posts: 240 ✭✭sailing


    80 more flights that a management team need to explain the truth to its customers as to why their flights are cancelled.


    Not enough pilots to fly them without them flying on their days off, doing overtime, changing their duties etc etc etc.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,799 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Quite normal for most companies in the transport sphere I would suggest, who are experiencing a 'strict work to rule'.

    Management merely trying to protect the schedule to minimise disruption



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,198 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    My understanding is not that these are cancelled because they don’t have the crew but more so keeping a surplus of crew “available” so last minute disruption doesn’t result in delays that would require a risk to flights being cancelled due to crew going out of hours etc



  • Registered Users Posts: 237 ✭✭CoisFharraige


    I'm not sure I would agree with "regularly" going out of hours unless you have some insider knowledge in which case better to state that - if that's the case (crew on a certain sector regularly going into discretion) a company needs to address it. The Max FDP (flight duty period) under EASA FTLs (flight time limitations) is 12h 15mins for a flight departing at that time in the afternoon. The flight departs at 14:50 and lands back into Dublin at 00:35. That's less than a 10hr sector, add an hour for beginning of duty. I'd be very surprised if that was the case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,968 ✭✭✭trellheim


    They are probably looking at predictions on the aircraft running late so the jets dont get stranded at far ends leaving them unable to do the next days trips , and that is the basis for the cancellations.



  • Registered Users Posts: 65 ✭✭knobtasticus


    Flight departs at 1340 with a report time of 1245. Scheduled arrival back in DUB is 2359 plus 20mins post flight duty - 0019. 11:34 total duty time assuming everything runs on schedule.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 203 ✭✭breadmond


    An hour isn't a lot of slack in an 11 hour duty. On two long sectors like that it's very easy to pick up a slot for enroute restrictions when you're passing through so many different countries. And then there's Turkish ATC and airport infrastructure...

    Also with it being an afternoon flight in summer it's a near certainty that there will be thunderstorms somewhere along the route, increasing the likelihood of slots



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,956 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Indeed. The wording is usually "industrial action up to and including strike action"
    Unfortunately no union can credibly state that "we have voted for industrial action, if we want to escalate to a strike we will vote again in 2 weeks".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,832 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    You can judge from my posting history if I know what I’m talking about or not, but I’m not going to disclose that on a public forum, for obvious reasons. I hope you understand that.

    Max for that time of day is 12hrs 30mins, the extra hour for reporting etc is included as part of the FDP, the extra few mins after isn’t. It’s more than an 11hr duty for crew as scheduled, any issues and and your into discretion. Which isn’t a big deal tbf! Crew want to get home as much as pax.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,956 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    I think Aer Lingus made a statement about that last week. Cancelling more flights that needed to create extra standby flight crew to cope with WTR related disruption.

    EG. That Dalaman-Dublin flight that was cancelled. The crew on that would be unavailable to operate the next day.
    Thus needed to be replaced on the 3rd.


    Regarding that flight, the aircraft for it must have gotten in very late to Dublin from its previous flight that day. (or as mentioned above been subject to some vicious ATC restrictions)
    FR24 shows it leaving 3 1/2 hours late, and 4 1/2 hours late on the 29th June;
    https://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/ei790



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,477 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    Thanks; I understand that. What I meant was that it is conceivable that not all of the pilots necessarily understood that an 8 hour strike would shortly occur, ie the report that a pilot was unhappy is not inconceivable which some posters asserted was the case.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,956 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Fully agree. I'm sure many (if not most) voted for industrial action as the first stage rather than definitely hoping for a strike.*
    The strike was called after the company ignored existing internal sick leave policies.

    *(personally I voted twice for such action, only once did it end up with a strike….thankfully a long time ago)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 237 ✭✭CoisFharraige


    Makes sense, my maths after a day in the office failed me. Thanks for the explanation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,832 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    All good..! it’s Friday dude, we’re all fried 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭plodder


    If a crew can decide to fly (or not) at their own discretion, presumably it's not a safety issue and it makes you wonder who is in charge here. I'm sure there is more to it than that, but that's how it comes across to me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 65 ✭✭knobtasticus


    It is solely a safety issue. That’s why the decision to use discretion to work beyond normal flight duty period (FDP) limits legally rests with the captain. Each crew member must be polled on their alertness levels and if they are fit to operate beyond their duty limits. Based on that feedback, the captain makes a decision for the entire crew. Any crew member reporting unfit will not be expected to operate.

    The responsibility of any decision to do with safety in a live environment rests solely with the captain. Therefore, there’s also no obligation to work up to legal FTL limits - if crew fatigue is a concern, a captain can also reduce that day’s max FDP to below the limits set by the Authority. A captain can also refuse to depart home base if it is expected that discretion will be needed to get back to base later.

    While I’ve no doubt there are certain atmospheres in certain airlines in Europe where there’s an implicit (and explicit!) pressure on crews to operate into discretion, I’ve never heard it said that EI is one of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭plodder


    Thanks for the explanation. Then, the implication of post #1131 seems to be that pilots are effectively claiming to be fatigued when they aren't, as part of this work to rule.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement