Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Foynes Line

Options
11314151618

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,083 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Yeah, as I posted earlier, it predates Ryan by years. He came into office in 2020, but SPFC commissioned the scoping study in 2014 and detailed design was done by 2019. All Ryan did was sign off on an already formulated plan.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭Hibernicis


    Like so many of your posts, this is nothing more than your opinion, devoid of facts, sources and punctuation, and consequently very unconvincing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Your point about not having to go through the planning system is irrelevant. Some sort of cost-benefit or other form of economic and financial appraisal should have been done, as public funds were being used. Planning is another matter entirely.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,097 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    the thing is that i don't need to convince you or anyone of anything here.

    the line is being rebuilt, it's happening, it's ultimately over for it's opponents.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,097 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    it's like a lot of things TBH, just people blaming ryan for stuff that was happening anyway or would be happening anyway or had majority support regardless of him.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 29,097 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    it obviously did go through some sort of economic apprasal hence it's happening.

    if the details aren't published that's on the relevant authorities but there is no way in hell this line just got rebuilt cause reasons or cause ryan something something that was nothing to do with him.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 137 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    The Foynes Branch is just the longest siding in Ireland. That's it. It is nothing else.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,914 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    After watching the video above, my first thought was also "where are the necessary facilities at the port?" I assume they would require planning permission so were dropped, much like raising the level of the bridge which had to be replaced. Presumably they'll scramble to add them later should they find a customer.

    This project just happened to tick some relevant boxes; it didn't need planning permission, cost was <€100m so didn't need Cabinet sign off (just the civil works though, signaling, Level Crossings, etc. will likely push it over but will be a separate contract), had TEN-T to hide behind, aligns with policies regarding sustainability (in theory at least), IE are semi-state so more autonomy, etc. therefore got through with little scrutiny.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Economics101


    @end of the road "it obviously did go through some sort of economic apprasal hence it's happening."

    Sorry, but are you saying that because it went through an appraisal this ensured the project would go ahead? Appraisal might be (or should be) a necessary condition for a project, but it is not a sufficient one: there also has to be some sort of political decision.

    I any event, whare is the appraisal? What about FOI on this? I know I can't prove a negative, but I refuse to believe that these was an appraisal until I see the evidence.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,097 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    nothing stopping you from putting in a FOI yourself if you want to, let us know how it goes and the details when you get a response.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 137 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    Foynes is part of the whole culture of the "Railway Delusion" in Ireland. Politicans create deulsions of new railways lines and then this is sold to the population as a kind of religion. It is always backed by 'scripture'. Plans, engineering drawings, working reports etc. All designed to have the population keeping the faith. Most of the West of Ireland thinks there is a railway from Limerick to Donegal coming soon. There isn't. People in Dublin think a Metro is coming - look at the fanatical evangelists in the Infrastructure forum salviating over plans and drawings like they are the Dead Sea Scrolls. No metro is coming to Dublin. Here is some kind of belief that ships and mines will be filling the Foynes Branch with freight trains. What happened to mega Railfreight Hubs of last year? Again, sermons for Railway Faithful.

    None of this is happening. Irish politicans are like the Bishops in the 1940s and 50s. Emigrate if you want any of this stuff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,097 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    foynes is being rebuilt.

    metro is happening this time believe it or not.

    athenry to claremorris will be reopening, but when who knows, however beyond there to sligo won't.

    there will be no line that way to donegal, that will come via a line from derry perhapse when the abomination of partition is undone which it will be eventually thankfully.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20 HMS Erebus


    You're quite right, I stand corrected - thanks. Not a case of 'the Brits are at it again' after all!



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,336 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    wonder if there would be any scope to do an occasional “unit train” from Foynes to Limerick of passengers from cruise ships in the summer months. No intermediate stops - just load from a simple platform with no shelter or ticket machine, and go

    at present it looks like Foynes will see about 3 ships a month in the summer



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,651 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Let's put this idea firmly to bed:

    1. You would need to build a 100m platform to accommodate a 4-car train; would need a lot of clearance work given the dilapadated state of the terminus.
    2. you would need to signal the route for passenger operation: not that cheap.
    3. You would need to reverse at Limerick Check (the junction with the main line about half a mile outside Limerick station).
    4. You would need to rustle up some spare rolling stock ( a spare 2-car 2800 at Limerick wold hardly be adequate)

    All for 3 or 4 days a month in the Summer season. Not a runner.



  • Registered Users Posts: 246 ✭✭I told ya


    Regarding point 2, would you be so kind as to explain why a passenger train requires different signaling from a freight train?

    Other than installing signals at stations, what additional signaling is required?

    Non-technical people like me would assume a train is a train.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Economics101


    I am not a signalling engineer, but it is well known that the rules for freight and passenger operations differ in respect of various safety issues such as: points locking, points and signals interlocking. On freight only lines such as Drogheda-Navan, level crossings may be operated by the trrain crew, necessitating 2 stops per crossing, and hardly a practical proposition for passenger trains, quite apart from any safety rules.



  • Registered Users Posts: 77 ✭✭Not made with hands


    You could solve 3 by reinstating the direct curve LOL.



  • Registered Users Posts: 246 ✭✭I told ya


    I would have thought that with a full rebuild of the line automatic level crossings would be installed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,336 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    once again I marvel that we used to be able to provide rail service on an events basis using temporary platforms (Papal Visit 1979, Eurovision Millstreet) but now everything must be a Taj Mahal (or at least costing it). I was thinking more a basic, even wooden, structure but long enough for 6-7 22s or a Mark 4 set - like I said, a people unit train for 400-500 not a shuttle.

    passenger services are currently being operated over manual (not crew operated) crossings - look at the ones currently up for elimination on Cork line near Buttevant, plus the ones on the Nenagh branch and Tipperary-Waterford.

    If the issue is that there can’t be any new or reinstated manual crossings then that’s one thing. But I don’t think it is reasonable to set the bar above the point it has to be.




  • Registered Users Posts: 460 ✭✭Bodan


    Barry Kenny mentioned in a recent interview that the line was been done up to passenger standard and it was up to the government whether they want to put paying passengers back on it or not.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,083 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Kenny said a lot of questionable things recently. The simple fact is that the current works will not bring the line up to passenger standards.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,336 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    in other countries, what constitutes passenger standards is in publicly available legislation or regulation. When you say “passenger standards” is there a document you are basing this off of, even if it’s not publicly online?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,070 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Sorry for the off topic swerve but where was a temporary platform built for the Papal Visit? Or Eurovision?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Economics101


    For the Papal visit the platforms at Ashtown may have been refurbished and (as far as I can remember) a crossover installed fro turnback. For Eurovision Milstreet has its platform extended to take long trains (9 Mk IIIs).

    In both cases the lines were functioning passenger lines so very different cases.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,336 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    so the Papal Visit passengers came through Ashtown which opened for the event

    https://x.com/32Milepost/status/781539533171089410

    And here is a piece on Millstreet

    I may not have been entirely accurate (at least in that I couldn’t find a cite for either as I recalled them - as temporary and a permanent install done later, and I don’t have access to stuff like IRRS archives.

    In the case of the Phoenix Park in particular I remember something about an 18 coach setup which now that I think further may have related to the Eucharistic Congress a bit further back.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭Hibernicis



    Latest fly past from Dronehawk showing significant progress



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,863 ✭✭✭CrabRevolution


    Looking good.

    About 6 workers on the track at 03:00 and still leaving only 1 poor lad to push the cart along!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,651 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    It will be a great greenway in 10-15 years time when they redapt it for that after it closed down because of non use

    Slava Ukrainii



Advertisement