Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Joe Biden Presidency thread *Please read OP - Threadbanned Users Added 4/5/21*

Options
1691692693694695697»

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,554 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Thanks. This was exactly my point but I was writing it at a bus station. A state like Oregon gets a Senator for a hundred or two hundred thousand people. California gets one per 24 million. It makes the UK look like democratic utopia.

    I daresay that if I googled how many Americans support a woman's right to choose and tallied that against the composition of both houses of Congress, I'd be unpleasantly surprised.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,426 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Can also look at it like this, people in Wyoming get 1 senator per 290,000 persons.

    California gets 1 per 19,000,000.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5 Redacted Circular


    Either Joe goes or it's hail President Tump.

    That's the reality and all the coping in the world will not change that.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,932 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Fair enough, I missed the point ancap was making and jumped to the wrong conclusion based on the line I quoted. My bad.

    So the point I was making was irrelevant as a response to ancap's post I quoted, but it is not irrelevant to the discussion of the US election and Biden's bid to get reelected:

    Political elites think they know better than the electorate and are then surprised if the electorate has the cheek to disagree with them at the ballot box.

    The electorate, including registered Democrats, have shown in extensive polling for past few years that they don't think Biden should run again, their principal concern being he is too old for another four year term in such a demanding job.

    The Democratic party have totally ignored what the electorate think and pressed on with Biden regardless, presumably because they believe they know better.

    That strategy is currently looking to be a risky one.

    But nobody should be surprised by that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,426 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    this isn’t true really either.

    See you may have forgot but they ran a primary against Biden (GOP canceled their own 2020 primary, all hail king Trump see) and lo and behold despite these fabled polls, the voters let Joe run away with the vote by a very high margin too. Can you even remember the names of his opponents? Who really backed them? Nobody else stepped up to the plate and it was an open field.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,548 ✭✭✭brickster69


    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,291 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs




  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,932 ✭✭✭hometruths


    You're correct, I cannot remember the names of his challengers, presumably as they were non-entities. Nobody credible wished to challenge him since he was an incumbent president.

    That's been the norm. If you want a future tilt at the nomination, don't challenge the incumbent.

    Before Biden announced his plans to seek reelection there was plenty of evidence and discussion about the polls showing the majority did not wish for him to stand again.

    Perhaps if the Democratic party had used their influence at that point to encourage to bow out with dignity, there would be less discussion now about the idea of forcing him out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,548 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Really, so you mean Biden administration is as bad as the Trump administration ?

    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,291 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Trump even had a press secretary that gave no press conferences, so I'm looking for the post of yours saying that's perfectly normal but it can't be found



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭rogber


    He did quite a good job actually but the Republicans will support anyone the democrats oppose, hence their love for Putin



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,426 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    again: who?

    Name one person who would challenge him in a primary and ought to have run and had a chance at winning the election?

    Nobody. There is nobody with the name recognition or the base or the ability to win nationally. And the primaries confirmed that.

    Whatever name you got jiggling around in your head, it’s easy to figure out party elitism isn’t why they didn’t run. Just do the math and whatever.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,932 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Isn't that the point of whole primary process? To build name name recognition, a base, and test their performance under the spotlight to see if the have the ability to win nationally, and an opportunity for polling etc..

    If early 2023 Biden hadn't announced he was running for reelection, credible challengers would have emerged in that process, and the winner of the nomination would have the name recognition, the base and the ability to win nationally.

    Are you genuinely claiming that the party could not have found a single other candidate with the ability to beat Trump, other than the guy who the overwhelming majority have doubts about whether he is physically and mentally capable of carrying out the job for a four year term.

    If that's the case then the Dems have deeper problems than just the decline of Biden.

    They're now between a rock and a hard place, probably their only choice is to force Biden to stand down in favour of Harris.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,417 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Anyway, thanks to press overload there are more signs of Biden being asked/told to step aside.

    What do ye think?

    Will he do it?

    If he will, who will replace?



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,065 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Well as regards ego, they certainly seem to be on par.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,524 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    They were discussing this on RTE's This Week at lunchtime today. An American professor of politics based in Paris reckons Biden will step down in August, will be replaced by Kamala Harris and that she would be the best bet from the Democrat candidates of defeating Trump.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,932 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Silly to wait until August, the longer it takes the more damage is done.

    AAnd if Harris is to be the replacement, she's got to field questions daily between now and then with little option but to reply with public support. This will then be weaponise d against her when she does take over.

    IIf that's the eventual outcome, the sooner it happens the better.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,417 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Watch for those who asked in bad faith for Biden to step down, to start saying Harris should step aside...



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,426 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Biden said, in 2019, he only really wanted to serve for one term. He didn’t formally announce a 2nd term run until mid 2023 (6 months after Trump did).

    If someone else in the Democratic Party wanted to put their name forward, they have had plenty, plenty of notice. And plenty of time to put together a committee and all the normal things.

    They didn’t, except for those few who tried, and lost the primary by overwhelming margins.

    So, therefore, this is all hot air from the shouldwouldacoulda blimp. This fabled candidate that Biden kept out of the race through “elitism” TM - doesn’t exist.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,932 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Biden said, in 2019, he only really wanted to serve for one term.

    This is exactly why he's so vulnerable with so many swing voters who have concerns about his age. Plenty were happy to vote for him in 2020 in the belief that his age was not a big issue, he'd get the necessary job done in seeing off Trump, and Dem's would find a successor for 2024.

    They're rightly pissed off seeing him back on the ticket when they do think his age is an issue, even more so after his debate performance.

    He didn’t formally announce a 2nd term run until mid 2023 (6 months after Trump did).

    If someone else in the Democratic Party wanted to put their name forward, they have had plenty, plenty of notice. And plenty of time to put together a committee and all the normal things.

    They didn’t, except for those few who tried, and lost the primary by overwhelming margins.

    He may not have formally announced until mid 2023, but he told everybody he was considering running in early 2022. As soon as he did that, it was a warning shot that anybody going for the nomination would likely be challenging the incumbent. No serious challenger would do that.

    So, therefore, this is all hot air from the shouldwouldacoulda blimp.

    it's definitely shouldawouldacoulda stuff

    The party leadership "should have" reminded Biden of his one term presidency chat, and discouraged him from running again.

    If that had happened credible challengers "would have" emerged.

    The nominee "could have" been closer to the convicted felon in the swing state polls four months out from the election.

    Both Bill Clinton and Obama came out of nowhere through the primary system, beating party grandees but in both cases there was no incumbent to challenge. On the other hand no incumbent has lost nomination process since 1884.

    Strong candidates do not challenge incumbents. It's politically naive to do so.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,932 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I have just checked, it was actually late 2021 he said that he intended to run in 2024

    https://www.reuters.com/world/us/white-house-says-biden-intends-run-again-2024-2021-11-22/

    From that point on, any serious candidate would have been on notice of Biden's plans, and better off waiting to see if he formally announced his candidacy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,426 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    again what other leadership?

    who are these fabled people who were to step and say no I’m running

    Names.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,770 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Leadership like Obama, Pelosi and Schumer should have stepped up to tell Biden to step aside. That would have allowed a viable candidate or candidates to rise up. Using the primary system to gain a profile.

    But it didn't happen.

    That same leadership should be having words with Biden now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,426 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    viable candidates didn’t need Biden to “step aside” or Obama lol to step in and tell him to either to challenge Biden. The primaries proved that.

    And still no names of these mystical people just lingering in the shadows waiting for a benediction to run.

    It’s a grave misunderstanding of the point of democracy itself to imagine the Democratic Party has some process where eg. Schumer or Obama or Pelosi decide if you’re able to make a run. You just announce you’re running. This isn’t like the GOP where you’re branded a RINO or a traitor for speaking against the party line.

    Still eager to know who the superhero in the wings was who just, darn, was waiting for Biden to announce he wasn’t running again? If they were that unsure of their own success in the primary they needed to get out of Biden’s shadow, doesn’t sound like they had a shot to start with.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,932 ✭✭✭hometruths


    II think you're being deliberately obtuse now.

    IIm not talking about some putative young challenger, taking the President aside for a quiet word and telling him to pipe down about running again.

    Im talking about these people:

    https://democrats.org/who-we-are/leadership-2-2/



Advertisement