Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Junior minister refused communion - ‘excommunicated’

124678

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra


    The pope is responsible for every priest, nun or brother's actions?

    The church has addressed, accepted and paid compensation to a lot of victims. Much more needs to be done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra


    How much compassion is given to a defenseless and disposable human being when it is seen as nothing more than a hinderance to someone's life or lifestyle?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra


    The father should be able to have as much of a say as the mother.

    Yes, I care to address that issue … Abortions where contraception was or was not used is still wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,560 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Nope, I'm a guy btw. I don't view it as my right to force a woman to continue an unwanted pregnancy. That's her health that's affected, not mine.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Your bias stems from the fact that you were adopted yourself and therefore you place great value on your own life and appreciate that you weren't disposed of as an embryo, as you should. It doesn't however give you the right to judge and condemn others who may not have had the same options.

    I'm not here to promote abortion and as a mother I'm under no illusions as to the gravity of having to consider terminating a pregnancy. I have compassion for every women who has experienced physical violence or abuse, rape and suffering, poverty and despair and homelessness or those contemplating suicide due to their predicament. Not to mention those who are carrying pregnancies that are unviable or cannot be carried to full term due to sickness or ill health. I don't believe condemning them to hell is the solution and sticking them in Magdalene laundries didn't fare well for them either. I have merciful compassion for all of them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra


    Ahhh. Glad you let the mask slip.
    Unwanted.
    Health is secondary - but let's just add it in to give it an air of respectability and acceptance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38 Upandout


    It's wrong in your opinion. You are not the world expert on women's experience I am guessing from your posts

    It is a right in mine. I get to make the choice for my body. As does the ten year old girl raped by a man. Are you really that ignorant to say abortion in that case would be less preferable to forcing a raped child give birth?

    Now stop mansplaining and religious brushing women's choices to women. It's easy to see you never will be in a position to understand how mens abuse impact women daily. Yet women are still expected to adhere to their wants about their own body. Disgusting isn't even close.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,560 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    No mask has slipped, I don't think a woman should be forced to continue a pregnancy against her will. Pretty simple really. A pregnancy impacts a woman's physical and mental well-being, so yep it's not good to force a person to continue that situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra


    So, standing up for the unborn is a bias?
    Or maybe it's common decency and a tendency to want to do what's right.
    I do not have the right to condemn. Or to judge. I am simply repeating the church's teaching and viewpoint on the matter.
    And now that you are on that point, you do not have the right to condemn nor judge anyone for having a viewpoint that doesn't fit with your own narrative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,612 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra


    So, all-in, no objections to any abortions for any reason the mother might have?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 624 ✭✭✭Raichų


    honestly who gives a toss? Sounds like publicity stunt making a song and dance about it with the backdrop being attending a funeral.

    Going to the paper and complaining that you were refused a wafer and you’ll be writing to the bishop, god some of us really have nothing to worry about do we?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38 Upandout


    Women have a right to choose to continue or end a pregnancy. The pregnancy is dependent on this choice. A being which can't survive outside the womb does not trump the woman in front of you.

    The fact you are putting a potential person above one in front of you speaks volumes to your lack of understanding of women and equality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    The absolute irony of you talking about "stop crying over it" when you're the most prolific poster in the this thread clearly still bitter over the choice that the people overwhelmingly made 6 years ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,124 ✭✭✭Doc07


    not agreed and the association of Catholic priests of Ireland (for probably the first time ever) are on my side on this OP issue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra


    The fact that you choose to stem/risk/intervene in the "potential" (not a word of my choosing) human being coming to birth speaks much about your understanding of what the essence of human life.

    I dare you to tell any expectant mother that they are not carrying a child. Let's see how you rationalize their misunderstanding of the facts as you present them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra


    Simply addressing comments put to me by way of reply.
    Some have even questioned why I did not answer specific points.
    Should I ignore them?

    Not a bit bitter over a choice people made. Just amazed at the sheer ignorance of some people not realizing that actions have consequences.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,518 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    Its the usual irony of the theists not understanding how their own religions rules work and the anti-theists having to explain it to them.


    I’m not sure that applies here Vin, as it’s the TD in this case who doesn’t understand the rules of their own Church, whereas the priest is correct in that he is obligated to refuse communion to those who are in a state of excommunication with the Church. Canon 915 is what you should be looking at:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_915#:~:text=Administration%20of%20Holy%20Communion,-The%20general%20rule&text=Canon%20915%20not%20only%20permits,to%20those%20classes%20of%20people.

    As for the ACP, well they’re a lot like this:



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,560 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    It's her personal decision, it's frankly none of my business. Free to have an opinion or be upset if it's your partner or whatever but that doesn't mean you should have a right to prevent it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,929 ✭✭✭uptherebels


    The head of the organisation is responsible for the cover up of atrocities by the organisation and it's members. They are also responsible for the response of the organisation and it's members.

    The church gets dragged kicking and screaming to everything. Even when they get sweetheart deals from the state.

    A lot isn't all or even most



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra


    Agreed.

    Also, take a look at this article: https://www.catholic.com/qa/apart-from-abortion-are-there-other-sins-that-incur-automatic-excommunication

    Note the following:

    Automatic excommunication for abortion (CIC 1398) applies not only to the woman who has the abortion, but to “all those who commit this crime with knowledge of the penalty attached, and [this] includes those accomplices without whose help the crime would not have been committed” (Evangelium Vitae 62).

    Also, the following:

    No one is automatically excommunicated for any offense if, without any fault of his own, he was unaware that he was violating a law (CIC 1323:2) or that a penalty was attached to the law (CIC 1324:1:9). The same applies if one was a minor, had the imperfect use of reason, was forced through grave or relatively grave fear, was forced through serious inconvenience, or in certain other circumstances (CIC 1324).



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You're standing up for yourself, to do what's right by your own life because you weren't terminated. In any other situation you might just have been flushed down a sluice and that probably makes you feel a bit upset. So I understand your reason for being 'pro-life'.

    As a woman I care about women's lives,and as a mother as much about their rights and see things from their point of view. I always found the term pro-life a bit of an oxy-moron because there is no regard for the woman's life at all. Men and children, sure but women just don't figure into the equation.

    It's easy for you to portray them as murderers, maybe you get enjoyment from calling them child-killers yet there's not one woman who doesn't know the value of bearing a child. Women have spent half their lives menstruating the lining of their wombs when not required for conception and carrying pregnancy. There's not one who hasn't breathed a sigh of relief when that period arrives and they realise they're not pregnant. I can assure you the one's who discover they are in an unplanned situation know the sense of absolute dread because they are aware of the significance. Considering abortion is a very grave matter which no one takes lightly, unlike as you suggest, the option someone takes because they want to go out and party and not allow motherhood interfere with their lives.

    It's insulting to continue to propose that it is. It's insulting to continue to imply that women's lives have zero value outside of being a womb to bring people like you into the earth because your life matters more.

    I listened to the radio interview on red too and when I heard the priest call the politician a dog and a swine (in reference to the parables) I realised that we're probably better off without the church now. I don't think there's any going back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra


    If it's nobody's business, why is it a matter for the law?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,124 ✭✭✭Doc07


    why is this individual priest correct and not the APC?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,929 ✭✭✭uptherebels


    You didn't answer the question, what say should the father have? Do you want him to be able to force the mother to carry to term?

    So you incorrectly claiming people are using abortion as contraception is actually immaterial.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,124 ✭✭✭Doc07


    Is there a particular reason the APC don’t agree?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra


    Of course a lot isn't all or most. I never intimated as much.
    However, they are engaging. Kicking and screaming as you put it. But they are engaging.

    So, lets get back to the point from the OP.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,560 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    You do know legislation around medical issues is pretty standard? It's between a woman and her doctor would have been a more appropriate description.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 529 ✭✭✭StormForce13


    Or, equally significantly, force her to have a termination so he doesn't have to pay maintenance.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra


    The individual priest was correct in quoting the law as it stands.
    The ACP are not, as I have mentioned in another post, representative of the hierarchy nor adjudicators of the law.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra


    Why should you care what I have to say about what say the father should have? You have indicated your stance to suggest unless they can carry the child for 9 months, they should have no say.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38 Upandout


    As a woman who has birthed live and dead babies. I can tell you pregnancy is potential life, you ignorant person.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,124 ✭✭✭Doc07


    I never said they represented hierarchy but they surely represent his peers?
    why are they wrong and this individual correct (not on the pedantics of abortion and mortal sin ) but on the treatment of the TD in the church, who like the vast majority of catholics in Ireland voted yes in the referendum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,888 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Storm in a communion chalice.

    The present Irish RCC dares not get too dogmatic with its current flock, because then a sizeable chunk of the population wouldn't be left in the door.

    Don't bite the hands that feed you, even if they are bouncy castle catholics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,809 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    As for the OP, I actually spend a while trying to get disassociated from the Catholic church using the old defection process. They unfortunately changed cannon law though so people couldn't use it anymore.

    I wonder is this perhaps a new way of 'getting out'? Could I email a bishop and tell them I fully support abortion up to full term (!) to get excommunicated I wonder?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,929 ✭✭✭uptherebels


    I don't care, but I'm interested what possible say you think they should have. I'm assuming you are avoiding answering the question because you already know how bad your stance is



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra


    Take a look at the below link. The ACP are not singing from the same hymn sheet as church teaching.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/pope-warns-catholic-politicians-who-back-abortion-idUSL09563188/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra


    Sure give it a go. Let me know how you get on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra


    When you get personal and delve into name calling, you lose the right to engage in conversation/debate. Come back when you learn to behave in a dignified manner.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 818 ✭✭✭Yeah Right


    Equating the catholic church to Nazi Party is reprehensible. There is no equivalence.

    I'm pointing out how ridiculous your handwashing is. You're excusing paedophiles and murderers and those who kept the paedos and murderers safe from justice for, literally, a hundred years. The Nazi party never killed any Jews, only their members did" is exactly what you're saying, only using the church instead.

    I have no disdain for women. None. What you are doing is living in denial. No one has right over another.

    More hypocrisy. Nobody has the right over another, yet you think you have the right over what women do with their own body. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so disgusting.

    It may have been untrue in the past. But not now.

    More handwaving away and pretending all is rosy in the garden. "In the past"……you make it sound like it was centuries ago…..the blasphemy nonsense was removed from the constitution around the same time Covid appeared. You're ignoring the countless other influences they still have on culture and life in Ireland. And you're also glossing over the fact that there are huge swathes of the church-going population (including everyone in the church hierarchy) who want it all brought back. Hell even yourself, I'd wager, would welcome back the 8th amendment, the blasphemy laws, gay marriage ban and plenty of the rest.

    All available.

    So I can buy alcohol before 12:30pm on Sundays now, can I?

    No. The church exists to preach the good news of the gospel. You don't like that. The church is there to advise the faithful.

    LOL…….Advise the faithful on………what? How to live their lives, that's what. And chastise the infidels for not living the way they want them to…….aka telling people how to live their lives.

    Are they dragging you to church? If not, you are exercising your option to not be catholic. Observance of Sundays and Holy Days of obligation are mandatory. For Catholics.

    They still count me as a Catholic because I can no longer avail of an option to remove myself from their stats. They did this deliberately, because people were leaving in their droves. Fewer members = less power. They STILL want to control all of the sh1t they controlled for decades, it's just that they can't. They want to force everyone to be Catholic.

    Here we go again. It all boils down to this.
    Have you heard of a recent case of a priest getting moved around and covering this up?

    Ah it hasn't happened recently, has it not? Well then, that's okay, all's forgiven so. What's the time limit then? At what point does it not become relevant because it was too long ago? Is ten years ago count as recent? Y'know, when Pope Francis brought a known abuser with him to the Holy Land? And do you hold those who get an abortion to those same term limits or are you a complete hypocrite about that too?

    Also, you need to learn how to quote properly. Replying to your hypocritical drivel is enough of a pain in the hole already without having to do your admin work for you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,386 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Late to the party….(a party that seems to involve the typical cohort of anti-choice voters who didn’t really like how Irish democracy produced a…well…*democratic* result) but I’m surprised we’re not focusing on the core issue here:

    I had no idea that publicy going out there and declaring your respect for Women’s bodily automomy was the Magic Ticket to get your membership to the RCC pulled?!

    Jesus, Mary and Jimbo; I should go get a loud speaker and the proudly declare on the steps of the nearest RCC Church that I feel that women should have control of their own bodies, that they should be regarded as equals (I know, a controversial Hippie ideal..but I hold it) and that maybe promoting contraceptives is great way to limit STDs and nasty little illnesses like AIDS.

    I would then kindly like to have my excomunication. Ideally, if I could choose, delivered by the guy who played Bishop Brennan and delivered in his classic Father Ted fury. I’m sure they can afford it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,123 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Not a supporter of them myself but think this Fr Gabriel Burke is going a bit off piste here as far as dem oul sins are concerned .

    The ACP , Association of Catholic Priests , have made a statement about this .

    Apparently they feel its hypocritical after looking the other way for years when desperate women had to travel for abortions or suffer to now be excommunicating parishioners willynilly .

    That the matter was something to be discussed pastorally and left to a person's own conscience . And that they did not own the Eucharist so did not have the right to decide who should and should not receive it .

    Not only that but Pope Francis doesn't want people excommunicated either .He said in 2021 he wants people " dealt with pastorally " without public condemnation , if people not in line with church teachings .

    All very good and enlightened from the church so far you say ?

    Except Fr Gabriel ...He says that the Pope doesn't know what he is talking about :) that abortion had not been introduced when the Pope was a Bishop in Buenos Aires And that the junior minister had automatically excommunicated himself when he voted for abortion legislation , something that is beyond the Pope, Canon law , excommunication ..fully automatic!

    Have to say this is a hilarious turn in the proceedings .

    The priest is going off on his own little journey here it appears 😁

    Its' in yesterday' s Irish Times but had to share the story in case its behind a paywall , and link doesn't appear to be working today .

    Ah here we go ..

    https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/2024/07/14/priest-group-condemns-refusal-of-communion-to-cork-td-who-supported-repeal-of-eighth-amendment/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭deravarra


    When you learn to conduct yourself in a suitable manner and not make accusations without foundation, and take things to a petty level of not quoting properly, I may engage with you.

    Not everyone is adept at using the quote marks to your liking. And I couldn't care less whether or not my posts meet your OCD requirements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,252 ✭✭✭circadian




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,124 ✭✭✭Doc07


    I hope they are not singing from a 2007 Ratzinger quote anyway.
    I said previously forget the semantics and cannon law etc, the APC in 2024 in Ireland have made a statement and they are absolutely not going to be excommunicated for it. So why is their opinion of how the priest treated the TD (yes back to the OP) so wrong ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 818 ✭✭✭Yeah Right


    I do not have the right to condemn. Or to judge.

    And yet, you did just that in the previous sentence when you said……."Or maybe it's common decency and a tendency to want to do what's right". That's you condemning and judging people for having a different viewpoint that doesn't fit with your own narrative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,123 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Thing is , if they did still automatically excommunicate every body connected or voting for abortion worldwide how many would the RCC be able to claim as it's members ?

    Think the Pope is far more realistic than some of these crazy zealots who would happily have the church pared back to people like themselves .

    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c84j07d0j92o&ved=2ahUKEwifyo72s6mHAxXnS0EAHeZlCgYQFnoECBcQBQ&usg=AOvVaw2GaOr7nk9-0P4FQOJosUJL

    These guys are destroying their own church and all for some ill conceived power trip .

    They need to follow the money like the RCC has always done in the past ..less members of a church less priests less funds and donations rolling in .

    Think this priest and others like him should be sent on a barefoot pilgrimage in some cold frugal place for a while to contemplate their existence , and maybe get a taste of what it might be like in the future if they continue down this very hardline route .

    Can see many returning to their comforts and being more amenable after a retreat like that .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38 Upandout


    When you tell a woman pregnancy isn't potential and she has delivered live and dead babies, that is ignorance. But as you appear to believe you have the right to tell women what to do why should I expect less you literally proved my point.

    All pregnancies are potential and any woman who has been pregnant you don't ever take it for granted.

    I really hope your kind are on the decrease and that eventually equality and equity become a reality because I hate that yet another generation of women have to put up with the same level of abuse and bullying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 818 ✭✭✭Yeah Right


    Translation:

    "I have lost the debate because I cannot string two words together properly to refute your arguments. Instead of turning tail and fleeing like the coward I am, I am now going to attempt to take the higher ground and pretend that the reason I'm not responding to your valid, well-thought and well-made points is because I am a better person when, in reality, it is because I cannot."

    Bold move. What are you gonna do when you have to ignore everyone?



  • Advertisement
Advertisement