Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Why wont die hard GAA fans admit football these days is muck?

1363739414244

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 18,853 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    It was mostly one dimensional stuff when you really look at it. For example in Tyrone v Kerry games Kerry ran into traffic, Tyrone would hunt in packs and win it back.

    Eventually teams copped on like Kerry not run into traffic and be more patient with the ball.

    Dublin and Kerry (in particular) had to adapt even more when Donegal appeared with the more extreme defensive counter tactic.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,365 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    But it isnt football, as the hardly ever kick the ball. when great forwards arent allowed show their skill most of the game, then there is a problem. can you imagine the damage david clifford would do if he had space to do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,228 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    They do kick the ball. One of those "clipboard" types counted how often they do it. And even if they never kicked the ball, that is not against the rules. One stat which shows that the game is not muck is the amount of time the ball stays in play. Unless people get enjoyment looking at a football crossing the end lines and the sidelines.

    https://www.rte.ie/sport/football/2023/0928/1407954-new-study-outlines-stark-extent-of-possession-football/

    "Despite the increase in hand passing, there has not been a comparable slide in foot passing. While kicking was on the decrease from 2011 to 2018, it has started to level off at approximately 130 passes per game.

    Some of the rise in passing can be explained by an increase in game time. The ball was in play for an average of 34 minutes in the 2011 season and now stands at 45 minutes, 30 seconds, a 32% increase over 13 seasons."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,120 ✭✭✭Bobson Dugnutt


    The Euros were pretty crap as well. It’s just an era of too much coaching, GPS tracking, stats and a fear of losing. Losing the fan isn’t considered as much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,228 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    People who think a particular sport is crap or muck have so many other ways to pass their time these days. No need for anyone to ever see a football game again, if it is so painful for them to watch.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,641 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    The fact that the highest and most respected people in the GAA do seem to think that Gaelic football needs

    a serious makeover to increase the spectacle of the game seems to mean nothing to you.

    Lets let the clipboard merchants and the backroom grifters run it into the ground till eventually only the

    hangers on and a couple of stray dogs go to games.

    Instead of fessing up and admitting that change is needed to prevent our game from turning into outdoor basketball.

    Thats how it rolls bro…..



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,495 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Some people get their kicks bumping a thread to call something shite several hundred times over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,641 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Who would they be bro……..and are they wrong?



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,853 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    They do kick the ball, but the problem is the weaker sides go for the safe option constantly. Sorry for referring to Dublin again, but they are the team I have seen the most of, and have shown the different options if teams are brave enough.

    The peak recent era of Dublin had the ability to switch the play quickly from one side of the pitch to the other, head up that type of thing with a kick pass. The problem is players with no confidence rarely do it and go for the easy backwards and sideways handpass.

    Ironically Dessie Farrell purposely made his team more direct with less handpassing, however they are not as consistent as the great Dublin teams were.

    It is combination of poor rules in GAA and poor teams. The top level teams can still come up with good standard stuff variation. The good teams evolve within the rules and look for the best way of winning a game imposing their style on the opponent forcing errors.

    The weaker teams and/or teams with poor managers look for the easy safe option, where they play NOT to get beaten rather than try and get a win/draw.

    I understand exactly what you are saying too much handpassing. Former Kerry great Mick O'Connell agreed with you to the extent that he refused to call it "gaelic football" only "Gaelic".

    But it can be a vicious circle where the poor teams constantly funnel back, then a better team is forced to play keep ball for while. Eventually though the better side will break down the mass defence, if they have enough movement and speed of thought, and quick ball.

    Roscommon played really well v Dublin in this years championship, they actually caused havoc to the Dublin defence on many occasion. But towards the end of the match Dublin scored some great goals breaking at pace, quick interchange with Jack McCaffery heavily involved. Again providing options and movement was key to it. It probably is more appreciated at a live game, rather than on telly in fairness.

    In my opinion it can be a thing of beauty where there is a build up a team probing for weakness, then bang, speed, passing, movement they break, and finish it with a goal or a point.

    The good sides play with a purpose they don't hit aimless balls, the poor sides looks for the easy option particularly where their manager is not very tactically astute or brave. So with the poor sides it can be a CONSTANT sideways backways job, no risk nothing.

    The game of Gaelic Football has evolved where possession is king, and it is up to the rule makers to catch up to it forcing the weaker sides to be braver, and their managers to think tactically.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,641 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    ”It can be a thing of beauty”…..but unfortunately currently it’s not.

    Jarlath knows it….that’s why James Gavin is being brought in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,853 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    It is if the players -

    1. Are brave enough to try and execute attacks
    2. Have a manager that encourages them to do so
    3. Have players intelligent enough to have the movement to execute such attacks

    I will use the goals against Roscommon by Dublin to show what can be done -

    Goal 1 for Dublin v the Rossies @1:35 -

    A counter attacking break from Dublin considered interchange of hand passes quick low ball, players offering options and interchange with Fention and Basquel, Roscommon did not know to mark. Finished deftly by Baquel.

    Goal 2 for Dublin v the Rossies @ 2:08 - 2:26 counter attacking break at speed from one end of the pitch to the other - Roscommon did not even get a touch. Less than 20 seconds from one end of the pitch to the other. Jack McCaffery's incisive run was integral here drawing players out of position.Finished by Con O'Callaghan who got the most from play in the championship thus far.

    Both goals were even more impressive at the game itself, as it gave full appreciation of the players use of space, and players providing angles.

    The problem Jim Gavin, E.Fitzmaurice are trying to solve is the sides who constantly play with limited ambition and do not vary their play. The problem is not solely the evolution of football and the lack of rules catching up. It is the teams that are unwilling to create and play safety first. There was absolutely nothing wrong with those Dublin goals. I was at the game. I remember the goals for the level of skill involved in them, the level of movement and options provided in both.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,983 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Some misinformation in here as usual.

    Donegal until and including the 2010 season played a very leaky gung ho style. It wasn't until the 2011 season they want ultra defensive under Jim McGuiness.

    Dublin in 2009 developed an ultra defensive style after Meath hammered them playing the game the way it should be played.

    That qualifier run seen some of the most damp displays by Dublin we've ever seen but it was effective.

    Jim Gavin in 2014 tried to return to the traditional attacking style but after Donegal hammered them with the more effective counter attack system Dublin never returned to their traditional way of playing. They realized the southern style so to speak was inferior.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,365 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    Them 2 Dublin goals wouldn't have happened if players marked their own player like the old days, Roscommon were always very weak at marking in Croke park as well, too nice of a team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,365 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    Was just watching that 2014 Dubin V Donegal game there, great game, looked a fast exciting game, not too defensive with no space like all the games these days.

    on the Dublin V Roscommn goals, the Dublin goals were nice to watch, I agree but we dont see them kind of goals in most matches, which is a pity, I liked the long kick in the first one because you never see kicks like that anymore.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,853 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I was at that 2014 Donegal v Dublin one as well. that one is cited as the one that made Jim Gavin change tactics and not go gung ho. more precision based stuff.

    In the early part of that match Dublin were hitting points from way out, it looked like Donegal were going to get walloped. From what I remember a grey haired Christy Toye came on as sub and destroyed Dublin. Donegal were lethal on the counter and Dublin no idea how to cope with Donegal. For the life of me I still cannot understand why Gavin left Dennis Bastick on the bench. It was a game suited to power and big units. I would put it down as Jim Gavin's biggest error of his tenure.

    In the recent Roscommon game there was a mix of everything to be honest, but there were plenty of parts of the game that I know you would hate, where Dublin and Roscommon played "keep ball" working a score conserving energy/probing side to side. I felt it was one of those slow build psychological trillers.

    But what Roscommon did that a lot of teams were/are afraid to do v Dublin they pressed right up on Dublin making life really difficult. It really threw Dublin early on as they were not used to it. I enjoyed the match because both sides were not afraid to vary the play. If more teams did that football would be better overall.

    I am going to be really interested to see what rule changes Gavin and Fitzmaurice come up with. Because from the sound of things Fitzmaurice wants any rule changes throughly tested and any loopholes/unintended consequences figured out, before trying them in proper high level games.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,109 ✭✭✭Rosita


    The ball being in play is not necessarily entertaining either if it involves players hand-passing the ball to someone two feet away with zero chancenof a dispossession. The ball goes out of play when people score as well. I wouldn't read too much into 'ball in play' stats. It's a blunt enough measure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,109 ✭✭✭Rosita


    The '70s is half a century ago. Most people have no recollection of that. Hard to be nostalgic about that which you didn't experience. Let's concentrate on football 2024.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,641 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    They won't do that Ms.R.

    Will just pump up irrelevant 'stats' which have little to do with the actual current issues with the game.

    The 'outdoor basketball' image needs re working ….and quickly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,228 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    The most entertaining aspect of the game is surely scoring. More of which is achieved by keeping the ball in play, and keeping possession. The game used to be based on regular surrendering of possession. Until players woke up to the fact that it is better to keep possession, and produce more scores that way. Starting with the kick out. Which used to be a 50/50 ball into midfield. Not very smart.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,109 ✭✭✭Rosita


    Actually strictly speaking you cannot score without putting the ball out of play. And you cannot score by keeping possession all the time. Possession is not the be all and end all when it becomes an end in itself.

    As for the kick out, it becomes an instrument of possession only when teams choose not to push up. There could be good reason why they don't mind surrendering possession 160 yards from goal most of the time. Most teams can keep possession but have no clue what to do with it which leads to absolute paralysis.

    Nobody has said that passing the ball to a colleague is a bad idea. You are arguing a point not in dispute.

    In my view the most entertaining aspect of the game is potential contests for possession. Watching a player call a mark and kick a score uncontested is hardly entertaining for example. Plenty of scores are not entertaining when they are achieved from positions of very low risk. But I suppose it is subjective what someone finds entertaining.

    Post edited by Rosita on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,641 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    No it’s not ,,when as others have said including myself ,that points scored with the hand or kicked via 20 metre frees or kicked from the hand 10 metres out from the goal are not in the least “entertaining”. This ‘outdoor basketball’ as currently played is about as entertaining as stale bread, and you know it!



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,511 ✭✭✭shockframe


    The 70s wouldn't be the reference point if the players from the 70s were not running down the modern game so much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,689 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    Pat Spillane (who is as much 80s as 70s). And who else?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,109 ✭✭✭Rosita




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,511 ✭✭✭shockframe


    Well Spillane, jack o shea,dinny Allen,Sean o Neill to name but a few.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,641 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,228 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    The old timers come from the era when no Gaelic Footballer ever played soccer, or even saw it played. It was a very specialised game which never developed much because of that isolation.

    With the ending of the Ban, the influence of soccer gradually impacted on coaching. And the demise of Catch and Kick and the development of the Possession game ensued. Because that was the natural progression, and there is no going back. Anyone who think it is muck should find another hobby.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,109 ✭✭✭Rosita


    Surely people are entitled to comment on the state of their sport without being advised to walk away if they don't like it?

    Nothing would ever change in any sport if that approach was taken. And frankly the sport would lose a lot of people too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,228 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    We got 1169 posts since the OP declared it was Muck.

    "15 players behind the ball, balls going backwards, the mark is awful, goalkeepers playing as outfield players, the basic arts non existent like the tackling is shocking these days, the list is endless. Would it not be a lot better if it was like the old days?"

    Including dozens of suggestions for new rules and new competetion formats, supposed to solve the perceived problems. None of which are of any interest to the people who play the game. Comment away, but don't expect to change the game. And if it is painful to watch, it is only going to make people unhappy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,109 ✭✭✭Rosita


    I'm not so sure that those who play the game have no interest in its condition. I know a guy who won a County championship medal and an inter-county Senior provincial medal in recent years and is now in Australia. He ended up hating the whole thing. And he's a young man who had a fair bit of success. Don't assume inter-county players to be automatons with no thought process.



Advertisement