What’s your most controversial opinion? **Read OP** **Mod Note in Post #3372**

The Genedal, what a lad.

Who doesn't view Stalin as a monster? Mao is also as bad, if not worse. Hitler wasn't going to stop anywhere, what he became known for was embedded in him from the 1920's.

It's tempting to give government extra powers to crack down on protestors you disagree with, but these powers will still be there to use against you if you want to protest.

If people are breaking the law or committing criminal damage then the Guards already have the laws to arrest them. Of course, it might not be practicable during a protest.

You make laws for the bad government, not the good one. A bad government would love the ability to fire rubber bullets at protestors. Make protests illegal in practical terms and then treat protestors as criminals. I doubt you'd be happy about it if you actually got what you're asking for. Effective protest is pretty important and what you're proposing is part of neutering protest against a bad government - which is when we'd really need it.

Not sure where you're getting your information from but Kosovo is 95.6% muslim. Albania is 60% muslim. Turkey is 90% muslim

Having actually lived in the area I can say that they are tolerant societies. And they are not ' All of them are much more intolerant than the European mainstream. '

Let's hope not. Hope for the best, prepare for the worst.

Palestine is not a true State, it is a radical Arab construct to kill the last remaining Jews in the Middle East by any means including sacrificing their own women and children as suicide bombers and human shields just to kill one Jew or even just for anti-Israel PR.

It has fooled whole nations, including Ireland, who think that the Arabs are the oppressed. Only 7m Jews left in the midst of 450m Arabs. It is one of the most diabolical and ingenious plots in history and it is working.

Yeah that's about as clever as anti-Irish propaganda when we were fighting for our right to self-determination.

The British told each other the Irishare savages who just wanted to kill the British, but what we actually wanted was our own country and to govern ourselves and not to be second class citizens in someone else's control. After we got independence it took a few decades to properly normalise relations. But we got there.

What we wanted was equality and independence, not to kill the British.

I think his treatment of the Jewish people and "undesireables" would have prevented him from getting that title even without WW2, but please do tell me the damage the far left have done in the last 75 years?

If marriage was the other way around ie the woman had to propose, would end up losing almost everything if it didn't work out it would be very interesting to see how high marriage rates would be.

Plus as well, polling on who is the most evil is just very opinionated and arbitrary. Like definitively saying one party is the most evil is just an awkward thing to define. Go to one region and you're likely to get a different result because the impact on the region is more recognised by the people there. Such a vote result doesn't translate to people viewing other parties as not evil.

Honestly, it reminds me of the posters who excitedly say "Hitler was a socialist", there's an agenda and it's pretty dodgy.

I meant without the treatment of the Jews and "undesirables" etc. Damage the far left have done, wokeism for a start. They have lobotomised the youth of the West.

You said, " if Hitler had've stopped at the Anschluss, he'd be considered the greatest statesmen of the 20th century" - his persecutions started long before that. If you take out his invasions and persecutions there's not much to remember him by, let alone make him "the greatest Statesman of all time".

You didn't say "damage", you said "heinous crimes". And wokeism is as broad a term as you can get not to mention divisive and not even close to being a synonym for "far left", but again: if would depend on what specific acts you're refering to as "heinous crimes". "Lebotimis[ing] the youth of the West" is a bit too figurative to be considered.

There is a big class divide, between the people who work and have ambition and the lazy people who want everything for free and refuse to work and begrudge people who have built up wealth for themselves. I despise the former, a bad little crowd of bitter people who blame the Government for all their problems, they will be put in their place soon enough. As for Martin Cahill, he was a piece of dirt, glad he is dead, hardly a hero, slashing peoples tyres is pathetic, the action of someone who never grew up.