Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1204205207209210217

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 15 LastCall


    Surprised this hasn't been posted here yet:

    NTA planning an extension to Kilcock.

    https://www.kildarestreet.com/committees/?id=2024-05-02a.5&s=kilcock+segment%3A8911960#g429

    Mr. Hugh Creegan: NTA
    The short answer is not this year because we have not yet received planning consent for the DART+ West project. Assuming that comes through this year, we envisage starting a project with Irish Rail next year to extend to Kilcock and ensure that we get the extra distance run out. The Deputy is right; it is a short extension.

    T D. Is it likely to run in tandem with the project?

    Mr. Hugh Creegan: NTA
    Exactly. That is our ambition. It is a small project in comparison with DART+ West and, therefore, we ought to be able to make it concurrent with DART+ West in order that it all comes together at the same time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,773 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    I'd say that's news to Irish Rail anyway



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,402 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    They did previously say that they were going to do it, so it's not "new" news. Although, in saying that, I think it might be the first time that the NTA themselves have acknowledged it, it might have been a TD that previously said that they were going ahead with a Kilcock extension.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,773 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    I mean the statement that it will be delivered concurrently with DART+ West is news.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,164 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    This is more for my own notes, but I found it hard to find the detailed blueprints for the DART+ Coastal North works. They are here:

    https://www.dartplus.ie/railwayorder/dartcoastalnorth

    03.1 Railway Order Book 

    Railway-Work-Plans-Combined PDFs: 1 to 3.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,763 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    If you're going to do it as part of Dart+ West then why leave it out of scope for that project?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭gjim


    Presumably because DART+ West RO was submitted ages ago and they absolutely do not want to restart that process. And I don't see any downside with doing it as a separate project? Isn't it better have a continuous pipeline of projects following each other through proposal, design, funding approval, planning, construction, etc. instead of hitting bottlenecks everywhere by forcing a single massive mega-project through each stage one-by-one once every few decades.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,164 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Yep totally agree and the NTA are right to do it this way.

    It's been pointed out here before that a better way to do DART+ would have been to do a line per decade instead of all the lines in the 2020s, but at least the lines are all separate projects with their own permitting so one line can't hold up the others. Am I right in saying you could build the 3 lines in any order?



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,402 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    I believe that Maynooth has to be first, as that's got the new depot that'll store some of the new carriages.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,402 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Ah, I just saw that's from May, which explains it, as that's when I read it first, it's the same news, I'd just forgotten some of the details. I'm pretty sure that it was in here before, with a link to an article on it, but I may be mistaken.

    Either way, it's still good news, even now.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,402 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    I honestly thought that I was going crazy already knowing about the concurrent stuff, but yeah, it's already been discussed on this thread.

    I guess it'll just have to be something else that drives me crazy….



  • Registered Users Posts: 94 ✭✭OisinCooke


    Has anyone seen the plans for the new turnback at Malahide just before the Broadmeadow viaduct…?

    New track is in red with existing track in orange. Doesn’t look like the turnback will have access to the southbound/city-bound platform… any idea why this is and why it wasn’t made to access both platforms…?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,868 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Very interesting comment. They might as well have had the turnback just in the form of a siding off the Down line: much less trouble than slewing the Down (fast?) line to make way for the turnbank. You clearly maximise the benefit by having assess to both platforms to and from the turnback.

    Maybe the digram has an omission.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,767 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The diagram is the basis of the planning request. Any "omissions" are permanent unless you want to go thorough the whole lark again.

    Further North, Clongriffin is gaining a turnback, so there may be an intention to expand the core, high-frequency service area or that far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,975 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    They don’t have to submit a railway order to install a set of points.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,767 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Ah, I misread the post. I thought it was missing track. Apologies for confusion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,612 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Minor works can be, and are, done using normal planning permission also.

    From memory the entire WRC 1 reopening was done using planning permission not a RO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,868 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Glad to hear that.The way the planning bureaucracy is assuming such a huge scope makes me wonder. Did the original DART have to get planning permission for all that OHLE?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,164 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Wait, isn't an RO just a specific type of planning permission for rail infrastructure?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,028 Mod ✭✭✭✭G_R


    Presume the distinction being made is that it goes to ABP and not the local authority.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    The current order will be here and in use long before Kilcock gets built. They can’t order any new trains until it’s built though. That doesn’t include any replacements for the 8100 fleet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,742 ✭✭✭tnegun


    The KCC Maynooth ABTA report mentions a new/second station for Maynooth to the west of the current one several times, it was the first I've heard of it I don't think it is part of Dart+? Does anyone have any information on it?

    This is the suggested location.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,612 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Its not part of DART+ West. It might, but probably won't, appear with the Kilcock DART+ stuff



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,059 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Adding a train station is easy but it will take decades to deliver the rest of the necessary infrastructure to support a greatly increased population on the western side of the town. The ring road on the eastern side has been going through the process for many years, has had CPOs confirmed and might actually be built by the end of this decade. Much of the population growth over the past 10 years has been closer to the eastern, rather than western, side. Why can't they just do the sensible thing and put a station under the ring road?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,763 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Why do one very minor project when you can do two right over twice the time, right?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,612 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Kilcock DART+ is meant to be delivered at the same time. Meant.

    Adding a station after, if its a simple two track job, isn't difficult. There may be justification to have more than two tracks though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 145 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    Sound be included now. But this being Ireland…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,473 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    No, let's just build DART+.

    Ireland is where we would cancel the whole thing and resubmit the plan with the extra two stations added on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 410 ✭✭Ireland trains


    https://www.irishrail.ie/en-ie/news/The-DART-is-40%21

    First of the new Dart fleet to be unveiled in October.

    Interesting it specifically mentions a Dart to wicklow, saying that an option and feasibility study is due to report in the autumn.

    Costal south says that ‘Proposals to enhance capacity to/from Greystones being developed’, which seems to confirm what others have said about other elements of the project being scrapped - and still no date for consultation.

    Interesting to see that 20% of energy is recouped through regenerative braking.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15 LastCall


    I didn't even know the old rolling stock is hybrid.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,612 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    It isn't, it returns the regenerated power to the grid



  • Registered Users Posts: 632 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Dart West approval coming "any day now" according to Eamon. Fingers crossed.

    https://www.thejournal.ie/eamon-ryan-dart-other-cities-6444513-Jul2024/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,773 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    will believe when I see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,954 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    I admire his enthusiasm but how would it be possible to introduce it in Waterford?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,612 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Would have to be entirely new build lines; and to where?

    Only "suburb" of Waterford is Tramore; which only ever had a direct, unconnected to anything, line. South Wexford line notably served nowhere of scale, Dungarvan line is a very successful greenway and none of the towns close by are particularly big



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,767 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    @L1011 Agreed. The Rosslare-Limerick line serves Fiddown/Portlaw (closed in 19th century) and Carrick-on-Siur both of which have potential for development or as P+R. Same goes, but weaker, for Campile. The big problem with that is that Waterford's biggest traffic flows are on a North-South axis from Slieverue in South Kilkenny to Dunmore/Tramore.

    I could see a Tramore-Waterford service as a tram - the volume is there - but not as heavy rail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,333 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    Guys there is an election coming soon. Even if entirely unplausible to have DART in Waterford, these guys will say anything to get votes. A Tramore luas would be good, but I'm pretty sure the bus service does an alright job already.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,773 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Tramore to Wateford is open countryside not suitable for a tram.

    Anyway no need to worry about it, we can barely build a few metres of unconnected cycle lane in Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,868 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Jesus wept, this is a DART+ thread and all of a sudden we are on about Waterford and Tramore!



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,164 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Keep it on DART stuff please!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 469 ✭✭Bodan


    A planning inspector with An Bord Pleanála submitted their report on
    Dart+ West to the planning authority’s board for a decision nearly 180
    days ago, but the board still has yet to approve or reject the project.

    Irish Rail submitted the Railway Order, a type of planning
    permission, for the project just under two years ago on July 29, 2022.
    Different sources said it is felt that the board would rule on the issue
    soon but expressed frustration at the length of time the project has
    spent in the planning system.

    The main element of the project includes electrifying the Maynooth
    line and closing level crossings. It will allow the line to go from six
    trains per hour with a capacity of five thousand passengers to 12 trains
    per hour with a capacity of over 13,000 passengers.

    But Dart+ West is seen as a critical project for Dart expansion,
    especially given the inclusion of a large depot on the route. Additional
    orders of Dart carriages, beyond what’s planned for the Northern Line
    expansion using hybrid battery/overhead electric trains, are on hold
    until the planning decision is made.

    Cllr Feljin Jose (Green Party), a Dublin City-based councillor and
    former chair of the Dublin Commuter Coalition, said An Bord Pleanála
    told him that the inspector’s report was submitted to the board over 170
    days ago.

    Cllr Jose said: “The staffing issues at An Bord Pleanála are well
    documented, but we’ve seen very little improvement on the time it takes
    for large transport projects to be approved by An Bord Pleanála. Dart+
    West has been with An Bord Pleanála for almost two years now, of which
    six months have been spent waiting for final approval of the planning
    inspector’s report.”

    He said: “This is a major source of delay for projects like Dart+,
    MetroLink and BusConnects and won’t improve until we see a massive
    increase in the size and resources available An Bord Pleanála.”

    Mark Gleeson, a spokesperson for Rail Users Ireland, said: “The big
    constraint [with Dart expansion] now is the lack of the new depot in
    Maynooth. Until that is done, there will be no more orders to expand the
    fleet, and Irish Rail is still awaiting the railway order. They could
    replace the existing 1984 fleet, but no more.”

    Rail Users Ireland also recently raised concerns about An Bord Pleanála’s 37-month approval process for a “relatively straightforward” level crossing removal project on the Cork-Dublin train line near Buttevant and Charleville. This
    raises concerns about the planning system’s ability to deal with rail
    projects in a timely manner.

    https://irishcycle.com/2024/07/25/an-bord-pleanala-board-received-its-inspectors-report-for-dart-west-project-nearly-180-days-ago/



  • Registered Users Posts: 823 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Ridiculous.

    Even more so that it takes a (no offense) niche media site to report on it.

    Our regular media don’t have a clue how to cover transport. This is the issue of importance, start hounding ABP.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,773 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Eamon Ryan came out publicly and said that DART+W was due a railway order 'any day soon' so I'd imagine he's putting pressure on ABP. Again, objectively speaking the best transport minister we've ever had, albeit not that media or people friendly. It's a shame that ministers for government departments have to also win a popularity contest, it tends to exclude the type of personality that actually delivers things.



  • Registered Users Posts: 145 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    I am surprised Drogheda has no proposal for a North Station as the location is a long trek to the main station. The area is growing in population and Drogheda United are building their new stadium over there. Yet there seem to be little or no talk of this.



  • Registered Users Posts: 239 ✭✭specialbyte


    I think a station does make sense. But it's only a single track over the Boyne viaduct. Does the northern line over the viaduct have the capacity for extra DART trains without impacting commuters to Dundalk and Enterprise services to Belfast?

    DART+ is already a massive project, scope creeping it further is only going to further slow it down. That's not to say that Louth County Council, Irish Rail and the NTA shouldn't designate and protect a site for a future train station on the north side as part of some later project



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,059 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    A Drogheda North station could just be served by Dundalk trains.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,242 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    I was wondering yesterday about what the DART expansion will mean for Dundalk, will they still run diesels from Dundalk to Dublin? Or has that been mentioned at all?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,975 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Dundalk will be served by the hourly Enterprise and additional peak hour diesel operated services.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,846 ✭✭✭thomasj


    Incredible for an inspectors report to be sitting waiting for consideration for so long. Staffing levels at ABP must be bad.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,763 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Dundalk passengers will have to catch a shuttle service to Drogheda and change for a train into Dublin /s



Advertisement