Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why wont die hard GAA fans admit football these days is muck?

12021222426

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,917 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    It is if the players -

    1. Are brave enough to try and execute attacks
    2. Have a manager that encourages them to do so
    3. Have players intelligent enough to have the movement to execute such attacks

    I will use the goals against Roscommon by Dublin to show what can be done -

    Goal 1 for Dublin v the Rossies @1:35 -

    A counter attacking break from Dublin considered interchange of hand passes quick low ball, players offering options and interchange with Fention and Basquel, Roscommon did not know to mark. Finished deftly by Baquel.

    Goal 2 for Dublin v the Rossies @ 2:08 - 2:26 counter attacking break at speed from one end of the pitch to the other - Roscommon did not even get a touch. Less than 20 seconds from one end of the pitch to the other. Jack McCaffery's incisive run was integral here drawing players out of position.Finished by Con O'Callaghan who got the most from play in the championship thus far.

    Both goals were even more impressive at the game itself, as it gave full appreciation of the players use of space, and players providing angles.

    The problem Jim Gavin, E.Fitzmaurice are trying to solve is the sides who constantly play with limited ambition and do not vary their play. The problem is not solely the evolution of football and the lack of rules catching up. It is the teams that are unwilling to create and play safety first. There was absolutely nothing wrong with those Dublin goals. I was at the game. I remember the goals for the level of skill involved in them, the level of movement and options provided in both.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,143 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Some misinformation in here as usual.

    Donegal until and including the 2010 season played a very leaky gung ho style. It wasn't until the 2011 season they want ultra defensive under Jim McGuiness.

    Dublin in 2009 developed an ultra defensive style after Meath hammered them playing the game the way it should be played.

    That qualifier run seen some of the most damp displays by Dublin we've ever seen but it was effective.

    Jim Gavin in 2014 tried to return to the traditional attacking style but after Donegal hammered them with the more effective counter attack system Dublin never returned to their traditional way of playing. They realized the southern style so to speak was inferior.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,489 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    Them 2 Dublin goals wouldn't have happened if players marked their own player like the old days, Roscommon were always very weak at marking in Croke park as well, too nice of a team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,489 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    Was just watching that 2014 Dubin V Donegal game there, great game, looked a fast exciting game, not too defensive with no space like all the games these days.

    on the Dublin V Roscommn goals, the Dublin goals were nice to watch, I agree but we dont see them kind of goals in most matches, which is a pity, I liked the long kick in the first one because you never see kicks like that anymore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,917 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I was at that 2014 Donegal v Dublin one as well. that one is cited as the one that made Jim Gavin change tactics and not go gung ho. more precision based stuff.

    In the early part of that match Dublin were hitting points from way out, it looked like Donegal were going to get walloped. From what I remember a grey haired Christy Toye came on as sub and destroyed Dublin. Donegal were lethal on the counter and Dublin no idea how to cope with Donegal. For the life of me I still cannot understand why Gavin left Dennis Bastick on the bench. It was a game suited to power and big units. I would put it down as Jim Gavin's biggest error of his tenure.

    In the recent Roscommon game there was a mix of everything to be honest, but there were plenty of parts of the game that I know you would hate, where Dublin and Roscommon played "keep ball" working a score conserving energy/probing side to side. I felt it was one of those slow build psychological trillers.

    But what Roscommon did that a lot of teams were/are afraid to do v Dublin they pressed right up on Dublin making life really difficult. It really threw Dublin early on as they were not used to it. I enjoyed the match because both sides were not afraid to vary the play. If more teams did that football would be better overall.

    I am going to be really interested to see what rule changes Gavin and Fitzmaurice come up with. Because from the sound of things Fitzmaurice wants any rule changes throughly tested and any loopholes/unintended consequences figured out, before trying them in proper high level games.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Rosita


    The ball being in play is not necessarily entertaining either if it involves players hand-passing the ball to someone two feet away with zero chancenof a dispossession. The ball goes out of play when people score as well. I wouldn't read too much into 'ball in play' stats. It's a blunt enough measure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Rosita


    The '70s is half a century ago. Most people have no recollection of that. Hard to be nostalgic about that which you didn't experience. Let's concentrate on football 2024.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,765 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    They won't do that Ms.R.

    Will just pump up irrelevant 'stats' which have little to do with the actual current issues with the game.

    The 'outdoor basketball' image needs re working ….and quickly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,447 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    The most entertaining aspect of the game is surely scoring. More of which is achieved by keeping the ball in play, and keeping possession. The game used to be based on regular surrendering of possession. Until players woke up to the fact that it is better to keep possession, and produce more scores that way. Starting with the kick out. Which used to be a 50/50 ball into midfield. Not very smart.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Rosita


    Actually strictly speaking you cannot score without putting the ball out of play. And you cannot score by keeping possession all the time. Possession is not the be all and end all when it becomes an end in itself.

    As for the kick out, it becomes an instrument of possession only when teams choose not to push up. There could be good reason why they don't mind surrendering possession 160 yards from goal most of the time. Most teams can keep possession but have no clue what to do with it which leads to absolute paralysis.

    Nobody has said that passing the ball to a colleague is a bad idea. You are arguing a point not in dispute.

    In my view the most entertaining aspect of the game is potential contests for possession. Watching a player call a mark and kick a score uncontested is hardly entertaining for example. Plenty of scores are not entertaining when they are achieved from positions of very low risk. But I suppose it is subjective what someone finds entertaining.

    Post edited by Rosita on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,765 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    No it’s not ,,when as others have said including myself ,that points scored with the hand or kicked via 20 metre frees or kicked from the hand 10 metres out from the goal are not in the least “entertaining”. This ‘outdoor basketball’ as currently played is about as entertaining as stale bread, and you know it!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,514 ✭✭✭shockframe


    The 70s wouldn't be the reference point if the players from the 70s were not running down the modern game so much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,709 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    Pat Spillane (who is as much 80s as 70s). And who else?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Rosita




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,514 ✭✭✭shockframe


    Well Spillane, jack o shea,dinny Allen,Sean o Neill to name but a few.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,765 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,447 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    The old timers come from the era when no Gaelic Footballer ever played soccer, or even saw it played. It was a very specialised game which never developed much because of that isolation.

    With the ending of the Ban, the influence of soccer gradually impacted on coaching. And the demise of Catch and Kick and the development of the Possession game ensued. Because that was the natural progression, and there is no going back. Anyone who think it is muck should find another hobby.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Rosita


    Surely people are entitled to comment on the state of their sport without being advised to walk away if they don't like it?

    Nothing would ever change in any sport if that approach was taken. And frankly the sport would lose a lot of people too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,447 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    We got 1169 posts since the OP declared it was Muck.

    "15 players behind the ball, balls going backwards, the mark is awful, goalkeepers playing as outfield players, the basic arts non existent like the tackling is shocking these days, the list is endless. Would it not be a lot better if it was like the old days?"

    Including dozens of suggestions for new rules and new competetion formats, supposed to solve the perceived problems. None of which are of any interest to the people who play the game. Comment away, but don't expect to change the game. And if it is painful to watch, it is only going to make people unhappy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Rosita


    I'm not so sure that those who play the game have no interest in its condition. I know a guy who won a County championship medal and an inter-county Senior provincial medal in recent years and is now in Australia. He ended up hating the whole thing. And he's a young man who had a fair bit of success. Don't assume inter-county players to be automatons with no thought process.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,447 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    They can play any style they like. That is the beauty of the rules. Any player including goalkeepers can go to any area of the pitch. They can kick pass or hand pass. Nobody is forcing them to play Possession, it is just the natural thing to do to win games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Rosita


    Presumably managers and coaches are forcing them to play possession?

    Anyway, players playing "possession" isn't the issue. People passing the ball to each other is hardly revolutionary. The issue is massed defences in front of goal which leads to pointless 'going around in circles' retention of possession.

    That is a hard watch for anyone especially when it involves teams without the wherewithal to break down such a defence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,447 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    It won't be an "issue" for whoever wins the All Ireland. Fans included.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Rosita


    Indeed. Not sure that's the most enlightened way to consider the sport and its future though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,927 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    The two teams in the final are as entertaining as any in the present time, their 2022 game was regarded as the best of the season. These two teams are not killing football, but less able teams are.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,765 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Still coming up with the same auld rubbish.

    The President of the GAA thinks it needs attention, so much so a high powered team have been set up to

    Examine changes that might make the game more watchable.

    The pundits say it, the commentators say is, a huge percentage of fans say it.

    And here you are trying to ignore all that.

    Take a look at yourself my friend.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,447 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    The big idea on this thread is that the game needs more occasions of contests for possession. In other words back to Catch and Kick, and players staying in designated areas of the field.

    Not going to happen, when there is long term proof that keeping possession by whatever means, is the logical way to engineer more scores. Especially cruel is the attempt to shame goalkeepers into not taking a full part in the play when they see the need.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Rosita


    Your second paragraph seems to assume nothing can ever change. The obsessive retention and recycling of possession is advantageous only because the way the sport has developed facilitates it. Why would someone kick a football into an areas where a massed defence means their offensive players are outnumbered? Keeping possession is not the major cerebral breakthrough you suggesting. It's just a logical reaction to massed defences. Take that out and suddenly two guys handpassing the ball to each other 100 metres from opposing goals might look a bit pointless. You just never know.

    If the rules change to impact on constant possession retention and make it less advantageous players and coaches will have to adapt. Rules have always followed 'problems' in sports which needed to be addressed. If at some point a decision is taken to restrict players to certain areas of the pitch then you can be quite confident players will adapt because they'll get no advantage from not doing so.

    Rugby has adapted rules to prevent the ball being smothered and possession retained endlessly. Likewise, goalkeepers in GAA presumably feel no shame in having specific rules to protect them and their area. Why should they feel shame if they are not being facilitated to play in the forwards as well? Soccer goalkeepers cannot have the ball passed to them by foot in the manner of every other player. Outfield players do not expect a turn in goals and are shameless about that.

    Changes have happened down the years in various sports and the sky hasn't fallen in. Not everyone likes change but there's no reason to assume it can't happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,447 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Whatever changes happen will happen naturally. Just like the ban on soccer keepers handling backpasses developed them into having equal footballing skills to the outfield players. They take part in intricate moves near the goals to defeat the "high press". In the old days they just hoofed to ball up the field. Gaelic already outlaws the player receiving the kick out from passing back to the keeper. That is enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Rosita


    It is a rules' based game. Changes happen primarily because rules dictate the response (at least successful ones do).

    Your belief that goalkeepers in soccer had no skills with a ball at their feet prior to the passback being banned but now are as good as outfield players is an unwitting admission of the power of a rule change. There was nothing remotely 'natural' about that development. It happened as a response to rule changes.

    I just don't get "that is enough" about rule changes. No need to fear rule changes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,489 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    I have talked to lots of lads who play football now, these lads would only ever know the defensive football, 30 players in one half football and most of them tell me they dont enjoy playing and they think there is something wrong with them game. when I played I never felt like that, I always enjoyed the game, otherwise I would have quit playing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,765 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    pg, these dudes see the writing on the wall.

    The clipboard and stats merchants cannot turn back the tide and lose their nice little numbers.

    They know the game is up when from the top down it’s accepted that GF as it’s played right now

    is a painfull watch in most cases.

    Well done Jarlath fo spotting the disease in our game and wresting it from the clipboard merchants.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,447 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Back in 2017 Jarlath stated his opposition to going back to mandatory old style kickouts to midfield. He is happy with the 20 metre rule, which facilitates the playing out from the back copied from soccer. Sometimes the opposition will take up field positions to make the short kick out more difficult, other times they will allow it unimpeded. Same in both sports and entirely logical.

    https://www.rte.ie/sport/gaa/2017/1001/908882-jarlath-burns-kickout/

    Neither is he convinced that the Committee needs to make wholesale changes to the current rules. But he will let them do whatever they will. They won't be able to force the players to do stuff that they don't want to do. His expectation that the game will develop organically, matches my own. His fellow Armagh man Kieran McGeeney is also another stout defender of the way the game is played now.

    https://www.rte.ie/sport/football/2024/0223/1434012-attractive-football-a-goal-for-new-gaa-president-burns/

    However, he said he was keen not to pre-empt the research and potential findings of the new football review group.

    "I think that what will emerge from this, nothing might emerge from it. They might decide (to) allow the game to change organically and it will come back to what it is," Burns continued.

    "But there are many things that people disagree with. I personally like the idea of bringing the goalkeeper into the play and one of the dividends of that has been whenever you're picking a team now at under-10, young players want to play nets now because they see a role for themselves, a more creative role than standing freezing in the rain under the posts and I think that people like Ethan Rafferty and Niall Morgan have helped that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,765 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Still ignoring the elephant in the room I see, Ah well, the ‘outdoor basketball’ currently being played with handpassing up to around forty times before a shot is even considered Will drone on.

    The penny will soon drop that the only people supporting this will be the clipboard merchants who want to maintain their positions in the game at all costs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,841 ✭✭✭✭Dtp1979




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,447 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,765 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Yep…. turning the game into 'outdoor basketball',and boring possession tactics.

    John Spectator won't pay big bucks to watch these grifters kill the game.

    Ja sees it …… and has acted…maybe nothing too big, but he sees where this is going if left in the hands of

    the clipboard merchants.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,489 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    I wonder will hurling take advantage of the situation? people might realize it is a way better game and start going to hurling games and get their kids playing it over football? maybe it will take off and get stronger in places like Leinster and Connacht.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,765 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Lets keep this one on football Pee, lets keep the feet of the 'clipboard merchants' to the fire.

    They are running out of excuses and getting backed into corners.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,447 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Hurling is evolving more into a possession game, much to the dismay of the traditionalists. They say fire the ball in long to the forwards and let them battle for it. The more modern approach is to retain possession and progress up the field with shorter passes. Plenty more in the press like this bit below if people want to look it up. Anyone with an interest in hurling should be well aware that it is changing into a possession game. Or Muck as some will call it.

    "IN ALL FAIRNESS - Hurling trending in the wrong path

    The first half of Saturday’s National Hurling League game between Limerick and Tipperary was a hard watch. Even taking the cold and wet conditions into account, there was little to excite the over five thousand people that made their way to Cork for a neutral venue hurling league game.

    The over proliferation of the handpass and Brick-flick is something all hurling people should be concerned about. Sports evolve and certainly hurling is going through a major one at the moment, but evolution is good once the game doesn’t suffer, and I feel it is at the moment.

    Hurling is now being poisoned by the possession disease that has made Gaelic Football a hard watch in recent years, bar when the few elite teams face off against each other. The thinkers have gotten their hands on the game and in an effort to find a new element to the game of hurling, they have made it harder to watch."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,395 ✭✭✭megadodge


    Nnnnnnn……..nnnnnnnnn……..hiccup………..nnnnnnn……clipboard merchants………. nnnnnnnnn…….nnnnnnnnnnn…….hiccup……..nnnnnn……..handpassing………nnnnnnnnn………nnnnnnnnn…….outdoor basketball………….nnnnnnnnnnnn……………..clipboard merchants…….hiccup ………nnnnnnn……..nnnnnnnnnnn……………..zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,765 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    They are the problem,bro, there are still denyers out there.

    Coming up with rubbish trying to convince folk black is white.

    Time to fess up and accept reality, because reality will be thrown at you every time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,489 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    I was watching the highlights of Laois v Antrim yesterday, from the semi final a few weeks ago, it looked a good game, lots of long kicking and points scored from long range, not sure if it looked good because it was the highlights or if the game was actually good? anyone see the full game?



  • Registered Users Posts: 197 ✭✭Charlo30


    You keep mentioning clipboard merchants and I do somewhat agree with you. Teams have become a bit too focused on stats and data. But regardless of any rule changes. Management teams will still be looking at certain data & stats. So while the clipboard merchants influence might be curtailed they wont be going away



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,765 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Agree, however the stranglehold they have on the way the game is played today needs to be loosened.

    I would not be expecting big changes, however, the business of 37 handpasses sideways and backwards before a shot is even attempted is, to even the most feeble minded members of the spectators is not a good watch.

    The supporters of the Clipboard merchants of course will try to hold on to their status and Gaelic football will become two teams shunting back and forward playing amongst themselves whilst the spectators will turn to their mobile devices while this procession back and forth continues.


    There is nothing surer unless changes are made.



  • Registered Users Posts: 715 ✭✭✭blackvalley


    “ Highlights of Laois V Antrim “ . That would be a very short watch I would think.



  • Registered Users Posts: 511 ✭✭✭Davys Fits


    While I might agree with some of what your saying why would you bring it up on this tread after and Epic hurling match? Yesterdays match would put and sport in the shade. If you are really concerned about the welfare of hurling maybe start a new thread about it and I will join you there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,447 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    It was well before Sunday, and was in response to the suggestion that we should abandon football for the much superior game of hurling. I only have a scant knowledge of hurling, but I am better informed than the OP of this thread. The short passing possession game works well in both codes. No need for a new hurling thread, you can contribute to this one.

    https://www.the42.ie/clare-waterford-2-933271-Jun2013/

    "And what way will Davy Fitzgerald set out his Clare team? The short-passing possession style of game is high-risk and brilliant to watch when it’s done well and executed at speed. But Waterford will feel confident of breaking down Clare by applying maximum pressure in key areas."

    https://www.sportsjoe.ie/gaa/story-clare-hurlers-2013-binned-supermacs-196821

    "The year 2013 and the Clare hurlers and Davy Fitzgerald are like men possessed. 16 years without an All-Ireland senior win, a good deal of hurling folk slating their short-passing style, a batch of gifted under-21 hurlers coming of age, this was the time to do it."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,489 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    I watched the Clare V Cork game yesterday, there was any amount of hitting the ball long into the forwards, nothing like the amount of hand passing you see in football.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 833 ✭✭✭Butson


    Lucky enough to be in Croker yesterday. It had everything, the atmosphere was the best I've ever experienced at any sporting code ever. Lucky enough to have been at world cups in soccer and rugby and not a patch on yesterday.

    Have a free ticket to the football this Sunday and I honestly don't know if I will bother going. Desperate stuff. Hopefully the new rule changes are positive because right now it is a terrible spectacle.



Advertisement