Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General Irish politics discussion thread

Options
1148149150152154

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,207 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Say the next government is made up of Independant Ireland and FF/FG. Would everyone all of a sudden be happy that the populist right is in government, where they make policy and legislation to row back on this like clean air and water, public transport, abortion, divorce, drunk driving

    Divorce is enshrined in the constitution anyway so that's just silly to mention. No government is going to touch abortion for a generation either.

    If Independent Ireland get into power with FF & FG then their potential to bring in unpopular nonsense will be severely curtailed. Realistically it would likely just mean that foot-dragging on climate issues gets increased and anything seen as being too "woke" wouldn't see the light of day.



  • Registered Users Posts: 709 ✭✭✭moon2


    Would everyone all of a sudden be happy that the populist right is in government, where they make policy and legislation to row back on this like clean air and water, public transport, abortion, divorce, drunk driving

    To be honest, I'd be happy if Independent Ireland were in government with FF, FG or both, and then they proposed these things for a vote. The new policies would fairly obviously not pass, and the optics of attempting to row back such popular legislation would likely tank their vote amongst the swing voters. They'd be a 1 shot coalition party.

    This is one of the stronger points about our voting system - a minor party has minor power and can't do these kinds of things with the support of the majority party, who has the majority of the power by virtue of obtaining the majority of the popular vote.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,914 ✭✭✭Augme


    Rowing back on abortion and divorce would require a party being in charge of department of Health and Justice. A minor party like Independent Ireland would never been given those. They end up with transports and could easily see investment in public transport and progress public transport policies being decimated then. As we have seen with FG involvement with trying to dismantle the Dublin City transport plan, they'd be in favour of that as well so there's be.liyyle objection to a car first policy in a FFG-II coalition.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,429 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    II don't offer answers to anything. I call them the Ballygobackwards Party. A crystalisses of what they are, a new Soc Dem Cllr is seeking to remove prayers from the start of each Cork County Council meeting, II come out opposing it before there's any discussion. A variant on Ulster says NO.

    I'm not vehemently against prayers, but I would have a rational discussion on it. Do we really follow through on the separation of religion and state?



  • Registered Users Posts: 34,884 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Rowing back on abortion rights is electoral death and everyone knows it. Renua turned into crank central for a reason.

    The Dublin Airport cap is damaging the economy of Ireland as a whole, and must be scrapped forthwith.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 34,884 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    @Water John we talk a good game about being a secular republic but in reality there is no separation of church and state in Ireland, almost 95% of our primary schools are religious controlled despite being fully state funded, and they indoctrinate kids with the state’s blessing.

    Michael “Opus Dei” Woods decided the taxpayer would pick up the vast majority of the RCC’s abuse compensation and that was that. €1bn+ and counting.

    Post edited by Hotblack Desiato on

    The Dublin Airport cap is damaging the economy of Ireland as a whole, and must be scrapped forthwith.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,742 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Why would you need a praying session before a political meeting?

    Would it just be Catholic or Christian prayers or, for example, would there also be prayers from the Quran?



  • Registered Users Posts: 34,884 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    I’m thinking of setting up a religion with prayers of minimum length one hour, then forcing the councils to recognise it because it’s sectarianism if they don’t 😎

    The Dublin Airport cap is damaging the economy of Ireland as a whole, and must be scrapped forthwith.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,949 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I think that was one of the issues raised. It should either be fully ecumenical or not be there at all, but currently it's just Christian.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,207 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Seems a bit out of place in this day and age.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 27,901 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I have to disagree there. The biggest obstacle to public transport is Sinn Fein wavering on the subject, the latest being the stupid ridiculous idea to revive the Clongriffin rail link.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,914 ✭✭✭Augme


    Of course you'd disagree. Despite being in government, despite FG controlling Dublin city Council, despite a FG Minister very vocal pleas to stop the Dublin City transpor plan tpostponed, it is still somehow SFs fault. 😂😂😂



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,491 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    That's some degree of myopia to look at the transport infrastructure in this country and conclude it's Sinn Fein's fault. You do realise how ludicrous the statement is, assuming you're not trolling?



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,068 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Can we have examples please, of how SF are "the biggest obstacle to public transport"?



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,797 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Enjoyed the RTE doc The Locals I have to say Malachy Steenson came across as a right miserable looper usual buzzwords, Brian Garrigan a complete lunatic, but decent people like Daniel Ennis getting in gives you some hope for the future!



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,699 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think O'Gorman should come out and inform the nation of exactly the process for IP applicants. eg - they are identity checked, fingerprinted, photographed, checked with EU database, etc. etc.

    That way, the disinformation merchants will know the truth before their lies start.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,462 ✭✭✭corkie


    With only 20 incumbent TD's as mentioned earlier in thread, FG need new blood for the GE.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,901 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Harris is looking to promote a fresh new brand image for FG. It works both ways, if he gets back into government, he can claim new ideas and new blood, if he ends up in opposition, he won't be stuck with old TDs who have no chance in 5/6 years time of getting elected.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,800 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    The recent locals have made it a bit easier for him, as there's a pool of councillors to draw from.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,207 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Yeah I wouldn't be too worried for FG. They have a rake of councillors with experience at winning elections will likely be crawling over one another to get a shot at all these Dail vacancies.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,187 ✭✭✭realdanbreen


    I think they should go the whole hog and have Astrology sessions before each meeting. Astrology and the effects the planets etc have on us certainly make a lot more sense than the various forms, thousands, of religious nonsense that is out there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,187 ✭✭✭realdanbreen


    Steenson is a complete chancer whose being doing the rounds for years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,707 ✭✭✭eire4


    All TFPTP system needs is for one of the main parties to get pushed to the extreme right or left just as has happened to the now authoritarian Republican party in the US which has lurched to the far right. Thus the system itself which rarely requires coalitions leaves the door very open even more so as with TFPTP system governments can get into power despite only winning a minority of the votes cast.

    It is not debatable that compared with FPTP PR is much more democratic. It produces results much more reflective of the voters as a whole and it leads to very often coalition governments which represent the whishes of a majority and which require much negotiation and consensus.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,196 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    To be fair STV isn't perfect either, we get many candidates getting seats without reaching the quota. Take for example in 2016 where 49.8% of the vote gave FF and FG 94 seats (or 59% of the 158 available)

    I don't think there is a "perfect" system though to be fair, just degrees of perfection. Of which STV has a much higher degree of it than FPTP. With that being said FPTP makes for stronger governments so you have to weigh positives with negatives the whole time



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,886 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    49.8% of the first preference vote. Which, while not quite a meaningless figure, is not relevant to the seat count. That it doesn't align directly with the seat count is a feature, not a bug.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,196 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    It would suggest that people gave a first preference to one party (or indo) and a second preference to another suggesting party loyalty is not very high so that would be the main bug.

    The system itself is a good one aside from the numbers that can get in without a quota, min 1 per constituency you could essentially have a political party on the fringe in theory gain 43 seats without a quota



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,886 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It would suggest that people gave a first preference to one party (or indo) and a second preference to another suggesting party loyalty is not very high so that would be the main bug.

    What? Who cares about "party loyalty". At some point (often after choice 1) you have to go to another party. It's a consensus based system to find compromise candidates.

    The system itself is a good one aside from the numbers that can get in without a quota, min 1 per constituency you could essentially have a political party on the fringe in theory gain 43 seats without a quota

    You don't have min 1 per constituency getting in without a quota and who cares? It means they are the next most agreeable candidate. The quota is a purely mathematical function of how the counting is done. Not reaching it is meaningless.



  • Registered Users Posts: 34,884 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Get rid of 3 seat constituencies and most of this "problem" goes away. But as Podge says, first prefs are certainly not the be all and end all in PR-STV. Your tenth pref might be the one that pushes someone over the line.

    It's also very possible to protest vote (or even pity vote) with your no.1 and then move on to candidates who are actually electable.

    The Dublin Airport cap is damaging the economy of Ireland as a whole, and must be scrapped forthwith.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,196 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    You mean make every constituency a 5-seater? Not an auful idea



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 34,884 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Yes, the larger the average constituency is, the more proportional the result.

    But we're wedded to the old county lines, which makes it difficult.

    The Dublin Airport cap is damaging the economy of Ireland as a whole, and must be scrapped forthwith.



Advertisement