Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

What’s your most controversial opinion? **Read OP** **Mod Note in Post #3372**

Options
1161162163165167

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 428 ✭✭Sponge25


    Most historians agree that if Hitler had've stopped at the Anschluss and didn't commit the prejudicial crimes against the Jews etc. he would've retained the admiration that most Western statesman had for him. He brought a nation out of the depths of despair and depravity and turned it into the most powerful country in Europe in less than four years. People don't understand just how traumatic WW1 and the Versailles treaty were for Germany. Hitler had huge support in the West until the Munich agreement. He went from an absolute nobody in the World War to restoring a great country to its natural place as a great power in Europe in an extremely short period of time, if that isn't great statesmanship then I don't know what is.

    As far what the far left have done to the West, that should be so obvious that i'm not even going to bother discussing it. 'Those with understanding need no explanation, to those without understanding no explanation will suffice' etc. I will just say they have so undermined the traditions, morals and values of the Western world that they pose an existential threat to the continuance of the Western way of life. Universities were once the bastion of free thought, now they're the bastion of lefty thoughtlessness.

    eightieschewbaccy: I don't admire Hitler. I love history, especially the periods leading up to the Great War and the end of that series of events in aprox. 1945. I will say though, just because Hitler was evil and commit some of the worst crimes in history that doesn't mean he didn't possess any desirable traits. He had extreme courage under fire and was awarded the Iron Cross. The problem with discussing anything about Hitler is when you point out a single admirable thing about him people accuse you of holding sympathies.



  • Registered Users Posts: 139 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    If you stripped away some of the gloss from Ireland and there was a bit of an economic decline (not even on the level of 2009-2013), it would seem that the country has not really developed much over the last 20 years. Close a few businesses, lose a few jobs and all of a sudden people would start to notice that a lot of roads are of poor quality, cycle lanes not really developed, public transport unreliable and dated, architecturally unique buildings not really produced despite the boom of the last 20 years, housing underdeveloped, public amenities lacking and of poor quality, health system terrible etc. Essentially it doesn’t seem like much investment had gone into making the place modern, more liveable and nicer despite the billions upon billions that have flowed into the country.

    What I have noticed from going to other European countries is that they are just nicer all round than Ireland is in terms of infrastructure, pedestrianised streets, trams, metros, cleanliness and even with architecture there has been no attempt at developing aspirational and inspirational buildings in the country that you would see in other countries. It all seems to be just under the high house prices and booming corporate tax receipts surface that Ireland is in fact not investing in itself for the modern times and feels very underdeveloped.



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,402 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    1 - Exactly how did he do this? What policies and acts are you talking about here? I'm guessing you're not talking about the fascism, so what's he being admired for?

    2 - Best sidestep I've see in a while - you don't answer the question because you CAN'T answer the question.

    3 - See question 1. And don't answer it with "everyone knows…." or "it's soooooo obvious, duh….."

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 428 ✭✭Sponge25


    It's not that I can't answer, it's that I can't be arsed answering. I'm not going to spend the next hour formulating a response with evidence that the far left see the family as their biggest threat because if you had any real knowledge of communism or read any far left literature on fundamentals then you would know this. It's for my own sanity really, a simple google search will provide an abundance of evidence as it's a core tenet of Communism (the destruction of the nuclear family).

    As for what Hitler accomplished, it's kind of hard to say without sounding like a sympathiser but i'll give it a try.

    Hitler was ordered to spy on a party called the Deutsche Arbeiter Partei (DAP). He had just returned from the Great War to a country that was bankrupt both morally and fiscally. People who had worked their entire lives lost their entire lives savings, you LITERALLY needed a wheel barrow to carry the money to buy a single loaf of bread that was worth over a billion reichsmarks. The country was extremely traumatised, they were promised a swift glorious victory and received degradation beyond your worst imagination. Debauchery was everywhere, old women had to sell their bodies to put meagre food into the bellies of their loved ones. I could go on and on but it's well documented so I see no need too. Hitler, an absolute nobody, in short order turned this country into the most powerful country on Earth (atleast militarily). He restored dignity, jobs, happiness and order back to the German nation. He achieved what alot of commentators at the time called a miracle. This coming from a man who didn't come from the political class too. The DAP was a fringe party of about 100 losers, he renamed it the NSDAP and turned it into the most powerful party in Germany and became chancellor in the democratic manner proscribed by law. As I said, if he didn't persecute the jews and others and stopped at the Anschluss he would rightly be considered the greatest statesmen of the 20th century. I could go on, but I don't fancy writing a novel.



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,402 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    1 - My point entirely. You know you don't know, I know you don't know, we leave this one here.

    2 - Doesn't answer my question. I'm aware of the effect the reparations had on Germany - my question wasn't about that, it was about the specific policies and reforms he put in place - or are you not "arsed" about answering that either?

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 428 ✭✭Sponge25


    You're the one that obviously doesn't know. It's been an aim of Communism since the beginning to destroy the traditional family and associated values. The most infamous demand of the Communist Manifesto is "Abolition of the family". They see the family as the greatest impediment to Communism… You obviously haven't read it.

    Between 1933 (the year of Hitlers rise to power) and 1938 wages rose by 19%, unemployment was practically zero and ordinary workers went to the Italian riviera trough the Strength trough Joy programme. (Something absolutely unheard of for working class people) Their economy improved faster than most other countries coming out of the Great Depression and the populace was happy. I'm not an expert on the specific policies that enabled the growth but it was because of policies Hitler introduced. There was a system of promissory notes but i'm not entirely familiar with how it worked as it's not my area of interest.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,342 ✭✭✭kowloonkev


    Buddy give yourself a break. You have already pointed out the kind of people you can't have a discussion with and you are trying to have a discussion with them. It's utterly pointless.

    You do seem to know your stuff. I've also recently developed an interest in that time period despite hating history in school.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Eh, @Sponge25 has happily omitted that Hitler assumed dictatorial powers in 1933. Tended to jail his political opponents, sterilisation of undesirables started back then as well. So the disabled were a big target. On top of that, their economy boom was increased militarisation due to the intent for a war. In terms of things like issuing MEFO bills, it was unsustainable and would have collapsed their economy, then they entered a war and started plundering their victims. And the way Sponge is referring to antisemitism, you'd think it wasn't heavily prior to 1938.

    Also, want to start citing some of the historians you're claiming back you up? Perception wise at time, it might have been good but the reality is it was gonna be a train wreck economically.

    http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/nazi-germany/nazi-germany-and-the-economic-miracle/



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,402 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    1 - you said it was woke, now it's communism, you still can't point to a specific "heinous crime".

    2 - again, I'm aware of the history, but you claim Hitler was a great stesman but can't, by your own admission,point to a specific reform that wasn't based on genocidal repression?

    You've been called out and we're done here.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,269 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Agree, we have a terrible aesthetic and useless at any sort of medium or long term planning.

    Fired up as cheaply as possible but still wildly expensive somehow.

    In many European cities they have a historic centre with nice old well maintained buildings. I think kilkenny city is about the only place that comes anywhere near this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,182 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    Ireland has declined massively in the last 20 years in my opinion.Our GDP figures are a load of nonsense and aren't producing any real benefit for the people who live here.

    People in their 20's and early 30's are facing a much tougher life and a lot less to hope for than their parents had.If the country was going well it would be the other way around.

    Instead of spending budget surpluses on infrastructural developments we seem to want to squander them on reducing taxes or bumping up social welfare payments which are nice in the short term but produce no long term benefit for anyone and are just used to buy peoples votes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 428 ✭✭Sponge25


    I'm starting to see that now buddy. The only reason I gave a response at all is because they oppose wokeism in their signature. It seems like I could give them an encyclopedic response and they wouldn't be happy. shrugs



  • Registered Users Posts: 428 ✭✭Sponge25


    Do you seriously need crimes that then Communists did pointed out to you? I thought it was common knowledge that it was a barbaric doctrine that espoused senseless nonsense that caused the deaths of well over 100 million people. My original point was this: It's OK to call yourself a Communist but not OK to call yourself a National Socialist when both ideologies are responsible for some of the most heinous crimes in history.

    PS. You're putting words in my mouth, I didn't claim Hitler was a great statesmen. I claimed he would've been if he stopped at the Anschluss and didn't persecute the Jews and others.

    eightieschewbaccy: Hitler didn't just "assume" dictatorial powers. They were conferred upon him by President Hindenburg because of the Reichstag being burnt to the ground. I'm not a fan of Hitler by any means but in order to understand History we must see it from all angles instead of the "Hitler was an insane monster" one or else falsehoods become truths, especially amongst the general populace. Also, eugenics was practised widely in the 30's. It wasn't just a German thing, the US, UK and practically all Western countries practised it, that's not to say it makes it OK though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,402 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    You still considered him to have been a great statesman up until he started the persecutions c. 1933.

    But again, the telling point is that you can NOT point to a single act, policy or reform between 1920 and 1933 on which to base your opinion. On top of that, the DAP were preaching anti-semitic and ultranationalist policies long before Hitler came to power and THESE are the police that projected him to dictatorship.

    Now, I'm not for one second saying you approve of any of these - I'm saying you're completely ignorant of them, and the eividence of your last few posts plus the admission that you can't actually point to a policy, pretty much confirms this.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 990 ✭✭✭gym_imposter


    I couldn't care less if every player on the team attended Eaton, it's the boring nature of the sport which irks me

    Who cares where sportspersons were educated?



  • Registered Users Posts: 990 ✭✭✭gym_imposter


    The real - politik reason for Israel being where it is ,suits the USA as they prefer an unstable middle East

    In the past four decades however, the Christian Zionist agenda has played an increasingly bigger role



  • Registered Users Posts: 889 ✭✭✭Iscreamkone


    The fact that most of the Irish players went to private schools tells me that the sport is elitist and in no way representative of the country as a whole.
    If 10% of the school going population is in private schools then the same percentage should ideally be on the national team. This is far from the case.


    What percentage of players on our national football team went to private schools?

    What percentage of gaa inter county team players went to private schools?

    If you look at the FAI u15/16 teams you will see plenty of boys with African heritage. This is not the case with rugby as these lads are not in private schools.

    When lads from Knocknaheeny and Tallaght have as much opportunity to make the Irish team as lads from Clongowes or PBC Cork then I might support the “team of us”.




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Pretty telling that you're not willing to discuss the state the economy was gonna end up in. He would never have had a good reputation with the direction he was sending the economy. The war pretty much masked the issue.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,236 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    If the Irish soccer or boxing teams came from less affluent areas, I'd still support them even if I don't share the same background.

    Irish rugby is missing out on good prospects by focusing on the private schools and it's making efforts to broaden its reach. On the other hand schools sometimes offer scholarships to students to bring them into the private school to improve the rugby or hurling teams. I know a few people who got sports scholarship to private school. The schools focus on sport and hire better coaches, play higher standard opposition etc. so it's not surprising those players improve and have a greater chance of being picked up by academies. Academies focus a lot (not all) of their attention in the schools teams because it's such a rich seam of prospects at the age of 17 or 18

    It's not ideal, but it's also not a big conspiracy keep people from poorer areas out. Keith Earls is famously from a poor area and recently retired as one of the most respected players of his generation, on and off the pitch.



  • Registered Users Posts: 990 ✭✭✭gym_imposter


    That's a political position you have, I don't need to politicise rugby or any sport, most hockey schools are even posher



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 91 ✭✭Charlo30


    What schools the Irish Rugby Team went to doesn't bother me in the slightest. I still cheer them on. I do however find some of the marketing around the team a bit over the top. But I can largely drown that out



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,750 ✭✭✭✭EmmetSpiceland


    Well said, I find it bizarre that people complain, loudly, about the “Team of Us nonsense” not realising that it’s a Vodafone marketing campaign.

    Has nothing to do with any supporters or any “agenda” bar to advertise Vodafone and its products.

    “It is not blood that makes you Irish but a willingness to be part of the Irish nation” - Thomas Davis



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,967 ✭✭✭Cordell


    The whole world prefer an unstable or US controlled middle east because the world needs their oil at affordable prices and the world can't afford to allow arabs to keep it hostage again with their prices and supply as they did in 73.



  • Registered Users Posts: 428 ✭✭Sponge25


    I never considered him a great statesmen, I said he would've been considered the best statesmen of the early 20th century if he didn't persecute anyone and stopped after he incorporated all German peoples into the Reich. Saying the DAP propelled Hitler into power is laughable, they had absolutely no power and were beyond a fringe party until Hitler joined and grew the party largely trough his remarkable oratory skills. Yes, the DAP were anti-semitic from the start, so were the vast majority of people, including in Britain and the USA. You should look into Henry Fords 'International Jewry: The world foremost problem'. It wasn't remarkable at all in the 20's or 30's to be anti-semitic.

    He instituted a vast scheme of public works such as building and repairing the auto-bahn, housing and other vital infrastructure projects and amongst other things created the most formidable army in the world at the time, creating mass employment and spending power and thus taxation. There was a certain promissory note called a MEFO note used to enable these things but most of all he created a persona that the nation could coalesce around to create the economy in the first place. If there was no strong leader like Hitler, the economy would have remained stagnant and fractious. He got the nation to do what needed to be done to get the job done, that's his foremost contribution to the economy but I already told you twice that this isn't my area of expertise nor interest.

    You seem to be trying to find any reason to disagree with me and accuse me of ignorance.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    And that promissory note was creating a pretty artificial economy that would have eventually have collapsed. You got short term gains but long term it would have created huge issues. Also worth noting from 1936 onward, they basically all of their economy into war preparation so you had 0% unemployment but it was to prepare for a war.

    Plus that antisemitism created brain drain so you had incredibly gifted individuals who were either not allowed to work or simply fled. The most prominent example being Einstein. But sure, he was doing a great job. Care to start citing some historians or economists btw?



  • Registered Users Posts: 428 ✭✭Sponge25


    Usually I would agree and no one knows for sure what would've happened to the economy eventually, least of all me but the fact that German productivity INCREASED while they were being bombarded day and night says there was some merit to the scheme. Speer produced a practical miracle of his own in this regard. To be honest with you, I don't know an awful lot about the economic situation. I'm far more knowledgeable about the political and military situation. Before you say it, I know there was other reason for the increased productivity such as forced labour etc. but I highly doubt if Germany had won the war, especially if they didn't getting involved with a war with America, that their economy would have eventually collapsed because of the MEFO system.

    As for the brain drain, Germany still possessed some of the brightest and most capable men in the world, they produced the first jet fighters, the first man made object to enter space (the V2), had the finest tanks in the world and even boasted a nuclear programme (which wasn't ambitious enough thankfully) to name but a few things. This is evidenced by the fact the victorious allied nations vied with each other to scoop up as many German scientists, engineers etc. as absolutely possible (Operation Paperclip). Werner von Braun, the director of the vengeance series of weapons went on to head NASA and build the Saturn V that put a man on the moon, multiple times.

    It's an absolute shame what happened to the Jews and other assorted victims of the genocide, especially because the vast majority of them were integrated, highly patriotic Germans who often considered themselves Germans first and Jews second. I have tried for years to discover the real cause of the holocaust but I can't find a genuine reason why the Jews were despised to such an extent they were murdered in their millions. The vast majority of Germans were not happy with exterminating every last Jew. They had Jewish friends, they knew that the Jews were like any other people, some were bad, some were good, most were somewhere in between. I think the blame for the Holocaust lies squarely on the NSDAP and those who aided them and not with the German people. I know we weren't discussing this but it always comes up at some point.

    As for princess bananna hammok, I still await your response now that I have given you actual policies that Hitler instituted in my previous post but I suppose it will be the usual ad hominems.



  • Registered Users Posts: 889 ✭✭✭Iscreamkone


    But the Irish team is not representative of the Irish population. Outside of ironic marketing campaigns I just can’t support this team.

    When people mention Keith Earls I just laugh- where is the Dublin version of Keith Earls? Why isn’t there 10 Keith Earls on the team?



  • Registered Users Posts: 960 ✭✭✭Anaki r2d2


    I am sure this has been mentioned before but most people on boards are complete ****.

    Especially those who photograph badly parked cars, ev drivers, SF voters and all the trolls on gender issues. The cycling green proganda machine that think we should cycle to work on our bikes, the complete **** who think dog controls wont work because it’s hard to tell a pittbull from a cockapoodledoo.

    Post edited by Anaki r2d2 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,750 ✭✭✭✭EmmetSpiceland


    Which other Irish teams would you not support? Is it only the soccer team who represents the country?

    Would any of the Irish soccer players even be residents of Ireland?

    I dunno, I support anyone representing our country. Even in sports I, personally, am not too “keen” on.

    “It is not blood that makes you Irish but a willingness to be part of the Irish nation” - Thomas Davis



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Honestly it's sounding rather like you're pushing propaganda at this point. So care to point to historians that back up your perspective?



Advertisement