Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Joe Biden Presidency thread *Please read OP - Threadbanned Users Added 4/5/21*

Options
1727728729730732

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 385 ✭✭Roger the cabin boy


    Re: Biden's intern's moonlighting onto his twitter accounts.

    I find it embarrassing and fraudulent.

    I know it's std practice these days for anyone in the spotlight but **** me, with Biden, it's quite clear that he's utterly unable for it.

    I doubt he's ever logged onto twitter.

    Todays voting generations have their head stuck up their arse.

    It's not good for democracy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,272 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Lol the game's not over yet after trumps speech. Threads gone awfully quiet. Cue all the Biden stans coming back saying he's the best candidate, nothing wrong with him, "dark brandon" (cringe) etc etc. If he doesn't step down this weekend of course. Then they knew all along, best president ever etc etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,296 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,926 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison


    I don’t know what medical condition Biden has or doesn’t have but I’ve experienced enough serious medical conditions with elderly relatives and family over the last 30 years to know that something “wasn’t right”.

    My personal view is that he is displaying a level of dementia type symptoms at this point simply because of some of the observed behaviours over the last year.

    Doesn’t matter if my “diagnosis” around the name for his condition is wrong, the observed behaviours are concerning enough and need an open and honest discussion with the American people.

    I found it extraordinary how the democrats tried to keep his condition, whatever it is, out of the public domain- that’s not democracy.

    And it doesn’t at all bode well if Trump arrives in the Whitehouse next year- the Democrats have simply shown the way forward on how to keep the condition of the Presidents health and well being out of the public domain, not for a short period which is mostly justifiable, but for a very long time- the American people deserve better and I hope they start shouting for change in this area.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,743 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    She's made it clear she has no interest in running in politics so name dropping her is just more random at this stage.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,614 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    "I found it extraordinary how the democrats tried to keep his condition, whatever it is, out of the public domain- that’s not democracy.

    And it doesn’t at all bode well if Trump arrives in the Whitehouse next year- the Democrats have simply shown the way forward on how to keep the condition of the Presidents health and well being out of the public domain"

    It would appear that you have the medical condition "amnesia", as Trump's first doctor admitted to lying about Trump's medical condition, and his second one said;

    “I told the president that if he had a healthier diet over the last 20 years, he might live to be 200 years old"

    This is the same Jackson that..

    "was quietly demoted from his rank of Rear Admiral after a scathing DOD investigation into allegations of misconduct".

    Hypocrisy once again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,784 ✭✭✭✭briany


    The recent story of Pelosi's conversation with Biden show that Biden's defiance over calls to leave the race is largely based on being in a bubble of bad information. Pelosi apparently told Biden that the polls showed he couldn't win. Biden responded by saying he had polling that showed he could. Pelosi asked to see it, but Biden (or rather one of his campaign staffers) could not produce it.

    We were told once upon a time that the Republican party would get destroyed by Trump. This is half true. It did get destroyed by Trump but in the way a larval parasite eats its host. A new party has emerged from the destruction which displays a notable political agility because they aren't trying to play by the rules, which is a huge advantage, especially since the penalties for not doing so seem to amount to a weak tap on the wrist.

    Meanwhile, the Democrats have stagnated to an unbelievable degree. It probably shouldn't be a surprise that Biden has been getting bad info since they're a party so inured to their party hierarchy that who's going to tell him different. Seems like the Democratic is also about to be destroyed by Trump and, like the Republican party of old, they will deserve it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,926 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison


    Whatever physical medical condition Trump may or may not have had wasn’t as bleeding obvious as the one Biden has now and has had for some time.
    His personality traits were clear for all to see - we didn’t need a clinical psychiatrists report on those -if you still decided to vote for the man then sorry youre not a particularly good judge of character would be my view.

    he’s still alive today so obviously he had nothing life threatening to be concerned about, over and above the average old man in the street.

    Rightly or wrongly, Trump is already facing accusations of early onset dementia in some quarters - if he gets into office, clearly we’ll never be told of this very important detail - so at best we can say Democrats and Republicans are equally as bad at hiding such details from the public - there’s no party coming out looking well on this point that’s for sure



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,138 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    What information is Pelosi privy to that suggests someone else will win?

    Biden has been reported having asked several times can Kamala win, the resounding answer has been no.

    I have no doubt Joe will step aside but it will be messy, not as messy as trying to get Kamala to do likewise.

    So is it a case the Pelosi rocked up to Joe telling him he couldn't win but could not provide a credible alternative scenario where someone else will?

    Joe Biden stepping down is just the start of a whole heap of new problems, unless the Democratic hierarchy have a plan in place. Which they probably don't.



  • Registered Users Posts: 813 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    "Joe Biden stepping down is just the start of a whole heap of new problems"

    Joe Biden being president until 2029 is its own set of problems. Winning the election is one thing but there is a tunnel vision about it. Vietnam's leader just died of natural causes at the ripe old age of 80 and I swear looked to be in better shape when he met Xi last December than Biden looks today.

    Biden really shouldn't be president if the Democrats can offer an alternative. An 85-year-old can be president but not an 85-year-old Biden. Too many things are happening in the world. He will make a mess of the debate in September and that will seal the election because people will not go out and vote for a physically weak president.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,138 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Indeed. But that doesn't answer the question.

    What data has Pelosi seen that her or an alternative could win the election?

    It's an extremely question Joe is entitled to ask.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,784 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I don't think she has any information which suggests another candidate can win but in fairness to her, you can't know what another candidate's chances are until you actually run with them and give them a chance to campaign. The logic of "let's stick with someone who will more than likely lose because we don't know if anyone else can win" is fundamentally flawed and is exactly the kind of staid, fearful strategy that has so far led them to being outwitted and outflanked at every turn in this electoral cycle by the Republicans under Trump.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,895 ✭✭✭Augme


    It's not though. There's massive benefits to being the primary candidate for the Dems and that is media exposure. No one else in the Dems get the media exposure Biden goes and no one else gets to put their message across. The fact that Biden is roughly level with Harris is a damning indictment of poor Biden is performing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 813 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    Whether or not one thinks Biden is entitled to that data before making a decision really comes to whether or not one thinks Biden is entitled to run at all.

    There was an intentional deceit to hide his condition, presumably led by him and his closest companions, and that has now been laid bare for all to see and people are telling him to step aside. He should do the right thing, with or without perfect data showing some other Democrat will definitely win.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,614 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    "Whatever physical medical condition Trump may or may not have had wasn’t as bleeding obvious as the one Biden has now and has had for some time."

    You're arguing that the democrats are setting the dangerous standard.

    They are not.

    That's the point



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,497 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    What exactly is that condition? Old age? He's old. He stammers. He looked dreadful in the debate.

    He'll still make a FAR better president than his opponent.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,634 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Yes, his deterioration has been so marked in the last 12 months that it's impossible to see how he could see out a successful four year term. Electing a guy who is likely to run into serious health difficulties in the next year or two would be irresponsible.

    It's nothing to do with his actual age. Mick Jagger is 81, currently touring with the Rolling Stones and stomping around the stage every evening like a 50 year old.



  • Registered Users Posts: 813 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    People become too old to lead, and that happens to some earlier than others. His team tried to hide the extent and impact of his aging, and by doing so, have left the party in a messy situation with an almost guaranteed loss.

    Americans vote every four years and the primary for an incumbent isn't a real primary with actual competition. I don't think Biden has any moral right to take it for granted or believe he is entitled to be the candidate in 2024 because he won in 2020. I don't think it is fair to Democrat voters. The material and obvious concern about the change of his physical condition, with all the calls to drop out coming from his own party, is unheard of.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,982 ✭✭✭hometruths


    If Biden is likely to lose the election and hand the presidency to his opponent it's something of a moot point whether or not he would make a far better president than his opponent.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,138 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I don't think she has any information which suggests another candidate can win

    Well that's a big problem, it's a pertinent question Biden, his campaign team and his supporters are to entitled to ask.

    It's the main question.

    The logic of "let's stick with someone who will more than likely lose because we don't know if anyone else can win" is fundamentally flawed

    If you black and white it.

    It could be the democrats have no chance whoever they put forward and whoever that may be may negatively effect down stream elections.

    If for instance Trump was to open a more commanding lead over Kamala or whoever, then the hard core Biden supporters which number in the 10s of millions will be outraged.

    Whoever you put forward is finished as a viable candidate for the future.

    We are about to find out though, barring a miracle Joe is gone, unless he gets a bounce from his own party trying to "persuade" him to leave.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 21,419 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    The info on the Pelosi/Biden call is that Joe said to her, the info being given to him by his poll guy, McDhillon was that he was ok. Pelosi said no and asked for McDhillon to be put on the call, so she could disprove what he was saying.

    Candidates other than Biden seem to be getting a 5% bounce in polls. Heavyweights, like Pelosi and O'Bama, Schumer wouldn't be leaning on Biden unless they thought another candidate has a better chance. They also all seem to be worried about the, down the ballot effect.

    Using any objective analysis, Biden's performance in the debate was simply not adequate, for a person in any role of responsibility. It seems to happen to him occasionally. That may be the reason only a few were fully aware.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,138 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Heavyweights, like Pelosi and O'Bama, Schumer wouldn't be leaning on Biden unless they thought another candidate has a better chance

    They also thought Clinton had a better chance.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,551 ✭✭✭✭markodaly




  • Registered Users Posts: 19,614 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Sheesh, it was a joke. It wasn't a campaign strategy ffs



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,551 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Interesting comments about Biden.

    For years people were telling you that water wasnt wet, when it came to Biden and his obvious cognitive decline over the last few years.

    Now it's coming home to roost.

    They are hoisted on their petards, so to speak, as they look to get spanked in the forthcoming election.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,551 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Gallows humour is all ye folks have these days.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,614 ✭✭✭✭everlast75




  • Registered Users Posts: 14,551 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Desperate and hopeless describe Joe Biden's campaign alright.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,614 ✭✭✭✭everlast75




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,784 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Your argument about possible candidates not wanting to shoot their shot in this electoral cycle rests on the assumption that there will be an open election in 2028 and that assumption in turn rests on particularly shaky ground since Trump and his acolytes will likely look to fundamentally reshape the US government to the extent that they're allowed, and the extent that they're allowed looks considerably further than it would have been four years ago with a sympathetic Supreme Court and the potential for a civil service restaffed with people not with a loyalty to the US constitution and the ideals of liberal democracy, rather with a personal loyalty to one Donald J. Trump and will pull whatever strings they can in order to keep him and cronies in power in perpetuity.

    We're not talking about the usual political games, here. We are talking about the potential fall of US democracy as it has been known, so if Newsom, Whitmer et al, are waiting until until 2028, they're idiots.

    The Democrats don't seem to have a plan for anything - not a plan for how to defeat Trump in the election and not a plan for how to resist what Trump's team wants to do in the wake of his election. They're fúcked.



Advertisement