Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Tesla Talk

Options
1115117119120121

Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,434 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    If that’s your concerns. Fair enough. Plenty of petrol and diesel to go around for now.

    I don’t agree with them, I think they are FUD and what you hear in the pub from non WV owners unfortunately but everyone has the choice. No wrong choice.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,527 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    …take a look at ev purchasing figures, and not just from ireland, theres clearly a falling trend with ev's, we have failed to convince the public to change over, and its completely understandable why, due to the uncertainties it presents, manufacturers will continue to create ice cars for sometime, therefore purchasers know that resale values will remain reasonable, therefore supports will remain in place as long as this dynamic remains…..

    …im actually all for ev's, i think many look stunning, including most teslas, and the tech is impressive, and the rate of advancement in the tech has been incredible, but……

    …again, its the overall uncertainties with ev's thats actually preventing significant change over, yes theres enormous 'potential', but only a relative small proportion of drivers have actually truly changed, with now some even changing back to ice

    …again, yes, there will be another surge in ev when manufactures end ice production, but that actually wont be for some time, so that probably wont occur well into next decade, or beyond, by that stage many of the issues with ev's presented will be ironed out, so the ev market more than likely will remain fairly stagnant for a few years



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,434 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Now we know you’re a liar 😆😆

    “i think many look stunning, including most teslas”

    Most are like your own children. You love them because they are yours 😆



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,527 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    i take great offence to that, again, many ev's are truly stunning, filled with great advancement in technology, i spend a lot of my time around people that are extremely environmentally aware, and have been their whole lives, this actually includes myself, ive actually studied environmental matters for some time at third level, most of these individuals have not converted to ev, most have very little intention of, i.e. theres a serious problem in regards conversion…..

    …policy makers also dont seem to understand why people are not converting, their projections of conversion are not realistic, they are unable to understand why, i.e. there is a significant disconnect on why so…..



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,941 ✭✭✭Bobson Dugnutt


    Does anyone actually believe Musk when he says there will be Robotaxis this year? He’s been promising it for years now. Same as hyperloops, colonising Mars this year, fully autonomous driving.

    Meanwhile Tesla struggle with basic reliability issues, panel gaps, massive depreciation.

    I genuinely believe they are in a lot of trouble. Dated designs, no new model (apart from the laughably awful cybertruck), EV sales down, resale values turning people off EV, other manufacturers launching new models, the Chinese launching EVs to beat the band.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,434 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Ok. Maybe sarcasm doesn’t come across well in text. I was pulling your leg 👀



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,783 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    It's not at all surprising to me. There is a significant and very powerful lobby that is dedicated to maintaining our reliance on the ICE and oil. And as the day of obsolescence draws nearer and nearer, the rhetoric and FUD about EVs is increasing in tone and ubiquity. Pretty much every non-EV driver I've met since I've got mine has trotted out all the canards that have done the rounds, some of which you've repeated above.

    Battery life

    Charging infrastructure inadequate

    Fires

    Range too short

    Too expensive

    Lithium is rare

    More harm to environment from production than ICE

    Grid infrastructure will collapse

    There are many more, but that's enough to get the idea. And this lobby is getting more and more vociferous and the lies are flying around the world before the truth can get its boots on. The advantages and refutations have been drowned out in the minds of the general populace. Yet there are outliers. Norway put a lot of effort by way of grants and incentives in the early years of EVs and that has resulted in over 70% of new car sales last year being EVs. Our government has decided that because EVs have got cheaper, they can cut back on these incentives. That was a mistake. The Green Party has a policy of pushing against the private car in favour of better public transport. EVs have become a victim of that policy. Even Italy has pushed more incentives into the market and has already seen the benefits of that. In France, 24% of car sales this year are EVs. So it's not across the board that there's been a slump, just enough to make sales in Europe flatten year on year.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,434 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    You need to separate your dislike for the ceo as an individual and decide if you like the cars or not. Most of your posts seem to be dragging the CEO into the gutter or ridicule the man himself instead of the products.

    I don’t believe in any of the taxi, mars stuff , although you can’t argue what he has done for the space transport industry with Space X.

    Your opinion of the Tesla cars also seems to be outdated as the go to argument seems to be panel gaps from the EVHaters. There are plenty of panel gaps in the German cars, both ice and EV. Post a picture of your personal car and I guarantee there’s panel gaps.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,783 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    Yeah. I don't particularly like the man, but that's only relevant to the cars if he goes off the rails a la Twitter and makes a pig's mickey of it. That may happen yet, but we'll have to wait and see.

    I think the cybertruck was a mistake. Lots of fans of it out there (I'm not one of them), but the problem seems to be production not being able to match demand at present. That could be down to the design as it doesn't seem very practical from a manufacturing point of view. Stainless steel is a bitch to work with and an even worse one to maintain.

    Dropping the model 2 might have been a pragmatic decision because of intense competition from other manufacturers including Chinese ones. But I'm not sure. A Tesla mini could have been a huge seller in the US and Europe and there's scope in that bracket for performance and high end variants too.

    A mercurial CEO might be fun from a customer point of view, but maybe not so much from an investor one. You'd wonder how much that affects sales all the same.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,434 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    I think the removal of stalks effect more sales than he does, in Ireland at least. In the US, they maybe more militant in who they support and think they associate him with Trump.

    I genuinely don’t follow him or give a toss what he does. The day I like a car better than the M3P, I’ll swap it. The day a better car becomes affordable, I’ll swap. If that day doesn’t come then so be it!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,369 ✭✭✭sk8board


    As suspected when he said it, it appears this robotaxi day next month is being postponed - in fairness he only said it the day the share price tanked because the model 2 was canned, and now the SP is up again, so he can kick this down the road with the other litany of projects



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,758 ✭✭✭zg3409


    Thinking of getting this for my Tesla. Slots into the cup holder. Only 31 euro. Stops the car being boring to drive...5 stars..



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭MojoMaker


    Had to check the date for a moment.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,369 ✭✭✭sk8board


    has there ever been a brand new car the price of an M3 that so many owners want to give the Halfords/China treatment to right from delivery?

    I can’t think of any.

    It usually happens with the 3rd or 4th owner or whatever - cheap cars. I’ve never seen happen with a brand new €40-60k car before, and let’s face it the Tesla doesn’t need fake speed stuff, and the standard spec is already fantastic.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,783 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    See similar for the BYD Seal. Spoilers and other such frippery.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,596 ✭✭✭wassie


    Yep - common enough in Asia to accessorize your ride from the go-get. Just look on Aliexpress to see what you can for the likes of the Asian brands.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,617 ✭✭✭Conar


    There were so many white teslas in my work that I just had to do something to make mine look a bit different.



  • Registered Users Posts: 406 ✭✭gossamerfabric


    4680 cells giving trouble. headline is clickbaity but scaling production is obviously challenging.

    https://electrek.co/2024/07/17/elon-musk-might-give-up-tesla-4680-battery-cell-end-of-the-year/

    even in China self-driving is taking time.

    https://carnewschina.com/2024/07/18/robotaxis-make-friends-and-enemies-on-the-streets-of-wuhan/

    the fares of the self-driving taxis is attractive though.

    economics in China of self-driving taxis aren't looking great. this report and the comments suggest it is a low profit business unless someone corners the market and can prevent competition.

    https://cleantechnica.com/2024/07/18/will-baidu-apollo-be-the-1st-profitable-robotaxi-service/

    Elon appears to have got bored of being in Automotive industry which is capital intensive and low margin. He'd prefer to re-position Tesla as a Tech Company where retail Investors can over*estimate the future value of the company.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,369 ✭✭✭sk8board


    the primary role of the CEO is to deliver shareholder value.
    if 80% of your revenue comes from 2 car models first released quite a few years ago, and falling YoY sales, you need other projects, and if you’re operating a car company with the forward P/E of Tesla, you need those projects to be large scale and delivered asap.

    When you look through the projects Tesla have, there’s almost none that appear to have any future, never mind the scale that would grow the SP of a $700bn MarCap company.

    if this was the dotcom days you’d strip out the car revenue and call the rest a Ponzi scheme build completely on forward-looking hope :)



  • Registered Users Posts: 406 ✭✭gossamerfabric


    A fleet manager for a blue chip company was invited to talk to employees of our company about their sustainable goals with regard to fleet management.

    They refuse to supply Tesla cars to employees of their company as the aftersales is lacking and sales strategy of dictating when cars are delivered along with yo-yo pricing make it impossible for the fleet to manage their risks.

    Our company don't supply Tesla either for similar reasons.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 121 ✭✭The Mist


    Can't see a model X thread.

    Been watching YouTube reviews and auto lane change is featured in most reviews. Was that standard in 2017? I know this is only included on EAP in the newer cars...

    Looking at buying a 172 model X.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,434 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Would be the same. Enhanced auto pilot. I had it on both my old MS’s. From memory, it’s called something different, like highway…. Or something.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,137 ✭✭✭CoBo55




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,679 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    My insurance is up next month and I am seeing some serious anti-Tesla bias from insurers. I tried to get quotes from several insurers/brokers to best my renewal on my 22 Model 3 which went from €475 to €600. No changes to my circumstances, other than I am a year older and the car is worth less. Here's what I was looking at for fully comp.

    Aviva €600

    123.ie €700

    Chill.ie €955

    AA €600

    AnPost €695

    Axa 955

    Quote Devil €895

    Supervalu €995

    Kennco €935

    Best Quote €935

    And I got no quote messages from

    Allianz, its4women, Liberty, AIG, Zurich, FBD, Bonkers, Liberty.

    When I changed to my 2018 Leaf, everywhere quoted and they were about 20-30% less than the ones that quoted the Model 3.

    I replicated the same issue with the Model Y and Model S. Very similar quotes to the Model 3 and no quotes from the same ones that gave no quote on the 3.

    I then checked a BYD Seal and Mustang Mach-E and found no issue getting quotes, some of which were cheaper than the 2018 Leaf!!! WTF is going on here?

    Allianz give the excuse that the Model 3 refusal is because of the power of the car, but they have no issue insuring far more powerful EVs despite the clear winning safety aspects of the Model 3/Y over the competition. I've heard of insurers being biased against Teslas before, but hadn't really experienced it. Only Allianz and Zurich wouldn't quote last year, with all others quoting.

    Strangely enough my RWD M3 shows up as a Long Range model on half the sites. Can't fix it either.

    EDIT: After all that, I just got a new quote from Aviva for the same price as last year. Lowered the excess to €125 which added another €20ish to the price. This time the correct RWD version showed up, where previously, only Long Range showed under the reg plate.

    Post edited by ...Ghost... on

    Stay Free



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭allinthehead


    My Rwd shows up as a performance version, questioned my insurance company about it and they said it makes no difference to the price 🤔.

    ☀️



  • Registered Users Posts: 121 ✭✭The Mist


    Just in case… I drive a model y and pay the minimum premium with full comprehensive= €310.

    I'm 41, no claims ever and house and wife insurance are with them too, but yeah... Our second car is a 2015 auris and insurance is €340, so no anti-tesla stuff there I don't think.



  • Registered Users Posts: 121 ✭✭The Mist


    Thanks gumbo, I guess I'll just have to wait and see!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,679 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    Who are you insured with? The last time I had companies refusing to quote was when I was rear ended 10 years ago and claimed through the other persons policy for same. The bolloxology logic they used at the time was that the other party could open a claim against me even though it was a clear no fault on my part. I had 4 years of high premiums because some cnut ran into the back of my car, writing it off and leaving me with a permanent back injury. Anything over 7 years they can't even search due to GDPR rules, so isn't relevant.

    I'm your age. Wife is also insured with Aviva on the 2018 Leaf. No claims history to mention. 3 points for speeding which expire next March. I think the price I paid is reasonable which includes NCD protection and a lower excess.

    The quotes were only problematic for the Teslas, hence my thinking there is a bias there. Clearly they don't like your Auris either 😂.

    Stay Free



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,783 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    Who are you insured with? The last time I had companies refusing to quote was when I was rear ended 10 years ago and claimed through the other persons policy for same. The bolloxology logic they used at the time was that the other party could open a claim against me even though it was a clear no fault on my part.

    My answer to that sh1te would be to ask was there a claim against me, then when answered in the negative, ask for a certificate of NCB and tell them to shove their policy where the sun don't shine and walk.

    They charged you extra for an imaginary claim. Any chance they refunded you when the imaginary claim failed to materialise? Why would you reward that crap by continuing to insure with them for another four years?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,679 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    When they ask if you've been involved in accident in the last "x" number of years, they ask "regardless of blame". Lie to them and you could find your situation with insurance becomes a lifelong shafting. It's ridiculous, but if you are in an accident and it is crystal clear you are not at fault, they still use the open claim and the recent accident history against you. Moving to another insurer is possible, but is prohibitively expensive.

    People choose not to tell insurers about open claims if the accident was not their fault, but they are effectively not insured. Sure, the insurer would have to pay out a third party claim, but they would come after you for the bill after unearthing the fact that the insurance was taken out under false declarations. It boiled my blood and no…I received no refunds after the claim was settled. I reckon the extra loading cost me in the region of 5k over the period. So whether you are at fault or not, the insurance companies win on both sides. It's a cartel.

    Stay Free



Advertisement