Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Question on "Unwritten Rules"

Options
  • 21-05-2024 9:10am
    #1
    DialecticAspirations
    Registered Users Posts: 59 ✭✭DialecticAspirations


    Hi,

    I posted in the Newbies forum, but now think I should have put it here…

    It seems like there are some "unwritten rules" for the forum in general that I was hoping to get some information on.

    It could be that you're supposed to just learn as you go, but as not knowing one of these un-written rules has resulted in my first warning, I thought I'd seek clarification here before I get bashed by a banhammer. I'm hoping I'm wrong, and there are pages already written on these topics.

    1 - Anecdotes. These seem to be not allowed in some threads. Is it just a rule specific to Current Affairs? I get the idea behind it - people can just make stuff up to back up their opinion, so it can be abused. But at the same time it can make communication/posting very difficult in some instances. Is there any existing thread/post that gives some information/definition on this? Is it just done on a case by case basis, as applied by a mod who subjectively decides?

    2- Back seat modding. Again, I get the idea, but the application seems a bit unclear to me. Example : Person 1 attacks Person 2 instead of Person 2's post. Person 2 posts saying "Person 1, you are attacking me, not my post" → is Person 2 back seat modding here and will get a warning? If so, what should they do instead? Simply report the post?

    It feels a bit heavy-handed /overly process-focused to report that kind of thing every time, when you could just highlight that Person 1 is attacking Person 2 (i.e. engaging in an ad-hominen attack), the same way you might point out a straw-man argument when it is made.

    3 - Stating that you are going to ignore someone. This one I don't understand well. You're simply letting the person know that you won't be able to see their posts again. If you don't say it, it could cause confusion within that thread or elsewhere. I guess the idea is to avoid offending the ignored person? In any case, again - is there more detail written somewhere on this?

    If there are more that I have not mentioned, please let me know.

    And btw, saying that all these follow from the rule : "don't be a dick", and so we don't need this level of detail is clearly untrue. The anecdote rule, for example, is just one solution to solve the problem of that particular kind of lie, and offering a truthful anecdote is not "being a dick". So it's unreasonable to expect people to logically extrapolate all these rules from that one rule.

    Thanks for any help that anyone can provide.

    P.S. Technical question - do I have enough posts now to be able to post hyperlinks? I tried to do that the other day and failed. Could just be "user error" but wanted to check if there's another reason.

    Cheers.



Comments

  • Options
    #2
    Beasty
    Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 76,291 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    I think there is one current thread in CA with a "no anecdote" rule set out in the OP - ie the rule is written and you are directed to read the OP in the thread title. It was applied to the thread as so called "anecdotes" had resulted in the closure of a prior thread on refugees. We had a choice - allow discussion without such "anecdotes" or don't allow the discussion. We chose to allow the discussion without anecdotes.

    Backseat moderation is not acceptable anywhere on this site. If you have an issue with a post or poster report it and leave the modding to the mods

    Is person 2 backseat modding - yes. They should report it and a mod will look at the report and act as they see necessary. Will they get a warning? That is at the discretion of the mod. If they do it regularly then yes they can expect a warning. Equally a nil point "warning" is a way to attach a post to a PM explaining why the post was inappropriate/deleted. The odd nil pointy warning does not amount to much assuming no repeat

    You do not need to say you will ignore someone - just do it. You ignoring anyone is nothing to do with the topic - it is essentially discussing the user. It is openly implying criticism of the poster rather than the post and you can expect a warning for being uncivil. It boils down to "attack the post, not the poster"



  • Options
    #3
    Musicrules
    Registered Users Posts: 1,899 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    Hello. I'm not posting in relation to this thread. I can't open a new thread, can anyone tell me why that is the case? Thanks.



  • Options
    #4
    Ten of Swords
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 23,453 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ten of Swords


    If you are using the mobile site you will notice prison bars on your profile avatar (these don't show on the desktop site for some reason)

    This means that you have accumulated sufficient warnings that the system has placed additional restrictions on your profile, including being unable to start new threads.

    Warning points expire one by one each week. When these warnings have expired you will be able to create threads again.

    /off topic

    Moderator: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender, Vegan & Vegetarian

    Category Moderator: Social & Fun



  • Options
    #5
    Ellie Fluffy Sunset
    Posts: 0 ✭ Ellie Fluffy Sunset


    Wow, is that a first in that the upgrade has a cool feature?



  • Options
    #6
    Musicrules
    Registered Users Posts: 1,899 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/122174061#Comment_122174061

    But how can I appeal a warning without starting a new thread?



  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #7
    Spear
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 25,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Spear


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/122174099#Comment_122174099

    By PMing me or Shield as the DRP rules state to do so.



  • Options
    #8
    Musicrules
    Registered Users Posts: 1,899 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    Ok, thank you.



  • Options
    #9
    Beasty
    Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 76,291 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/122174099#Comment_122174099

    Please note your latest warning was issued by an Admin in an Admin capacity. As you have already been told that is not appealable



  • Options
    #10
    Musicrules
    Registered Users Posts: 1,899 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/122174888#Comment_122174888

    Hello. That's actually what I wanted to make a thread about. The admin overruled a decision by another admin. I have been nothing but polite and courteous to the admin in question but they seem adamant about giving me a number of warnings about a particular issue. To me, they seem so adamant that this issue appears to be personal for them. I could be wrong but for them to give me 2 warnings over it, to state instantly that I couldn't appeal it and then to message others to get their side of the story in seems off.

    This is suspicious to me. I'm not trying to cause trouble it's just I don't think the treatment of myself has been fair and balanced. I'm sure you have access to our PM conversation? Do you also have access to PM's involving the issue in question? I'm asking for someone to look into this and to please look into this with an open mind. Thank you.



  • Options
    #11
    Big Bag of Chips
    Administrators Posts: 14,032 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Big Bag of Chips


    @Musicrules just to clarify, I did not over-rule another admin. Nor did I message anyone else to get my side of the story across. And PMs are not visible to anyone other than the people involved in the PM.

    I applied a warning outlining the reason for the warning. That warning is visible on your account to all moderators. That is how Beasty knows what I said about it not being open to the appeals process. I have explain in a number of PMs to you why you received the warning. The warning was applied as you don't seem to be getting the message and I thought a warning was the best way to get your attention.

    You had a dispute on pretty much this identical issue upheld last week. This week you start a thread again discussing a situation that has already been dealt with.

    We do not discuss actions taken against any posters with other users. We also don't allow posters with a grudge to start threads about other users and take digs at them. This has all been explained to you, a number of times. And you have been warned that the next time you bring this issue up you will receive a temporary siteban.

    I suggest you move on now. Everyone else has.

    Do not post in this thread again. It is completely off topic and you have been told you have no grounds for appeal.



  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #12
    Musicrules
    Registered Users Posts: 1,899 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    Hello. I'm sorry but it wasn't an identical issue at all as I've stated in the pm conversation we had and you did overrule a decision already made. My suspicions are raised further by your post above.

    Instead of the hassle of banning me, I will close my account and I won't reopen an account. But I will only do this if you state that you have not had private conversations with the topic of the warnings you have given me.

    If you state that then I will apologise because I got this wrong and I will delete my account.

    ---------------------------------------

    Warned for ignoring moderator instruction.

    Post edited by Big Bag of Chips on


  • Options
    #13
    Big Bag of Chips
    Administrators Posts: 14,032 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Big Bag of Chips


    Warned for ignoring mod instruction. It should be at least 1 point or 2 but applying 1 more point warning will trigger a siteban. So I am giving you a chance.

    I am giving you this one chance. Do not post on this thread again. Do not post anywhere else querying this warning. Do not reply to the PM you received with the warning.

    If you get sitebanned and re-register, both accounts will be permanently sitebanned. If you close your account and open another and continue posting about this issue your warnings from this account will carry over and your new account will receive a temp siteban.



  • Options
    #14
    DialecticAspirations
    Registered Users Posts: 59 ✭✭DialecticAspirations


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/122171459#Comment_122171459

    Thanks for looking into this and for the helpful response.

    I'd suggest that the next time the FAQs/Site rules etc are being updated, the rule/guideline on backseat modding and not talking about ignoring someone are added (not anecdotes as it's thread specific).

    They may seem obvious for veteran users/mods, but for some new users it is not obvious and would be helpful to have a written rule/guideline somewhere easily accessible on the site.

    Cheers



  • Options
    #15
    Beasty
    Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 76,291 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Every forum has a charter. Some of them are very detailed, such as Soccer where the rules have been built up on user feedback over the life of this site.

    The site ToUs advise posters to Report any material they find objectionable. They instruct users not to treat other users with disrespect.

    On the specifics of backseat moderation, it really should be common sense that a site that uses moderators expects those moderators, and not regular users, to moderate. And if someone does do it once and get pulled up on it then they will be perfectly well aware of this if they do so again.



  • Options
    #16
    ottolwinner
    Registered Users Posts: 520 ✭✭✭ottolwinner


    not sure where to ask this question but if a profile says it’s sitebanned how long does that ban last? Or is there any set timeline for it? Thank you.



  • Options
    #17
    Beasty
    Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 76,291 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/122403535#Comment_122403535

    This is only disclosed to Mods, CMods and Admins

    Some bans are permanent, and others are for a time based on a totting up process. When a warning is issued it can carry 0, 1 or 2 warning points. 1 point stays "active" for 1 week, 2 points for 2 weeks. 5 active points result in a siteban. The way it works in detail is best illustrated by an example

    User A picks up 2 points on 1 January. They expire 2 weeks later on 15 January

    On 10 January they pick up a further 2 points. That means they have 4 active points, but they remain active until 29 January (2 weeks after the initial 2 "expire")

    No further points are picked up during January, and all the active points expire on 29 January

    On 1 February they pick up another 2 points, expiring on 15 February. On 10 January they pick up another point, making 3 points, expiring on 22 February. On 16 February they pick up another 2 points, taking the total to 5, expiring 2 weeks after 22 February, ie on 8 March (not a leap year!). An automatic siteban then kicks in for 5 active points, and that expires on 8 February when the warning points are re-set to 0

    Bet you wish you had never asked now…



  • Options
    #18
    ottolwinner
    Registered Users Posts: 520 ✭✭✭ottolwinner


    thanks and thanks for going to the trouble of answering. I will read it a few times to justify your effort in replying. Was always curious and now I know. Thanks Beasty



  • Options
    #19
    ottolwinner
    Registered Users Posts: 520 ✭✭✭ottolwinner


    thanks Beasty on reading it a second time it makes more sense. Do they know if they have picked up points? Like would I know if I had points or would a Mod C Mod or admin have to inform me?



  • Options
    #20
    Beasty
    Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 76,291 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/122410087#Comment_122410087

    You will see it on your own profile page. Both the number of points and expiry date.

    That info is only visible to the account holder, Mods, CMods and Admins.

    Whenever a warning is issued a PM will be sent to the user setting out the number of points being applied



Leave a Comment

Rich Text Editor. To edit a paragraph's style, hit tab to get to the paragraph menu. From there you will be able to pick one style. Nothing defaults to paragraph. An inline formatting menu will show up when you select text. Hit tab to get into that menu. Some elements, such as rich link embeds, images, loading indicators, and error messages may get inserted into the editor. You may navigate to these using the arrow keys inside of the editor and delete them with the delete or backspace key.

Comment As ...
Advertisement