Global warming

No dont think i will.

Scilly had a record of 48.9 degree's c.

Id say if ya walked out in that yad catch fire.

Think its all over exaggerated horseshit.

Next will be the atmosphere will catch fire and we'll all burn to death.

Once you have "data collection" and models one isnt discussing science anymore but human bias and error. One thing you can always bet against is a model 100 years out, you can take that to the goddamn bank as they say

How many days did it hit 45C In Croatia in a row?
You do know 45C is not 50C?

That’s not what the poster was talking about whatsoever.
We all know 50C is bad for humans- however you said parts of Europe were getting 50C and that there would be a significant increase in deaths this month.

Where in Europe has consistently hit 50C?

Croatia has hit 45C for one day which is 5C cooler than 50C- did anyone die in Croatia directly from the heat on that day?

comparing like for like will not be possible in many places. I saw a viral clip of a dude pushing ice blocks into a pool in Doha. Going back a 100 years Doha probably didnt exist (guessing ,maybe it did) but the point is it would have cooled down more a night time so it would have heated up from a lower point and if temp was measured at all there would be all kinds of issues with consistancy and measuring techniques.

Yes but maybe you could answer the question I asked?

Where in Europe has consistently hit 50C?

If your post says that it’s because you edited it after.

Has anywhere in Europe hit 50C this year yet?

That 48.8°C record raises questions about the quality of the station and the siting of it.

We're almost there! Just in the last couple of days, just need someone to blame the sun..

Yes really, there's no need for 'extensive work trying to discredit the weather station network' as a fair proportion of the stations do that all by themselves. Rubbish quality digital sensors in rubbish quality sites will result in rubbish data.

Perhaps some folk need to take a closer look at the state of the equipment and the sites used to collect weather data before jumping up and down in hysterics. Behind every single 'last month was the hottest ever' headline is a glorified computer plotting a model of what it thinks was the temperature in a given area.

Here's the health warning given on the website that produces 'estimates'. Funny how the clearly stated disclaimer gets omitted from virtually every news article gleaned from such data:

Really? Thats the level of rebuke?

Here's the thing, grounded people who don't get swept up in a fanatical frenzy haven't been making doomsday prediction after doomsday prediction which have failed and failed time again to materialise to the point the self-contradict and make no apology for doing so.

Everywhere is warming faster than everywhere else. C'mon man.

Was heat always recorded as a mortality factor in previous centuries?

For instance it's only in recent decades that we're getting accurate figures on suicide because previously religious taboo drove the narrative, so is heat being cited now as a primary cause now because of the environmental narrative.

Plus we're now in a rapidly aging Europe where deaths will outnumber births, so more deaths of the inform could be a factor in compounding the doomster agenda.

I'm getting more into the numbers as they're used. Societies in the med have had siestas long before the doomster agenda.

But they came into existence because of heat.

That's the point. Long before the environmental doomsters took the podium societies had structured daily routines to counter heatstroke.

Plus thanks to modern medicine we are living longer and there's increasingly more of us heading towards vulnerable dotage.

I'm not not arguing that there isn't climate change, but I'm challenging any doomster assertions that mortality trends are being driven by climate change.

I guess some need to feel they're doing something, but you could light a penny candle too.