Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Tesla Talk

17072747576

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,131 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Irish sales figures have no bearing on the Tesla market, never had. They certainly have no bearing on the profit slump. And the supply issues have no bearing on the US market at all . We have no factories here and we are RHD which is a subsection of production. Figures here are meaningless on the context of the profit slump and the CEO



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,936 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    I’m not saying Irish sales have a direct impact but I’m highlighting the general down turn in EV buying.

    This downward spirals are similar across the globe. Across all brands, not just Tesla and its CEO.

    Post edited by Gumbo on


  • Registered Users Posts: 887 ✭✭✭JOL1


    To be fair what is happening in Irish market (increased competition etc) is likely to be indicative of whats happening in the wider industry and Tesla pricing strategy here (reduced prices) is also featuring across their other geographic markets feeding into drop in margins—> drop in profitability.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,071 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    US EV sales aren't down, Tesla just have less of a market share due to much more choice in the market. According to the ACEA EU BEV sales overall are up 1%, but we've seen a shift in which countries EVs are sold in. The sudden withdrawal of the environmental bonus in Germany caused a big swing in prices which has led to a drop there. It was meant to run to 2025 but was struck out by a court.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,071 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    This is what they put out in their earnings report

    "Plans for new vehicles, including more affordable models, remain on track for start of production in the first half of 2025. These vehicles will utilize aspects of the next generation platform as well as aspects of our current platforms and will be able to be produced on the same manufacturing lines as our current vehicle line-up,"

    The next gen platform was meant to be the base of the robotaxi and a model that slots below the 3/Y. If they can launch a smaller cheaper car that can be co-produced on the 3 and Y lines, then I can see it selling well. Something Golf sized would work well. 3 has just had a design refresh so is likely fine for another few years, Y is meant to have similar next year.

    Tesla have moved from trying to be an Audi to being VW, I treat the S as the Arteon. I don't think it's really needed as a serious money maker.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭sk8board


    this is very apparent in the fall in California sales which is material to the overall business - CA sales dwarf all other states by a factor of 5x (CA 350k, next is TX: 65k - and all other states are in the relative noise level. Some remote states have a few hundred sales total pa).


    one thing that stands out from the financials is the auto margins - half what they were just 2 years ago, and let’s be honest there’s absolutely no chance of recovering, and will probably fall further.

    This 14% seems to be the same or even a little lower than BMW, Porsche and Merc - while the likes of VW, BYD, Toyota and many others operate on 6-10% margins, but on far higher volumes obviously.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭sk8board


    SP is down 13% today, on these results, which is actually a surprise when you consider the very high level of retail ownership and Musks 14%.

    Retail is usually pretty dumb in its buying methods, buying dips like this.

    Retail controls about 55% of outstanding shares, which is massive for a company this size



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,936 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Is that a big deviation?

    For example, are any other large companies down similar amounts?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,673 ✭✭✭maidhc


    13% is pretty sizable by any measure

    Retail gets bored easily though. It is turning into a meme stock alright. Tesla will collapse or get bought for a song is my prediction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,131 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Overall tech is down a few points this week, stock market is down off the back of some expenditure coming on earning calls. OpenAI for example needing 5billion to just run their processing. Tesla is down 14 percent over 5 days which is way off market 4 times most drops.

    But it could be down to miserable forecast results but also coupled with elons play for tech and AI running a poll this morning on X about tesla investing in xAI. The cost per openAI commentary would be scaring off retail and non retail. The future plays may be wearing thin on reality now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,673 ✭✭✭maidhc


    Tesla is a car company though. Its value proposition was what it was bringing to bear in a sector dominated by industrial behemoths. It did really well in shaking things up, the model s was a truly groundbreaking vehicle. Maybe they will successfully pivot into something else, but it seems like a weird move… like Peugeot focusing on their peppercorn grinders rather than cars or something.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,071 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    Tesla hasn't been valued as a car company for a long time, the stock price was more closely matched to tech companies based on a future as a mobility services provider. Selling cars to consumers is just part of the so-called masterplan to get to that point.

    I wouldn't see working towards a thing you'd said you would as a pivot. Whether they achieve it or not is a whole other question. I think they will, but not in the timelines that investors have to come expect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,131 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    i dont see it, he'd have to aquire to pivot in a meaningful way. Theyre behind any play for AI. more fluff. Hes far too invested in X and commentary on it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭sk8board


    just reading the Musk transcript from the earnings call. It’s actually mental stuff - this is not a person to be taken seriously 😂

    • goes into detail about how FSD would work on other planets too, but also says there is a known issue with it not working on our own planet if you’re wearing sunglasses 😂
    • Reckons the $25k humanoid robot business is worth $5tn in the “short to medium term”. I mean what the actual heck!

    No wonder the institutions are selling and retail investors + musk are now almost 70% of the stock of a company with a $700bn marCap.

    Retail and insiders trade on pure hope. This is why there’s no fundamental underpinnings to the SP.

    There’s no other company that comes remotely close to such a lopsided share register.

    Likely some of the 13% fall yesterday is disillusioned retail owners too - seeing falling sales, falling revenue, falling margins - and no real tangible replacement projects - it’s all hope and moon shots.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,673 ✭✭✭maidhc


    all he needs to do imo is reskin the y and 3 to a more cybertruck inspired look. The phaeton was a failure, but it sold shed loads of passats .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,131 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    cybertruck has been a massive failure by all measures. falling values, non completed orders. court cases to allow for resale. And god knows that level of production investment was made. If Q3 goes the same way, And there doesnt seem to be anything realistically that will change that then hes toast in Tesla leadership. Is the Pivot to Trump in full form a play on making his vehicles more competitive or obtaining more large goverment subsidies. Hes not cosing up to him within the last month for no reason. There is something going on here he doesnt pivot like this without seeking large personal gain.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,071 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    I think that Elon being distracted by X may be good for some of the engineering efforts. The FSD team are making progress every release, it's not as quick as "Elon" time but it's still moving towards the goals they outlined in the master plans.

    My point was addressed at @maidhc who thought that Tesla's value proposition was in the automotive sector, Tesla could pivot to be a pure auto play with an 8% margin matching other manufacturers in their premium economy market, a lot of people who've invested in the aspirational side of the business would be burnt as you aren't going to see high multiples in that kind of business.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 968 ✭✭✭SchrodingersCat


    Tesla are an automaker, albeit one more tech oriented. They bend metal like other automakers and are limited in scale as a result like other automakers. They want you to believe that they are a different type of company and that they deserve to be valued like a tech company. But the truth is their margins are what other automakers achieve (<20%) and have similar automaker issues and cycles with their products.

    Bulls will claim that their value isn't in how much they are currently selling, but how much they will sell in future. They point to their Full Self Driving as evidence of their AI potential.

    This is tech that was promised years ago but still hasn't fully delivered. None of the breakthroughs in AI used in FSD have come through Tesla. Transformers came from Google. The acceleration in the AI hardware came from NVidia. CNN's were developed by one of the "Three grandfathers of AI" from Meta. Actually, there was a laughable argument between him and Elon on Twitter not so long ago where Elon showed how he didn't understand the tech that was used Teslas Autopilot; CNNs and Transformers.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2024/05/28/elon-musk-is-feuding-with-ai-godfather-yann-lecun-again-heres-why/ https://www.thinkautonomous.ai/blog/tesla-cnns-vs-transformers/

    Lets say FSD and thus Robotaxis do deliver, what potential does it have? Elon said "you can think of Tesla [like] some combination of Airbnb and Uber"

    Airbnb and Uber.

    Two companies whos total valuation is around 200b. A fraction of the 600b that Tesla is currently valued at. Thats what they want to become?

    Elon is a good salesperson, not so much a tech person. He has done good with Starlink and SpaceX. But Tesla is too hyped and overvalued for what it does.



  • Registered Users Posts: 887 ✭✭✭JOL1


    Institutional Investors hold 43.96% (source Nasdaq)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 887 ✭✭✭JOL1


    Comparisons with Airbnb/Uber is clearly meant in terms of business models and maximising the assets utility as opposed to the combined value….



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,071 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    Contrast Uber as the current model, they make money by connecting paying drivers to move consumers. The drivers bring their own car.

    In a future robotaxi model, you remove driver wages as a primary cost, if the robotaxi company is making their own cars then you also remove vehicle acquisition costs as a primary input. Tesla have a charge point operator business so don't even need to make money on the charging of the car.

    If the company is using electric cars that leaves vehicle manufacturing, energy, and maintenance as the only costs. If an investor believes that Tesla will achieve that in a timeframe that suits there require for a return on investment, they you can see why they would value the company so much higher than Uber.

    I've said it a few times, I believe that if Tesla achieve their robotaxi goals they will stop selling cars to consumers. Why sell a car with an 8% margin, when you can use the manufacturing capacity to build a taxi and make 8% on every single journey.

    I don't have any money invested in Tesla, as I don't think they'll achieve it at scale in a time frame that suits me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,131 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Tesla cannot do FSD or robotaxi without radar / lidar. It's not possible at all. It's voodoo science.

    At best with their current technology stack they can cover specific mapped and videoed cities and get licenses for that. But even that would be hard to do with camera and AI image examination. There's far too much emphasis and showmanship put on their capabilities when they aren't doing the basic right. Are they the best in image recognition at scale? Probably yes. Can FSD work on that alone. Not at all.

    We don't talk about that enough because the bears seem to rule the information roost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭sk8board


    that’s correct, but it doesn’t show the true retail ownership, only who controls the shares.

    If you trade Tesla on robinhood, you don’t own the shares on an individual basis, the HOOD institution does.
    It’s actually hard to estimate true retail ownership because of that, but generally it’s thought to be about 55%, 13% Musk (he’s sold a lot), and 28% institutions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭sk8board


    I read something recently that if you strip out the auto business from Tesla and look at all the other projects and things in isolation, all massively delayed or eventually canned - it’s a textbook ponzi - finding one project after another to keep giving people hope and prop up the price.


    it’s worth remembering that this is a company that investors once valued at twice its current SP, and also that on a 3 years view is down over 30%, while something as generic as a global ETF is +55% in the past 3 years (SWRD for example).
    you have to go back to the 2020 Covid rally (that rose all stocks), to find a true Tesla meme rally.

    Retail is never patient, because they don’t trade on fundamentals, they trade on hope and the presumption that they know what they’re doing.

    I gave the example before that if you bought Bank of Ireland at the bottom of the Covid crash in May 2020, it has outperformed Tesla since, and even paid a dividend in the past 3 years too



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,071 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    If you ask the question is vision and general knowledge enough for a car to be driven in a new area, I think the answer has to be yes based on the fact that we have millions of drivers doing so every day. Claiming it's not possible at all is a very large claim. Claiming it's not feasible in the short-term future makes sense.

    Lidar is a good technology and much cheaper than it used to be, it's use is to obtain depth information to map into a 3d world. We know that can also be achieved by using offset vision and computation, 3d projection from more than 1 video is no longer on the list of particularly hard things to do.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,131 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    the answer is no, i work in the image tracking technology sector. Dirt, Rain , Darkness knocks out much of your processing capabilities. This alone means that cameras are not 'the sensor' they form only part of real FSD. These are factual things



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭sk8board


    it’s a fundamental weakness with cameras for sure.

    Even in the days of the “appreciating asset/robotaxi” lies, FSD only had a take rate in the US of 5%, @ $12k, and virtually 0% outside the US.
    more recent data from May on the $99 subscription model suggested a take rate of just 2% after the free trial, and potentially less still after month 1 as some people forgot to cancel until they saw the charge. The main reason given was that after using it, people just couldn’t see how it was worth the money.

    I think that’s Tesla’s biggest problem with FSD - by the time it’s usable, people won’t value it nearly as highly as expected - and it’ll still be a US system - it won’t be a concern for Irish drivers in the next decade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭sk8board


    Fortune’s Christiaan Hetzner also reports that nearly half of the $1.89 billion Tesla earned before tax accrued from the sale of regulatory CO2 credits, could be on the chopping block should Former President Donald Trump be reelected. ”

    I guess this might help explain the $45m/month Musk support for Trump - it’s buttons compared to his personal loss of wealth if those credits are binned.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,071 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    Your claim is that there will never ever be a development in imaging sensor technology that allows water or dirt to be removed from the surface of a lens, some kind of wiper that can remove liquids and solids, and that's why vision-based driving can never work.

    I don't take issue with your thought that it's not practical today, but to claim it as fact or voodoo science that it will ever be possible is ridiculous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,131 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    It's voodoo science. Your saying fsd success is predicated on a window wiper.

    It seems you don't have enough understanding of the limitations of image processing and environmental conditions including but not limited to rain, dirt , sunshine and obviously... darkness.

    It's all show man razzmatazz to say they can create a robotaxi without addressing the fundamentals of additional basic sensors which allow the image processing to partner up and enhance its decisions.

    At the very best Tesla can license their image processing to others they're great at it they've lots of data gathered But they simply cannot have that alone do fsd nor robotaxi. I hope your choosing your investments wisely...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,113 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    You are reiterating exactly the mistake Musk made, which was to infer that something humans can do is likely trivial and something current gen tech can be made to replicate. It's conceit of epic proportions. The original cost premise of Tesla's original business case was that the cars would be entirely made by robots.

    Musk face-planted on that massive error so hard he spent months living in Tesla offices trying to bully the staff into enabling his massively flawed 'vision' and under estimation of human abilities, then gave up and accepted only humans could do the job and had to transform a factory built for robots to one where humans did the work.

    You and Musk are severely underestimating the computing power needed to process images in a way that obviates the use of LIDAR.


    It's simplistic nonsense. An adult human knows what everything in their visual field is and important charateristics of every one of those thousands of 'things'. We have a specialised and fast memory sub-system entirely dedicated to this and can distinguish a real child from a cut out, a real cat from a toy cat and we can do something no AI system can begin to, which is anticipate scenarios as to what the movement of these things might be in the future, which requires General Intelligence.

    All this current AI hype is just that, because the 'I' is a misnomer, it's not intelligence. Here's a doozy from Microsoft:

    Driving the way humans do it requires general intelligence, something I don't believe tech is remotely in sight of achieving or replicating.

    A good example of this would be: I was in a town, after dark, travelling down a slight hill approaching a crosswalk, parked cars on the left. I noticed a girl, about 9-10 years of age sprinting down the footpath to the left in the same direction I was headed. FSD, and no version of it that is likely to exist this century, could know that a child of that age might behave recklessly, nor could it anticipate that the crosswalk was the likely destination of the girl nor could it anticipate that the slope would give the girl more speed than might be usual or put all these things together from very brief visual cues, limited to just snippets of the top of a head briefly seen through the windows of the parked cars.
    I anticipated the child would get to the crosswalk before me and that she would possibly dash across without looking, and that's what happened.

    A robo-taxi in China recently bumped into a pedestrian; the excuse fielded was that the human didn't follow the rules.

    You can state no one can rule out what FSD will be able to do, which might be true in the literal sense but it's wrong in the practical sense. FSD is predicated on the human visual system being easy to replicate, which isn't remotely the case, and on the task of driving being simple, which it is anything but.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,071 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    Not really, you've made the mistake of thinking I've claimed it's possible today. I haven't, I'm saying it's doable at some point in the future. @listermint is claiming it's voodoo and fact that a vehicle can never be driven purely using a vision-based approach. I don't think that's true. At least you've limited the scope of it not being possible to the next 76 years.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,071 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    I think the fundamental of whether FSD is successful or not won't be predicated on whether or not it has radar/lidar. I think the challenges of delivering self-driving vehicles that work at level 5 is far more on the software and regulatory side. Whether the 3d model of the world is generated from a lidar point cloud or binocular video input isn't a big challenge that needs to be overcome.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,674 ✭✭✭wassie


    Its interesting you mention the Tesla bears, because the focus is on the automotive, where increased EV competition, especially from China, was always going to impact their marketshare going forward. Combine this with a general slowdown in EV sales growth (not decline), then the it doesnt look good.

    Although it is still dwarfed by Automotive, Tesla Energy is doing very well. Just google Tesla Megapack for news articles - they have big contracts globally including US, China, Canada, France, Australia



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,131 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    It's not a 3D model. Its live. Major distinction.

    And regulation won't allow it let alone insurance. Hence I call it voodoo in its current format.

    They could as I said license their video technology to other marques though as a part of an overall actual fsd system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭sk8board


    this is a business with a $700bn valuation lads - it’s going to take a lot more than energy, solar, roadster, robotics, cybertruck, semi, Ai, Optimus, FSD, robotaxis, affordable EV and so on. Have I forgotten anything?

    (Edit, I forgot the 3 and Y!)

    Musk promised 6 things last night on the call for ‘later in 2025’ 🙄🙄, and guess what - an actual car isn’t one of them, meaning core revenue will continue to fall, and that’s whats weighting on the SP this week too.

    Even If you break out the energy business, the most bullish of musketeer bulls places a $36/share price on future value of the business, which means it may at some point be worth 15% of the business - that’s still a $125bn business in its own right btw!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,673 ✭✭✭maidhc


    Aside from all this; what precise problem is a robotaxi addressing? In large cities mass transit is a far better solution to getting people from a to b. For people who need a car, driving the vehicle isn’t as onerous task, and for “manned” taxis, it doesn’t seem the highest margin role to be automating.



  • Registered Users Posts: 887 ✭✭✭JOL1


    New car(s) were mentioned in this weeks Investors call ..extract below from Musk's statements

    "We won't get too much into the product road map here because that is reserved for product announcement events. But we are on track to deliver a more affordable model in the first half of next year."

    'With respect to Roadster, we've completed most of the engineering. And I think there's still some upgrades we want to make to it, but we expect to be in production with Roadster next year.'

    Am not debating how accurate timelines are but set out above for clarity relative to your comments



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,131 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    But they said they abandoned the affordable model last year.

    He's not to be trusted as per his own I'm giving Trump 45 m per month. Oh no I'm not. Yes I am I have created a super PAC then no I'm not it's media making it up.

    He wrote all of that himself on his own twitter page...

    So his words don't carry weight as much of what he says is not real or a springling of the truth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,417 ✭✭✭positron


    Robotaxis (if possible, tesla/waymo whatever, I am talking about the core idea) will change the way the world buys or owns cars.

    You don't need to buy a car if you can get one to come and pick you up as reliably and impersonal as only robots can do. You can also afford more car when your car can go and work as taxi when you are busy with life.

    The way our towns, roads and even houses are designed could change as parking space doesn't have to be near anything.

    Robotaxis could augment public transport - addressing public transport's 'last mile' problem.

    It will be almost as significant as switching from horses to cars all those years ago.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,071 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    Cities that have excellent mass transit still have taxi services.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,071 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    Which regulations won't allow a vehicle control system that operates without lidar or radar?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,673 ✭✭✭maidhc


    Fair enough. It’s dafter than I allow my mind go to. We live in a world where auto wipers and full beams only work half the time,“isa” has a mind of its own and road sign recognition is hit and miss.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,417 ✭✭✭positron


    It's indeed beyond our capabilities right now. But Telsa is betting on AI - similar to ChatGPT and generative AI, if you can harvest and come up with a model and algorithm that constantly learns and improves from driver actions around the world - ignoring the massive computing power required to do so - will ultimately result in an amazing AI solution.

    Given nvidia / etc keeps pushing the technology, it's beyond the realm of possibility that we will get there eventually - may be in 2 years, may be in 20 years, but eventually we will / have to, right?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,936 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Am I the only one that doesn’t want FSD. I don’t want to be ferried around. I want to drive.



  • Registered Users Posts: 887 ✭✭✭JOL1


    And in a world where rockets blast for space only to land back on the very spot where it took off 20 mins before to be reused time and time again..only because someone believed it possible. Many failures before success, each one an oportunity to learn..but all requiring an open mind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,624 ✭✭✭Conar


    Replying to Gumbo....

    Definitely not the only one. I want FSD to drive me home from the boozer, and home from work after nights. Til then I want to drive my car.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,673 ✭✭✭maidhc


    yes, but it only took 80 years from the point Wernher von Braun figured out how to make it go down with the pointy end to make it land on its tail!



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,071 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    I'd love a use case where I drive to the airport then the car drives itself back home, it's very niche and I don't think any manufacturer will offer that to consumers.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,936 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo




Advertisement