Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

In the event of united Ireland could DUP attract a significant vote in the Republic / 26 Counties ?

12357

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Right so a glib mic-drop; yet nothing substantive that makes the proposal remotely credible vs. all the fairly obvious differences in policy or social outlook - including 2 referenda that … well, let's charitably say the DUP would probably have opposed?

    The DUP do not have an analogue South of the Border and its weird to spitball FG beyond what I presume is some resting pre-existing personal contempt for the party. If you had have said "parts of Fianna Fáil" it might have made more sense, not FG tho'.

    "Water Charges" and polite applause for a guest speaker don't exactly read like stirring proof here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,857 ✭✭✭donegal_man


    On social issues DUP is probably a lot closer to Aontu than it is to any mainstream party in the Republic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,769 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Wuestion posed: Name a single economic or social policy on which FG and the DUP align

    Answer given: Water charges

    If you don't like the answer given then maybe it's beacause you're a closet SF supporter



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    If you're gonna trot out childish, asinine comments like that because your "proof" of like mindedness was some polite applause and a single point of comparison wasn't taken seriously, then, lol, sure. If you think a meeting of minds would be possible because of Water Charges? Okay.

    But I think we can all see there's no sane merit to claiming FG and DUP are kindred because ... "water charges" @donegal_man hit on the more likely ideological relationships found further down the food chain of Irish politics.

    Being called a "closet SF supporter" did give me a good laugh though, so fair play.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,769 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    I'm not sure are you disputing my answer. Do you need more than one similarity between the DUP and FG? If so you should have asked



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Sigh, okay if you insist on pedantry to score points: Yes I am disputing your answer and already had done so because, again, your assertion that FG and the DUP are kin because of one guest speaker 5 years ago and "water charges" are not silver bullets towards some "same coin". And, TBH, wilfully ignores the fairly distinct and inescapable ideological differences that foundationally makes the entire thread laughable redundant. But here we are 7 pages later.

    But if you're gonna make childish jibes about closet SF support or clinging to technicalities rather than interrogate the credibility of your point - and I suspect you know it - then we're done here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,603 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    The very people who are least likely to care whether a UI is in the BC or not.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,383 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I see the argument now is that the DUP is also ideologically aligned to literally every governing party in Europe outside Ireland as if that makes any sense whatsoever.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Sure why not? Cos at this stage it seems any and all comparisons are on the table if alignment can be tethered like random policies like a Stopped Clock. At this stage if the DUP's leadership prefer the same brand of teabag it'd be enough it seems.

    Let's not forget for a second this entire, utterly pointless thread that won't die, all started because of this statement:

    I think they could. There's clearly a gap in the market for a political party which supports traditional values, families, are anti-abortion and are sceptical of the wokery rubbish.

    With a start that suspect & ideologically tedious, where else could it all have gone except downward? And at the risk of blowing my own trumpet, the only rational answer I still think is that if a United Ireland happened, the Capital-U Unionist vote will have been diluted enough that anyone still that socially-conservative under that umbrealla would probably just drift into whatever equivalent minor party existed at the time (New-Renua? Post Tóbín Aontú if it still exists?)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    If they take any votes at all, it will be the FG socially conservative ones. Socially conservative FFers republicanism would put them off I think.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,870 ✭✭✭CrabRevolution


    FG take the "progressive" stance on just about any social issue you can imagine though (abortion, gay marriage, surrogacy, trans, hate speech, "conversion therapy" etc.).

    If this isn't costing them votes from social conservatives, I don't know how the DUP entering the fray would change anything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I've seen people luxuriate in this image of FG being 'progressive'. It's not my experience of them.
    Sure they have had 'progressive' politicians and even some policy, but the vast majority of FG voters were always the most conservative in Ireland followed closely by elements of FF. Leo Varadkar is nearly 15 years younger than me and in his lifetime he was opposed to same sex marriage rights until the wind changed. 'Progressive'? Yeh right.

    Might make you uncomfortable but that still present conservative rump have more in common with the Paisley's party than anyone else. Take the constitutional question out of it (and sometimes you don't even need to do that as FG would attract most partitionists and those who regret leaving the UK resident in the south) and I see no problem with the DUP attracting votes here at times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,870 ✭✭✭CrabRevolution


    This makes no sense though. FG currently have absolutely no socially conservative policies, if anything they pride themselves on their crusading progressive zeal. What would motivate a social conservative to vote for a party which is the opposite of socially conservative?

    Bringing up some past stereotypical FG voter is pointless too, unless through time travel unification happens in the past. FG have planted their flag firmly in the liberal/progressive/whatever camp, and they'll have no social policies in common with the DUP if/when unification comes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,603 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Nonsense. FG has had a strong liberal wing since the mid 1960s. It certainly wasn't FF pushing for divorce or non-prescription condoms…

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


     liberal wing

    Which is what I said. See post.

    Is the entire FG vote 'liberal'. No, I don't think you can say that at all.

    I think some would align with the social policy of the DUP and after a time give them a vote. Donaldson addressing their conference and being applauded shows you that IMO. Brexit may have set that friendship back a bit but that had more to do with the DUP's aversion to the south generally than FG.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,603 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    That's not what you said Francie. This is what you said:

    the vast majority of FG voters were always the most conservative in Ireland 

    You have not provided anything whatsoever to substantiate this.

    Bringing up Donaldson's visit yet again is ridiculous. You might as well be trying to link FG with alleged sex offenders, it'd make no less sense than what you are saying.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Personal experience.
    I was one of those who as a recently graduated student campaigned for divorce in the 80's for instance. The most bitter and vociferous objection to that social change encountered, came from conservative FGers. If you didn't live through those times and later ones I can understand how you might not share my point of view.
    To this very day, the most partitionist and pro-unionist people in the south support FG, this site is a microcosm of that hence the easy applause for the leader of the DUP. They may not wholly agree but they are amenable to agreeing with them. Just an pretty obvious fact IMO however uncomfortable it might now be for some.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    It shouldn't need pointing out that the 1980s were approximately 40 years ago and tethering your belief of FG being a predominantly conservative party to relative ancient history doesn't match the reality of recent, relevant events. FG is socially liberal, and parties re-align their ideologies all the time. What times you lived through, I'm afraid, are irrelevant to the discussions of today.

    But trotting out the Donaldson talk as some Silver Bullet is so laughable it defies credibility. As if polite applause of a guest speaker is some ideological j'accue when … what? They should have booed? Thrown rotten eggs.

    And I see mixing in the personal jibe like others again; pretty good way to dirty the waters without having to interrogate the obvious personal bias in your own views. There's a difference between wanting there to be some relationship, and proving there is one. Raging Thatcherite that he is the mere presence, the mere existence of Leo Varadkar undercuts the entire argument in the crib - though doubtless there'll be an exuse there too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    All the main parties are socially liberal now more than they were in the 80's.

    The conservative vote has not disappeared though.

    What 'personal jibe'?

    And I never said there was a 'relationship', I said they would be more amenable to one than any other party I can see.

    The discomfort pointed to, is very apparent in your inability to read posts properly. Donaldson, as leader of the DUP received applause at a key FG event, it happened and it happened for reasons. You might not like those reasons being 'interrogated' but ho hum TBH.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    What 'personal jibe'?

    The discomfort pointed to, is very apparent in your inability to read posts properly.

    Well that one will do for start. I guess noting the passage of time touched a nerve but you'll find Boards is predominantly old men these days. We're all obsolete.

    Your insistence to read what amounted to a diplomatic speaking engagement as some ideological manifestation or proof of conservative values is borderline histrionic. Doubtless were relations softened enough a DUP leader spoke as a guest at a SF conference there'd be a much different read of things.

    Hilarious on both occasions I challenge this Donaldson appearance, one person quips I must be a closet SF supporter, while the resident SF supporter winks at disgruntled FG supporters having some truths told. Very telling that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Can't address FG issues without a pop at SF. How predictable. SF support will be the last to give the DUP a vote IMO for reasons that should be apparent.

    Nobody is surprised at the embarrassment FG feel about Donaldson's reception.

    No doubt you'll keep trying to ignore the fact that if we rejoin the Commonwealth that it will be most enthusiastically promoted by some in FG and it's support. If somebody in FF was enthusiastic about it as Neale Richmond is for one, would they rise through the party ranks as successfully as he has? I doubt it.
    That is not to deprive Richmond etc of their opinions, they are entitled to them even if I can't support them, I'm just pointing to facts about the party and their possible amenability to DUP and wider Unionism.




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,383 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Donaldson, as leader of the DUP received applause at a key FG event, it happened and it happened for reasons.

    Yes, that reason being incredibly basic decorum.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Where's the pop? The reflexive defence where none is needed kinda proves my point, congrats. I think if SF had the DUP as a guest speaker we'd all be happy 'cos it'd say a lot about relations on the island as a whole - but we both know your personal alignment would demand hagiographical applause.

    I've not seen a single credible perspective, only what amounts to political innuendo: references to 40 year old stale outlooks, a wilful ignoring of current standing on social issues - successful ones at that given the referenda - and now speculation about the Commonwealth?

    What it reveals if you obviously haven't attended too many conferences where guest speakers are not necessarily kin with its audience; deriving applause as endorsement is thin gruel for declaring ideological overlaps - but if that's all we have in the entire discussion, it's not much of a discussion to begin with. Again, what did you expect here: Donaldson to be pelted with onions, cos that sure seems to be the only expected outcome.

    Which it never has been; a discussion that is. Suppose it's sexier to chatter about the dreaded FG sharing a bed with the most regressive party in the British Isles, than consider the more prosaic reality the DUP would either cease to be, or roll into whatever minor political backwater party existed at the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,603 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    That's just an anecdote and yes I did live through those times Francie.

    Never mind that divorce was FG policy, and FF opposed it even going to a referendum in the first place. You can say what you like about 70s-80s FF but they were very well aware of what their electorate would or would not support.

    Your last paragraph is just irrelevant bitterness, who on this site is applauding the former DUP leader exactly?

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




    Again, the question asked - In the event of united Ireland could DUP attract a significant vote in the Republic / 26 Counties ?
    I said that I think some FG voters would be amenable to voting for them on social issues.

    Why? Because I think a fair share of the conservative vote here still belongs to FG. Yes FG are more socially liberal than they were but so are all the major parties here. No biggie there. A fair share of the conservative vote belongs to FF too, but as I said the constitutional issue and their republicanism would stop them voting for the DUP. So they aren't a part of the equation here IMO
    You talk about 40 year old stale outlooks but seem to forget that the only political party that campaigned for a No vote in the 2018 referendum was a party founded out of a FG revolt over social issues and that social change caused much rancour within the party even under Fitzgerald. There is IMO a conservative rump within FG. I think many of them contributed to the NO here in my own constituency of Cavan/Monaghan in the 2018 referendum. I'm judging that based on who was campaigning and the less than enthusiastic endorsements coming from their TD's.

    I don't think it can be denied either that the partitionist element, such as it is, votes for FG. Certainly in a UI referendum they would be wanting the same outcome and saying many of the same things as the DUP etc. And I don't think it is any secret that those actually sympathetic to Unionism along the border constituencies are traditionally FG voters. They could certainly be attracted to vote for the DUP if they stood here.

    Those are the grounds for my opinions so maybe actually counter them rather than give another tetchy censorious reply?





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    See my answer above to Pixelburp. I don't think you can consider FF in the context of the OP.
    P.S. I didn't say anyone here was 'applauding the DUP' although some do stand up for them.
    There are many here though who would align with the DUP on the constitutional issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,161 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The referendum that was called by and supported by FG ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Yes.
    As I said. they have progressive politicians and voters, but that is not the whole story.
    Social change has caused controversy and rancour, expellings and even new political parties down the decades.
    Are we in denial about this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,603 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Renua? Yes it was formed by ex-FGers, and they all lost their seats.

    If that party had been able to attract even a small proportion of FG voters it would have been able to survive.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Yes, and Creighton Timmins etc thought they could attract that 'support', because it IS there. You don't start a new party unless you think it can find support.

    That they were not able to is not proof that it doesn't exist and has more to do with how they ran the party.

    Also, some of those people are back in FG, has their conservative outlook changed, could they be attracted to support the DUP if they ran? If they were prepared to start a new party I don't think that would be a big hurdle to jump tbh.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,603 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Oh Francie, give it up will you, it's nonsense and you know it.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The only thing that is 'nonsense' in the OP is the word 'significant'.
    The DUP will be able to attract a vote from the demographic I mentioned, but it won't be significant.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,338 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    If there was a U.I., and a unionist was brave enough to stand for election in the 26 counties (the point of this thread), do you think they would suffer the same fate as some of the unionists who stuck their head above the parapet the last time ( ie after independence, in the early 1920s?).

    Remember James Sproule Myles in Donegal : he was a TD who was, and I quote "elected on his first attempt at the 1923 general election and was subsequently re-elected six times, winning the greatest number of first preferences in each of the seven elections. "

    That was despite the intimidation and disappearances. Quote: "He was among a group of 40 Unionists kidnapped in February 1922".

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Myles



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Great example of what I was saying about the border constituencies. Re-elected to Dáil Eireann 6 times.
    I see no reason why a person of his convictions cannot be elected again, there is a vote there and in Cavan/Monaghan/Leitrim etc that is sympathetic to unionism and would normally go to FG. In my own constituency Heather Humphries would attract a large if not nearly all of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,280 ✭✭✭combat14


    perhaps a rebranded dup could become the far right party many are looking for in relation to excessive undocumented immigration issues



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    We have hard right parties here already, none of whom have made any inroads off the back of anti-migrant sentiment. So "many" is being charitable, notwithstanding the attempt to derail the conversation in the Pavlovian topic du jour.

    Post edited by pixelburp on


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,338 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    James Sproule Myles was an exceptional person though. He served in WW1, won a military medal and reached the rank of major. He refused to be intimidated, even though he was among a group of 40 Unionists kidnapped by Republicans in February 1922, with some others "disappeared".

    Much more likely if there was a U.I. that any DUP person standing for election in the 26 counties would be intimidated, if not disappeared. Interested you mention a FG politician in Monaghan, it is in my living memory that another FG politician (Billy Fox) was killed by Republicans there and his girlfriends family home burnt, after their family bible was symbolically burnt. Even though he was Fine Gael, he was called a B Special and other names by FF ministers in the Dail, who were forced to apologise. If Republicans did that to a FG protestant when the south was trying to woo the north, what do you think they would be capable of doing to a DUP protestant in a U.I.?

    Be realistic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    em…republicans in a UI would have gotten what they want by democratic means.

    The War of Independence and the conflict/war more recently are long over,
    Unless the DUP were intent on reviving their paramilitary wing there is zero reason to see a return to violence.

    Realistically.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Much more likely if there was a U.I. that any DUP person standing for election in the 26 counties would be intimidated, if not disappeared

    Jesus wept. If there was a UI, then unless said DUP candidates were violent belligerents themselves there's no reason to think even running would cause their disappearance. In this hypothetical scenario the North joined by democratic consent - clearly sectarianism hasn't lasted.

    This thread has been the funniest stretch of histrionic theorising; and I take back my chiding of the 1980s as too historical to be of value - if now the 1920s are given over as testimony.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    This thread has been the funniest stretch of histrionic theorising;

    The DUP will almost certainly stand candidates in the former border constituencies of a UI and they will pick up votes from those who up to now vote mostly for FG. There is also a demographic throughout the country that will be attracted to their conservative, fundamentalist offerings.

    Can you counter that or are you just going to continue with trying to stop the discussion?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    You've shown no evidence of these floating voters beyond the worse kind of conjecture. Your contention depends entirely on the continued existence of a party whose prior raison d'etre was as a belligerent entity in the North, and little else. As continued to be demonstrated by their rank inability to govern today in the here & now. I see no reason to believe the Democratic Unionist Party would even exist in this hypothetical - hence the notion its members would simply wander into whatever small social conservative party exists and not FG, who are demonstrably socially liberal ATM.

    And clearly I can't stop anything, if the segues contain such muscle popping stretches going on. Why would I stop that which I find so hilarious?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    What do you mean ‘I haven’t shown’?

    Who else do the members of the OO in border constituencies vote for other than FG?

    And why wouldn’t some of the conservative voters not vote for a party offering fundamentalist values that the DUP offer?

    Sure the DUP might not survive but the OP assumes that they do. Wether they do or not that demographic they represent is not going anywhere.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,383 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Same reason they didn't vote for Renua or Aontú or any of the other socially right wing crackpots.

    You are displaying about as much political sense as the people constantly decrying Ireland needs a new right-wing party and refusing to engage with the reasons the previous 20 all failed. The idea that there is some cohort of voters (and you seem desperate to suggest it is FG voters) secretly wanting regressive stances on abortion, gay marriage etc as represented by the DUP is fantasy stuff based on absolutely nothing except vague assertions from you about life in the 80s.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    We're now dealing with the Orange Order? Okay, I mean, hypothetical upon hypotheticals: considering as of 2022 there were only 30,000 left, down from 100,000 60 years prior, then it seems a fair guess this niche demographic will only become even smaller by the time of this fictional UI scenario. Time will do most of the work it seems, going by the faces seen at contemporary parades.

    You seem fixated on FG being the one-stop shop for conservative voters, despite no strong evidence indicating a broad trend in this direction. Quite the opposite really, given FG's stance on every major socially liberal talking pint of the last 10 to 20 years. If anything they probably shed conservative voters because of the party's position with gay marriage and abortion.

    Nor can we see a ravenous appetite for socially conservative parties in general - more critically TBH to the entire topic. Why, given the actual social conservatives down here have routinely failed to make inroads in politics, would the DUP find success where others have failed?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Well OO was shorthand for those who celebrate the 12th and the culture. They may not be fully fledged members but they are sizeable in number and almost exclusively vote for FG.

    Again you aren’t reading posts correctly or keeping the OP in mind.
    I have already said FF conservatives would be much less likely to vote for the DUP because of their republican ethos. I am not fixated on FG just dealing with realistic possibilities.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I'm aware of the OP, but have ignored by dint of its naked prejudicial slant, something we've all moved away from, given few here share its lament. It wouldn't be a day ending in Y if Boards didn't have someone bemoaning the lack of a Hard Right party (running the country).

    Ah now, don't back-trac or shift goal posts: you have mentioned FG consistently and let's not forget you were happy to through around the Donaldson speech as ammunition of some secret ideology; we can also read very well so let's not pretend you didn't really try to make some DUP-adjacent credentials stick by way of conjecture and when that didn't work, changed tack.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    eh?
    I ruled out FF ages ago. If anything your back went up as soon as FG were mentioned.
    I haven’t switched tack, i absolutely believe Donaldson was there because FG is the repository of partitionist and Unionist sympathising votes. That’s just a fact here IMO. It was the beleaguered DUP after Brexit blew up in their faces who cut ties not FG per se.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Sigh. Right back to the wink and nod "why you outraged" nonsense. You tried that already. There's plenty to hang FG with without inventing conspiracy, or implying tacit support when others call out the nonsense of tying them to the DUP.

    That’s just a fact here IMO.

    In your speed to tut bout my comprehension, you might want to pause and think about the meaning of "fact" when coupled with "IMO".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,226 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    God do you speak to actual people like that?

    Lecturing without addressing any points made. I’ll leave you at it.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    You have offered no evidence to your points so why do they deserve challenging when the best you offer are vague accusations and ancient personal anecdotes? You extrapolate ideological support through applause without even naming any cliques or politicians at the head of this supposed "unionist sympathising" bloc - how and where can that be reasonably challenged when the notion is so patently ludicrous... especially when considered against the entire, foundational hypothetical of an Ireland that doesn't match the one today - ie, unified one.

    I daresay you're trying to contemplate the DUP "now" entering politics in the republic, and all your biases of existing parties to match, rather than the likely topography of Ireland in .... I dunno, this fantasy 2050 we're talking about. "Unionism" as we know it won't be as it is now, going double for the hardcore.

    Indeed. By all accounts the DUP mightn't exist BEFORE unification, let alone after. Not like it's a party with unstoppable momentum and a canny eye for realpolitik at the moment.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement